Cobble Hill Health Center Inc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 251 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 168 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 364 beds and averages 354.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IDR2026-06-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from physical abuse. This was evident for one of six residents (Resident #1) sampled for abuse. Specifically, the facility surveillance video dated 06/14/2026 from 09:38:24 AM through 09:39:55 AM revealed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 running out of the dining room chasing Resident #1 who walked out of the dining room into the hallway holding a banana. In the hallway, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 grabbed Resident #1 at the back of their neck and used their right hand to hit Resident #1 on the top of their head. During the incident, Resident #1 fell on the floor and hit their head on another resident's wheelchair. Resident #1 did not sustain any visible injuries. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy to resident health and safety at Past Non-Compliance. The findings are:The facility's policy titled Resident Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, Involuntary Seclusion, Misappropriation of Property and Injury of Unknown Origin dated 06/09/2026 documented that each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation result in serious bodily injury, to the State Survey Agency. This was evident in one (1) (Resident #370) of five (5) residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #370 had an unwitnessed fall on 03/20/2026 and was later diagnosed with an acute subcapital left hip fracture on 03/23/2026. The resident had severe cognitive impairment and was unable to provide information regarding the circumstances of the fall. Despite the unwitnessed nature of the incident and discovery of a major injury, the facility failed to report the incident to the New York State Department of Health.The findings Include:The facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, Involuntary Seclusion, Misappropriation of Property, Injury of Unknown Origin with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised following a significant change in condition and ongoing pain management interventions. This was evident in one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pain management out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #1's comprehensive care plan for potential pain was not reviewed and revised despite the resident exhibiting actual pain.The findings include:The facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan and Baseline Comprehensive Care Plan with a last reviewed date of 04/2026 documented the interdisciplinary team will review and revise the care plan upon a change in condition and as needed.Resident #1 had diagnoses that included osteoarthritis, vertebral low back pain, and hypertension.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #1 had intact cognition, required assistance with activities of daily living and was not on pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated survey (NY00307820), the facility failed to ensure that the services provided or arranged by the facility meets professional standards of quality. This was evident in 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #1) sampled. Specifically, on 12/27/22 at approximately 06:30am on the night shift (11:00pm-07:00am), Resident #1 was observed on the floormat in their room and was picked up and put back into their bed by Registered Nurse #1. An x-ray result dated 12/28/22 documented that Resident #1 sustained an acute nondisplaced right femur intertrochanteric fracture. The facility's Investigation Summary dated 12/29/22, revealed that Registered Nurse #1 did not report the fall. There was no documented evidence that Resident #1 was assessed by Registered Nurse #1. The facility became aware of Resident #1's fall on 12/29/22 during an interview with Registered Nurse #1. The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Reporting and Documenting Resident Accident/Incident with reviewed date 11/2023 documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 2/08/2024 to 2/15/2024, the facility did not ensure food was prepared and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety to prevent foodborne illness. This was evident during kitchen observation. Specifically, expired food was observed in the kitchen refrigerator. The findings are: The facility policy titled Labeling and Dating Items dated 09/2023 documented all food items that enter the facility will have the date that the case was received to ensure that all food items entering the facility are utilized using the First In, First Out process. Any items found out of date will note be used and will be discarded. On 02/08/2024 at 09:38 AM, the kitchen Refrigerator #1 was observed with 2 (5 lb) tubs of egg salad with a use by date of 2/07/2024 and 2 (5 lb) plastic containers of egg salad with a use by date of 1/26/2024. Refrigerator #3 was observed with 2 wrapped whole baked hams with a use by date of 2/6/2024. On 2/12/2024 at 10:48 AM, Dietary Aide #1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 02/08/2024 to 02/15/2024, the facility did not ensure a person-centered Comprehensive Care Plans was developed and implemented to meet a resident's needs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #36) of 2 residents reviewed for Urinary Catheter out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #36's Comprehensive Care Plan was not developed with interventions to address their urinary (Foley) catheter. The findings are: The facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Planning and Baseline dated 10/2023 documented the Comprehensive Care Plan will include measurable goals and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs. Resident #36 had diagnoses of Benign Prostrate Hypertrophy and Diabetes Mellitus. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #36 was cognitively intact and had an indwelling catheter. The Physician's Orders dated 12/29/2023 and renewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification survey from 2/8/2024 to 2/15/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion. This was evident for 1 (Resident #243) of 3 residents reviewed for Limited Range of Motion out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident # 243 did not have bilateral hand rolls in place according to Physician's Order. The findings are: The facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living Care Guidelines dated 10/2023 documented the Certified Nursing Assistant will apply splints, braces, and assistive devices as directed. Resident #243 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease and Anemia. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #243 was severely cognitively impaired, had functional limitations on their left upper extremity, and required assistance with activities of daily living. On 2/8/2024 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey 02/08/2024 to 02/15/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident requiring dialysis services received such services consistent with professional standards of practice. This was identified for 1 (Resident #645) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, there was no Physician's Orders for Resident #645 to receive hemodialysis treatment. The findings are: The facility policy titled Hemodialysis dated 09/04/2023 documented all dialysis residents will be monitored pre and post dialysis treatment. Resident #645 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hypertension, Diabetes, and Hyperlipidemia. The Comprehensive Care Plan related to hemodialysis initiated 1/31/2024 documented Resident #645 received dialysis treatment at a dialysis center. The Nursing Hemodialysis Communication Form dated 2/1/2024, 2/3/2024, 2/6/2024, 2/8/2024, and 2/10/2024 documented pre and post dialysis monitoring and vital signs for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated survey (NY00316471) from 2/8/2024 to 2/15/2024, the facility did not ensure allegations involving abuse were reported to the New York State Department of Health within 2 hours of occurrence. This was evident for 2 (Resident #246 and #210) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Residents #246 and #210 were involved in a resident-to-resident altercation that was not reported to the New York State Department of Health within 2 hours. The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse, Mistreatment, Neglect and Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property dated 11/2023 documented the Administrator and Director of Nursing has the responsibility to report all alleged violations in which there is reasonable cause to believe that abuse, neglect, or misappropriation has occurred. Resident #246 had diagnoses of hypertension and dementia. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #246 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure food storage in accordance with professional standards. Specifically, undated and expired food was observed in the Kitchen and Storage Room during the Kitchen Task. The findings are: The facility policy titled General Purchasing of Food and Non Food Products last revised 6/14 documented all items received in the kitchen will be dated by the storeroom worker. Refrigerated foods and opened boxes/cans/bottles are to be dated. The following was observed in the facility Kitchen on 12/01/21 at 10:20 AM: 1) Refrigerator #3 and, 2 packages of sliced ham deli meat, 4 packages of smoked ham deli meat , and 9 packages of turkey breast deli meat undated; 2) the Cook's Refrigerator contained housemade cranberry sauce dated 11/20/21; raw cubed steak and pork shoulder unlabeled and undated; 4 plastic bins of cut vegetables without a date. The following was observed in the Kitchen on 12/06/21 at 09:44 AM: 1) the Storage Room opened bottles of vinegar, sweet and sour…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review conducted during the recertification and complaint survey (NY00281549), the facility did not ensure that an alleged violation involving Abuse was reported to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) within the acceptable timeframe. Specifically, one allegation of resident to resident abuse, involving Resident #122 and #203, was not reported within 2 hours. This was evident for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for Abuse (Resident #122 and #203). The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, Involuntary Seclusion, Misappropriation of Property effective 7/98 and reviewed 4/21 documented allegations of abuse are to be reported to the NYSDOH in adherence to state and federal requirements. Resident #203 had a diagnosis of Schizophrenia, Depression, and Diabetes Mellitus. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident # 203 had moderately impaired cognition and required limited to extensive assistance of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 49 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY