Woodcrest Rehab & Residential H C Center, L L C

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 196.0 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.66 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.75 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/01/2025 to 07/09/2025, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion. This was evident in 2 (Resident #150 and #85) of 4 residents reviewed for Rehabilitation and Restorative Care. Specifically, 1.) Resident #150 was observed without hand rolls and no knee abductor cushion in place that were ordered for the use and prevention of increased contractures of the bilateral upper and lower extremities. 2.) Resident #85 was observed without hand rolls in place as ordered by the physician. The findings include: The facility document titled Policy and Procedure for Assistive Devices which was last reviewed on 11/2024 documented that assistive and adaptive devices may include, but not be limited to hand rolls, hand/arm splints, arm/leg braces, slings, and heel/elbow pads. The policy stated it is the charge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/01/2025 to 07/09/2025, the facility failed to ensure each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was evident for 1 (Resident #150) of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #150, who had a physician's order to use a mouth guard in the morning, was observed without a mouth guard applied on 2 occasions. The findings include: The facility's policy title Mouth Guard Use and Management with a revised date of 10/2024 documented the staff will ensure proper management, storage, cleaning, and supervision to maintain resident safety, and oral health. Resident #150 had diagnoses of Muscle Spasm, Gastrostomy, and Cerebrovascular Accident. The Minimum Data Set assessment with reference date of 05/31/2025 documented that Resident #150 had severely impaired cognition and required total assistance for all areas of activities of daily living. A comprehensive care plan for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/01/2025 to 07/09/2025, the facility failed to ensure a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers. This was evident for 1 (Resident #150) of 3 residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, Resident #150, who was at high risk to develop pressure ulcer and had physician's order for bilateral heel booties while in bed, was observed on 2 occasions in bed without heel booties. The findings include: The facility's policy titled Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Intervention dated 09/2024 documented the facility will have a pressure injury prevention program to identify risk factors, pressure injury formation when avoidable and promote skin integrity as well as interventions to heal existing pressure injury and prevent development of additional pressure injuries. Resident #150 was admitted with diagnoses that included Hemiparesis and Cerebrovascular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 07/01/2025 to 07/09/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors. This was evident for 1 (Resident #46) out 7 residents sampled during the Medication Administration Task. Specifically, Resident #46 was not administered 8 milliliters of Levetiracetam 100 milligram/milliliters by oral route for seizures as ordered by the physician. The findings include:The facility's policy titled Medication Administration that was last reviewed on 10/2024 documented that all medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to resolve illness, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis. Resident #46 had diagnoses of Seizure Disorder and Dementia.The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident #85 had severely impaired cognitive skills and had seizure disorder and was taking an anticonvulsant. A care plan for potential for injury…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/01/2025 to 07/09/2025, the facility did not ensure infection control practices and procedures were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was evident in 1 (Resident #9) of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, Registered Nurse #4 failed to practice hand hygiene during wound care.The findings include:The facility's undated policy titled Dressing Change documented in the procedure to wash hands and don gloves: after preparing the area and equipment for wound dressing change, and after removing and discarding the soiled dressing. Resident #9 had diagnoses of Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Parkinson's Disease, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and Malnutrition.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #9 had severely impaired cognition and Stage 4 pressure ulcers.The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00347821, NY00348092 and NY00354868), the facility did not ensure that the alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property were reported immediately, but not later that two (2) hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation do not involved abuse and do not involve serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Agency). Additionally, the facility failed to report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within five (5) working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation is verified appropriate corrective action must be taken. This was evident in three (3) out of seven (7) residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-09 · tag F0570 — pattern
  Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey from 2/2/23 to 2/9/23, the facility did not ensure the surety bond provided security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility. This was evident for 122 of 194 residents with personal needs accounts (PNA) with the facility. Specifically, the facility's surety bond was less than the total amount from 122 PNAs maintained by the facility. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Funds dated 02/2023 documented the facility holds a surety bond to guarantee the protection of residents' funds managed by the facility on behalf of the residents. The facility's Resident Fund Listing Balance dated 02/06/2023 documented the Total Resident Fund = $219,839.48. The facility Surety Bond documented resident PNAs were protected against $150,000. The surety bond ($150,000) is less than and does not cover all of the resident PNAs ($219,839.48). On 02/07/23 at 12:44 PM, the Finance Director (FD) was interviewed and stated they just now realized the facility's current surety bond was not enough to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 2/2/23 to 2/9/23, the facility did not ensure Housekeeping and Maintenance services maintained a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. This was evident on 2 (Unit 4 and 5) of 5 units. Specifically, 1) Unit 5 was observed with multiple environmental concerns throughout the unit including furniture in disrepair, dirty floors, dust, rust, and stains in resident rooms and the common areas, and 2) Unit 4 was observed with peeling paint, rusty areas, a broken closet door, and equipment in disrepair. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Resident Room Cleaning dated 3/2016 documented daily cleaning will ensure optimum levels of cleanliness and sanitation, prohibit the spread of infection and bacteria, and maintain the outward appearance of the facility. 1) Observation of Unit 5 was conducted on 02/02/2023 at 9:00AM with the following being observed: A ) in the lobby outside of the Admissions Office, 3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification and Complaint Survey (NY00305874) from 2/2/23 to 2/9/23, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegations were made, to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH). This was evident for 3 resident-to-resident altercations involving 4 (Resident # 402, # 145, # 37 and # 97) out of 4 residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, 1) the facility did not report to NYSDOH after Resident #402 hit Resident #145, 2) the facility did not report to NYSDOH after Resident #402 hit Resident #37, and 3) the facility did not report to NYSDOH after Resident #402 hit Resident #97. The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation: Prevention and Reporting revised 6/2018 documented the Administrator or Director of Nursing (DON) must report allegation of abuse immediately but no later than 2 hours after the alleged incident. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey from 2/2/23 to 2/9/23, the facility did not ensure quarterly financial records were made available to a resident's representative. This was evident for 1 (Resident #78) of 1 resident(s) Personal Funds review. Specifically, Resident #78's designated representative (DR) did not receive quarterly statements of the resident's Personal Needs Account (PNA). The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Funds dated 02/2023 documented statements will be distributed to residents/DR on a quarterly basis. Resident #78 had diagnoses of anemia and dementia. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #78 was severely cognitively impaired and the DR participated in the assessment. On 02/02/23 at 12:34 PM, Resident #78's DR was interviewed and stated Resident #78 has a PNA with the facility but the DR has never received quarterly statements. The DR stated hey visit Resident #78 regularly and no one in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY