Fairport Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 151 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 196 beds and averages 138.2 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 05/05/2025 to 05/13/2025, the facility did not ensure they had an Infection Preventionist who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention Control Practices. Specifically, the facility could not provide verification and documentation of the Infection Preventionist designated onsite hours for the assessing, developing, implementing, monitoring, and managing the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. The findings include: The Facility Assessment, reviewed on 04/30/2025, included that the facility has an infection prevention and control program that is headed by a certified Infection Preventionist Registered Nurse who develops and monitor the systems needed for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigation, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, and volunteers. The Infection Preventionist report to the QAPI committee each month For additional information see Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services Form 2567, reference…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey 05/05/2025 to 05/13/2025, the facility did not appropriately label and store all medications in accordance with currently accepted professional standards of practice and in accordance with stated and federal laws for eight (8) of 14 medication carts and five (5) of eight (8) medication rooms reviewed. Specifically, medications were left unattended by staff, multiple expired medications were stored in medication carts and medication rooms, loose unlabeled and uncovered pills were stored in multiple medication carts, narcotic medications were kept for multiple deceased residents over an extended period of time (versus returning to pharmacy) and narcotic sheets were missing signatures to verify that the narcotic medication counts were completed, correct and signed by two nurses. The findings include but not limited to the following: Review of the facility policy Medication Storage/Med Cart, dated May 2024, documented the medication cart shall be secured during medication passes and must be securely locked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 05/05/2025 to 05/12/2025, for six (6) (Third Floor A, E, F, and G-units, Second Floor A and F-units) of 10 resident units, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, there were undated and unlabeled food items, microwaves and a freezer were dirty, there were outdated food items, food warming/holding units were not functioning properly, cups and lids were stored below sink plumbing, and there were moldy bread items. The findings are: The undated facility Food Storage Policy included all foods must be labeled with product name, date received/prepared, and expiration or use by date. Spills must be cleaned immediately, and housekeeping/maintenance maintain cleanliness and report any equipment issues. During observations and interview on 05/07/2025 from 12:05 PM to 12:40 PM, the Third Floor G-unit kitchenette had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0868 — pattern
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 05/05/2025 to 05/13/2025, the facility did not maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee consisting at a minimum of the Director of Nursing Services, the Medical Director or his/her designee, at least three other members of the facility's staff, one of who must be an individual in a leadership role, and the Infection Preventionist. Specifically, the facility could not provide documented evidence the Infection Preventionist participated in the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meetings on a regular basis. This is evidenced by the following: The undated facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program policy documented the quality and appropriateness of resident care, including the identification of trends in performance were monitored and evaluated in infection control. The policy did not include the Infection Preventionist as a committee member. The Facility Assessment, dated 04/30/2025, documented the facility had an infection prevention and control…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during a Recertification Survey from 05/05/2025 to 05/13/2025, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for seven (7) (Residents #9, #41, #45, #87, #94, #121, and #384) of 12 residents reviewed. Specifically, for Residents #45, #87, and #94, a Licensed Practical Nurse tested their blood glucose (sugar) levels using a glucometer (a machine used to test blood glucose levels using a drop of blood from the resident's finger) without cleaning the glucometer between each resident's use or after. For Resident #9, a Licensed Practical Nurse tested their blood glucose level at the dining room table without completing hand hygiene, without wearing gloves, and without cleaning the glucometer. For Resident #41 who as on enhanced barrier precautions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 05/05/2025 to 05/13/2025, for seven (7) (first floor E and F-units, second floor A, E, F, and H-units, and third floor E-unit) of 10 resident units, the facility did not properly maintain the resident call system. Specifically, the nurse call system did not function properly to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized work area from each resident's bedside and toilet/bathing facilities, and clean utility rooms lacked nurse call annunciators. The findings are: During an observation on 05/06/2025 at 10:27 AM, there was no centralized nurse call station panel or annunciator at the second floor H-unit nurses' station, and staff did not carry phones or pagers connected to the nurse call system. During an observation on 05/06/2025 at 10:59 AM, there was no centralized nurse call station panel or annunciator at the second floor F-unit nurses' station. During an interview on 05/08/2025 at 11:42 AM, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during a Recertification Survey from [DATE] to [DATE], for two (2) (Residents #124 and #332) of four (4) residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that all residents had the right to request, refuse, or formulate an advance directive (a resident's wishes to be or not to be resuscitated in the event of an acute cardiac or pulmonary arrest) that would be honored. Specifically, Resident #124 and Resident #332 had current phyisician's orders regarding their advanced directive wishes in the event of cardiac or pulmonary arrest that was not consistent with their signed Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) directives. The findings include: The facility policy Advance Directives and Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment, dated [DATE], documented it shall be the responsibility of the nursing, medical and social work teams to determine each resident's preference for Advance Directives upon admission to the Facility. The Medical Orders for Life…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 05/05/2025 to 05/13/2025, for one (1) (Resident #110) of one (1) resident reviewed the facility did not ensure the right to be free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Specifically, Resident #121 who was able to self-propel (move themselves) in their wheelchair was observed on multiple occasions to have their wheelchair wheels locked, who was trying to self-propel, and was unable to. The finding includes: The facility policy Restraints, dated June 2023, documented the resident has a right to be free from any physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Restraints of any type will not be used as a punishment or as a substitute for more effective medical and nursing care or for the convenience of the facility staff.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 05/05/2025 to 05/13/2025, for two (2) (Residents #43 and #131) of 12 residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were reported to the New York State Department of Health in accordance with state law. Specifically, for Resident #43, the resident reported potential abuse and neglect to a Licensed Practical Nurse who did not report the residents concerns to nursing leadership and the alleged incident was not reported to the Department of Health. For Resident #131, the facility did not report to the Department of Health an incident where the resident was found to have a femur fracture (broken thigh bone) of unknown cause. The findings include: The facility policy Abuse Prevention and Management, dated November 2024, included the facility has designed and implemented processes, which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 05/05/2025 to 05/13/2025, for 1 (Resident #131) of 12 residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that an incident was thoroughly investigated to rule out abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Specifically, Resident #131 had complaints of hip pain, was found to have a femur fracture (broken thigh bone) and the facility was unable to provide documented evidence (including statements from all involved staff members or potential witnesses) that the incident was thoroughly investigated to rule out abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. The findings include: The facility policy Abuse Prevention and Management, dated November 2024, documented the facility has designed and implemented processes, which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident/patient abuse, neglect, mistreatment. The shift supervisor was responsible for immediate initiation of the reporting process. The Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Risk Manager were responsible for completing an investigation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY