Fairview Nursing Care Center Inc.

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 218 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 387 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.89 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 197.4 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.39 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.87 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.51 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.15 to 1.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:Number of residents cited:Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain each resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was evident in 3 of 5 units (Unit 1, Unit 4, and Unit 3.) observed. Specifically, resident's rooms were noted with torn window screen, ceiling tiles not firmly affixed to ceiling, paint plastered on wall, dining room furniture in disrepair, shower room with stains and shower curtains that were soiled and in disrepair. The findings included but were not limited to: The facility policy titled 'General Housekeeping Policy' dated revised 01/10/2025 documented it is the policy of the facility to provide a clean, safe, orderly comfortable and attractive home-like environment both indoors and outdoors, including walls and floors are to be maintained in accordance with state and federal codes and regulations. 1.During multiple observations from 12/01/2025 at 11:16 AM to 12/03/2025 at 10:01 AM, on Unit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:37Number of residents cited:4 Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. This was evident for one (1) resident (Resident #86) of three (3) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living out of a sample of 38 residents. Specifically, 1). Resident #86 was not assisted out of bed, but documentation reflected that resident was taken out of bed, 2). Requested documents for Residents #79, Resident #221 and Resident #220 and access to the facility electronic medical record were not provided in a timely manner. The findings are: 1. Resident #86 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses include Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, and Opioid Dependence. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #86 has intact cognition, did not refuse care, was dependent on staff for sit to stand, chair to bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled:Number of residents cited:Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure that it provided a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. This was evidenced by multiple observations of the staff bathrooms, elevators, lobby area and nursing stations.This was evident in the Lobby Area including on one (1) of five (5) units. Unit 4.The findings include but are not limited to: The facility policy titled General Housekeeping Policy dated 01/10/2025 documented that is the policy of this facility to provide a clean safe orderly comfortable and attractive homelike environment both indoors and outdoors.On multiple occasions from 12/01/2025 - 12/08/2025 the following was observed: 1. Lobby Area: a. three (3) of three (3) wall light fixtures located in the lobby wall area dusty shades, each missing one (1) of two (2) tear shaped crystal ornament.b. area located near kitchen area: corner panels missing and broken. c. ice machine located outside kitchen area with black and silver tape. d. broken…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from chemical restraints. This was evident for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #162) reviewed for Unnecessary Medication out of a sample of 38 residents. Specifically, the facility did not rule out underlying medical conditions prior to initiating and increasing a dose of an antianxiety medication. In addition, there was no evidence the continued need for the medication was evaluated after Resident #162 was treated for a urinary tract infection and no longer displayed behaviors that were present when the medication was initiated. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled 'Use of Psychotropics' reviewed 4/2025 documented physicians use psychotropic medications appropriately working with the interdisciplinary team to ensure appropriate use, evaluation and monitoring. Evaluate the ongoing effectiveness, benefits as well as risks of non-pharmacological approaches and psychotropic medications.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 35Number of residents cited:1Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure needed care and services that are resident centered, in accordance with the professional standards of practice that will meet resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs are provided to a resident. This was evident for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #79) reviewed for Tube Feeding out of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, 1). functioning of a gastrostomy tube was not checked prior to the administration of medications, and 2). Multiple medications were crushed and administered together. The findings included but were not limited to:The facility policy and procedure titled 'Medication Administration via Gastrostomy, Nasogastric or Jejunostomy Tube' dated 06/2025 documented pour medication into individual plastic bag and crush medications individually, pour powdered medications into a plastic calibrated medication cup and dilute with sufficient amount of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services and assistance to maintain grooming, and personal hygiene. This was evident for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #86) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living out of a sample of 38 residents. Specifically, Resident #86 was not assisted out of bed as per physician's order and their plan of care. The findings are:The facility's policy and procedure titled 'Activities of Daily Living Supporting' reviewed 01/10/2025 documented residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.Resident #86 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses include Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, and Opioid Dependence. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #86 has intact cognition,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure that a resident fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment to prevent complications of enteral feeding. This was evident for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #79) reviewed for Tube Feeding out of a 38 sampled residents. Specifically, 1). The functioning of a gastrostomy tube was not checked prior to the administration of medications, and 2). Multiple medications were crushed and administered together.The findings included but were not limited to:The facility policy and procedure titled 'Quality of Care' dated 02/15/2025 documented the facility will deliver high quality, person-centered care based on accurate assessment, individualized care plans, resident rights, professional standards and evidenced based clinical practices.The facility policy and procedure titled 'Medication Administration via Gastrostomy, Nasogastric or Jejunostomy Tube' dated 06/2025 documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:Number of residents cited:Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention practices and procedures were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was evident during the Infection Control Task. Specifically, Resident #3 was observed with an open right shoulder wound and was not maintained on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The findings are:The facility policy titled 'Enhanced Barrier Precautions' dated 05/18/2019 and last revised 06/10/2025 documented Enhanced Barrier Precautions are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of community acquired multidrug resistant organisms colonization's/infections in patient care areas. The policy also documented Enhanced Barrier Precautions may be indicated for resident with wounds or indwelling medical devices regardless of multidrug resistant organism status.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-15 · tag F0575 — pattern
  Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews conducted during the recertification survey on 11/08/23 - 11/15/23 the facility did not ensure that pertinent State Agency information was posted as is required. Specifically, the New York Department of Health Complaint Hotline number and related information were observed not posted on any resident units. This was evident for 5 of 5 resident units. The finding is: The undated facility policy & procedure titled Residents' Rights documented that any written information required to be posted shall be posted conspicuously in a public place in the facility that is frequented by residents and visitors, posted at wheelchair level. During the initial tour on 11/08/23, and subsequent observations on all resident units (1-5) on 11/09/23 and 11/10/23, there were no postings informing residents of how to contact the New York State Department of Health Complaint Hotline. During the Resident Council Meeting conducted on 11/9/23 at 3:00 PM, all residents stated that they did not know how to formally complain to the State about care they are receiving. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey (17LT11) from 11/08/2023 to 11/15/2023 the facility did not ensure safe food storage and infection control was practiced. Specifically, two five- pound cottage cheese tubs with a use by date of 10/19/2023 was noted with broken plastic seal and green colored discoloration on top of one container top. This was evident during the Kitchen Observation Task. The findings are: The facility policy on food storage was requested and it was not provided. On 11/08/2023 between 09:29 AM and 09:45 AM during the tour of the main kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD), two five-pound plastic containers of [NAME] Cottage cheese 4% milk fat minimum containers of cottage cheese were observed on the shelf in the kitchen. The containers were stamped with sell by [DATE] X AG 12:08 below the cover and stamped with a receive date stamp of 9/22/2023 on top of the container lid. The containers were noted with broken plastic seals and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.8M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY