Franklin Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

29.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 74 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 28% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 320 beds and averages 309.7 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences. This was evident for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living out of a total of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #238 was observed to have their call bell out of reach on multiple occasions.The findings include:The facility policy titled Call Bell - Nurse Call System, with an approval date of 06/11/2025 stated that the facility is committed to maintaining a functional and accessible call bell system in all resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas, in compliance with federal regulations. The policy also stated that all residents' rooms, bathrooms, and bathing areas must have accessible call devices within reach of the resident, including when lying on the floor. Resident #238 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including osteomyelitis (a bone…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility to ensure it promoted and facilitated resident self-determination through support of resident choice. This was evident for two (2) residents (Resident #13 and #188) of six (6) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #13's and Resident #188's bathing preferences were not honored. The findings include:The facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living with an approval date of 02/20/2026 stated the facility will ensure that bathing and showering practices, including frequency, method, timing, and assistance, are individualized, clinically appropriate, and aligned with each resident's preferences and needs. 1.Resident #13 had diagnoses which included paraplegia (paralysis or severe weakness of the lower half of the body), hypertension (high blood pressure), and peripheral vascular disease (blood vessels outside the heart and brain become narrowed or blocked). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment (a resident assessment tool) dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident is free from physical restraints imposed for discipline or staff convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This was evident for two (2) residents (Resident #109 and Resident #184) of two (2) residents reviewed for Physical Restraints out of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, 1). Resident #184 was observed on several occasions, lying on a perimeter mattress and, 2). Resident #109 was observed on two occasions, lying on a perimeter mattress with an armchair and pillow wedged on the left side of the bed, in between the upper part of resident's bed and the window area. The findings include: The facility's policy titled Use of Restraints with an approval date of 03/06/2026 stated that a restraint is any physical or mechanical device or intervention that restricts a resident's freedom of movement or access to his/her body. The policy also stated that interventions/devices that may be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised to reflect the resident's status after each assessment. This was evident for one (1) resident (Resident #68) of two (2) residents reviewed for Activities, and one (1) resident (Resident #4) of two (2) residents reviewed for Urinary Catheter, out of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, 1). the comprehensive care plan for Activities for Resident #68, and 2). the comprehensive care plan for bladder care for Resident #4 were not revised after each assessment. The findings include but were not limited to: The facility policy titled Care Planning-Conferences with an approval date of 03/05/2026 documented the facility shall develop, implement, maintain, and timely update a comprehensive, interdisciplinary, and person-centered care plan for each resident based on thorough assessment of the resident's clinical needs, functional status, and individual preferences, to ensure the provision of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality. This was evident for two (2) residents (Residents #7 and #28) observed during Medication Administration. Specifically, 1) Registered Nurse #8 was observed administering intravenous medications without flushing the access line, and 2) Registered Nurse #7 was observed administering multiple medications via gastrostomy tube without flushing the tube with water before and after each medication. The findings include:The standard of practice for maintaining the patency of intravenous catheters, as defined by the Infusion Therapy Standards of practice published by the Infusion Nurses Society in 2024, dictates the administration of antibiotics via the sequence of, saline-administer-heparin-saline, is a standardized flushing sequence designed to maintain vascular access patency, prevent occlusion, and ensure safe medication administration. The standard of practice for preparing and administering medications via enteral tube, as defined by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality. This was evident for two (2) residents (Resident #7 and Resident #28) observed during Medication Administration. Specifically, 1). Registered Nurse #8 did not check for patency and placement of the Resident #7's gastrostomy tube (a surgically placed tube that delivers nutrition, fluids, and medications directly into the stomach) prior to administering medications, and 2). Registered Nurse #9 checked for patency and placement of Resident #28's gastrostomy tube by auscultation (listening to sounds with a stethoscope) instead of using a recommended method for checking placement.The findings include: The standard of practice for maintaining the patency of intravenous catheters, as defined by the Infusion Therapy Standards of practice published by the Infusion Nurses Society in 2024, dictates the administration of antibiotics via the sequence of, saline-administer-heparin-saline, is a standardized flushing sequence designed to maintain vascular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments. This was evident for one (1) unit (Unit 6) of eight (8) units observed for Medication Storage. Specifically, seven (7) blister packs of medications and a bag containing several vials of unmixed antibiotics for several residents were observed in an open box in an unlocked nursing supervisor's office which was located across from the nurse's station on Unit 6.The findings include:The facility policy titled Medication Storage Guidelines with an approval date of 03/10/2026 stated all drugs and biologicals are to be stored in a secure and orderly manner under proper temperatures and are to be accessible only to licensed nursing and pharmacy personnel.On 05/13/2026 at approximately 12:30 PM, the New York State Department of Health Life Safety Surveyor reported to the State Surveyor that they observed medications in a box in the Unit 6 nursing supervisor's office.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that are accurately documented. This was evident for one (1) out of three (3) residents (Resident #28) reviewed for Tube Feeding out of a total of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #28's medication orders inaccurately documented to be given by oral route when medications were being given by gastrostomy tube (a flexible tube placed in the stomach for feeding, hydration and medication administration). The findings include: The facility policy titled Physicians Orders, with an implementation date of 05/07/2012 and approval date of 04/05/2026 stated that the facility will ensure that physician orders are timely and accurately carried out. The policy also stated the physician should provide clear medication orders to avoid misinterpretation and potential medication errors. The facility further stated that it is the physician's responsibility to review, enter and approve orders into the electronic medical record and that the nurse's responsibility is to pick up the order which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was evident for one (1) resident observed during Medication Administration. Specifically, Registered Nurse #8 was observed changing gloves multiple times during medication administration without performing hand hygiene between glove changes. The findings include: The facility policy titled Hand Hygiene, effective 12/07/2021 and last revised 03/05/2026, stated that all members of the healthcare team will comply with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention hand hygiene guidelines as effective hand hygiene reduces the incidence of healthcare associated infections. The indications for handwashing and hand rubbing listed in the policy both include after glove removal as a clinical situation where hand hygiene is appropriate. The policy also stated that the use of gloves does not eliminate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from physical abuse. This was evident for one (1) out of seven (7) residents (Resident #1) sampled for abuse. Specifically, on 05/01/2026, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 was giving Resident #1 pain medication. Resident #1 refused the medication by putting their hand over their mouth. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 removed Resident #1's hand and placed the medication in Resident #1's mouth. Resident #1 spit the medication out and Licensed Practical Nurse #1 picked up the medication and gave it to Resident #1. Certified Nursing Assistant #1 who was present stated Resident #1 was refusing their medication.The findings are:The facility's Policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Exploitation Prohibition dated 03/16/2026, documented that the facility shall not use or permit verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, including corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion of residents/patients, or other mistreatment or neglect. This can be directly or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY