Haym Solomon Home for the Aged

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 1,051 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 445 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.79 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 232.7 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00323375 & NY00316928), the facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This was evident for two (2) out of two (2) residents (Resident #1 & Resident #2). Specifically, On [DATE] at 5:30 AM, Certified Nurse Assistant #1 transferred Resident #1 from their bed to the wheelchair and Resident #1 fell. Resident #1 required two-person assist with mechanical lift. Resident #1 was assessed by Nursing Supervisor #1 and was observed with an opened purpura (purple-colored spots and patches on the skin) on their left lower extremity. A nursing note dated [DATE] documented Resident #1 was transferred to the emergency room at 8:38 AM on [DATE] after being observed with decreased oxygenation and breathing with their abdominal muscles. Emergency Department Provider's note, by a Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine, dated [DATE] at 9:27 AM, documented the following: fractured right proximal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 10/31/2024 and 11/07/2024, the facility did not ensure individual resident financial records were made available to resident and resident representatives through quarterly statements. This was evident for 2 (Residents #60 and #174) of 2 residents reviewed for Personal Funds out of a total sample of 38 residents. Specifically, quarterly statements were not provided in writing to residents and/or resident representatives within 30 days after the end of the quarter. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Resident's Personal Funds Account dated 05/2018, last revised 05/2024 documented that the resident and/or Designated Representative will receive an account statement on a quarterly basis, and all inquiries will be addressed in a timely fashion. The Residents Fund Listing printed 11/05/2024 documented that Residents #60 and #174 had active accounts and funds with the facility. 1. The Quarterly Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0570 — isolated
  Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey between 10/31/24 and 11/07/24, the facility did not ensure that a surety bond or similar protection with the amount equal to at least the current total amount of resident's funds was obtained to assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility. This was evident for 81 residents who maintained personal funds accounts with the facility. Specifically, the surety bond obtained by the facility was not sufficient to cover the total held in all resident's accounts. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Resident's Personal Funds Account dated 05/2018, revised 05/2024 documented that the facility purchases a surety bond to assure the security of all funds which residents have deposited with the facility. The Residents Fund Listing printed documented resident's funds which totaled $191,407.87, The bond #10BSBEX0694 created October 4, 2023, to cover the period January 2024 to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (NY00341031, NY00353026) conducted from 10/31/2024 to 11/07/2024 the facility did not ensure that injuries of unknown origin were reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegations involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the New York Department of Health. This was evident for 2 (Resident #144 and #130) of 2 residents reviewed for Abuse out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1). on 04/29/2024 at 10:00 AM Resident #144 observed with large bluish/purple discoloration to the left breast and yellowish fading discoloration to the chest area that were not reported to the New York State Department of Health in a timely manner, and 2). on 10/23/2023 at 10:00 AM, Resident #130 was observed with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated (NY00330333) survey from 10/31/2024 to 11/07/2024, the facility did not ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. This was evident for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed for Pain out of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #3 had a Morphine pump installed in 7/2020, and there was no documented evidence that the cartridge of the pump was changed and or refilled as required every 6 months, or that Resident #3 had been referred to pain management in over 12 months. In addition, there was no documented evidence that Resident #3's had an active order for the morphine pump or as needed pain medication as documented monthly by the physician. The findings are: The facility policy titled Pain Assessment and Management revised 5/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that person-centered comprehensive care plan (CCP) was developed and implemented to address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. This was evident for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for Accidents out of a sample of 40 residents (Resident #s 156, 184, 218, 519, 522). Specifically, no CCP was developed and implemented for residents' use of side rails. The findings include but are not limited to: The facility Policy on Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP), last reviewed on 01/22 documented: Each resident shall have a Comprehensive care Plan that includes the strengths and weakness measurable objectives, and timetables to meet medical, nursing, and psychological needs that are identified in the MDS assessment and review of the triggered RAPS. 1) Resident #156 was admitted to the facility 08/10/2022, with diagnoses that included Anemia, Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Hypertension,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-09-26 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that residents observed using bed side rails were appropriately assessed for risk of entrapment or that the risks and benefits of side rail use was explained to the resident and/or representative. This was evident for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for accidents out of a sample of 40 residents (residents #184, #218, #519, #522) The findings include but are not limited to: The facility's Policy and Procedure for side rail usage, last reviewed 3/1/22, documented that it is the policy of the facility to ensure residents attain and maintain their highest practicable level of well-being and be free of restraints. Each resident will be assessed for functional status on admission, readmission and quarterly, for any significant change as needed. A resident will only use partial side rails to assist with his or her bed mobility in accordance with individual facility IDT team assessment. Partial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during a Recertification/Complaint Survey from 9/19/2022 to 9/26/2022, the facility did not ensure that a resident's designated representative was provided with a written summary of the baseline care plan. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Care Plan out of 40 sampled residents. (Residents # 431). The findings are: The facility policy titled Baseline Care Plan (BCP) created 10/7/2017 and updated September 1, 2022 documented that the completed BCP will be provided to the resident and/or designated representative within 5-7 days. It also documented that Evidence of completion of the baseline care plan with notification to resident/des.rep of BCP will be in the assessment section of the EMR and in the Social Service section of the hard copy chart. Resident # 431 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Hemiplegia, unspecified affecting left nondominant side; Pain, unspecified; and Unspecified atrial fibrillation. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-26 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews during the recertification survey the facility failed to ensure that the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments, at each visit. Specifically, the physician did not review the Rehab assessment and place order for the resident's use of bed side rails. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Accidents out of a sample of 40 residents. (Resident #156). The findings are: The facility Policy on Physicians/Rehab Recommendation Orders, dated 11/2020, last reviewed on 06/22 documented: Recommendation for rehabilitative services (including Nursing Rehabilitation) will be reviewed and included in the medical record as signed orders or telephone orders within 24 hours after being recommended by the rehab therapist. Resident #156 was admitted to the facility 08/10/2022, with diagnoses that included Anemia, Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Hypertension, BPH, Hip Fracture. The admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint survey, the facility did not ensure safe food handling and storage was practiced to prevent food-borne illness. Specifically, two expired boxes of enteral feeding was found in the central supply storage room on the 2nd floor in the enteral feeding and liquid nutritional supplement storage area on the main floor of the facility. This was evident during the Kitchen Observation task. The findings are: The Facility Policy and Procedure titled Securing and Storage of Tube Feeding reviewed 03/22 documented when residents are discharged unused feeding will be returned to storage area, The Facility Policy and Procedure titled Storage and Distribution Enteral Feeding Products reviewed 1/3/2022 documented Nursing will pick up the enteral feeds from the second floor as needed and check the date to ensure formula has not expired. Any expired enteral feed will be discarded, purchasing will check the storage area every two weeks to ensure all products are up to date. Nursing staff will check…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews during recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that raw food was handled appropriately during food preparation in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, potentially hazardous raw chicken and raw fish were handled with bare hands during food preparation. This was evident during the Kitchen Observation facility task. The findings are: 1) The policy and procedure titled Handwashing Policy For All Employees last reviewed 11/01/2019, documented the purpose of the handwashing was to prevent of spread of microorganisms, to prevent incidence of cross-contamination and to remove dirt and possible pathogenic organisms present on skin. The policy and procedure titled Safe Food handling effective 1/31/2019 documented gloves and hairnets will be worn when handling food. Hands will be washed prior to putting on gloves and changed each time a task is changed. On 12/04/2019 between 9:12 AM and 10:37 AM, [NAME] #1 was observed preparing and chopping raw chicken in the cook's area with bare hands in metal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,512 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,512 — penalty dated 2024-12-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY