Caton Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 32.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 117.3 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.71 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.82 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (2578058) on 11/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours to State Survey Agency after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. This was evident for one (1) out of one (1) resident (Resident # 1) reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, on 07/28/2025, Resident #1 fell from the bed to the floor during care and the facility did not report Resident #1 was found with a laceration of the head, fracture of the third metacarpal bone at right hand, and a fracture of the middle phalanx of the left hand to the New York State Department of Health until 07/31/2025.The facility policy titled 'Abuse Prevention' with effective date 09/19/2022 and last reviewed 12/29/2023 documented the facility staff must report alleged violations related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 08/12/2024 to 08/16/2024, the facility did not ensure that resident's Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed and revised for 1 (Resident #15) of 7 residents reviewed for Accident out of 26 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #15 had a multiple history of falls, and the fall care plan was not reviewed and revised after the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure titled Comprehensive Care Plan dated 1/26/23 states that an individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs are developed for each resident. The policy also stated that the Care Planning Interdisciplinary team is responsible for reviewing and updating the care plan during admission, every quarterly, annual or readmission. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of Depression,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/12/2024 to 08/16/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident received assistance devices consistent with a resident's needs, goals, and care plan to prevent accidents. This was evident for 1 (Resident #75) 7 residents reviewed for Accidents out of 26 total sampled residents. Specifically, floor mats were not in place for Resident #75 as per Physician Order. The findings include: The facility policy titled Fall Prevention with an effective date of 02/2022 and revised 2/2024 states that the interdisciplinary team will take effort to provide the resident with multiple falls a protective environment to mitigate the chance of serious injury. This includes but is not limited to furniture padding, floor mats, protective padding on head or foot of bed, and furniture re-arrangement in room. Resident #75 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, and Contracture of Right Upper Arm.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 08/12/2024 to 08/16/2024, the facility did not ensure that infection control prevention practices and procedures were maintained. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #87) observed during the Medication Administration task. Specifically, Enhanced Barrier Precautions were not maintained for gastrostomy tube medication administrations for Resident #87. The findings are: The facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last reviewed 3/28/24, documented that Enhanced Barrier Precautions refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug resistant organisms that employs targeted use of gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. The policy also stated that all residents with indwelling medical devices and chronic wounds will have Enhanced Barrier Precautions used by staff during high contact resident care activities. Examples include device care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated survey (NY00323120), the facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident in 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #1) sampled. Specifically, Resident #1 was observed with facial grimacing and pointed to their right leg while being cared for by Certified Nursing Assistant #1 on 08/27/23 at approximately 06:00pm. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 and Nurse Supervisor #1 both stated that they observed Resident #1 with facial grimacing, right leg swollen and warm to touch on 08/27/23. There was no documented evidence to support that Resident #1 was assessed and the medical doctor was notified on 08/27/23. A nursing note dated 08/28/23 at 10:41pm documented that an x-ray of Resident #1's right knee was done. The x-ray result dated 08/28/23 documented no fracture subluxation. Additionally, Resident #1, who was severely impaired, was not assessed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00323120), the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practices, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. This was evident for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #1) sampled. Specifically, Resident #1, who had severely impaired cognition, was on pain management for diagnoses of pain in other joints. An initial pain assessment was not done on 08/27/23. A medical record review also revealed that Resident #1 continued to complain of pain from 08/28/23 to 08/30/23, but there were no changes in pain management. Additionally, there was no documented evidence that Resident #1's pain level was monitored before and after each pain medication was administered to determine effectiveness. The findings are: The Policy and Procedure on Pain Management reviewed 10/09/22, the procedure states a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 42 CFR 483.90(i)(4): Maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests and rodents. Based on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY 00320109) initiated on 07/26/2023, the facility did not ensure that an effective pest control program was maintained so that the facility was free of pests. Specifically, there was evidence of roaches in the resident rooms. This occurred on 2 of 5 resident floors. The findings are: Observations during the tour of the facility on 07/26/2023 between 09:00 AM - 03:00 PM identified the following: - One live roach was observed by the leg of three drawer nightstand of bed A in room [ROOM NUMBER] located on the first floor. - One dead roach was observed under three drawer nightstand of bed B in room [ROOM NUMBER] located on the third floor. - One dead roach was observed by the radiator near the TV in the dining room adjacent to room [ROOM NUMBER] on the third floor. On 07/26/2023 between 09:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-10 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessments were electronically transmitted in a timely manner. This was evident for 5 of 14 residents reviewed for the Resident Assessment task (Resident #4, 13, 8, 17, 9). Specifically, a quarterly assessment was not transmitted within 14 days after the completion date. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Assessment using the MDS dated 01/09/2020 with revision on 08/09/2022 documented MDS Assessments will be transmitted to CMS within 14 days after completion by MDS coordinator/designee and a monthly validation report will be downloaded from MDS to ensure that all MDS transmissions have been received by CMS . 1. Resident # 4 ---- Target date Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 05/16/2022 -- Completed ---5/30/2022 -- Transmission and verification Date --- 08/08/2022 2. Resident # 13 -- Target date ARD 05/16/2022 -- completed ---5/30/2022 ---transmission and verification date ----08/08/2022 3. Resident # 8 -----Target date ARD…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during a recertification and complaint (NY00283611) survey from 08/03/22 to 8/10/2022, the facility did not ensure that allegations of abuse, including injury of unknown origin, were reported to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) within 2 hours. This was evident for 1 (Resident #40) of 3 residents investigated for abuse. Specifically, Resident #40 complained of right shoulder pain and subsequent right shoulder dislocation was not reported to the NYSDOH within 2 hours. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention, last reviewed 12/09/2021, documented the facility must report alleged violations related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse including injuries of unknown source and report the results of all investigations to the proper authorities within prescribed timeframes. Resident #40 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease and restlessness and agitation. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #40…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure comprehensive person-centered care plans (CCP) were developed and implemented to meet each resident's needs. This was evident for 2 of 34 sampled residents (Resident #81 and #102). Specifically,1.) Resident #81 had did not have a CCP to address bleeding and anemia, and 2.) Resident #102 did not have a CCP developed to address their Intravenous (IV) hydration and antibiotic treatment. The findings are: The facility policy titled CCP last revised 12/2/2021 documented the CCP will be resident centered having the Individual Resident as the Locus of Control. The CCP will be ongoing, constantly evolving, focusing on everyone as a unitary being constantly changing and interacting with the environment/energy fields. The CCP will consist of identified or potential problem areas, or needed areas of focus to maximize wellness, Individualized resident centered goals and specific interventions and will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY