Gurwin Jewish Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 1,904 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 840 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 460 beds and averages 432.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated survey (NY 00282941 and NY 00277891) initiated on 8/15/2022 and completed on 8/22/2022, the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. This was identified for 2 (Resident #394 and Resident #35) of 7 residents reviewed for Accidents . Specifically, 1) Resident #394 required bilateral Ankle-Foot Orthoses (AFO) and Darco shoes (special orthopedic shoes) and two-person assistance for transfers from one surface to another. On 9/8/2021 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 transferred Resident #394 without using the AFO and the Darco shoes and without the assistance of a qualified staff member to transfer the resident from the wheelchair to the bed. Subsequently, Resident #394 twisted their knee and fell resulting in left tibia, fibula and ankle fractures. 2) Resident #35 had a Physician's Order for bilateral padded upper siderails when in bed. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility did not ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment was completed to accurately reflect each resident's status. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #11) of three (3) residents reviewed for Physical Restraints. Specifically, Resident #11's Minimum Data Set assessments dated 10/31/2025 and 11/11/2025 inaccurately documented that Resident #11 used physical restraint in a chair or out of bed daily.The finding is: The facility's policy titled Minimum Data Set Accuracy last revised on 09/2025, documented the Minimum Data Set Assessor will ensure the Minimum Data Set is coded accurately to reflect the resident's status. All Minimum Data Set assessments must be completed accurately and within the required timeframes. Minimum Data Set coding must be supported by clinical documentation in the medical record. Minimum Data Set entries must reflect the resident's status and services provided during the applicable look-back period. The Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #30) of three (3) residents reviewed for Activity of Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #30 had limited range of motion for both hands and required assistance with hand hygiene. The resident was observed with accumulation of moisture and brown sticky substance with a strong odor in the resident's hands. The assigned Certified Nursing Assistant #8 acknowledged not providing hand hygiene to the resident due to not being able to open the resident's hands.The finding is: The facility Activity of Daily Living policy revised on 09/2025 documented care and services will be provided for activities of daily living such as bathing. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review (Complaint #2698214), the facility did not ensure each resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #473) of five (5) residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #473 required two (2) person assistance for transfers as per their plan of care. On 12/19/2025, the assigned Certified Nursing Assistant #5 transferred Resident #473 alone from the wheelchair to a shower chair, resulting in the resident sustaining multiple skin tears to the right hand, left hand, and left shin.The finding is:A facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living last revised 09/2022 documented Certified Nursing Assistants must review the Certified Nursing Assistant Taks List and Kardex to ensure adherence to the resident's plan of care. Care and services will be provided including transfer and ambulation; locomotion on/off unit; and walk in the corridor with the use of the safety and assistive devices.An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure the irregularities identified by the Pharmacist during the drug regimen review was documented on a separate, written report and the attending Physician documented in the resident's medical record that the irregularity identified by the Pharmacist had been reviewed and what action had been taken to address the recommendations. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #358) of five (5) residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, Pharmacist #1 documented a medication regimen review recommendation in Resident #358's medical record on 12/2/2025 to review duplicate use of sleeping agents Melatonin (a sleep medication) and Ramelteon (a prescription sleep medication for adults with sleeping difficulty-a melatonin receptor). There was no documented evidence that a separate, written report of the recommendations was sent to the attending Physician, the Medical Director and the Director of Nursing Services. Additionally, Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility did not ensure that it maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of infectious diseases. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #432) of nine (9) residents reviewed for Infection Control. Specifically, Resident #432 had a physician's order for contact isolation precautions for a diagnosis of shingles (blistering skin rash caused by the reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus). Certified Nursing Assistant #1 was observed in Resident #432's room making the resident's bed without wearing appropriate personal protective equipment.The finding is: The facility policy titled Transmission Based Precautions dated 04/28/2024, documented transmission-based precautions are a group of infection prevention and control practices that are used in addition to standard precautions for residents who may be infected or colonized with infectious agents that require additional control measures…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews during the recertification survey initiated on 5/15/2024 and completed on 5/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that a person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's needs was developed timely and implemented accurately. This was identified for one (Resident #210) of five residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #210 had a physician's order for oxygen therapy at one liter per minute via nasal cannula. During three seperate observations, Resident #210 was observed receiving oxygen at three liters per minute. Additionally, there was no documented evidence that a comprehensive care plan for the resident's Respiratory Status was developed in a timely manner. The finding is: The facility's undated Comprehensive Care Plan policy and procedure documented that the resident's Comprehensive Care Plan must address the main reason for admission and that the Comprehensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY 00321973) initiated on 5/15/2024 and completed on 5/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. This was identified for one (Resident #90) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #90 was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation on 8/11/2023 and sustained a 4-centimeter by 4-centimeter Hematoma (bruise) to their left forearm. The comprehensive care plan for Resident #90 was not reviewed or revised to reflect the altercation. The finding is: The facility's undated Comprehensive Care Plan policy documented to ensure the timeliness of each resident's person-centered comprehensive care plan and ensure the comprehensive care plan is reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team composed of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 5/15/2024 and completed on 5/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was identified for one (Resident #210) of five residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #210 had a Physician's order for oxygen to be administered at one liter per minute via nasal cannula. On three separate occasions, the resident was observed receiving oxygen at three liters per minute. The finding is: The facility's oxygen policy and procedure dated 7/2023 documented to check the physician's order for the rate of flow and type of mask used. The policy also documented adjusting the liter flow gauge as per the physician's order. The facility's Physician Order policy dated 6/2023 documented that physician's orders must be entered in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 5/15/2024 and completed on 5/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that the facility's medication error rate was not five percent or greater. This was identified for three of the 27 medications observed during the medication pass observation, resulting in an 11.11% medication error rate. Specifically, during a medication pass observation Resident #155 did not receive three of their 8:00 AM physician-ordered medications until 11:46 AM on 5/15/2024. The finding is: The Facility's Policy for Administering Medications revised on 1/12/2024 documented that medications should be administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal). Resident #155 was admitted with diagnoses that include Dementia and Hypertension. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13, indicating the resident had intact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 5/15/2024 and completed on 5/23/2024 the facility did not ensure that all drugs were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards including the expiration dates. This was identified for 1) one (medication cart on Unit 2) of thirteen medication carts observed during the medication storage task, and 2) one (Unit 4 medication room) of seven medication rooms reviewed for the medication storage task. Specifically, 1) On 5/22/2024, Unit 2's medication cart was observed with an expired Fluticasone inhaler. The label on the inhaler had Resident #371's name with an expiration date of 5/15/2024. 2) On 5/22/2024, Resident #350's 50 cubic centimeter bag of intravenous antibiotic solution (Normal Saline with 1 gram of Ceftriaxone) was observed in the medication room refrigerator with an expiration date of 5/20/2024. The findings are: The Facility's policy titled, Dispensing Medication, revised 7/20/2022…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY