No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Guthrie Cortland Medical Center

134 Homer Avenue, Cortland, NY 13045 · Non profit - Corporation · 80 certified beds · (607) 756-3909 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Sep 20231 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$255,876 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (27% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $255,876 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-11)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
135 N Main St · (607) 756-6330 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
14 Clinton Ave · (607) 753-1591 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
157 Homer Ave · (607) 344-3025 · Call to confirm hours
Park
25 Homer Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
78 Homer Ave · (607) 341-7264

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.6%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.7%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.6%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.2%12.5%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.7%13.2%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.2%19.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.2%13.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.4%78.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.4%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.8%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.801.701.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.701.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 290 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
78.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 78.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 123 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.3%CMS range 47.3–59.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 9.2–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge78.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge82.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 5.3–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.95
RN hours/ resident / day
1.15
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.69
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
27.2%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 72.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.09 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.19 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-25)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-15)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, on 07/14/2024 at 3:36 PM, Resident #1, who had a history of exit seeking behaviors, was at risk for elopement, and had a wander alert device, exited the facility through the 3rd floor North Hall stairwell door. The resident was found outside by a visitor approximately 15-30 minutes later and brought back into the facility by nursing and security. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy, past non-compliance, to Resident #1, and placed them at risk for serious harm serious injury, serious impairment, and death. Findings include:The facility policy Wandering Residents/Risk for Elopement and Recovery of Missing Resident, dated 06/01/2021, documented all residents will be assessed upon admission and on an on-going basis (quarterly, significant change, annually) to determine if wandering and elopement issues are present. The use of assigned staff to monitor a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2026-02-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for three (3) of three (3) Residents (Residents #6, #43, and #74) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #6, #43, and #74 had severe weight loss, which was not addressed by the medical provider and their nutritional needs were not reassessed by the registered dietitian. Additionally, the registered dietitian recommended the addition of Liquacel (liquid protein supplement) for Resident #6 and there was no documented evidence the supplement was ordered. Failure to assess and address nutritional status resulted in immediate jeopardy to Residents #6, #43, and #74 and placed all residents with altered nutritional status at risk for serious harm, serious injury, serious impairment or death. Findings include:The facility policy Admission, Nutrition Assessment and Care Plan, revised 01/23/2026, documented nutritional problems, goals, and plan were documented in the interdisciplinary care plan. The Nutrition Assessment and interdisciplinary care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated surveys (NY00316770 and NY00322185), the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #2 and #7). Specifically, Resident #2 had a left leg surgical wound from a below knee amputation (BKA) with 21 sutures in place and wound treatments were not completed as ordered. There was no documented evidence of ongoing monitoring of the wound and when the wound worsened, there was no documented evidence the medical provider was notified or that an assessment was completed. The resident's wound dehisced (re-opening of the incision) requiring hospitalization, debridement (surgical removal of dead tissue), and antibiotic treatment for the infection of the amputation. Resident #7 did not receive wound treatments as ordered and instead, staff applied a wound treatment, unapproved for use on humans, without a physician's order. Subsequently, Residents #2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-09-11 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00320465) the facility failed to ensure a resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments, was reviewed by the medical provider for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 had a history of seizures and was admitted to the facility with hospital discharge orders for seizure medications. The medications were not included on the facility admission orders and the resident did not receive anti-seizure medications for 6 days. The resident subsequently had a seizure requiring hospitalization. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1. Findings include: The facility policy admission Process for New Residents dated 10/1/2020 documented the facility would complete a thorough nursing interview and assessment for all residents newly admitted . The interdisciplinary team (IDT) would obtain an accurate medical history of the resident and gather the necessary data to formulate a plan of care. The Nurse Manager/Charge Nurse would ensure the physician's orders were obtained and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #6) reviewed. Specifically, -Resident #6 required a colostomy (a surgical opening in the abdomen that allows stool to pass out of the body) and did not have orders for changing the appliance and was not provided with appropriate colostomy supplies.-Resident #6 required use of a urostomy (surgical opening in the abdomen that allows urine to pass out of the body) and there were no orders to change the appliance. -the person-centered comprehensive care plan did not include the diagnoses of diabetes mellitus and insulin use, use of an anticoagulant (blood thinner), or the use of opiates (narcotic pain medication). -the physician was not notified when the resident had low blood pressure. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for one (1) of one (1) meal reviewed (the 02/09/2026 lunch meal) and 10 of 10 anonymous residents during a resident council meeting. Specifically, food was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures during the lunch meal on 02/09/2026 and 10 anonymous residents during a resident council meeting stated the food was cold. Findings include:The facility policy Food Safety and Infection Control, last revised 07/02/2025, documented food and sauces were held at a temperature of 135 degrees Fahrenheit.The 11/24/2025 Test Tray Audit form documented entrees, soups and hot beverages should be 135 degrees Fahrenheit or above.During a meal observation on 02/09/2026 at 12:26 PM, Resident #46 was served their lunch tray. A replacement tray was ordered, and Resident #46's original meal tray was tested. At 12:26 PM, Registered Nurse #14 verified the measured food temperatures. The chicken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility failed to consult with the physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical status for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #6) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #6 returned from the emergency department on 01/30/2026 with a diagnosis of clostridioides difficile (a highly contagious bacteria causing diarrhea) and instructions to start vancomycin (an antibiotic) 125 milligram capsule every six (6) hours for ten (10) days and the physician was not notified. Subsequently, the antibiotic was not ordered until five days later on 02/04/2026. Findings include:The facility policy, Admission/ readmission Process of a New Resident, revised 01/23/2026, documented if a resident was admitted to the facility without discharge orders, nursing staff would contact the discharging facility. The nurse manager/ designee would discuss the resident's condition, status, and orders with the medical provider. The facility policy, Notification of Changes to Provider, effective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis services (filtration of blood when the kidneys do not work efficiently) received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #6) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #6 received hemodialysis treatments at a community-based dialysis center and did not have on-going assessments and oversight before and after dialysis treatments, there was no documented evidence the resident's dialysis access site (Permacath, a central catheter) was routinely assessed, and there were no physician orders for dialysis, pre or post dialysis assessments, or dialysis vascular site monitoring.Findings include:The facility policy, Offsite Hemodialysis Care and Coordination, revised 12/31/2025, documented a continuous 24-hour communication process was maintained between the facility and the dialysis center. Before each treatment a licensed nurse monitored the resident's vital signs, weight, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 3/11/2024 - 3/15/2024, the facility did not ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Specifically, walk-in freezer #3 within the main kitchen had ice dripping from the compressor onto food that was stored below. Findings include: The facility policy Food Safety Operations and Infection Control revised 8/20/2023 documented all walk-in refrigerators and freezers have temperature dials and thermometers inside. The temperature of the thermometers and condition of the food is monitored daily. The following observations were made: - on 3/11/2024 at 9:58 AM, walk-in freezer #3 had ice dripping from the compressor onto cases of food product stored below. - on 3/12/2024 at 12:14 PM, walk-in freezer #3 had ice dripping from the compressor onto a case of bread, a gallon jug of chocolate milk, and a sheet pan of cake partially covered with plastic wrap. The ice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 3/11/2024-3/15/2024, the facility did not ensure nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #45) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #45 used an external catheter device (a soft flexible wick that draws urine away from the body into a sealed canister using suction) to manage urinary incontinence and there was no documented evidence nursing possessed the competencies and skill sets to manage the device. Additionally, there was no medical order for use of the device. Findings include: The facility policy Compliance Training and Education revised 1/25/2023 documented employees were to be provided with ongoing training and education to mitigate noncompliance. Training/education were completed upon hire, annually, and as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00294915) surveys conducted 3/11/2024-3/15/2024, the facility did not ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #34) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #34's prepared medications were left in a cup unattended on their bedside table for over 2 hours and licensed practical nurse #1 documented the medications were administered at 8:00 AM when they were not. Additionally, licensed practical nurse #1 crushed extended release medications (potassium chloride extended release and pantoprazole delayed release). Findings include: The facility policy Medication Administration revised 12/1/2020 documented the nurse should stay with the resident until the medication was swallowed and should not leave medications at the bedside. All medications were signed for at the time of administration after the resident had taken the medications. Medications could be administered an hour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 3/11/2024-3/15/2024, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labelled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions when applicable for 1 of 3 medication carts (3rd floor Team1 cart) reviewed. Specifically, the 3rd floor Team 1 medication cart contained 1 insulin pen and 1 insulin vial without an opened date, and 1 insulin pen that was expired. Findings include: The facility policy Medication Storage in the Facility dated May 2018 documented medications and biologicals were stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial was initially broken, the container or vial was dated. The nurse placed a date opened sticker on the medication and entered the new date of expiration. The expiration date of the vial or container was 30 days unless the manufacturer recommended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00316770), the facility did not ensure alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and did not prevent further potential abuse/neglect while the investigation was in process for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #2) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #2 reported their wound treatments were not completed as ordered on 3 occasions and the investigation was not thorough and complete. The facility did not identify all involved staff and did not immediately implement a plan to protect residents and prevent reoccurrence. Findings include: The facility policy Investigation-Resident Abuse dated 3/1/2019 documented if there was reasonable cause to believe a person receiving care had been physically abused, neglected, or mistreated, the facility would conduct a thorough investigation. The investigation would be carried out immediately, all witnesses would be interviewed, and a record of the interviews would be in written form. The investigation of potential abuse would include a plan to prevent reoccurrence. The facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00267452) conducted from 12/15/21-12/17/21 the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances the resident may have for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #13) reviewed. Specifically, the resident and the resident representative requested the resident's personal laundry be done by the resident representative and the facility denied the request. In addition, when the facility began permitting resident representatives to do laundry again, there was no documented evidence staff followed-up with the resident representative regarding the change in the policy. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Personal Laundry reviewed 10/2020 documents when clothing is removed from the resident it will be placed in the laundry bags in the hallway. Once full they are put in the dirty utility room. The Housekeeping Linen Personnel will be responsible for sorting resident's laundry and returning the clean linen to each resident's room. Washer/dryer is available on second and third…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-03-15 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted 3/11/2024-3/15/2024, the facility did not ensure the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction were posted in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives. Specifically, the survey results and plan of correction were in a pink binder on a shelf behind the nursing station on Cedar Run (second floor) and in a black binder on a shelf in the dining room on Misty Glen (third floor). Additionally, there were no notices of the availability of such reports posted in areas that were prominent and accessible to the public. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Rights revised 2/2024 documented the facility allowed residents to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors including any statements of deficiencies, any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility and any enforcement actions taken by the Department of Health. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$255,876 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $185,442 — penalty dated 2026-02-11
  • $70,434 — penalty dated 2023-09-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GUTHRIE — 2 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes:

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
The other 1 home this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MACAFEE, FRANCISIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/04/2022
WRIGHT, MARYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2013
YARTYM, JENNIFERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2019
ALI, MOHAMMADIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/19/2021
HAYES, PATRICKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/28/2014
JOHNSON, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2021
LATTEN, DARLENEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2020
NEUMAN, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/23/2018
PARVIZI, NASRINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/23/2018
PATEL, DARSHANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2019
PUZO, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/22/2021
RAYMOND, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/22/2013
SETTINERI, MARCIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/26/2016
VANGORDER, GARRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2021
VERVALIN, PAULIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/22/2019
WIRTZ, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/24/2017
THE GUTHRIE CLINICOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335768. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next