St Cabrini Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 378 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 221 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 304 beds and averages 287.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews during the abbreviated survey (2674027) the facility did not ensure that care was taken to protect the privacy of personal information to safeguard the content of the medical records from the unauthorized users. Specifically, on 1/29/2026 a surveyor observed on multiple units (unit 3 North and 2 South) medication carts unlocked and unattended with no privacy screen applied. on the computer. 1) at 10: 42am and 10:46am the surveyor observed on 3 north medication carts left unlocked and with no privacy screens applied. 2) On unit 2 south at 11:00 am and 11:03 am the surveyor observed medication carts on the unit left unattended with no privacy screen on the computer.Review of a Resident Rights to Privacy Policy dated 8/2004 documented it is the policy of the facility to treat each resident with consideration, respect, and full recognition of their dignity and individuality, including privacy in treatment and in the care for their personal needs.During an observation on 1/29/2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews during the abbreviated survey (2674027) the facility failed to assure that medications were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents. Specifically, on 1/29/2026 surveyor observed on unit 3 North 10: 42am and 10:46 am medication carts on the unit left unlocked, unattended with no privacy screen on the computer. On unit 2 south at 11:00 am and 11:03 am observed medication carts on the unit left unlocked, unattended with no privacy screen on the computer.Review of the facility's Medication Storage policy dated 12/2020 documented medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medication.During an observation on 1/29/2026 at 10:42 am observed the medication cart left in the hallway unlocked and unattended. At 10:45 am Unit Manager #…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the recertification and abbreviated survey (NY00365065) from May 13, 2025, to May 20, 2025, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for Resident #489 reviewed for quality of care. Specifically, the physician was not notified timely of an 8/9/24 consultant cardiologist recommendation to reduce Carvedilol (used to treat heart failure and high blood pressure) from 25 mg to 6.25 mg. Subsequently Resident #489 continued to receive Carvedilol 25 mg until 8/13/24. The findings included: The policy and procedure titled Outside Facility Medical Consultation, dated January 2019, required nursing staff to complete a consult form and notify the attending physician of the consult report. A completed consultation form should be left for the physician's review. Resident #489 had diagnoses including chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The 6/13/2024 admission Minimum Data Set Assessment documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated Survey (NY00325770), the facility did not ensure a resident who was incontinent of bowel received appropriate treatment and services to assure normal bowel function as possible for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for bowel care. Specifically, Resident #1's constipation care plan and the facility policy 'Bowel Protocol' were not followed. There was no documented evidence that the Physician was notified that the resident had no documented bowel movements from 08/01/2023 to 08/05/2023. The Findings are: The facility policy on Bowel Protocol last revised on 12/2017 documented that resident's bowel movements will be monitored and documented on the certified nurse aide (CNA) accountability each shift, and if a resident does not have a bowel movement in 72 hours (or 3 days), the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) will report to the nurse, the nurse will report to the Physician, and the Physician may order a bowel protocol. The nurse will update the care plan and document in a progress note, the events of the bowel protocol. Resident #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the 5/10/23 to 5/18/23 recertification survey, the facility did not ensure all residents had the right to a dignified existence for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #153 and #43) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, (1) A Nurse was observed removing an Intravenous Therapy (IV) from the arm of Resident #153 in the dining room and (2) Resident #43 had a urinary drainage bag that was not covered and was visible from the hallway. Findings include: The policy and procedure titled Quality of Life-Dignity last revised 5/2022 documented staff shall promote, maintain, and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy, during assistance with personal care and treatment procedures. 1) Resident #153 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, history of Malignant Thyroid Neoplasm and Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Unspecified Lung. The 3/1/23 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview conducted during the 5/10/23 to 5/18/23 Recertification Survey, the facility did not ensure that the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS, a resident assessment tool) accurately reflected the resident's status. Specifically, Resident #224's diagnosis of Psychosis was not documented on MDS Assessments dated 5/07/21, 8/03/21, 11/01/21, 1/28/22, 4/18/22, 7/01/22, 9/29/22, and 1/30/23. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure titled Minimum Data Set effective date: 1/11, last revised 5/2019, documented the facility will use the MDS 3.0 RAI User's Manual for completing the Minimum Data Set to establish and maintain an ongoing process of assessment, care planning, evaluating and revising resident's care in order to attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental and psycho-social functioning as possible the assessment process will include reviewing the resident medical record Resident # 224…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the 5/10/23 to 5/18/23 recertification survey it was determined for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #127) reviewed for range of motion/position mobility, the facility did not ensure all residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent a further decrease in range of motion. Specifically, Resident #127 required left hand resting splint as per therapy evaluations and recommendations and was observed without the resting splint in place. The findings are: The Policy and Procedure titled Range of Motion last revised 5/2019 documented the nurse manager, or nursing supervisor in collaboration with the Rehabilitation Department determined the type and frequency of Range of Motion (ROM) to be done on selected joints. This determination and approach were to be documented on the care plan. Resident # 127 was admitted to the facility 3/23/22 and had diagnoses that included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Muscle Weakness and Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interviews during the 5/10/23 to 5/18/23 recertification survey, the facility did not ensure residents were provided nutritional supplementation consistent with the resident's plan of care for one of two residents (Resident #135) reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, Resident #135 did not receive their nutritional supplement as ordered by the physician. The findings are: The Policy and Procedure titled Nutrition Supplement Monitoring dated 2/2020, documented residents with weight loss or at risk for weight loss were provided with nutritional supplements as ordered by physician. Resident #135 was admitted to facility on 4/26/19 with diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia, Hypo-Osmolality and Hyponatremia. The physician orders documented on: - 10/21/22, 120 milliliter (ml) Milkshakes 3 times a day with meals; - 12/19/22, Magic cup 4 oz. at lunch meals; - 2/17/23, Liquid Protein Supplement (LPS) Sugar Free (SF) 30 ml 3 times a day; - 3/17/23, HI Cal 4 oz. 3 times a day; and - 5/11/23, Magic cup 4 oz. at supper. The 11/4/22 weight report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review during a recertification survey from 5/10/23 to 5/18/23, the facility did not ensure that an infection surveillance plan based on the facility assessment was implemented for identifying, tracking, and monitoring infections, communicable diseases, and outbreaks. Specifically, infections were not being documented on the infection line list at onset of signs and symptoms of infection. The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure Infection Surveillance effective 9/2002, and last updated 6/2022, documented an infection control program is developed and implemented to identify and investigate infections, to control the spread of infections The Infection line listing is to collect data on each potential or actual infection and to evaluate the infection control methods and to identify and clarify problems with policies or techniques, and bring to the attention of the Safety Committee and QAPI Committee. A review of the Infection Preventionist's Infections logs documented: Skin & Wound Infections Methycillin Resistant Staff Aureus…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-04-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey the facility did not ensure that care plan interventions had been evaluated for their effectiveness. Specifically, 1) care plan interventions to prevent further weight loss were not reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #199); 2) care plan interventions were not updated to address a resident's decline in urinary status and to potentially restore bladder function, for one of two residents reviewed for urinary incontinence (Resident #31); and 3) the care plan for Resident #63 was not updated to address the resident's issue with ongoing loose stools. The findings are: 1) Resident #199 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including; Hypertension, Alzheimer's Disease and Chronic Right Foot Ulcer, non-pressure. The admission minimum data set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 5/25/18 indicated the resident was 60 inches tall and weighed 115 lbs at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 101 rows in the source record cover these 39 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY