Park Terrace Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 11.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 196.4 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-08-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews during the Recertification survey conducted from 08/24/2023 to 08/31/2023, the facility did not ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. This was evident for Resident #144 reviewed out of a sample of 37 residents. Specifically, after admission to the facility, the resident developed a new left buttock pressure ulcer, which worsened and became infected requiring the resident to be admitted to the hospital. There was no evidence the wound was evaluated between identification as an excoriation on 03/06/23 and becoming an unstageable ulcer on 3/21/2023. The actual ulcer care plan had no goals or interventions, and a physician's order for an immediate surgical consult was not followed until 6 days later. Subsequently, Resident #144 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 04/27/2023, and they were diagnosed with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (Intake #797338), the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for the residents. Specifically, housekeeping and maintenance services were not maintained in Unit 4. The findings include: The facility's General Maintenance Policy with a revised date of 10/2024 stated the purpose of the policy is to ensure that the facility's premises, equipment, and systems are maintained in a clean, safe, and functional condition, promoting a safe environment for residents, staff, and visitors. 1.During environmental rounds with the Housekeeping Director on 09/05/2025 and multiple observations in Unit 4 on 09/08/2025, the following were observed: room [ROOM NUMBER] - The wall baseboard had peeling paint. room [ROOM NUMBER]- The top of the air conditioning unit was very dirty, with peeling black and white paint. The baseboard had peeling paint. And the bathroom floor had dirt in between the tiles.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents receiving enteral feeding received appropriate care and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding. This was evident for three (3) (Residents #137, #41, and #52) out of 25 residents reviewed for medication administration task. Specifically, licensed nurses did not appropriately verify placement of gastrostomy tube prior to administering medications and enteral feeding. The findings include: The facility policy titled Medication Administration with a last revised date of 05/2025 documented when administering medications via enteral route, placement must be checked by introducing air and listen to gurgling sound using a stethoscope. The facility policy titled Gastrostomy Tube Feeding with a last revised date of 01/2025 documented placement of tube must be checked prior to administration of tube feeding. 1. Resident # 137 had diagnoses of Gastrostomy status, Dysphagia, and Malnutrition. The Significant Change…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-09 · tag F0711 — pattern
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physicians reviewed the residents' total program of care. This was evident for two (2) (Residents #107 and #184) of three (3) residents reviewed out of 40 total sampled residents. Specifically, the physician's progress notes did not accurately reflect the residents' total care plan and current condition. The findings include:The facility's undated policy regarding Documentation stated that the facility staff were to document appropriately assessments, orders, goals and interventions for each resident. 1. Resident #107 had diagnoses that included Hemiplegia, Traumatic Brain Injury, and Anxiety Disorder. The physician's progress notes dated 09/03/2025 at 10:42 PM documented that Resident #107 had increased weakness, balance, and coordination deficits due to recent prolonged hospitalization. The progress notes documented that Physical and Occupational Therapy were ordered to improve the resident's mobility and self-care abilities; and the therapy goal was ultimately aimed in returning the patient to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident during the Kitchen task and during meal pass observation. Specifically, 1.) Expired food items were observed in the kitchen. 2.) Kitchen staff were observed without beard restraint while preparing food in the kitchen. 3.) Food was not in acceptable temperature range. 4.) Egg salad, ham, and tuna sandwiches were stored at room temperature in Unit 4 and Unit 6. 5.) Certified Nursing Assistant #3 failed to perform hand hygiene while assisting residents. The findings include:1. The following were observed during the kitchen observation:An open box of chicken pot pie with a best by date of 01/29/2025 was observed in the refrigerator. Fourteen (14) cartons of Jevity 1.2 with best by date of 08/01/2025, 23 cartons of Osmolite 1.2 with use by date of 09/01/2025, and 9 cartons of Glucerna with best by date of 07/01/2025 were found in the emergency food storage. During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. This was evident during kitchen observation and in five (5) (Units 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) of five (5) units observed. Specifically, ripped chairs were observed in the dining rooms in all units, dust accumulations were observed in the kitchen, and dirty floors and walls were observed in Unit 4, along with corroded metal cabinet. The findings include: The facility's General Maintenance Policy with a revised date of 10/2024 stated the purpose of the policy is to ensure that the facility's premises, equipment, and systems are maintained in a clean, safe, and functional condition, promoting a safe environment for residents, staff, and visitors. 1. During environmental rounds on the 4th floor from 09/05/2025 at 3:26 PM, and 09/08/2025 at 11:22 AM, the following were observed: 1. The floor in the unit dining room were embedded with black colored substance, dirt, and debris. 2. The medication room had brown stains on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (Intake #797338), the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests and rodents. This was evident for one (1) (Unit 4) of 5 floors and the kitchen. Specifically, multiple reports of roach and rodent sightings were made by staff and residents. Additionally, a roach was observed crawling on top of the dish machine during kitchen observation. The findings include: The facility's policy and procedure titled Pest Control with a last revised date of 12/2023 stated it is the policy of this facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests and rodents. 1. On 09/09/2025 at 10:04 AM, during kitchen observation, a roach was observed crawling on top of the dish machine. During an interview on 09/09/2025 at 10:10 AM, Dietary Aide #2 stated they see flies all the time in the kitchen, but this was the first time they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (Intake #797338), the facility failed to ensure Resident #199's representative was informed about a bed bug infestation in the resident's room. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #199) of one (1) resident reviewed for Notification of Change out of 40 total sampled residents. The findings include:The facility policy titled Notification of Changes with a revised date of 05/2025 documented the intent of the policy was to provide appropriate and timely information about changes relevant to a resident's condition or changes in room to the parties who will make decisions about care, treatment, and preferences to address the changes.Resident #199 had diagnoses of Vascular Dementia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Malignant Neoplasm of Colon.The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident #199 had modified independence with their cognitive skills for daily decision making and a short/long-term memory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-08-31 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 8/24/23 through 8/31/23, the facility did not ensure an Infection Preventionist (IP) with specialized training was designated to be responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP). This was evident during the review of the Infection Control Task. Specifically, the facility's designated IP did not have documented evidence of completing specialized infection prevention and control training. The findings are. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) memo titled Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Quality, Safety & Oversight Group. Ref: QSO-19-10-NH dated 3/11/19 documented Specialized Infection Prevention and Control Training for Nursing Home Staff in the Long-Term Care Setting. Effective 11/28/19, the final requirement includes specialized infection prevention and control training for the individual(s) responsible for the facility's IPCP. The course is approximately 19 hours long and comprises 23 modules and submodules. The facility's policy and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0577 — pattern
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 8/24/23 to 8/31/23, the facility did not ensure that the results of the most recent survey report and plan of correction of the facility was posted in a place readily accessible to residents, and family members and legal representatives of residents. Specifically, the survey report was posted at an elevated level, in a locked glass case on the wall opposite the main lobby elevators. This was evident for 12 of 12 attendees of the Resident Council meeting. The findings are: The facility policy titled Accessibility of Survey Results revised April 2022 documented that a copy of the most recent standard survey, including any subsequent extended surveys, follow-up revisit reports, etc. along with state approved plans of correction of noted deficiencies, is maintained in an area frequented and accessible to residents, such as in the main lobby. On 08/25/23 at 10:38 AM, during the Resident Council meeting, residents stated that they did not know where the results of the state inspection were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews conducted during a Recertification survey conducted from 08/24/23 to 8/31/2023, the facility did not ensure that proper sanitation and food handling practices were conducted to prevent potential foodborne illnesses. Specifically, 1) portions of the meat slicer were washed and sanitized but replaced on the machine with ungloved hands and 2) unlabeled, undated food and staff food was observed stored in a pantry refrigerator on a resident unit (Unit 4). The findings are: 1. The facility's slicer Cleaning and Sanitizing Directions state, Remove both the knife cover, cover knob, slice deflector by unscrewing the stainless-steel knob. Wash, rinse and sanitize the knife cover knob, knife deflector and both sides of the knife. On 08/30/2023 at 11:08 AM, the slicer was observed during cleaning. The Acting Director Food and Nutrition Services (ADFN) washed their hands, donned gloves and removed the knife cover, cover knob, slice deflector and blade. They placed them in the soapy water in the sink, then cleaned the rest of the slicer. Once the rest of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$45,617 in federal fines across 11 penalties.

• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
• $4,196 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $3,846 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
• $3,496 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
• $3,147 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
• $2,797 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
• $7,508 — penalty dated 2023-08-31
• $2,447 — penalty dated 2023-08-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $6.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY