No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Elm Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

210 North Main Street, Canandaigua, NY 14424 · For profit - Corporation · 46 certified beds · (585) 394-3883 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (585) 394-3883 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 35 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (86%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.8 mi
539 N Main St · (585) 394-7930 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
84 W Ave Plz · (207) 874-7483 · Call to confirm hours
Park
151 Charlotte St · (585) 394-4922 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.8%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%5.8%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms37.2%19.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.1%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.9%12.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication2.1%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.1%95.3%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%6.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.6%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.2%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine40.6%78.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.5%20.6%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.8%9.6%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.721.701.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.541.361.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.55U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.28hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.3%CMS range 26.3–53.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.7–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge64.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge70.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.4–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.361.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
0.77
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.62
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.84
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
85.7%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 41.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.84 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.62 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.96 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 86% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-08-27)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2022-10-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to provide nursing services necessary to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents for three (3) of three (3) sampled residents reviewed (Residents #1, #8, and #13), and additional residents identified through facility-generated medication administration audit reports. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently meet staffing levels identified in its Facility Assessment, staffing records reflected repeated discrepancies regarding licensed nursing coverage, and residents experienced delayed medication administration during periods of inadequate staffing.The findings include:The facility policy Staffing, dated 09/20/2024, included licensed nursing staff were available 24 hours a day to provide direct resident care services, and staffing numbers of direct care staff were determined by resident needs.The Facility Assessment, reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least eight (8) consecutive hours per day, seven (7) days per week. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide documented evidence of registered nurse coverage within a 24-hour period on three (3) separate days, and (8) hours or more of registered nurse coverage on two (2) separate days during the five (5) months reviewed. The findings include: Review of Employee Paired Punches (direct care staff time punches provided by the facility) from 12/01/2025 to 05/05/2026 revealed that there was no registered nurse within a 24-hour period on 12/15/2025, 12/16/2025, and 12/18/2025. Additionally, there were less than eight (8) consecutive hours of registered nurse coverage on 12/17/2025 and 02/24/2026. During an interview on 05/05/2026 at 11:44 AM, the Staffing Coordinator stated that there had to be a registered nurse in the building for at least eight (8) hours per day, but the hours did not have to be consecutive. During an interview on 05/06/2026 at 2:42 PM, the Regional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner which enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure administrative systems, including staffing oversight, medication administration monitoring, and quality assurance processes, were implemented and functioning to identify and correct deficient practices, resulting in a pattern of noncompliance across multiple areas of care, including but not limited to sufficient nursing staffing, medication administration, food service, resident rights, accident hazards, and activities of daily living (basic tasks for self-care and daily functioning), as evidenced by new and repeat deficiencies cited during the prior Recertification Survey completed on 08/27/2024 and continued noncompliance identified during the Abbreviated Survey completed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives received information necessary to make informed decisions regarding Medicare coverage enrollment and plan changes and failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for five (5) of fourteen (14) residents reviewed (Residents #6, #8, #10, #12, and #14). Specifically, under Issue One (1) for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed (Residents #6, #8, and #10), the facility obtained authorizations permitting the Administrator to act regarding Medicare Part D enrollment and plan changes and failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives received information regarding plan options, financial implications, reenrollment rights, and coverage changes. Under Issue Two (2) for three (3) residents reviewed (Residents #8, #12, and #14), the facility failed to maintain resident dignity by exposing Resident #8's urinary catheter collection bag, allowing Resident #14 to ambulate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living, the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for three (3) (Residents #5, #10, and #11) of seven (7) residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility could not provide documentation that Resident #5 had received a shower during their admission, Resident #10 did not receive incontinence care in a timely manner, and Resident #11 was observed on multiple occasions to have unwanted facial hair. The findings include:The undated facility policy Activities of Daily Living included appropriate care and services would be provided for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living including but not limited to bathing, grooming, and toileting. If a resident refused a shower, the refusal must be documented in a progress note and on the resident's care plan.1. Resident #11 had diagnoses including difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and did not ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices were provided to prevent accidents for three (3) (Residents #8, #10 and #11) of four (4) residents reviewed. Specifically, Residents #8, #10, and #11 had medical orders for mechanically altered diets and were observed to have been eating food provided by the facility of the incorrect texture and consistency. The findings include: The undated facility policy Altered Diets and Diet Texture Modifications, included to ensure residents received safe, appropriate, and individualized altered diets based on assessed needs, orders, and interdisciplinary team recommendations, and staff would verify diet accuracy prior to meal delivery. 1. Resident #8 had diagnoses including difficulty swallowing, weakness, and blindness. The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 04/02/2026 included the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for five (5) (Residents #1, #8, #9, #10, and #13) of seven (7) residents reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that Residents #1, #8, #10 and #13 received multiple significant ordered medications over the course of several days including but not limited to insulin (used to treat high blood sugar levels), anti-rejection medications (used for kidney and pancreas transplants), anticoagulants (blood thinner), anti-seizure medications (used to treat myoclonic jerks), cardiac medications (used to treat heart conditions), antibiotics (used to treat infections), and bronchodilators (a medication used to treat coughing, difficulty breathing or chest tightness). In addition, review of the Medication Administration Audit Reports revealed several medications to multiple residents (Residents #1, #8, #9 and #10) were administered outside the ordered timeframes and there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the interdisciplinary team determined the resident's right to self-administer medications was clinically appropriate for one (1) (Resident #1) of one (1) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 was found to have been managing their diabetes with their own supplies including self-supplied insulin (a medication used to regulate blood glucose levels) and a continuous glucose monitoring system (a device implanted into the skin that monitors blood sugar in real-time), and the facility could not provide documented evidence that they appropriately assessed the resident to self-administer insulins. Additionally, the facility could not provide documented evidence that they consistently monitored the resident to ensure order parameters were followed, that the correct medications and doses were administered, or that they consistently tracked the resident's blood glucose readings. The findings include:The undated facility Insulin Administration Policy and Procedure included that the facility had to ensure the safe,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the development of a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with measurable goals, timeframes, and interventions for three (3) (Residents #1, #8, and #10) of 14 residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 was prescribed insulin (a medication used to regulate blood glucose levels), Resident #8 had an indwelling urinary catheter (device that is inserted into the bladder to drain urine from the body), and Resident #10 required frequent incontinence care, and none of the residents' care plans included associated goals or interventions to address risks and care needs. The findings include: The facility's undated Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) Policy included each resident had an interdisciplinary, comprehensive care plan that summarized the team approach to active and/or potential problems or concerns and included measurable objectives to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs. 1. Resident #1 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a pressure ulcer received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed (Resident #10). Specifically, Resident #10 had an unstageable (a wound where full-thickness skin and tissue loss has occurred, but the true depth of the damage cannot be determined because it is covered by dead tissue) pressure ulcer to the sacral area with a physician order for daily wound packing and dressing. Resident #10 was observed without wound packing or a dressing in place for over two (2) hours after staff were notified, while the resident was incontinent of urine and stool.The findings include:The undated facility policy Dressing Changes included dressing changes were to be performed safely, consistently, and in accordance with physician orders, evidence-based practice, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food and drink were provided that was at a safe and appetizing temperature for one (1) of one (1) test tray and for one (1) (Resident #9) interviewed. Specifically, food and beverages during the meal were served at suboptimal temperatures and were not palatable.The findings include:During an interview on 04/28/2026 at 12:43 PM, Resident #9 stated that the food was typically cold, did not taste good and that the buns would be soggy from the vegetables being put on the same plate.During observations and interview on 04/29/2026 at 11:53 AM, the lunch meal tray line started. Meal trays were placed and covered on the tray cart which included the test tray. The tray cart was open and had no insulating doors. Cold food and drink items were held pre-portioned and pre-poured on the meal trays. The last cart left the kitchen at 12:41 PM and residents were served their lunch at 12:50 PM. A test tray was completed with the Regional Food Service Director and Dietary Aide #1 for temperatures and palpability. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, a liquid substance drained from the kitchen sink plumbing onto the floor during tray line (lunch meals were being prepared for the residents) and staff did not wash their hands in-between glove use or prior to touching ready to eat food after cleaning up the liquid on the floor. Additionally, the dumbwaiter (a small freight elevator used for moving items, such as food) was dirty, dried white debris was seen around the ice machine grate, and an ice scoop was observed resting inside a cooler of ice. The findings include:The facility's undated Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy included all personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. Staff should use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62 percent alcohol; or alternatively, soap and water after, but not limited to, the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee consisting at a minimum of the Director of Nursing Services, the Medical Director or his/her designee, at least three (3) other members of the facility's staff, one (1) of who must be an individual in a leadership role, and the Infection Preventionist. Specifically, the facility could not provide documented evidence that the Infection Preventionist attended the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meetings on a regular basis (quarterly).The findings include:The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program policy revised April 2014, included the primary purpose of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program was to establish data-driven, facility-wide processes that improved the quality of care, quality of life and clinical outcomes of the residents. Steps that would be employed to support and enhance the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases for one (1) (Resident #10) of seven (7) residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, facility staff did not perform hand hygiene after assisting Resident #10 with incontinence care and prior to touching multiple surfaces and equipment. In addition, the facility did not appropriately implement the use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control strategy that uses gloves and gowns during high contact resident care to reduce the spread of infection) for Resident #10, who had a wound, and staff were observed not using personal protective equipment (PPE; equipment, such as gown and gloves, worn to protect individuals and reduce the risk of exposure to and spread of infections) as required during high-contact care. Lastly, staff did not wash their hands in between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-27 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/21/2024 to 08/27/2024, for six (Residents #11, #24, #27, #29, #33, and #38) of six residents reviewed for Baseline Care Plans, the facility did not ensure that a Baseline Care Plan (developed within 48 hours of admission and included minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the immediate needs of the residents, that they were able to understand) was created in a timely manner or that a summary was provided to the residents and/or resident representatives. Specifically, for Residents #11, #24, #29, #33, and #38 there was no evidence the facility completed a Baseline Care Plan upon admission. For Resident #27, the facility was able to show that a Baseline Care Plan had been completed, but there was no evidence that a copy of the summary was provided to the resident and/or their representative. This is evidenced by, but not limited to the following: The facility's policy Care Plans - Baseline, revised December 2016, documented a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/21/2024 to 08/27/2024, for three of three observations of suction machines, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible. Specifically, suction machines were not prepared to be used in case of an aspiration emergency on units with residents at risk for aspiration. The findings are: Observations on 08/22/2024 at 11:05 AM included a Medline Vac-Assist and an Invacare suction machine (a compact medical suctioning device which is used to remove fluids from the airway) on the crash cart next to the nurse's station. Neither device was fully assembled and there was no tubing or reservoir attached to catch fluids. Observations on 08/23/2024 at 1:35 PM included a Medline Vac-Assist and an Invacare suction machine on the crash cart next to the nurse's station. The Medline device was observed to have the reservoir to catch fluids in place, but the Invacare did not, and neither…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00351141) from 08/21/2024 to 08/27/2024, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for all residents in the facility. Specifically, there was not sufficient staff to meet all resident needs in activities of daily living, including timely showers, long waits for addressing call lights, assistance with activities of daily living (eating, toileting, personal hygiene), and complete necessary documentation for resident transfers and discharges. This is evidenced by, but not limited to, the following: For additional information see Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services Form 2567: F677- Activities of Daily Living Care for Dependent Residents. The Facility Assessment, dated 02/20/2024, included the facility was licensed to provide care for 46 residents and had an average daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey completed 08/21/2024 through 08/27/2024, for one of one main kitchen, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, a potentially hazardous food item was not properly thawed, and potentially hazardous foods were not held cold at or below 45 degrees Fahrenheit (°F). The findings are: Review of the facility policy, Elm Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Dietary Policy and Procedure Food Preparation, dated 11/03/2022, included the following: It is the policy of Elm Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center that all foods are prepared by acceptable methods to maintain optimal nutritional value, flavor, and appearance. Meals are to be attractively served at the proper temperature and to meet the individual resident's needs. Observations on 08/22/2024 at 2:29 PM included a chest freezer holding approximately six square crates of pint sized 2% milk located in the kitchen dry storage room. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00351141) from 08/21/2024 to 08/27/2024, for one (Resident #191) of one resident reviewed for a discharge to the hospital, the facility did not ensure the transfer or discharge was appropriately documented in the resident's medical record to include the basis and necessity for the transfer, the receiving heath care institution, physician notification, and documentation of the discharge. Specifically, there was no documentation of a discharge summary, nursing assessment, change in condition to explain why the resident was transferred or discharged , or to where they were discharged . This is evidenced by the following: The facility's policy for transfers/discharges documented that the facility should provide a brief statement of facts that clearly supports the determination to discharge or transfer the resident and to document all discharge planning and notice activity in the social service notes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00342410) from 08/21/2024 to 08/27/2024, for two (Residents #5 and #26) of five residents, the facility did not ensure that residents who were dependent on staff for assistance received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene. Specifically, Resident #5 did not receive assistance with showering and washing their hair. Resident #26 did not receive assistance with showering, shaving, or obtaining a haircut. This is evidenced by the following: Review of the facility's Daily Staffing Sheets instructed that all staff are responsible for completing resident care tasks to include cleaning and cutting nails, shaving, and hair combing. 1. Resident #5 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia, hypertension, and chronic pain syndrome. The Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment, dated 06/10/2024, documented the resident had severely impaired cognition, required assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/21/2024 to 08/27/2024, for one (cart two) of two medication carts reviewed, the facility did not ensure all medications were stored and labeled in accordance with acceptable professional standards. Specifically, four medication cups that contained medications that had been pre-poured (medications that are prepared in advance and stored until the time of adminstration), were in the medication cart drawer uncovered and only labeled with room numbers. This is evidenced by the following: During observations on 08/26/2024 at 3:50 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse #2 was at medication cart two. The top drawer was open and contained four medication cups each containing multiple pills. The medication cups were labeled with room numbers only. During an immediate interview, Licensed Practical Nurse #2 said they had pre-poured their medications and were not aware that it was not good nursing practice to prepare medications and leave them in the medication cart. Licensed Practical Nurse #2 said they had seen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 10/24/22, it was determined that for one of one main kitchen, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, there were food and non-food contact surfaces not maintained in clean and sanitary condition, sections of flooring in disrepair, improper thawing of a potentially hazardous food, pests were present, a thermometer in use was not accurate, equipment was not properly air dried, a food preparation sink lacked an indirect drain, food was stored directly underneath an unprotected sewer line, and there was lack of sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service as evidenced by test tray food temperatures (see F804) and arrival of trays over one hour past scheduled meal delivery times on various occasions. This is evidenced by the following: A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Standard Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (#NY00292292) completed on 10/24/22, it was determined that for three (Canandaigua, Honeoye, and [NAME] Lanes) of three resident units and one of one basement the facility did not provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Specifically, boxes of medical supplies were stored on the floor, walls, ceilings and floors were dirty and in disrepair, pooling water was present, privacy curtains were inadequate, handwash sinks were in disrepair or not present in soiled holding locations, an electrical breaker was damaged, and a door was damaged. The findings are: 1. Observations on 10/17/22 from 10:17 a.m. to 3:25 p.m. included: a) A cardboard box of medical supplies was stored directly on the floor in the storage room across from room EM200. b) A cardboard box of incontinence supplies was stored directly on the floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 10/24/22, it was determined that for one (Canandaigua) of three resident units, the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards. Specifically, hot water temperatures exceeding 120 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F) were accessible to residents at point of use. The findings are: Observations, interviews, and record review from 9:34 a.m. to 12:26 p.m. on 10/17/22 included: 1. The following water temperatures were observed from handwash sinks using a ThermoWorks Thermapen One digital thermometer: 129°F in the shared bathroom between resident rooms #4 and# 2, 121°F in the shared bathroom between resident rooms #6 and #8, 134°F in the shared bathroom between resident rooms #5 and #7, and 133°F in the shared bathroom between resident rooms #1 and #3. The water temperatures in the shower room across from room [ROOM NUMBER] were measured using a [NAME] model 9842 digital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, conducted during the Recertification Survey, completed on 10/24/22, it was determined that for one of one main kitchen, the facility did not provide food and drink that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, the food was not served at safe and appetizing temperatures. This is evidenced by the following: When requested, the facility was unable to provide Food Service policies related to safe and appetizing temperatures for food and drinks. Review of the facility's resident scheduled mealtimes directed that breakfast was at 8:00 a.m., lunch was at 12:00 p.m., and dinner was at 5:00 p.m. During observations on 10/19/22 of the lunch meal, the meal cart arrived on the resident unit at 1:35 p.m. At 1:45 p.m., staff were observed bringing the last meal tray on the cart to a resident's room. At 1:46 p.m., the following food temperatures of a test tray were measured using both the Surveyor's Aqua Tuff 351 Thermocouple and a facility standard bimetallic thermometer (unknown brand). Both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-24 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 10/24/22, it was determined that for one of four residents reviewed for medication administration, the facility did not ensure that residents were appropriate for self-administration of medications. Specifically, Resident #22 had medications left at the bedside without a nurse present to supervise and without the resident being assessed and care planned for safe self-administration. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy, Self-Administration of Drugs at the Bedside, dated 7/26/22, included: 1. The care planning team will assess each resident's mental, physical, and visual ability to determine if the resident is capable of safe self-administration. Until the care planning team makes a decision, drugs will continue to be administered in accordance with Center policies governing the administration of medications. Residents will not be permitted to self-administer or retain medications in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, conducted during a Recertification Survey, completed on 10/24/22, it was determined that the facility did not ensure for two (Residents #24 and #29) of 42 residents reviewed, that the residents had the right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive that would be honored. Specifically, Resident #24's Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form and Resident #29's medical orders for code status in the electronic medical record (EMR) were not updated to reflect each resident's current wishes for code status. The facility policy Advanced Directives, dated revised on 7/15/21, included that the social worker (SW) or licensed designee would review or initiate a MOLST form upon admission. In addition, once the advanced directive is current and verified, the SW or verified designee would notify nursing and medical and place the originally signed MOLST or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 10/24/22, it was determined that for one (Resident #24) of one resident reviewed for hospitalizations, the facility did not ensure a written notification, which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy, was provided to the resident and/or the resident representative at the time of transfer to the hospital or as soon after as possible. Specifically, Resident #24 was transferred to the hospital and the facility could not provide evidence that a written notice of information regarding the facility's bed-hold policy was provided to the resident or the resident's representatives at the time of transfer or soon after per the regulation. This was evidenced by the following: The facility policy, 'Bed Hold Policy', reviewed/revised 7/11/22, included that at the time of each transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the facility would inform the resident of the bed-hold policy. 1. Resident #24 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 10/24/22, it was determined that for two (Canandaigua Hall and Honeoye Hall) of two medication carts reviewed, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals were properly labeled and stored in accordance with State and Federal laws. Specifically, both medication carts were observed to be unlocked and unsupervised, and contained multiple medications that were easily accessible to residents, visitors, and facility staff. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Medication Storage Of, dated 3/22/22, included that all compartments containing drugs and biologicals are locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items are not left unattended. 1.In an observation on 10/18/22 at 1:30 p.m., a medication cart in the Canandaigua Lane Unit main hallway was unlocked, unsupervised and filled with multiple medications. Residents were observed ambulating in the hallway near the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during a Recertification Survey completed on 10/24/22, it was determined that for one (Resident #7) of one observation of wound care, the facility did not maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infections. Specifically, the nurse did not ensure that appropriate and sanitary equipment was used when providing wound care. This was evidenced by the following: The facility policy, Infection Control Prevention policy, dated 5/31/22, included standard precautions are the practices used to prevent transmission of infectious disease and protect health care workers and residents from the exposure to infectious material. Resident #7 had diagnoses including a stage 4 (full thickness tissue loss with extensive destruction) pressure ulcer of the sacral area, morbid obesity, and bacteremia (infection in the bloodstream). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment included that the resident was cognitively intact. Physician orders for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-11-02 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews during the Recertification Survey, it was determined for one (Resident #11) of one resident reviewed for care planning, the facility did not ensure that each resident was given the right, along with their representative, to participate in the care planning process with their interdisciplinary team members. Specifically, there was no evidence that the resident or their representative had an interdisciplinary care plan meeting following admission to the facility. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Stage IV lung cancer, dementia, uncontrolled diabetes and anxiety. The Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 7/29/20, revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. In a random family interview on 10/27/20 at 2:06 p.m., the resident's representative stated that they had not been invited to any meetings (in person or remotely) with the resident's care team or spoken with anyone from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-11-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that the facility did not provide the residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for one of five residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #5 was observed for four days with nails that were uncut, jagged and filled with brown debris. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #5 had diagnoses including, malignant neoplasm of the bladder with chronic indwelling urinary catheter, chronic obstructive lung disease and sepsis. The Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 7/20/20, included that the resident was cognitively intact and had moderately impaired vision. The current Comprehensive Care Plan and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) [NAME] included that the resident had a self-care deficit in activities of daily living and required limited assistance of staff for personal hygiene, extensive assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-11-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (#NY00246752), it was determined that the facility did not provide necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for one of two residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #15 did not have dressing changes done according to wound clinic recommendations. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #15 had diagnoses including diabetes, peripheral vascular disease and an unstageable pressure ulcer of the right heel. The Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 9/2/20, included that the resident was cognitively intact. In an interview on 10/27/20 at 9:26 a.m., the resident stated that they had a sore on their right heel for months and it was starting to heal. The resident said they are being seen at the wound clinic. The resident said they used to get a dressing change daily but not anymore. On 10/28/20 at 2:17 p.m., the resident stated that they did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-11-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that for one of three residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible. Specifically, Resident #15 was being transferred with a stand-up lift despite a previous fall with one and contrary to therapy recommendations. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #15 had diagnoses including heart failure, morbid obesity and a history of a leg fracture following a fall from a stand-up lift approximately five months ago (May 2020). The Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 9/2/20, included that the resident was cognitively intact and required total dependence on staff for transfers. Review of the current Comprehensive Care Plan and the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) [NAME] revealed that the resident was transferred via a full mechanical lift with the assistance of two staff members. Review of the Fall Report, dated 8/16/20, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-11-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews during the Recertification Survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident received the proper respiratory treatment and care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered-care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for one of three residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #18 was receiving continuous oxygen with no physician order, and oxygen use was not addressed in the person-centered-care plan. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #18 has diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, a history of COVID-19, and was dependent on oxygen. The Minimum Data Set Assessments, dated 9/20/20 and 10/22/20, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and received oxygen therapy while a resident. Review of August 2020 facility policy, Oxygen Administration, directs staff to verify there is a medical order for oxygen that includes the amount of oxygen to be administered, the route (mask or nasal cannula) and if a humidifier bottle is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GRINSPAN, ARYEHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY15%since 12/13/2017
MAYER, ABRAHAMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 12/13/2017
MAYER, GIORGIOIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST75%since 12/13/2017
MACKENZIE, MARTINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/10/2025
MENSAH, SETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
LICHT, TZVIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
RUBIN, BAILAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/10/2025
RUBIN, SHOSHANAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/03/2025
OMEGA BUSINESS SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/13/2023
RF SNF NY HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2023
FRIED, JOELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2023
RUTNER, ABRAHAMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2023
RUTNER, ISRAELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 24%Other / private 20%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$356per resident / day
operating cost
$10,818per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$344per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335255. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next