Glen Arden Inc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 32.1 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.17 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.20 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.24 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.36 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.29 to 0.96 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-12-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation and record review during the survey, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers and to prevent worsening of pressure ulcers. This was evident for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #11) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, Resident #11 was assessed as at risk for pressure ulcers on admission and had no pressure ulcers. There was no documented evidence that offloading practices or turning and positioning were implemented to prevent pressure ulcers from developing. On 11/23/2025, a Stage 2 (damage to skin or underlying soft tissue) pressure ulcer to their left heel was identified. On 12/09/2025, Resident #11's left heel wound had progressed to a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full thickness skin and tissue loss). Recommendations by the Wound Care Physician were made for turning and positioning, offloading and nutrition shakes on 11/25/2025, 12/02/2025 and 12/09/2025. There was no documented evidence that the Wound Care Physician's recommendations were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview conducted during a recertification survey the facility failed to ensure that adequate supervision and effective use of the facility's monitoring program to prevent falls and injuries were provided for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #10 and #12). Specifically, (1) Resident #10 was care planned to be on 30-minute monitoring after a 4/12/24 fall. Resident #10 had a second fall on 4/14/24 which resulted in a nondisplaced transverse fracture of the distal malleolus (a break in the small prominent bone on either side of the ankle) and the facility did not implement care plan changes to address recurrent falls and (2) Resident #12 had 6 falls between 9/16/23 and 5/3/24 and the facility did not implement new interventions, including toileting schedules and monitoring, as recommended on the Accident/Incident reports. This resulted in multiple hospitalizations and the resident sustained fractured ribs from the falls on 9/16/23 and 5/3/24. This resulted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, 1) unsealed, unlabeled, and undated foods were stored in the refrigerators and freezer, 2) expired foods were stored in the dry pantry, walk in cooler, and reach- in refrigerator, and 3) staff were observed not wearing hair and beard restraints while in the kitchen. The findings include: The policy last revised 5/2018 titled Labeling and Dating documented all foods must be labeled and dated to ensure foods are being used in a proper timeframe, and any unopened food item will be discarded by the manufacturer labeled expiration date.The policy reviewed 07/1999 titled Personal Hygiene documented employees must follow personal hygiene practices and must wear hair restraints required by state or federal health codes. During observation of the kitchen on 12/16/2025 at 12:27 PM, the following was revealed:The reach- in refrigerator contained unlabeled and undated fruit salad, sliced cucumbers, crumbled bacon, a tray of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated in a manner that maintained or enhanced each resident's dignity and respect for one (1) resident (Resident #32) reviewed for dining. Specifically, Resident #32's meal tray and feeding assistance were not provided at the same time another resident (Resident #23) at the same table was provided their meal tray and feeding assistance. Additionally, once served, Registered Nurse #18 stood over Resident #32 while they provided the resident with feeding assistance.The findings include:The policy titled Resident Rights last revised 11/2025 documented residents have the right to a dignified existence. Residents will be treated with respect and dignity, and cared for in a manner, and in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life and recognizes their individuality. During an observation in the dining room on December 16, 2025, at 5:27 PM, while their tablemate, Resident #32, was waiting to be served, Resident #23 was served and eating their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of comprehensive person-centered care plans that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and nutrition needs for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #20) reviewed for Tube Feeding. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that a comprehensive care plan with goals and interventions was developed to address Resident #20's tube feeding and nothing by mouth status as per the 11/29/2025 physician order. The findings include:The policy and procedure revised 08/2025, titled Resident Assessment and Comprehensive Care Planning documented a comprehensive care plan includes measurable objectives to meet each identified problem/need and is reviewed and revised as necessary to outline care needs and strategies. Professional staff individualizes each care approach specific to each resident's needs.Resident #20 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, and dysphagia.The 04/16/2024 care plan titled Alteration in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0710 — isolated
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility did not ensure that medical supervision was provided for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #11) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, Resident #11 was diagnosed with a left heel Stage 2 pressure ulcer, and the primary physician did not address recommendations by the wound care physician on 11/25/2025 or 12/02/2025 or 12/09/2025. Subsequently, two (2) weeks later Resident #11's left heel wound was classified as unstageable, was surgically debrided on 12/09/2025 and then classified as a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full thickness skin and tissue loss).The findings include:The 3/28/2019 policy titled Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management documented the physician writes orders for treatments as needed.Resident #11's diagnoses included status post left hip fracture with surgical intervention, osteoporosis, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. The 11/12/2025 Comprehensive Nursing Assessment (admission assessment) documented Resident #11 was at risk for pressure ulcers. The 11/12/2025 Braden Scale (tool for predicting pressure ulcer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0730 — isolated
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that certified nurse aides had a performance review completed every 12 months. Specifically, one (1) of four (4) certified nurse aides (Certified Nurse Aide #5) did not have a performance review completed in the last twelve months.The findings include:There was no documented evidence of a completed annual performance review for Certified Nurse Aide #5 in the last 12 months. During an interview on 12/19/2025 at 12:45 PM, Registered Nurse Unit Manager #4 stated they were responsible for completing the annual reviews for the staff nurses, nurse supervisors, and certified nurse aides. They stated Certified Nurse Aide #5 worked with the facility since 09/24/2018. They stated they did not have a signed performance review for Certified Nurse Aide # 5 from the last 12 months.During a follow up interview on 12/22/2025 at 1:05 PM, Registered Nurse Unit Manager #4 stated they contacted Human Resources and determined they did not have a performance review on file for Certified Nurse Aide #5 from the last 12 months. 10NYCRR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 6/25/2024 to 7/2/2024, the facility did not ensure residents' right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This was evident during environmental observation of resident Unit 1 and Unit 2. Specifically, 1) Unit 1 was observed with a ceiling leak, stained and uneven carpeting, and stained ceiling tiles, and 2) Unit 2 was observed with broken bathroom floor tiles, stained, frayed, and uneven carpeting, and a broken desk in the nourishment station. The findings are: The facility policy titled Safety Committee Policy dated 4/21/2024 documented the Safety Committee was responsible for identifying issues pertaining to the environment and managing safety, and hazardous materials and wastes. 1) On 06/25/2024 from 9:47 AM to 11:00 AM, 6/26/2024 from 9:30 AM to 5:00 PM, and 6/27/2024 from 9:30 AM to 5:00 PM, Unit 1 was observed with the following: - hallway carpeting with large brown stains and rippled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-02 · tag F0841 — pattern
  Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the post-survey revisit from 9/3/2024 to 9/5/2024, the facility did not ensure the medical director was responsible for implementation of resident care policies and the coordination of medical care in the facility. Specifically, the new Medical Director hired on 8/1/2024 was unaware of their responsibilities as a medical director and had no previous nursing home experience, was not a part of the quality assurance committee, and did not assess residents until 12 days after hire date. The findings are: The facility Medical Director Agreement dated 7/29/2024 documented the Medical Director shall be responsible for assuring each resident's responsible physician attends to the resident's medical needs, participates in care planning, follows the schedule of visits in accordance with 10 NYCRR 415.15(b), and complies with the facility policies, rules, regulations, and medical staff by-laws. Please refer to F689. On 9/5/2024 at 3:54 PM, the Medical Director was interviewed and stated they were the only physician on staff at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 6/25/2024 to 7/2/2024, the facility did not ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public was provided. This was evident during environmental observation of the kitchen, staff lounge, housekeeping closet, and ancillary services room. Specifically, a sheet of ice was observed covering the kitchen freezer floor, the staff lounge and housekeeping closet had stained ceiling tiles, and the ancillary services room had several items stored on the floor. The findings are: The facility policy titled Safety Committee Policy dated 4/21/2024 documented the Safety Committee was responsible for identifying issues pertaining to the environment and managing safety, and hazardous materials and wastes. On 06/25/24 at 10:01 AM, 6/26/2024 from 9:30 AM to 5:00 PM, and 6/27/2024 from 9:30 AM to 5:00 PM, the facility was observed with the following: - staff lounge locker room and bathroom with stained ceiling tiles, - the ancillary services room had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 6/25/2024 to 7/2/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity. This was evident for 2 (Resident #13 and Resident #37) of 18 sampled residents during dining observation. Specifically, Resident #37 and Resident #13 were not served lunch at the same time as their tablemates. The findings are: The facility policy titled Open Dining dated 2/16/2007 documented residents participating in open-style dining will be able to dine at their preferred time and are served their meal according to the dining program. On 6/25/2024 at 12:05 PM, Resident #37 and Resident #10 were observed in the dining room seated at the same table. Resident #10 received their meal tray and began eating their lunch. Resident #37 watched their tablemate eat lunch and asked a staff member for a lunch tray. Resident #37 was served their lunch tray at 12:14 PM. On 06/27/2024 at 12:35 PM, Resident #13, #8, #36, and #10 were observed in the dining room seated at the same table. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not develop and implement a person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and time frames in accordance with comprehensive assessments for one of one resident reviewed for Communication-Sensory and Incontinence and one of three residents reviewed for Positioning / Mobility (R #10). Specifically, for Resident #10 comprehensive care plans were not developed and/or implemented to address hearing impairment to allow for clear communication between facility staff and Resident #10, bladder and bowel incontinence, and to address bilateral hand joint stiffness related to rheumatoid arthritis. The findings are: Resident #10 was admitted with diagnoses including Rheumatoid Arthritis, Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia. The 5/30/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment and screening tool) documented Resident #10 had severe cognitive impairment, had highly impaired hearing, did not use a hearing aide, and usually understood but missed some part/intent of message, was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$108,046 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $108,046 — penalty dated 2024-07-02
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-02 for 10 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY