No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Springvale Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

67 Springvale Road, Croton On Hudson, NY 10520 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 200 certified beds · (914) 739-6700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (914) 739-6700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2025
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (27% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
2005 Albany Post Rd · (914) 271-0832 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2005 Albany Post Rd · (914) 271-4094 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
67 Springvale Rd · (914) 739-6700

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.2%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%5.8%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.1%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms14.0%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.9%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.5%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.8%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.6%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.8%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%78.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.1%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.1%9.6%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.561.701.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.221.361.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 113 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
75.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 75.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.0%CMS range 32.9–50.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 7.2–13.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge75.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge76.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge70.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.4–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.481.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
0.77
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.56
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
26.9%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 194.6 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-15)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, conducted during the recertification survey from 8/11/2025 to 8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure proper storage, preparation, distribution, and service of food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Specifically, 1) undated cheese and juice was stored in the refrigerator; 2) ground meat and vegetables were not dated; and 3) Food Service Workers did not wear hairnets and beard guard to prevent hair from contacting food. The findings include: A facility policy dated 5/2023 and titled Dating and Labeling Policy documented the kitchen will ensure food safety by maintaining proper dates and labels to all goods and ready to eat food products. The procedure includes label products in storage with date the package was opened, ready to eat foods must be dated with a 72-hour use by date and discarded when expired. A facility policy dated 5/2023 titled Uniform Policy documented the kitchen will ensure that Food and Nutrition department employees represent a tidy, clean professional appearance and wear a uniform that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00359686) survey from 8/11/2025 to 8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure the resident's representative was notified when there was a need to alter the resident's treatment and transfer the resident from the facility. This was evident for 1 (Resident #194) of 4 residents reviewed for notification of change. Specifically, Resident #194's representative was not notified when the resident received intravenous hydration and was transferred to the hospital. The findings are: The facility policy titled Change in Condition dated 5/2025 documented the facility will notify the resident representative of changes in the resident's condition. Documentation of a change in the resident's condition is encouraged. Resident #194 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke) and colon neoplasm (cancer). The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #194 was moderately cognitively impaired. The Nursing Note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00359686) survey from 8/11/2025 to 8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure a safe environment with protection of a resident's property from loss or theft. This was evident for 1 (Resident #194) of 6 residents reviewed for personal property. Specifically, Resident #194's personal cell phone went missing and was unable to be found during their stay at the facility. The findings are: The facility policy titled Inventory/Personal Belongings dated 1/2025 documented each resident will be offered/provided a locked drawer or equivalent with a key for small valuables. Resident #194 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction and schizoaffective disorder. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #194 was moderately cognitively impaired. The Social Work Note dated 10/14/2024 documented Resident #194 reported their phone went missing while being charged. The note documented the Director of Social Work discussed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (2564017) from 08/11/2025-08/15/2025, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse or mistreatment, were reported to the Administrator of the facility immediately or within two (2) hours after the allegation was made for one of five (1 of 5) residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #200's daughter made an allegation of verbal mistreatment/abuse by a staff member, but staff did not report the allegation to the Administrator or State Agency. Findings include:The facility Abuse Policy-Prevention and Management last reviewed 08/2025 documented that the facility has designed and implemented processes, which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident/patient abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation/exploitation of property. Oral, written, or gestured language, that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms, to the resident/patient or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review during the recertification survey on 8/11/2025 to 8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure that the resident, resident's representative(s), or representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (an official patient advocate not hired by the facility) was notified of the transfer or discharge, and the reasons for the move, in writing and in a language and manner they understand for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #189 and Resident #191) reviewed for hospitalization and discharge. Specifically, 1) the facility did not complete a discharge notice or notification of bed hold for Resident #189 when they were hospitalized . The ombudsman was not notified of Resident #189's transfer/discharge to the hospital; 2) The Ombudsman was not notified of Resident # 191's discharge to the community. Findings include:1. Resident #189 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) and atrial fibrillation. The admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 5/10/2025 documented resident had severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey 8/11/25 to 8/15/25, the facility did not ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (resident assessment tool) for one of three residents (Resident #16) reviewed for urinary catheter. Specifically, the Minimum Data Sets with reference dates of 6/22/25 (quarterly), 3/24/25 (annual) and 12/24/24 (quarterly) were coded incorrectly, indicating the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter.Findings include:Resident #16 was admitted with diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia, acute cystitis, and urinary retention. The 3/26/25 Urinary Incontinence Care Plan documented occasional incontinence of bladder function with interventions to monitor for symptoms of urinary tract infection and change in continence status. Resolved from the plan of care was the Foley (urinary) Catheter/Suprapubic care plan.The 4/11/24 physician orders documented to remove the urinary catheter.The 4/12/24 nursing progress note documented the resident's urinary catheter was removed.The 6/22/25, 3/24/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the recertification survey from 8/11/2025 to 8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure that the Comprehensive Care Plan was revised to reflect preventative interventions for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #64) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #64's Comprehensive Care Plan was not updated to reflect new risk reduction fall interventions implemented after a fall. Findings include:The facility policy Falls Prevention and Management, reviewed 6/2025, documented the interdisciplinary team identifies and implements appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls or injuries while maximizing dignity and independence. Determining causal factors leading to a resident fall is necessary to provide consistent intervention to help prevent further occurrences. Adjust/add interventions on the fall plan of care, including date of new intervention. Discuss identified trends and immediately implement appropriate measures to prevent injury. Resident #64 had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, difficulty walking,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (2564017 and 781248/NY00353892) from 08/11/2025-08/15/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two of seven (2 of 7) residents (Resident #199 and Resident #200) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, 1) Resident #199 required assistance with activities of daily living and the certified nurse aide documentation was inconsistent; 2) Resident #200 required assistance with activities of daily living and the certified nurse aide documentation was inconsistent. The facility policy Activities of Daily Living Care Supporting Resident, last reviewed 03/2025, documented residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Activities of Daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the recertification survey from 08/11/2025 through 08/15/2025, the facility did not ensure that emergency equipment was readily available for one of two residents (Resident #125) reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #125, who had a tracheostomy, did not have an Ambu bag (a handheld device that provides positive pressure to residents who are not breathing) at the bedside. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure titled Tracheostomy Care, last revised in April 2025, documented an emergency tracheostomy setup was to be maintained at the resident's bedside.Resident #125 had diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy, and dysphagia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on a tracheostomy and oxygen therapy.The comprehensive care plan titled Respiratory Care, dated 08/24/2024, documented maintaining the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during the recertification survey from [DATE] to [DATE], revealed that the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored according to current professional standards for 2 out of 7 residents (Resident #60 and Resident #115) reviewed for medication storage and labeling. Specifically, 1) Resident #60 was observed three times with Carboxy-methylcellulose 0.5% eye drops, Deep Sea Nasal Spray 0.65%, and a Budesonide-Formoterol 80-4.5 micrograms/actuation metered-dose inhaler on their bedside table. 2) Resident #115's Humalog 100 units/milliliter insulin pen was observed on a medication cart on [DATE]. The insulin pen had an opening date of [DATE], which is past the manufacturer's recommendation to discard it after 28 days after the opening date and was found 17 days after the recommended discard date on the medication cart.The findings include: 1.The 3/2025 facility policy on self-administration of medications states that if a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 8/11/2024 to 8/15/2024, the facility did not ensure that special eating equipment and utensils were provided for residents who need them. This was observed during dining observation for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #17). Specifically, Resident #17 was observed on three occasions eating without the use of the proper assistive devices as indicated in the meal tray ticket, recommended by occupation therapy and ordered by the medical doctor.Findings include:Resident # 17 was admitted with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, peripheral vascular diseases, and Type 2 diabetes.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 08/02/2025 documented the resident had intact cognition, impairment on bilateral upper/lower extremities and required supervision assistance with eating.The Rehabilitation: Contractures Care Plan effective 7/28/2025 documented the resident had a left and right upper extremity contracture which interfere with the ability to use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the recertification survey from August 11, 2025, through August 15, 2025, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection. Specifically,1) Licensed Practical Nurse #13, did not don a gown while providing wound care to Resident #165, who was on enhanced barrier precautions; 2) Home Health Aide #4 did not perform proper hand hygiene during meal service and assistance with feeding Resident #183; and 3) Home Health Aide #8 did not perform hand hygiene after feeding Resident #157 and then fed another resident during a breakfast meal. Findings include: 1) The policy and procedure titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last revised April 2025, directed staff to maintain enhanced barrier precautions, requiring the use of personal protective equipment, including gowns and gloves, during high-contact resident care activities such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00382686) from 8/11/2025-8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure residents were adequately equipped to call for assistance through a communication system that relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for 1 (Unit 2 East) of 5 residential units. Specifically, on Unit 2 East, the call bell system was not functioning correctly on 8/13/2025, 8/07/2025, 8/01/2025, 5/07/2025, 3/16/2025, 1/11/2025, 1/08/2025, 10/16/2024, 6/19/2024, and 2/22/2024. The findings include:During an interview and observation on 08/13/2025 at 10:44 AM, Certified Nurse Aide #16 stated the audible portion of the Unit 2 East call bell system was not working. Certified Nurse Aide #16 was observed to activate the call bell system from room [ROOM NUMBER]. It was observed that the light illuminated outside the door, but no sound was heard on the unit floor or at the centralized nurse station.During an interview on 08/13/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification survey on 8/11/2025 to 8/15/2025 the facility did not maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of flies. Specifically, Resident #8's room was observed with several flies.Findings are:The facility policy and procedure titled Pest Control last reviewed 5/2025 documented it is the responsibility of the Maintenance Department to coordinate the control of pests with a company engaged in business of providing Pest Control Services. Pest control Company will provide the control of other insects that may be harmful to humans, equipment, supplies through direct and/or indirect contact or contamination.During an observation on 8/12/2025 at 8:50AM, flies were observed on Resident #8's room.During a subsequent observation on 8/13/2025 at 9:27AM, Resident #8's room was observed with several flies on the pillow, at the bedside chair, on the call bell cord, on the bedside table napkin, on the bed sheets, on the closet door and on the Resident #8's big toe and on the urinal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0948 — isolated
    Ensure that paid feeding assistants have the training they need.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey 8/11/25-8/15/25, the facility did not ensure individuals working in the facility under the title Home Health Aides, had successfully completed a State-approved training program for feeding residents for 12 of 12 employees reviewed (Home Health Aides #4, #8, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40 and #41.) Specifically, there was no documentation the Home Health Aides received the required training to feed residents and Home Health Aide # 4 was observed feeding Residents on more than one occasion and Home Health Aide#38 and #36 were observed feeding residents on the Dementia Unit.Findings include:The facility policy titled Home Health Aide Utilization and Scope of Duties dated 9/8/22 documented Home Health Aides are to be utilized within the scope of duties outlined in their job description. Home Health Aides provide non-clinical support services that contribute to the comfort, safety and wellbeing of residents and work…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00355663) the facility did not ensure the resident representative was immediately informed of a significant change in the resident's physical status or a need to alter treatment significantly for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes. Specifically, Resident #1's representative was not notified when the resident had a Midline Catheter (Intravenous Catheter) inserted. Findings include: The facility notifications policy dated 1/2017 last reviewed 1/2025 documented the clinical nurse will recognize and appropriately intervene in the event of change in resident's condition. The facility will notify the resident, attending physician and representative of changes in the resident's condition and or status. Resident #1 had diagnoses including dementia, end stage renal disease, and coronary artery disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) (assessment tool) dated 8/14/24 documented the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident required moderate to maximal assistance for all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview conducted during the abbreviated survey (NY00352849) the facility did not ensure that residents remained free from abuse for one of three (Resident #7) reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, for Resident #7 with documented ongoing aggressive behaviors and refusal of medication/s, there was no documented evidence that care plan interventions were evaluated to determine effectiveness to ensure resident safety. Subsequently, on 8/28/2024 Resident #7 propelled their wheelchair hitting another resident as staff assisted the other resident up off the floor and on 9/4/2024 Resident #7 struck Resident #10 in the stomach which caused a fall and resulted in Resident #10 sustaining a left side hematoma of the head, right wrist fracture, left femoral intertrochanteric (hip) fracture. The findings include: Resident # 7 had diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder, and psychotic disorder. The 9/20/2023 Care Plan tited At Risk for Abuse documented identify pattern of behaviors and redirect negative behaviors. The care plan was updated on 8/29/2024 to include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00331614) the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations of abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours to the state survey agency for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Abuse (Resident #5). Specifically, Resident #5 made an accusation of abuse on 1/15/2024 and that was not reported to the state agency until 1/17/2024. In addition, there was no documented evidence of the 5-day investigation report submission to the Department of Health either. Findings included: Resident # 4 had diagnoses including bipolar disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented moderately impaired cognition, with behaviors, and required moderate-maximum assistance with activities of daily living. The Investigation Report documented that Resident #5 called 911 on 1/15/2024 at 6:00AM and made an allegation of being beaten and raped. Law enforcement and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during an abbreviated survey (NY00332451), the facility did not ensure that 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) investigated for abuse received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and resident preferences to promote mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, on 1/29/24, Resident #4 made an allegation of abuse. The Accident and Incident report, nursing notes and care plans documented a referral to psychiatry was made. There was no documented evidence that the referral was completed. The findings included: Resident # 4 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to status post fall and right elbow injury triad, alcoholic cirrhosis, and hypertension. The Comprehensive Care Plan titled At Risk for Abuse dated 9/21/23 documented the resident will show no signs or symptoms of abuse. The Physician Order dated 9/21/23 documented Psychiatric Consult as needed. The admission Minimum Data Set,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00355610, NY00353621, NY00356241) the facility did not ensure residents' right to be free from abuse for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #1,#2, #3, #4) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (1) on 9/7/2024 Resident #1 who was assessed as having aggressive behavior walked up to Resident #2 in the dining room and pushed them from behind. Resident #2 complained of back pain, was given Tylenol, and sent to the emergency room for evaluation. On 9/26/2024 Resident #1 struck Resident #2 on the right ear, and they sustained an abrasion. First aid was administered to Resident #2, and Resident #2 was transferred to the emergency room for further evaluation. The corrective action for both incidents with Resident #1 and Resident #2 documented to keep the residents separated. There were no specific interventions on the care plan to address the behaviors and the investigation concluded that there was no cause to believe any alleged resident abuse or mistreatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00355610, NY00353621, NY00356241), the facility did not ensure submission of the report of the results of an investigation to the New York State Department of Health within 5 working days of the incident. This was evident for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (1) on 9/7/2024 Resident #2 reported that they were pushed by Resident #1. The 5-day investigative conclusion report was not submitted to the New York State Department of Health until 10/3/2024; (2) On 9/26/2024 Resident #2 reported they were struck on the right ear by Resident #1 and sustained an abrasion to their right ear. The 5-day investigative conclusion report was not submitted to the New York State Department of Health until 10/25/2024; (3) On 10/3/2024 Resident #3 and Resident #4 were found lying naked in Resident #4's bed during staff rounds. The 5-day investigative conclusion report was not submitted to the New York State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY003355610, NY00353621), the facility did not ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed, updated, and revised for 2 out of 4 residents (Resident #1, #2) reviewed for care planning. Specifically, (1) on 9/7/2024 Resident #2 reported Resident #1 pushed them from behind. Review of Resident #1's abuse care plan revealed it was not updated to reflect the incident; (2) On 9/7/2024 Resident #2 was reportedly pushed from behind by Resident #1. Review of Resident #2's risk for abuse care plan revealed no documented evidence of updating from the 9/7/2024 incident. Review of Resident #2's psychosocial care plan last revised 10/28/2024 revealed it was not updated with the incident that occurred on 9/26/2024. The findings are: The facility Care Plan policy last revised 8/2024 documented the facility will develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan for each resident. Care plan development, renewal and revision will be based upon the results of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated survey (NY00339167 & NY00345633) completed on 12/30/24, the facility did not ensure that their facility assessment included an evaluation of the overall number of facility staff that are needed to ensure that each resident's needs are met. Findings include: The Facility Assessment last updated on 10/10/24 has a section on page six titled the staffing plan where it documents the facility nursing levels are based on an average daily census of 185. This section further states that continued efforts are being made to maintain adequate staffing levels while experiencing a state of emergency in the state of NY regarding the health care worker shortage. This is the only section that documents staffing plans and it does not indicate any actual staffing minimum numbers. During an interview on 12/27/24 at 11:45 am the Staffing Coordinator stated that the staffing requirements are as follows: Day time shift 7:00 am to 3:00 pm there should be 1 Nurse Manager for each unit, and a Licensed Practical Nurse and/or a Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00340395, NY00339018) the facility did not ensure comprehensive care plans included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment or discharge plans for 2 out of 3 (Resident #2, Resident #4) residents reviewed for discharge planning. Specifically, Resident #2 had no discharge care plan initiated for the resident on admission and they were discharged from the facility on 4/1/2024. Resident #4 was discharged from the facility on 4/15/2024 and there was no documented evidence of a discharge care plan initiated on admission for the resident. Findings include: The facility care planning/process and care conference dated 7/2017 and last revised 7/3/2023 documented an interdisciplinary baseline care plan will be initiated upon admission by the admitting nurse and competed within 48 hours. Social service, dietician, therapy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00340395, NY00339018) the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 3 (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5) out of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #3 who had a history of falls had a total of 3 falls in a month (3/3/2024, 3/19/2024, 3/24/2024) and a 4th fall on 4/3/2024. Resident #3 sustained acute left femoral neck fracture with slight varus angulation. There was no documented evidence of timely updates/interventions after each fall to prevent reoccurrence. The resident's fall risk care plan was not updated after each fall and no new interventions were put in place. Findings include: The facility Falls Prevention and Management policy dated 3/1/2016 and last revised 1/12/2023 documented the interdisciplinary team identifies and implements appropriate interventions to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey, ( NY00333646) it was determined for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Quality of Care, the facility did not ensure a Baseline Care Plan was developed and implemented for each newly admitted resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective care within 48 hours of a resident's admission and that a summary of the Baseline Care Plan was provided to the resident and/or their representative. Specifically Resident #1's baseline care plan was not developed by nursing to provide direction for diabetic care and there was no documented evidence the plan was provided to the resident's representative. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure Admission dated 7/1/2023 documented a Baseline Care Plan would be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diabetes, Cerebrovascular disease, and Alzheimer's disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during an Abbreviated survey (#NY00333646) the facility did not ensure 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, Resident #1's hospital discharge orders for blood glucose monitoring and insulin were not reviewed or clarified. Findings include: The facility policy titled admission Process dated 07/2016 and last review 02/2024, documented residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to achieve the highest practicable level of function. The facility will obtain the appropriate physician orders from the discharge facility, if applicable. The Registered Nurse/Licensed Practical Nurse will verify the admission orders with the attending physician. The Registered Nurse/Licensed Practical Nurse will reconcile medications orders with the physician based on the discharge instructions from the transferring facility. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview and record review conducted during an Abbreviated survey (NY 00333646), the facility did not ensure sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing related services for the residents on 1 of 6 units (Unit 1 West) reviewed for staffing. Specifically, on 2/04/24 the facility did not have a licensed nurse on Unit 1 [NAME] from 3 PM to 6 PM when Resident #1 suffered a medical emergency requiring the resident's family to call 911 for assistance. Findings include: A review of the Policy and Procedure titled Staffing dated 11/29/22, and revised 7/1/23, documented the facility will provide sufficient staffing to meet needed care. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diabetes, Cerebrovascular disease, and Alzheimer's disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 2/4/24 documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition, required moderate assistance with toileting and transfers, supervision with eating and bed mobility, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey from 6/26/23-6/30/23, the facility did not ensure that residents were adequately equipped to call for assistance through a communication system that relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area. Specifically, resident bathrooms were observed to have call bells without pull strings, making the call bell inaccessible if resident was on the floor. This was evident for 2 of 2 residential floors. The findings include but are not limited to: 1. On 6/26/23 at 11:35 AM, it was observed that the call bell located in the bathroom of resident room [ROOM NUMBER], was activated by pushing button in toward the wall, however no pull string was attached to be accessible from the floor. 2. On 6/26/23 at 12:25 PM, it was observed that the call bell located in the bathroom of resident room [ROOM NUMBER], was activated by pushing button in toward the wall, however no pull string was attached to be accessible from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (#NY00304291) from 6/26/23-6/30/23, the facility did not ensure all alleged incidents involving injuries of unknown origin were reported to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) immediately, but no later than two hours after the time of the incident occurrence. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #94) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #94 sustained an injury of unknown origin resulting in a fracture to their left humorous (upper arm) bone, and there was no evidence the incident was reported to the NYSDOH in the required time frame. The findings include: A facility policy last revised 9/8/2022 titled Abuse Policy- Prevention and Management, documented after a resident sustains an injury of unknown source, the facility Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), or designee shall notify the appropriate Agency/State office according to State specific guidelines for timeliness of reporting as applicable. Resident #94 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey from 6/26/23-6/30/23, the facility did not ensure that a resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #84) reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, Resident #84's care plan documented the need for a weighted mug, and on three observations the weighted mug was not provided on Resident #84's meal tray. Findings include: Resident #84 had diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, encephalopathy and Alzheimer's disease. The Policy and Procedure titled Care Plan, dated 7/2017, documented resident care and interventions must be carried out per the care plan. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 4/24/23 documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with eating. Physician orders dated June 2023 documented an order for dietary adaptive assistive device including a weighted mug. The Nutrition care plan dated June 2023 documented interventions included assistance with eating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 6/26/23-6/30/23, it was determined for 1 of 4 residents (Resident # 76) reviewed for Nutrition, the facility did not ensure the resident was provided the necessary care to maintain, to the extent possible, acceptable body weight. Specifically, Resident #75 had a weight loss of 8.5% in 3 months, the physician was not notified and new interventions were not initiated. Findings include: The Policy and Procedure titled Weight Policy, dated 12/2022, documented the Registered Dietitian (RD) will review the medical record of residents with significant weight changes (i.e. 7.5% loss in 3 months), dietary interventions will be recommended as needed, and all weight changes will be reported to the physician. Resident #76 was admitted to facility with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, dementia, and anxiety disorder. The 5/9/2023 Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) annual assessment, documented Resident #76 had intact cognition and received extensive assist of 1 person with eating. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey from 6/26/23-6/30/23, the facility did not ensure that Infection Control practices and procedures were maintained. Specifically, Resident #90's Foley (indwelling) catheter bag was observed on the floor without the use of a barrier, and was observed on a soiled floor mat covered with a towel. Findings include: Resident #90 had diagnoses including obstructive and reflux uropathy, other urinary incontinence, and malignant neoplasm of the brain. The facility policy for Foley Catheter, dated 4/25/22, documented infection control considerations including do not allow catheter bag or tubing to lay on floor, and if resident in low bed place catheter bag and tubing in dignity bag and or wash basin to avoid lying on floor. During observation on 6/27/23 at 9:18 AM Resident #90 was in bed, and the indwelling catheter bag was observed uncovered on the floor. During observation on 6/29/23 at 9:21 AM Resident #90 was in bed, and the indwelling catheter bag was observed on a soiled floor mat covered with a cloth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 6/26/23 - 6/30/23, the facility did not provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. This was evident for one resident (Resident #90) on the 1 [NAME] unit. Specifically, Resident #90 was not provided a long enough bed and the control unit for the resident's alternating mattress was soiled and on the floor. An undated policy and procedure titled Resident Room Cleaning documented Daily cleaning will ensure optimum levels of cleanliness and sanitation, prohibit the spread of infection and bacteria, and maintain the outward appearance of the facility. Steps in the daily cleaning included to clean and dust all vertical and horizontal surfaces using a clean cloth soaked in or sprayed with disinfectant cleaner. Findings include: On 6/27/23 at 9:07 AM, Resident #90 was observed sitting up in a bed without a footboard, and their heels and feet extended past the end of their mattress without support. The control unit for the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F550 Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during a recertification survey, it could not be ensured that the facility residents were treated with respect and dignity. Specifically, for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #41, #72 and #108) reviewed for dignity, 1) Resident #41 was interviewed in a common area in proximity of other residents and staff, 2) staff did not respond in a timely manner to a meal request for Resident #72, and 3) staff did not assist Resident #108 with her meal at the same time as her tablemates. The findings are: 1. Resident #41 is [AGE] year-old who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Non-Traumatic Intra-Cerebral Hemorrhage, Anxiety and Depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) dated 7/24/2020 documented Resident #41 had intact cognition and requires physical assistance of one person for activities of daily living. During an observation on 10/13/2020 at 9:10 AM, Resident #41 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey it could not be ensured that the facility properly stored perishable foods and maintain food storage equipment in accordance with standards for food service safety. Specifically, several items of perishable foods were not properly dated and 3 of 3 refrigerators used to store items brought in by residents' families were not maintained in sanitary condition. The findings are: 1. The facility Policy and Procedure dated 5/14/2018 and titled, Labeling and Dating stated that all foods must be labeled with either a manufacturers label or handwritten label, all food items must be dated with a received date preceded by an R or the word Received, all pulled/defrosting bulk products will be labeled with a pull date preceded by a P and utilized within the number of days noted on the package or on the Quick Reference Shelf Life List provided by the food service vendor. Furthermore, the dining services manager on duty will check perishables for proper labeling and dating twice per day. The initial tour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    F880 Based on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, it cannot be ensured that the facility practiced proper infection control. Specifically, an observation of 5 of 5 residents (# 6, #20, #35, #103 and #108) revealed did not clean the pulse oximeter before and after each use, did not place a barrier between the pulse oximeter and table and staff did not perform hand hygiene after each use of the pulse oximeter. Furthermore, one staff did not perform hand hygiene after each resident contact for 3 of 3 residents (#4, #6, and #103) observed during dining . Findings include: The 4/14/2004 and last revised 9/10/2019 Policy and Procedure titled, Hand Hygiene indicated that a pathogen can contaminate the hands of staff during contact with residents or contact with contaminated equipment. Review of October 2020 Physician's Orders showed that Residents #6, #20, #35, #103 and #108 are to have pulse oximeter checks every shift. During observation on 10/6/2020 at 11:05AM, a facility Home Health Aide (HHA #1) was performing pulse oximeter checks in the 2 North…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-10-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the Recertification survey, it cannot be ensured that the facility provided Advanced Directives services. Specifically, no evidence was available to verify that staff periodically reassessed residents' desires regarding Advanced Directives or that facility staff communicated residents' wishes to the physician. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #30) reviewed for Advanced Directives. The facility Policy and Procedure titled, Advance Directives/Advance Care Planning dated 11/5/2005 and revised 5/2015 revealed the facility's Social Work Department leads ongoing education to all residents regarding their right to execute advance directives during care planning. Furthermore, on an individual basis, advance directives include a Health Care Proxy. Any advanced directives obtained or executed during a residents' stay will be placed in the advance directive section of the medical record, and existing advance directives will be reviewed as part of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BETHEL OP HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST43%since 05/05/2023
JSB BETHEL HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST43%since 05/05/2023
SCHWARTZ, JOELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 05/05/2023
BLEIER, AHARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST9%since 05/05/2023
BLEIER, SORAHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL34%since 05/05/2023
SOD, LEAHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL42%since 05/05/2023
SOFIA, LISAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL5%since 05/01/2023
DIAMOND, GILADIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/05/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-28.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 14%Other / private 18%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$490per resident / day
operating cost
$14,894per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$380per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335806. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next