Daleview Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 288 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 132 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 142 beds and averages 136.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure each resident has the right to be free from chemical restraints not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This was identified for one (Resident #1) of five (5) residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, Resident #1 with diagnosis of major depressive disorder was seen by a psychiatrist on 03/31/2026 who provided a recommendation to reduce the resident's quetiapine (an antipsychotic) dosage from 100 milligrams twice a day to 25 milligrams twice a day for seven days and then discontinue the medication. The facility did not respond to the psychiatry consultation until 05/06/2026, when the facility lowered the dosage as per the psychiatrist recommendation.The findings include:The facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medications, dated 12/01/2025, documented after medications are ordered for a resident, the staff and practitioner shall seek an appropriate dose and duration for each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure it implemented a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet each resident's medical and nursing needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #43) of two (2) residents reviewed for skin conditions. Specifically, Resident #42 had a physician's order to offload heels at all times. On multiple occasions while the resident was in bed, the resident's heels were directly in contact with a pillow and were not being offloaded.The findings include:Resident #43 was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebrovascular accident. The 04/16/2026 admission Minimum Data Set assessment documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10, indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had a diabetic ulcer and was at risk for pressure ulcer development. The resident required partial/moderate assistance for bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews during survey, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team to reflect each resident's preferences and status after each assessment. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #117) of three (3) residents reviewed for skin conditions. Specifically, Resident # 117 had a physician order for compression socks for both legs in the morning and remove at bedtime. Resident #117's care plan did not include the use of ace bandage (an elastic compression wraps designed to reduce swelling) on both legs during the day and remove at night for chronic venous insufficiency (a condition when the leg vein valves are damaged or weakened).The findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled, Care Plans last revised on 12/2025 documented that all residents will have a plan of care review initially and then no less than every 90 days. Problem statements, goals and interventions will be reviewed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during survey the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to each resident consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. This was identified for one (Resident #148) of one resident reviewed for pain management. Specifically, Resident #148 was admitted to the facility with chronic bilateral elbow pain; however, there was no pain medication ordered. In addition, when the resident reported sever pain rating of 8 out of a scale of 0-10 (a scale used to measure pain intensity, where 0 equals no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain) to a Registered Nurse Supervisor, the resident did not receive pain medication for more than two hours.The findings include:The facility policy titled Pain Assessment, dated September 2025, documented pain is difficult to define because of multidimensional aspects. All residents admitted for care management will be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews during the survey the facility failed to ensure it provided pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #146) of five (5) residents observed during the medication administration task. Specifically, during the medication administration observation for Resident#146, Licensed Practical Nurse #5 crushed an extended-release (designed to slowly release the medication) potassium chloride tablet. The blister pack for the extended-release potassium chloride tablet had a direction sticker that read do not crush.The findings include:The facility policy titled Medication Administration: General Policies and Practices, dated 12/01/2025, documented prior to administering medications, the staff nurse: reads the order carefully in its entirety, noting the name, dosage, route, and time of administration, making certain the dosages, frequency and schedules correspond with the physician's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. This was identified for one (1) (unit 3) of three (3) units observed during the initial tour and for one (1) (medication cart for Unit 2) of three (3) medication carts reviewed during the medication storage and labeling task. Specifically, 1) Unit Three (3) shower room had unlabeled cream on the ledge in the shower room. 2) Unit Two (2) medication cart was observed with an insulin pen, and an eye drop bottle without a date to indicate when the medications were first opened to determine when the medications should be discarded.The findings include:The facility policy and procedure titled, Medications: Storage and Handling last revised on 12/12/2025 documented that medications and biologicals are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and only authorized personnel have access to the keys. Medications and biologicals past their expiration dates are removed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the survey, the facility failed to maintain medical records that are complete and accurately documented. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #28) of three (3) residents reviewed for catheter. Specifically, Resident #28's contact precautions were discontinued on 04/21/2026; however, the resident's medical record was not updated to reflect discontinuation of the contact precautions in Resident #28's electronic medical record (EMR).The findings include: The facility's policy titled Charting and Documentation dated 09/2025 documented all services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. Resident #28 was admitted with diagnoses including neurogenic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure it maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. This was identified for one (Resident #43) of two residents reviewed for skin conditions and for one (1) (Unit 2 medication cart) of three (3) medication carts reviewed during the medication storage and labeling task. Specifically, 1) during the wound care observation for Resident #43, Licensed Practical Nurse #6 did not sanitize the overbed table before placing the wound care supplies on top of the table. Additionally, Licensed Practical Nurse #6 did not sanitize their hands after removing the dirty dressings from the foot wounds and prior to applying the clean treatments. 2) Licensed Practical Nurse #1 did not use an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved cleaning agent to sanitize the glucometer (a handheld device used to measure the concentration of sugars in the blood) machine after using the machine for each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey, initiated on 2/24/2025 and completed on 2/28/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. This was identified for two (Resident #90 and Resident #237) of three residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, 1) during a wound care observation of Resident #90's left buttock Stage 2 Pressure ulcer (wound with partial thickness loss of skin) on 2/26/2025, another stage Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer was observed on the right buttock. There was no documented evidence of an assessment or a Physician's order for treatment for the right buttock pressure ulcer. The wound care nurse administered treatment on Resident #90's right buttock wound without any Physician's Order 2) Resident #237 was assessed with a Stage 3 pressure ulcer to the sacrum.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/24/2025 and completed on 2/28/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident's environment remained free of accident hazards. This was identified for one (Resident #21) of four residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, an oxygen E-Cylinder tank (portable oxygen tank) was observed on the right side of Resident #21's bed. The E-Cylinder tank was not secured in a rolling safety stand or a metal rack. The finding is: The facility's policy, titled Oxygen Closet last revised on 9/2024, documented the facility would maintain an adequate supply of oxygen needed for the administration of oxygen. A minimum of two small E-Cylinder tanks will be maintained on each unit for emergency purposes. Oxygen tanks not secured on tank dollies or the E-tank rack, will be secured to the wall with chains. Resident #21 was admitted with diagnoses including Acute Renal Failure with Hypoxia (absence of enough oxygen in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY