Finger Lakes Health

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 206 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Hcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-04-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and did not ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices were provided to prevent accidents for four (4) of eight (8) residents reviewed (Residents #65, #75, #98, and #101). Specifically, Residents #65, #75, and #101 were at risk for accidents related to inconsistent and unsafe use of full body lift slings (a fabric device used with a mechanical lift to support and transfer a resident) including use of incorrect sling sizes and reuse of disposable slings. Resident #98 experienced a fall on 11/11/2025 from a full body lift, resulting in a head injury that required staples. This resulted in actual harm for Resident #98 that was not Immediate Jeopardy.The findings include: The facility policy Lift and Transfer last reviewed 05/05/2024 included all direct care employees will receive training on mechanical lift use and transfer techniques including use of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-04-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with the resident's needs and professional standards for two (2) of eight (8) residents reviewed (Residents #96 and #131). Specifically, Resident #96 who had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing that can lead to choking, coughing, or food feeling stuck in the throat), received a diet inconsistent with their swallowing needs due to failure to implement and communicate a diet recommendation and supervision needs, and experienced a choking episode requiring abdominal thrusts. Additionally, Resident #131 sustained thermal burns (a skin injury caused by contact with heat sources like hot liquids, causing tissue damage) after staff failed to follow safe food reheating practices. This resulted in actual harm for Residents #96 and #131 that was not Immediate Jeopardy.The findings include: The facility policy Change in Condition, Management and Notification last revised 04/05/2023,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations and incidents were thoroughly investigated and documented, including identification of root cause and implementation of corrective actions, for two (2) of eight (8) residents reviewed (Residents #98 and #131). Specifically, the facility failed to conduct a thorough and complete investigation for Resident #98 following a fall from a full body lift resulting in a head injury, and for Resident #131 following a thermal burn (a skin injury caused by contact with heat sources like hot liquids, causing tissue damage) incident related to reheated food. The findings include:The facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property last reviewed 06/27/2024 included alleged violations will be thoroughly investigated, including collection of statements, review of relevant documentation, and identification of contributing factors, and appropriate corrective actions will be implemented to prevent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect and an incident involving an injury of unknown source was reported to the State Survey Agency for one (1) of eight (8) residents reviewed (Resident #98). Specifically, Resident #98 experienced a fall from a full body lift resulting in a head injury requiring staples, and the facility did not report the incident to the State Survey Agency as required.The findings include:The facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property last reviewed 06/27/2024 included alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, will be reported to the State Survey Agency within required timeframes, including within two (2) hours if the events involve serious bodily injury.Resident #98 had diagnoses including stroke (a condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted), neuropathy (peripheral nerve damage), and hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis affecting one side of the body). The Minimum Data Set (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0836 — pattern
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey at the Geneva Living Center North, Geneva Living Center South, and Huntington Living Centers 8/28/23 to 9/1/23, it was determined that the facility did not ensure compliance with all applicable State codes. Specifically, the facility was not in compliance with Section 915 of the 2015 Edition of the International Fire Code as adopted by New York State, which requires the use of carbon monoxide detection in a building that has fuel-burning appliances. The findings are: Observations during the initial tour of the Geneva Living Center North on 8/28/23 at 2:45 PM included natural gas-powered hot water heaters in the basement boiler rooms. Additionally, there was a single station carbon monoxide detector located on the wall in the corridor outside the boiler room. Record review on 8/29/23 at 10:10 AM included a spreadsheet of completed work orders related to the maintenance and testing of two carbon monoxide (CO) detectors in the Geneva Living Center North building identified to be located by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during a Recertification Survey at Huntington Living Center 8/28/23 to 9/1/23, it was determined that for one (Resident #12) of 37 resident's reviewed for care planning, the facility did not ensure the residents person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was implemented to meet the resident's medical needs as identified in the CCP and their physician orders. Specifically, Residents #12 did not have a strap securing their indwelling catheter and did not have wound care done according to their physician orders and their CCP. This was evidenced by the following: Resident #12 had diagnoses including neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control due to a spinal cord injury) requiring a suprapubic (s/p) catheter (a catheter tube inserted directly into the bladder through the abdomen to drain urine into an attached drainage bag), paraplegia and multiple pressure ulcers. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident #12 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during an Recertification Survey at Huntington Living Center and Geneva Living Center North, from 8/28/23 to 9/1/23, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, and for one of one resident reviewed for edema (swelling of the tissues due to excess fluid). Specifically, the facility did not ensure that the bowel protocol was initiated as ordered by the physician for Resident #158. For Resident #36, the facility did not ensure that the resident's soap was used appropriately per manufacturer's guidelines or as ordered by the physician for a chronic skin condition. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Bowel Management Guidelines and Protocol, dated reviewed/revised on 11/22/21, included: Nursing staff will monitor resident's bowel elimination…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during a Recertification Survey 8/28/23 to 9/1/23, it was determined for one (Resident #104) of one resident reviewed for range of motion (ROM) services at Huntington Living Center and for one (Resident #150) three residents reviewed for position and mobility at Geneva Living Center South, the facility did not ensure that a residents with limited ROM received appropriate treatment and equipment to prevent a further decline. Specifically, for Resident #104 the facility did not ensure the resident who had increased edema (swelling) and limited ROM to both hands was evaluated by a therapist per physician orders in a timely manner. For Resident #150, the facility did not ensure the resident had wheelchair safety equipment in place as recommended by Physical Therapy (PT) for proper and safe positioning. This evidenced by the following: 1.Resident #104 had diagnoses including dementia, depression, and unspecified edema. The Minimum Date Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey at Geneva Living Center South 8/28/23 to 9/1/23, it was determined that for one (Resident #86) of one resident reviewed for smoking, the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards as possible. Specifically, Resident #86 was observed smoking in an unsafe area several times and the facility was unable to provide evidence that the resident had been assessed for safe smoking. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Smoking Assessment Guidelines, review date of 3/30/23, included that smoking is not allowed on facility property. A resident who is physically and cognitively able to leave the facility property with the intent of using tobacco products will be assessed for their capability to smoke unsupervised and unattended. If a resident chooses to smoke off facility property, a Smoking Safety Screen (an assessment) will be completed by the interdisciplinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey 8/28/23-9/1/23 the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, one (Huntington Living Center) of two main kitchens had issues with the dish machines' wash cycle that did not reach adequate temperatures for sanitizing and was being logged by facility staff as inadequate multiple times for August 2023, with no action taken by the facility. In addition, a dietary employee with not wearing a beard guard/net over their facial hair while serving on the food tray line. The findings are: The facility policy Dishwashing revised 2016 documented the purpose is to prevent the transmission of disease carrying organisms. Dish machine temperatures are taken and recorded after each meal at the beginning of the wash cycle. Temperatures should be monitored throughout the process to ensure they stay at required minimum levels. If the dish machine temperatures do not meet minimum requirements of wash at 160…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0948 — isolated
  Ensure that paid feeding assistants have the training they need.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey at Huntington Living Center 8/28/23-9/1/23 the facility did not ensure for one (Resident #104) of six residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), that staff members (non-nursing) working in the facility and feeding residents had successfully completed a New York State approved training program. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that a unit clerk (UC) who was observed feeding a resident had been trained through a state approved paid feeding assistant program per the regulations. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #104 had diagnoses including dementia, depression, and unspecified edema (swelling in the extremities). Review of the Minimum Date Set assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident #104 had severe impairment of cognitive function and required extensive assist with eating. The comprehensive care plan dated 11/15/21 documented Resident #104 had an ADL self-care performance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-07-22 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during a Recertification Survey at the Geneva North and South and Huntington Living Centers, completed on 7/22/22, it was determined that for six (Residents #112, #150, #330, #329, #163, and #336) of eight residents reviewed for Baseline Care Plans (BCP), the facility did not ensure that the BCP was reviewed with, and a written copy provided to the resident and/or the resident representative as per the regulations. This was evidenced by the following: Review of facility policy Baseline Care Plan, dated as last reviewed on 11/22/21, documented that the policy of the facility was to develop a BCP within 48 hours of admission and that a summary of the BCP would be provided to the resident and/or their representative to provide information on the initial plan for delivery of care and services. The BCP summary should include initial goals for the resident, a list of current medications, dietary instructions, services and treatments to be administered by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$125,650 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $125,650 — penalty dated 2026-04-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in NY