Taconic Rehabilitation And Nursing At Hopewell

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 368 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 163 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 142.8 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview during a recertification survey from 2/05/2026 to 2/12/2026, the facility did not ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, twelve (12) food items were not properly identified and dated in the kitchen refrigerators, freezers, and food storage areas.The findings include:The policy titled Food Receiving and Storage last revised December 2012, documented all opened items would be labeled, dated and discarded after three (3) days once opened. On 2/05/2025 at 9:31 AM, the initial inspection of the kitchen was conducted with the Food Service Manager, and the following were observed:One (1) gallon container of milk with no opened date and a one (1) quart container of half & half with no opened date in the night prep refrigerator.One (1) bag of chicken tenders with no identification label and one (1) bag of meatless chicken tenders with no identification label in the walk-in-refrigerator.One (1) bag of frozen pizza with no identification label and one (1) container of hot dogs with no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that staff facilitated the inclusion of the resident or resident representative in all aspects of person-centered care planning that supports the resident's goals, choices, and preferences including potential for return to a community setting for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for Discharge. Specifically, Resident #22 was admitted on [DATE] for short term rehabilitation and there was no documented evidence that Resident #22 and/or their representative were invited to participate in the Comprehensive Care Plan meeting. Additionally, there was no documented evidence that evaluation of Resident #22's discharge needs and/or options was ongoing prior to notification of their Medicare coverage ending on 01/23/2026. The findings include:Resident #22 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included repeated falls, chronic kidney disease, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (noncancerous enlargement of the prostate).The 01/01/2026 Social Work…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey and abbreviated survey (NY002683111) the facility did not ensure that grievances were resolved in a timely manner for (2) two of (4) four residents (Residents #24, and #162) reviewed for Personal Property. Specifically, 1) Resident #24 was missing a red flip phone as of 11/24/2025 and (2) Resident #162 was missing an iPhone case, and gold colored chain and cross as of 11/21/2025. Both residents were not provided with reimbursement as of 2/12/26. The findings include:The policy titled Management of Patient /Resident and Family Complaints Concerns/Grievances effective 01/01/2000 documented the facility would make prompt efforts to resolve complaints/concerns/grievances. The resident and/or designated representative will be instructed of both the facility and the Department of Health complaint procedures verbally and in writing. 1) Resident #24 was admitted to facility with diagnoses including Heart Failure and Depression.The 11/21/2025 quarterly Minimum Data Set (assessment tool) documented Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge was sent to the State Long Term Care Ombudsman for two (2) of three (3) residents (Resident #14, Resident #158) reviewed for Hospitalization. Specifically, 1) there was no documented evidence that a notice of transfer was sent to the New York State Ombudsman when Resident #14 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and 2) there was no documented evidence that a notice of transfer was sent to the New York State Ombudsman when Resident #158 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], The findings include: The policy titled Discharge Notice last revised 06/2025, documented when a resident is temporarily transferred on an emergency basis to an acute care facility, notice of the transfer may be provided to the resident and resident representative as soon as practicable, according to 42 CFR 483.15(c)(4)(ii)(D). Copies of notices for emergency transfers must also still be sent to the ombudsman, but they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility did not ensure accuracy of resident assessments for (1) one of (1) one resident (Resident #110) reviewed for Accidents, and (1) one of (1) one resident (Resident # 2) reviewed for Edema. Specifically, Resident #110 had documented falls on 08/09/2025 and 10/21/2025 that were not identified on their Minimum Dat Set assessments, and Resident #2 had a documented 12/04/2025 facility acquired stage three pressure ulcer that was coded on the Minimum Data Set assessment as having been present on admission to the facility. The findings include: The policy titled Minimum Data Set, last revised 02/2025, documented that the Minimum Data Set is expected to accurately reflect the resident status. 1)Resident #110 had diagnoses including orthopedic conditions, cancer, and osteoarthritis of the knee. The 8/09/2025 Accident /Incident Report documented Resident #110 was observed on the floor in front of their wheelchair. The 9/26/2025 quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment documented no falls anytime in the last month prior to admission, no falls in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised with each assessment and as needed to reflect residents changing needs. This was evident for two (2) (Resident #4 and Resident #11) of five (5) residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medication. Specifically, 1) the cardiac care plan for Resident #4 did not address the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and use of anticoagulants, and 2) the psychosocial care plan for Resident #11 did not address the use of antipsychotic medication. The findings include: The policy titled Interdisciplinary Care Planning last revised 09/25/2025 documented a comprehensive resident-centered care plan is developed by the Interdisciplinary Team upon admission and reviewed/updated on a regular basis throughout the resident's length of stay. 1) Resident #4 diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, and atrial fibrillation. The 01/16/2026 quarterly Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) documented Resident #4 had moderate cognitive impairment and received anticoagulants. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated survey (623104/NY00345976), the facility did not ensure each resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to treat and/or prevent pressure ulcers for two (2) of seven (7) (Residents #13 and Resident #143) reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, 1) Resident #13 who was assessed as at risk for pressure ulcers was not provided heel offload/float as per the comprehensive care plan, 2) Resident #143 who was assessed as at risk for pressure ulcers was not provided heel offload/float as per physician order and comprehensive care plan and a pressure reducing device was not provided as per comprehensive care plan.The findings include:1)Resident #13's diagnoses included bipolar disorder, unspecified dementia without behavior disturbance, and dysphagia.The current care plan titled Skin Integrity documented Resident #13 was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to impaired mobility. Float heels when in bed. The 12/26/2025 quarterly Minimum Data Set (a resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure care consistent with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan was provided for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #13) reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #13 was administered oxygen at a liter flow greater than the current physician's order. Additionally, Certified Nurse Aide #8 did not adhere to enhanced barrier precautions when they had contact with and handled Resident #13's nasal cannula. The findings include:The policy titled Oxygen Therapy, last revised 09/2023, documented oxygen administered by licensed staff. Oxygen administration requires physician order.Resident #13's diagnoses included bipolar disorder, unspecified dementia without behavior disturbance, and dysphagia.The 06/07/2023 care plan titled Impaired Pulmonary Function documented administer oxygen per physician order.The 10/28/2025 physician order documented enhanced barrier precautions stage 4 wound sacrum. The 06/14/2025 physician order documented continuous oxygen via…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00341591), the facility did not have a comprehensive patient centered care plan developed or implemented for 1 (Resident #1) out of three residents reviewed for care planning. Specifically, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility from a local hospital on [DATE] and when they came into the facility, they already had Hospice care in place from the hospital. Review of Resident #1's care plan revealed they did not have a Hospice care plan in place.The facility's policy titled Hospice Services with a revision date of 07/2025 documents that the resident and family participate in developing the care plan where appropriate and that nursing coordinates the plan of care and ongoing collaboration and communication closely with Hospice, the resident and family, and other disciplines. The facility policy titled Interdisciplinary Care Planning last revised 04/15/2024 documented that a comprehensive resident-centered Care Plan is developed by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interviews conducted during the abbreviated Survey (NY00341591), the facility did not provide services in accordance with professional standards of care. Specifically, for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for Hospice, Resident #1 was receiving Hospice care from an outside agency; however, the resident record contained no documentation, orders, progress notes, medical provider notes, or care plans addressing the Hospice care. The facility policy titled Hospice Services last revised 07/2025 documented that nursing coordinates the plan of care and ongoing collaboration and communication closely with Hospice, the resident and family, and other disciplines. The facility policy titled Interdisciplinary Care Planning last revised 04/15/2024 documented that a comprehensive resident-centered Care Plan is developed by the Interdisciplinary Team upon admission and reviewed/updated on a regular basis throughout the resident's length of stay.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included unspecified fracture of right femur,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY