Menorah Home & Hospital For Aged & Infirm

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 1,281 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 581 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (625460), the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This was evident for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #1) sampled for Injuries of Unknown Origin. Specifically, on 01/06/2024 at 5:45 AM, Resident #1 reported to Home Health Aide #1 that they had pain to their right hip. Resident #1 was assessed by Registered Nurse #1 at 8:23 AM and was observed with their right leg swollen and larger than the left. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital at 10:25 AM and was diagnosed with an acute traumatic comminuted right femoral intertrochanteric fracture (a break in the thigh bone) with superior displacement of the femoral head (broken hip). There was a Physician's Order dated 12/08/2023 which documented one-to-one supervision for Resident #1 which was not provided on the night shift (10:00 PM - 6:00 AM) on 01/05/2024. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-11-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (625460), the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to provide nursing services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing for each resident. This was evident for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #1) sampled. Specifically, on 01/06/2024 at 5:45 AM, Resident #1 complained of pain to their right hip and was assessed by Registered Nurse #1 at 8:23 AM and was observed with swelling to their right leg that was larger than the left. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital at 10:25 AM on 01/06/2024 and was diagnosed in the hospital with an acute traumatic comminuted right femoral intertrochanteric fracture (a break in the thigh bone) with superior displacement of the femoral head (broken hip). A review of the physician's order dated 12/08/2023, revealed Resident #1 had a physician's order for one-to-one supervision. A review of the Assignment Sheet dated 01/05/2024 for the 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM shift revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-11-24 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (625460), the facility failed to ensure a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The facility must review and update that assessment, as necessary, and at least annually. The facility must also review and update this assessment whenever there is, or the facility plans for, any change that would require a substantial modification to any part of this assessment. The facility did not consider specific staffing needs for each resident and adjust as necessary based on any changes to its resident population. This was evident during review of Staffing from 01/01/2024 - 01/06/2024. Specifically, on 01/06/2024 at 5:45 AM, Resident #1 complained of pain to their right hip and was assessed by Registered Nurse #1 at 8:23 AM and was observed with swelling to their right leg that was larger than the left. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital at 10:25 AM on 01/06/2024 and was diagnosed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00337987), the facility failed to adequately supervise a resident to prevent accidents. This was evident in 1 out of 3 residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, on 04/02/2024 at 2:20 pm, during recreational social hour in the dining room, Resident #1, accidentally spilled hot tea on their person. Subsequently, Resident #1 was assessed to have redness to two areas on the left side of the lower abdomen and left upper inner thigh. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 that was not immediate jeopardy. The findings are: The facility's Policy and Procedure on Resident's safety during recreation programs involving food and beverages dated 04/03/2024, documented this facility is committed to providing each resident with safety during recreational programs involving food and beverages. Also, documented Recreation staff to check diet orders and confirm with nursing staff that residents can feed themselves. Resident #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00331104), the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to a resident who requires such services, consistent with professional standards of practices, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. This was evident in one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #1) sampled. Specifically, on 01/06/2024 at 5:45 AM, Resident #1 reported to Home Health Aide #1 that they had pain to their right hip. Home Health Aide #1 reported the pain to Licensed Practical Nurse #1 who instructed them to wait for the incoming shift. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 did not immediately check on Resident #1 and the resident was not immediately assessed by a Registered Nurse. Tylenol 650 milligrams were administered to the resident by incoming Licensed Practical Nurse #2 at 6:25 AM, 40 minutes after they complained of pain. Resident #1 was assessed by Registered Nurse #1 at 8:23 AM and observed with swelling to their right leg that was larger than the left. Resident #1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — pattern
  Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY 00328412), the facility did not ensure that all residents received the necessary care to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care. This was evident in two out of three residents sampled (Resident #1 and Resident #2). Specifically, on 11/16/2023, Resident #1 reported to Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 they requested pain medication at 7:30 PM and did not receive it. Resident #2 informed Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 they received some medication at 5:00 PM on 11/16/2023 but did not receive the blue tablet (sleeping medication). In both instances, the narcotic logbook documented the medications were dispensed, but there was no documentation that the medications were administered on the electronic medication administration record. All residents were assessed and there were no adverse reactions. The facility took immediate corrective actions and was found to be in substantial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00320606), the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a nursing home staff. This was evident in one out of three residents sampled for abuse (Resident #1). Specifically, on 07/22/2023 at approximately 8:50 PM, Resident #1 told Registered Nurse #1 that Certified Nursing Assistant #1 threw them in the bed from the wheelchair and they hit their head on the headboard. Resident #1 was assessed by Registered Nurse #1 and there were no visible injuries. This resulted in Past Noncompliance with no potential for serious harm. The findings include: The facility's policy and procedure on Abuse Prohibition dated 10/24/2022, documented the facility shall not use or permit verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, including corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion of residents/patients, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation or other mistreatment or neglect. It also stated, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0577 — isolated
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 10/8/2024 to 10/16/2024, the facility did not ensure that the survey results were posted in a place readily accessible to residents, visitors, or legal representatives where individuals wishing to examine survey results do not have to ask to see them. Specifically, the survey results were located inside a binder placed behind a glass partition at the Security desk. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure titled Right to Survey Results, reviewed 11/22/2023, documented that the facility will ensure that the resident has the right to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of corrections in effect with respect to the facility. The Facility must: Have reports with respect to any surveys, certifications, and complaint investigations made respective to the facility during the 3 preceding years, and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility, available for any individual to review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during the Recertification survey conducted from 10/08/2024 to 10/16/1024, the facility did not ensure they provided the appropriate liability and appeal notice to Medicare beneficiaries at the termination coverage. This was evident for 1 (Resident #404) of 3 residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. Specifically, the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage was not mailed out to Resident #404's designated representative on the same day that telephone notification was made. The findings are: The facility policy titled Notice of Medicare Non- Coverage (NOMNC) dated 4/9/2024 that a copy of the signed Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage will be provided to the beneficiary or representative. The policy also documented that in the event that the beneficiary is not able to comprehend the information in the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage, the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage notification must be delivered to the beneficiary's representative. If the Notice of Medicare…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 10/8/2024 to 10/16/2024, the facility did not ensure that comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented to meet each resident's needs. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 64) of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, a care plan for use of anticoagulant medication was not developed for Resident #64. The findings are: The facility policy titled Care Plan with creation date 8/6/2020 and last reviewed date 8/6/2024 documented the interdisciplinary team will conduct a comprehensive assessment upon admission to develop a comprehensive care plan for the resident. The policy also documented that the interdisciplinary team would ensure that the care plans include the appropriate treatments and services to attain or maintain a resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being. Resident #64 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Chronic Atrial Fibrillation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint (NY00317447) survey from 10/08/2024 to 10/16/2024, the facility did not ensure resident's person-centered, Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed and revised with each assessment and as needed to reflect the resident's changing needs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #389) of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medication, and 1 (Resident 84) of 4 residents reviewed for Abuse out of an investigative sample of 38 residents. Specifically, the Psychoactive Drug Use Comprehensive care plan for Resident #389 was not reviewed or revised after each assessment, and Risk for Victimization Comprehensive care plan for Resident # 84 was not review or revised after annual or quarterly assessments. The findings are: The facility policy titled Care Plan revised 08/06/2024 documented that the care plan is reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey between 10/08/2024 and 10/16/2024, the facility did not ensure that needed services, care and equipment are provided to assure that residents with limited range of motion and mobility maintain or improve function based on the residents' clinical condition. This was evident for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for Position and Mobility, (Resident #382) out of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #382 had an order to apply bilateral splints to resident's hands to be worn at all times and was observed on multiple occasions without the device in place as per Physician's order. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Splint/Brace/Assistive devices dated 4/9/2024 documented the purpose is to ensure the correct application of the brace/splint. The policy further documented that the Certified Nursing Assistant applies the splint/brace as per instructions. Resident #382 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint Survey (NY00343354) from 10/8/2024 to 10/16/2024, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures. This was evident for 1 (Resident #357) of 4 residents investigated for Abuse out of an investigative sample of 38 total residents. Specifically, the facility received a report that Resident #357 was allegedly missing cash totaling approximately $900 and did not report to the New York State Department of Health in a timely manner. The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition dated 10/24/2022, documented that the facility shall not use or permit verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, including corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion of residents/patients, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during a Recertification and Complaint survey (NY00328780) from 10/08/2024 to 10/16/2024, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement. This was evident for 1 (Resident #369) of 3 residents investigated for Accidents out of an investigative sample of 38 residents. Specifically, on 11/23/2023, Resident #369 who was not identified as a high risk for elopement, was able to exit the front doors of the facility and walk down to the guard booth where Resident#369 was then redirected and taken back into the facility. The findings are: The facility's Elopement Policy titled Elopement Prevention and Management, created 8/11/2015 and last reviewed 11/27/2023, documented that the facility maintains measures to ensure safety and well-being of residents within the confines of the facility. The policy also documented that elopement occurs when a resident successfully leaves the nursing facility undetected and unsupervised and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-04-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $7.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY