Terrace View Long Term Care Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 177 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 120 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 390 beds and averages 377.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.47 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure that each residents' environment remained as free of accidents as possible and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (1) (Resident #1) of three (3) residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, on 09/17/2025, the facility failed to use two (2)-person bed mobility assistance, for overall rolling bed mobility, resulting in Resident #1 falling to the floor, sustaining an acute post-traumatic subdural hematoma (collection of blood that forms between the brain and its outer covering, often due to head trauma), and requiring hospitalization. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 that was not Immediate Jeopardy.The findings include: The facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, updated 01/2026, documented the nursing home will develop and maintain a comprehensive care plan for each resident to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment. The purpose was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-12-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on video surveillance, interviews, and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to protect the residents from physical, mental and verbal abuse by staff for one (1) (Resident #1) of three (3) residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 12/08/2025, Certified Nurse Aide #1 was observed striking Resident #1, which resulted in a red mark to the resident's cheek. Certified Nurse Aide #1 was also witnessed using profane language directed towards the resident at the time of the incident, in response to the resident's behavior. Using the reasonable person concept, as referenced on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Psychosocial Outcome Severity guide, it was determined psychosocial harm occurred as a result of the physical abuse since there is an expectation that the resident would not be slapped in the face in the facility, that is not Immediate Jeopardy.The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Abuse Prevention, Investigation and Reporting dated 04/2025 documented the facility will provide a safe, abuse free environment to residents and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review conducted a Compliant investigation (Complaint # NY00339904) during the Standard survey completed on 8/26/24, the facility and pharmacy services did not effectively implement processes to acquire, dispense and administer medications to meet the needs of each resident. Specifically, one (Resident #260) of four residents reviewed for controlled substances was not administered a regularly scheduled controlled antiseizure medication as ordered and missed a total of 5 doses. Subsequently, the resident experienced seizure activity was transferred to the hospital. Additionally, facility staff did not notify the provider of the unavailability of the medication, and the pharmacy provider did not notify the medical provider that only a 14-day supply of the mediation was dispensed versus the 30-day as ordered. The finding is: The policy titled Controlled Substances with an effective date of 9/2021 documented an official NYS (New York State) triplicate script must state the number of tabs or the number of days and number of refills. The 11:00 PM -7:00 AM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Compliant investigation (Complaint # NY00339904) during the Standard survey completed on 8/26/24 the facility did not ensure that its residents were free of significant medication errors for one (Resident #260) of three residents reviewed for anti-seizure medications. Specifically, Resident #260 was not administered 5 doses of their anti-seizure medication. This resulted in a significant medication error for Resident #260. The resident had seizure activity and was transferred hospital for evaluation and treatment. The finding is: Refer to F 755 Pharmacy Services/procedures, scope and severity F. The facility policy titled Medication and Treatment Administration Record with an effective date of 7/2023 documented the purpose is to assure accurate administration of medication and treatments. The policy titled Physician Services and Philosophy with an effective date of 8/2019, documented the licensed nursing staff notifies the Attending Physician/Nurse Practitioner/Physician Assistant for required, issuance/review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-26 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 8/26/24, it was determined the facility did not ensure residents received routine dental services to meet the needs of each resident for two (Residents #10, #112) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #10 had been missing dentures since 10/28/20 and was not provided with timely follow up appointments for denture replacement. There were no dental consults completed after 10/20 through 08/24. Additionally, Resident #112 had a delay in receiving routine dental services on admission, there was no physician order for dental consults and had not received a dental consult until 1/3/24. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Dental Services dated 8/2021 documented that it was the responsibility of nursing staff, vendor dental services and the medical team to coordinate dental care for residents. All residents are referred to the Dental Clinic and seen within 30 days of admission. Recommendations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard Survey completed on 8/26/24, the facility did not ensure that each resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for one (Resident #314) of six residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #314 was observed with dark brown debris under their fingernails on both hands and eating with their hands. The finding is: The policy titled Activities of Daily Living with an effective date of 2/2024, documented individual care plan interventions will be developed and implemented to encourage self-performance at the resident's highest functional level. The policy titled Grooming, AM (morning) and PM (evening) Care with an effective date of 1/2024 documented the caregiver assigned was responsible to see that care has been given in accordance with the resident's individual plan of care. Any deviation will be reported to the nurse. AM care includes nail care. The policy titled Nail Care, effective 8/2021, documented nail care is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (Complaint #NY00321223) during the Standard survey completed on 8/26/24, the facility did not ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #73) of seven residents reviewed. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aide #3 did not provide/utilize a calf board per the plan of care and the resident sustained an injury to their toe/s. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Closest Care Plan with an effective date of 11/2019, documented the purpose of the closet care plan was to provide care instructions, ready and available in the resident's room, to any caregiver based on the comprehensive care plan team. The policy documented that all caregivers were trained to check the closet care plan prior to assisting any resident. All caregivers assigned to care for residents were responsible for following the closet care plan and to report any concerns with the appropriateness of or need for changes to the nurse. Resident #73 had diagnoses including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review during a complaint investigation (#NY00329554) completed on 12/18/23, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse are reported immediately, but not later than 2-hours after the allegation is made, to the Administrator of the facility and to appropriate officials (including the State Survey Agency) for three (Residents #1, #2, and #3 ) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, alleged staff-to-resident verbal abuse allegations for Resident #1 and Resident #2 and staff-to-resident physical abuse allegations for Resident #3 were not reported to the Administrator and State Agency as required. The findings are: The policy and procedure (P/P) titled Abuse Prevention, Investigation and Reporting last approved date 6/2023 documented it is the policy of the facility to provide a safe, abuse free environment, educate all staff to recognize signs and symptoms of abuse, investigate all alleged abuse, mistreatment or neglect to the appropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-11-01 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Standard survey started 10/25/22 and completed 11/1/22, the facility did not employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the necessary functions of the food and nutrition service to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service safely and effectively. Specifically, the facility did not ensure sufficient support personnel resulting in extended meal wait times, accuracy of foods, and proper food safety with preparation and serving of foods. This included Residents #35, 230, 239 and 296. The findings are: Refer to: F 803 Menus Meet Resident Needs/ Prep in Advanced/Followed- scope and severity (S/S) = D Refer to: F 812 Food Procurement, Store/ Prepare/Serve- Sanitary- S/S = D Review of the undated Meal Times sheet provided upon entrance of facility the following mealtimes are documented to start at: 2A MLK: Breakfast- 7:45 AM, Lunch-12:00 PM 2D Delaware: Breakfast- 7:45 AM 3B Botanical Gardens: Lunch- 12:30 PM 4C Niagara Square: Breakfast- 8:15 AM Observations of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-11-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey started 10/25/2022 and completed on 11/1/2022, the facility did not ensure they immediately consulted with the resident's physician when there was a need to alter treatment significantly (that is, a need to discontinue an existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences, or to commence a new form of treatment) for one (Resident #343) of two residents reviewed. Specifically, there was a delay in notification to the medical provider when a peripheral intravenous line (PIV-a tiny flexible tube that is inserted into a vein for the delivery of fluids/medications) access was unable to be obtained for antibiotic (ABT) administration. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Physician/Provider Notification for Change in Patient Condition, dated 2/2022, documented that the registered nurse (RN) assigned to the patient or supervising the care of the patient was responsible for notification of and communication to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-11-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey started on 10/25/22 and completed on 11/1/22, the facility did not ensure that grievances were resolved in a timely manner for one (Resident #240) of four residents reviewed for personal property. Specifically, there was lack of a thorough investigation and resolution into a resident's report of missing property. The finding is: Review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Prevention of Resident Abuse, Mistreatment, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property dated 10/19, revealed all staff were trained annually and on orientation regarding misappropriation of resident property. Complaints regarding resident property required an investigation. Review of the facility P&P titled Resident/Family Concerns revised 10/19, revealed it was the policy of the facility to assure timely investigation and resolution of all resident concerns. When a complaint is received, the Grievance Officer will write the complaint into the log, assign complaint to applicable department director and or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-11-01 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review completed during a Standard survey started 10/25/22 and completed on 11/1/22, the facility did not ensure that the resident is free from physical restraints imposed for purposes of convenience, that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms, and when the use of restraints is indicated, the facility must use the least restrictive alternative for the least amount of time and document ongoing re-evaluation of the need for restraints for one (Resident #51) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, the resident had a merry walker (a seated rolling walker used to assist ambulation) with no doctor's order in place and no re-evaluation of the need for continued use of the restraint. In addition, Resident #51 had chair and bed alarms with no on-going re-evaluation of the need for the restraint and supporting clinical documentation to warrant the use of the restraint. The finding is: Review of the policy and procedure titled Physical Restraint Use last…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$30,843 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $30,843 — penalty dated 2025-12-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in NY