Nathan Littauer Hospital Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 68.8 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Specifically, residents were observed to be fed by staff wearing gloves in the west dining room and by the east nurses station. This is evidenced by: Policy titled Quality of Life- Dignity effective 05/2020 last reviewed 05/2024 documented each resident should be cared for in a manner that promoted and enhanced quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. Interpretation and implementation of this policy included residents should be treated with dignity and respect at all times. Treated with dignity meant the residents would be assisted in maintaining and enhancing their self-esteem and self-worth. During an observation on 02/10/2025 at 12:10 PM in the [NAME] dining room, staff wore gloves while feeding residents. During an observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure a safe, comfortable home-like environment and effective housekeeping and maintenance services were maintained for 2 (East and West) of 2 resident units. Specifically, (a.) the floors were soiled with dirt next to walls, in corners, along door thresholds, and where door frames meet the floor in the corridors on the East and [NAME] Units; (b.) door frames and doors were in disrepair for multiple resident rooms; walls in the East and [NAME] units were in disrepair with scrapes, smudge, chips, and marks; (c.) resident room NH. 44 wall was in disrepair and unfinished; (d.) ceiling tiles in the television rooms had water stains; (e.) shower rooms were soiled with dirt next to walls, and in corners, and (f.) handrails through unit were scuffed and scrapped exposing the underlying wood of the rails. This is evidenced by: The undated Policy &Procedure, titled Maintenance/Housekeeping Work Order Policy, documented that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not develop and implemented a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 (Residents #s 3, 9, and 19) of 25 residents reviewed for Care Plans. Specifically, (a.) Resident #3 did not have a care plan for falls that documented interventions that were in place including the use of multiple mattresses in their room; (b.) Resident #9's intervention for treatment of edema (swelling caused by fluid buildup in the body's tissues) was not care planned, and Resident #19 did not have a care plan that addressed their vision problems. This is evidenced by: A facility policy titled Interdisciplinary Care Plan Committee effective 09/1992 last revised 04/2024 documented the plan of care is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that its medication error rate did not exceed 5% for 2 (Resident #s 4 and 38) of 16 residents observed during a medication pass for a total of 25 observations. This resulted in a medication error rate of 8%. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy and procedure titled Medication Administration last revised 11/2024 documented, all Registered Nurses and Licensed Practical Nurses must have successfully passed the written medication exam and the medication administration competency to administer medications as outlined below. Registered Nurses and Licensed Practical Nurses have the responsibility to administer medications in accordance with this policy and any other relevant education and/or certification. Right Documentation - Administration is recorded in the electronic Medication Administration Record. If medication is held or refused or not given on time, a reason for such is recorded in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (West Unit Team 1) of 2 medication carts reviewed. Specifically, (a.) opened medications had no open and or expiration dates (b.) open bottles of eye drops had no label identifying patient and had no open and or expiration dates. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy and procedure last revised 11/2024 documented, Multiple-Dose Vials a. Multiple-dose vials would not be used beyond the manufacturer's expiration date. Any multi-dose vial that has been opened or punctured would have an expiration date of 28 days-label the container when opened with the date of expiration (28 days from date of opening, or manufacturer's date of expiration if that is sooner) and initials. They must be stored under manufacturer's recommended conditions and discarded if potentially contaminated.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, or served following professional standards for food service safety in 2 of 2 resident unit nutrition areas and the main kitchen. Specifically, the area of the main kitchen and resident kitchenettes were not clean. This is evidenced by: During the initial inspection in the main kitchen on 2/10/2025 at 11:05 AM, the following observations were made: • The manual can open had a build-up of debris in the cutting area of the device • The mixer had dirt and debris on and under the device. • Dust and dirt were on top of two fire extinguishers in the main kitchen. During an inspection of the East nutrition area on 2/12/2025 at 12:48 PM, the following observations were made: • Temperature logs for the refrigerator and freezer for February 6, 8, 9, 10, and 12/2025 were missing. • There was dirt and grime on the top of the refrigerator/freezer unit. • There was dirt, grime, and food particles on the freezer bottom and shelves. • There was dirt, grime,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0868 — pattern
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee consisted at a minimum of the Director of Nursing, Medical Director or designee, Administrator, and Infection Preventionist. The failure to meet to coordinate and evaluate the need for performance improvement projects had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. Specially, Director of Nursing was also the Infection Preventionist. This is evidenced by: A review of the facility's undated Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan, revealed that the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan provides leadership through its committee. The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee shall be comprised of the Administrator, Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Registered Nurse Manager, Registered Nurse Supervisors, Chief Executive Officer, [NAME] President of Operation, and other ancillary department heads. The Administrator is the chairperson of the Quality…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0882 — pattern
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not designate one or more individual(s) as Infection Preventionist (s) responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention Control Practices. Specifically, the facility did not have a specified designated individual as their Infection Control Preventionist, and the Director of Nursing had performed a dual role since May 10, 2023. This is evidenced by: A Review of the Policy and Procedure titled Infection Prevention and Control created in November 1977 and revised in August 2024 documented under Mission/Goal of the Infection Control Program: Through oversight of the Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee, the Infection Prevention and Control Committee, shall oversee the implementation of infection control policies and practices, and help department heads and managers implement infection prevention and control measures within their departments. Inquiries concerning infection control policies, procedures, and facility practices should be referred to the Infection Preventionist or Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the resident and resident representative had the right to participate in the development and implementation of their person-centered plan of care by facilitating the inclusion of the resident and resident representative in the planning process for 1 1(Resident #6) of 1 resident reviewed for care planning. Specifically, for Resident #6, their family member was not afforded the opportunity to participate in quarterly care plan meetings. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled Interdisciplinary Care Plan Committee effective 09/1992 last revised 04/2024 stated a comprehensive care plan was developed within seven days after the completion of a comprehensive assessment by the interdisciplinary team with participation of the resident and revised with significant changes. Care plans were reviewed at the interdisciplinary care plan meeting every three months and as indicated by a significant change or change in condition. The policy also stated the resident and/or their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #sNY00368587 and NY00370779), the facility did not ensure that residents were free from neglect for 2 (Resident #s 10 and 19) of 25 residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) Resident #10 was not monitored, turned and positioned or received personal care for at least one full shift on 11:00 PM-7:00 AM, 1/29/2025 - 1/30/2025; (b.) Resident #19 rolled out of bed and hit their head on furniture when receiving care by a Certified Nurse Aide on 1/21/2024 at 10:35 AM. This is evidenced by: The Facility's Policy and Procedure titled, Resident Abuse revised 8/2024, documented the facility would investigate all cases of suspected resident abuse, including allegations of neglect, misappropriation, mistreatment or injuries of unknown origin. Of those cases that the facility found reasonable cause and/or evidence that a resident has been abused, corrective action would take place with those involved: In the case of an employee…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in NY