Northern Riverview Health Care, Inc
87 South Route, Haverstraw, NY 10927 · Non profit - Corporation · 182 certified beds · (845) 429-5381 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.7% | 14.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.7% | 5.8% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 26.2% | 19.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.0% | 12.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.5% | 13.2% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 6.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.1% | 19.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.3% | 13.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.9% | 78.8% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.5% | 20.6% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.9% | 9.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.14 | 1.70 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.82 | 1.36 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 93 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 74.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.2%CMS range 33.8–53.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.6–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 74.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 69.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 62.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 5.0–14.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.45 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 182 beds and averages 178.5 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-03-13 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during survey, the facility failed to plan a safe and appropriate discharge for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #188) reviewed for discharge. Specifically, Resident #188 was admitted from a group home for individuals with intellectual disabilities and at the facility for short-term rehabilitation following hospitalization. The facility discharged the resident on 12/26/2025, without notice, for a non-emergent diagnostic test and the resident was left at the hospital outpatient department. The facility did not have a plan or date set with the group home for the residents' return. The resident was not cleared by a physician to be safely discharged , and the group home had not evaluated the resident's ability to safely return. The resident's representative was not notified in writing of the non-urgent discharge and was not given the option to appeal. It was determined that Resident #188's likelihood to experience actual psychosocial harm, using the reasonable person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 03/09/2026 to 03/13/2026, the facility did not store, prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, 1) unlabeled and undated food were stored in the kitchen and unit pantry refrigerators, and 2) expired foods were stored in the kitchen and unit pantry refrigerators.The findings are: The facility policy titled Food Service and revised 05/10/2024 documented all foods should be covered, labeled and dated. Date marking to indicate the date or day by which to consume will be visible on all food.The facility policy titled Food - From Outside revised 07/12/2023 documented food brought by family/visitors that is left with the resident to consume later will be labeled, (label will identify resident name, room number, item, date received and discard date). All refrigerated foods will be discarded within 48 hours.During the initial tour of the kitchen on 03/09/2026 at 6:24 AM with morning cook #5 an observation was conducted of the kitchen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (485232, 2704152) from 3/09/2026-3/13/2026, the facility did not ensure that the resident's legal representative upon written request, was provided with a copy of the resident's health care record within two (2) working days for one (1) of (2) residents (Resident #188) reviewed for discharge and one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #74) reviewed for notification of change. Specifically, 1) Resident #74's Health Care Proxy requested health care records on 3/18/2025 and the records were not provided until 6/03/2025; and 2) Resident #188's legal guardian requested health care records on 12/29/2025 and there was no documented evidence the records were provided.Findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled Medical Records Request last revised 11/2025 documented authorized requests of medical records will be made in accordance with current applicable laws. The Administrator will be notified of all requests for the release of medical records. The Administrator will ensure that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (2625787) from 03/09/2026 through 03/13/2026, the facility did not ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary care and services for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #138) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #138 was observed eating lunch lying in bed with head in a low position. The findings included: A facility policy titled Meal Service Process: Delivery, Set-up, Assistance, and Documentation last revised 12/15/2025 documented: The facility provides a safe and person-centered meal service to residents. The resident should be positioned/seated in an upright position so their -head and upper body are as upright as possible. Assist the resident with meal/tray set up as needed and requested. Resident #138's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, bilateral above knee amputation, and dyspnea. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 01/08/2026 documented Resident #138 had moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 03/09/2026 to 03/13/2026, the facility did not ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent and promote healing of pressure ulcers for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident # 14) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, Registered Nurse #2 did not adhere to the physician orders for the treatment of Resident #14's pressure ulcer by omitting a topical medication and applying a dressing that was not ordered.Findings Include:The facility policy Pressure Ulcer Treatment revised 11/2024, documents to apply dressing/treatment according to the manufacturers direction, care plan and the physician order.Resident #14 had diagnoses of paraplegia, anemia and type 2 diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 11/24/2025 documented Resident #14 was at risk for pressure injuries and had three stage 4 pressure ulcers.The physician's order dated 01/26/2026 documented to apply Santyl External Ointment (Collagenase) to their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (2702513) from 3/9/2026 to 3/13/2026, the facility did not ensure that each resident received the proper respiratory treatment and care consistent with professional standards of practice for two (2) (Residents #187 and #102) of four (4) residents reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, 1) the facility did not ensure that a physician's order for continuous positive airway pressure settings and administration parameters was in place for Resident #187 who was reportedly using a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine; and 2) Resident #102 did not receive the correct flow rate of oxygen therapy based on the physician's order and care plan.The findings include: The Policy and Procedure titled Airway Pressure Support dated 12/2/2024, documented the facility follows current standards of practice in the care of residents requiring airway pressure support devices, to improve respiratory function in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 03/09/2026 to 03/13/2026, the facility did not ensure daily nurse staffing was posted in an area accessible to all residents and visitors. Specifically, the posting of daily nurse staffing for all nursing staff working in the facility on each shift was not displayed for the date of 03/08/2026.Findings include:During an observation on 03/09/2026 at 6:10 AM, the nurse staffing posted in the lobby of the facility was dated 03/07/2026. There was no observed nurse staffing posted for 03/08/2026.During an interview on 03/13/2026 at 10:20 AM, the Director of Nursing stated that the overnight nurse supervisor was responsible for posting the nurse staffing for the day. They stated they did not know why the nurse staffing was not posted on the bulletin board in the lobby for 03/08/2026.During an interview on 03/13/2026 at 11:28 AM, Registered Nurse Supervisor #8 stated it was their responsibility to post the nurse staffing on the bulletin board in the lobby. They stated they completed the form on the morning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 03/09/2026 through 03/13/2026, the facility did not ensure proper disposal of garbage and refuse. Specifically, 1) the recycle dumpster had been left open and there were cardboard boxes spilling over the top onto the surrounding ground, and 2) the compactor door had been left open.The findings are:The facility policy titled Garbage - Food and Refuse Disposal revised 12/2020 documented, outside dumpsters provided by garbage pickup services will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter.During an observation of the garbage area on 03/11/2026 at 12:11 PM with the Food Service Director, the recycle dumpster was open with cardboard boxes spilling over the top. There were observed boxes, a plastic bag of cans, and other litter on the ground surrounding the dumpster and trapped under it. During an observation of the compactor at the same time, the door was held in an open position with the door holding chain. During an interview at that time, the Food Service Director stated the entire…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (2625787) from 03/09/2026 to 03/13/2026, the facility did not ensure that essential equipment was maintained in a safe and operating condition for one (1) (Resident #138) of four (4) residents reviewed for the environment. Specifically, Resident #138's bed was broken and could not be inclined beyond 30 degrees.The findings include:The facility policy titled Maintenance Services reviewed 05/2025 documented the facility provides maintenance services to the equipment in accordance with current standards of practice and State and Federal Regulations; and is responsible for maintaining equipment in a safe and operable manner.During an observation and interview on 03/09/2026 at 12:45 PM, Resident #138 was attempting to feed themself lunch while lying in bed. Resident #138 was positioned lying back at about a 30-degree incline and spilling food over their chest while moving the utensil horizontally across their body to their mouth. Resident #138 stated their bed had been broken in this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during a Abbreviated Survey, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations including injuries of unknown origin were reported to the Department of Health immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation if the events that caused the allegation result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the event that cause the allegation do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey agency) in accordance with the State law through established procedures, and report the results of all investigations to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency), within 5 working days of the incident for one (Resident #4) of three Residents reviewed for injury of unknown origin. Specifically, 0n 1/21/2026, Resident #4 reported right knee pain during cares and was found with swelling to the right knee. A STAT Xray was completed. The radiology report dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during an Abbreviated Survey, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origin for two(2) of four(4) sampled residents (Residents #1 and #4). Specifically: 1) Resident #1: Following the discovery of a forehead hematoma, the facility failed to provide a completed investigative report. Documentation lacked staff statements from those providing care prior to the injury and failed to include a detailed description of that care. Facility staff could not provide an explanation of how the injury occurred. 2) Resident #4: After an X-ray on 01/21/2026 revealed an acute right tibial plateau fracture, the facility's investigation was incomplete. Missing elements included staff descriptions of care at the time of the incident, details on how the resident was transferred, and a formal investigative conclusion or root cause. The findings are:The facility's policy titled Accident - Incidents, documented a review date of 06/01/2024, and that The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (2695368), the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and implementation of an identified intervention for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for injury of unknown origin. Specifically, Resident #1, who resided on a secure unit, required supervision with ambulation and had a history of wandering and falls, was found on 12/10/2025 with a hematoma to the forehead of unknown origin. Following the incident, enhanced monitoring for safety was initiated on 12/10/2025, however, the facility was unable to demonstrate consistent implementation of the enhanced monitoring intervention. The facility provided incomplete enhanced monitoring documentation from 12/15/2025 through 01/10/2026 which contained missing staff signatures and lacked supervisory review.The findings are:The facility policy titled Safety and Supervision of Residents, revised on 02/01/2024, documented that facility-oriented and resident-oriented approaches to safety are used together to implement a systems approach to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (2622688), the facility did not ensure that the resident's family representative was notified of a change in condition for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for notification of changes. Specifically, on 08/29/2025, Resident #1's family representative observed redness to Resident #1's right eye. The Family representative reported the observation to facility staff and was informed that the redness was due to an allergic reaction to medication the issue had already been addressed by the physician. There was no documented evidence that nursing staff identified or assessed the redness prior to the family representative' observation. There was no documented evidence that the resident's representatives were notified of the change in condition prior to the report from the family representative.The findings include: The facility policy titled Notification of Change, revised 07/07/2025, stated that the nurse will notify the resident, resident representative, and the resident's physician promptly of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (2622688), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect are reported not immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made if the events that caused the allegation involve abuse or results in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24hours if the events that cause the allegation do not result in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials including the State Survey Agency for one (1) resident (Resident #1) of three (3) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 09/12/2025, Resident #1's family representative informed the facility that Resident #1 had been punched in the face by another resident. The facility's investigation form and progress notes revealed that a report was received on 09/12/2025 from the family representative and an investigation was initiated on 09/13/2025. There was no documented evidence that the allegation was reported to the New York State Department of Health or local law enforcement. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (2622688), the facility did not report to the State Agency an alleged violation of abuse against a resident who is receiving care from the facility no later than 24hours if the events that cause the suspicion did not result in serious bodily injury for one(1) Resident #1 of three (3) residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 09/12/2025, Resident #1's family representative informed the facility that Resident #1 was punched in the face by a peer. The facility's investigation form and progress notes revealed the report from the family representative was received on 09/12/2025 receiving the information from the family representative. The Facility provided documentation of an investigation initiated on 9/17/2025. There was no documented evidence that the allegation was reported to the New York State Department of Health or local law enforcement. The Facility did not report the results of the investigation within 5 working days of the incident.The findings include: The Facility's Abuse Policy revised on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (2622688), the facility did not ensure that Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan was revised to include measurable, resident-specific interventions specifically reflecting a change in condition involving right-eye redness that resulted in the initiation of antibiotic eye drops. Specifically, Ciprofloxacin(antibiotic) ophthalmic drops were ordered on 08/29/2025 and initiated on 08/30/2025 for the resident's right-eye redness. The Comprehensive Care Plan was not revised to include interventions related to the new treatment and the change in condition. Resident #1's comprehensive care plan interventions was last update 01/23/2025 which addressed a prior influenza related infection. There was no documented evidence of the current condition reported on 08/29/2025. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Care Plans - Comprehensive (revised 10/2019 and reviewed 08/02/2024) documented, Assessments of residents are ongoing, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (# 2622688), the facility did not ensure that necessary care and services were provided to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical well-being for one (Resident #1) of three (3) residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 08/29/2025, Resident #1's family representative reported redness to Resident #1's right eye to nursing staff. The family representative stated that nursing staff told them the condition was already addressed. Record review revealed was no documented nursing assessment, a change-in-condition evaluation or a physician notification. There was no documentation that staff identified the redness prior to the family representative report. Ciprofloxacin ophthalmic (antibiotic) eye drop was ordered on 08/29/2025 and initiated on 08/30/2025 with no documented clinical rationale for the treatment. There was no registered nurse assessment or a physician evaluation at the time the order was placed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (2622688), the facility did not ensure physician supervision oversight of medical care for one (Resident #1) of (3) three residents reviewed for physician services. Specifically, an order for ciprofloxacin(antibiotic) eye drops was ordered for Resident #1's right eye on 08/29/2025 after redness was reported by family representative. There was no documented physician assessment or nursing assessment at the time the order was entered. The treatment began 08/30/2025, and Resident #1 was not evaluated by a medical provider until 09/04/2025 six days after the change in condition was identified and after treatment had already been initiated.The findings include:The facility policy titled Physician Services, revised 05/2019 documented that a physician shall review and document orders for the care and treatment of residents and shall evaluate residents as clinically indicated. The policy also stated that all verbal orders must be authenticated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00355946, NY00334577, NY00336626), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. The facility also did not report the results of all investigations to the New York State Department of Health in accordance with State law, within 5 working days of the incident for 3 out of 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #5) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (1) on 9/27/2024 Resident #1 reported to their representative that staff had beat them up while in the dining room the day before. The Administrator was not made aware of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00355946, NY00334577), the facility did not ensure the comprehensive care plan was updated and revised for 3 out of 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #4) reviewed for care planning. Specifically, (1) On 9/27/2024 Resident #1 reported to their representative that they were beaten on 9/26/2024 by staff in the dining room. Review of Resident #1's abuse care plan revealed it was not updated to reflect the allegation of abuse (2) On 3/26/2024 Resident #4 exposed themself to Resident #3. Resident #3's abuse care plan was not updated to reflect this allegation and Resident #4's behavior care plan was not updated to reflect their behavior. The findings are: The facility Comprehensive Care Plan policy last reviewed 8/2/2024 documented a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00373143, NY00352914), the facility did not ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal care for 2 out of 3 residents (Resident #2, Resident #7) reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, (1) Resident #2 had a known history of bladder and bowel incontinence and was dependent for toileting. Review of Resident #2's Certified Nurse Assistant documentation for June 2024 revealed the bladder and bowel incontinence care was not signed by direct care staff was not provided on 5 occasions. Review of Resident #2's Certified Nurse Assistant documentation for July 2024 revealed the bladder and bowel incontinence care was not signed by direct care staff,on 7 occasions; (2) Resident #7 had a known history of bladder and bowel incontinence and was dependent for toileting. Review of Resident #7's Certified Nurse Assistant documentation for July 2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00373143) the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was consistent for residents according to the daily staffing needs. Certified nurse aide staff levels were frequently below the levels determined by the facility to be necessary to meet the needs of the residents. Specifically, review of the facility daily staffing sheets for July 2024 and August 2024 revealed staffing was not adequate across various shifts, on the first floor, based on the unit needs and provider average ratio levels documented in the facility assessment. The findings are: The facility Staffing Hours policy last revised 4/2025 documented the facility provides adequate staffing to meet needed care and services for our resident population. Our facility maintains adequate staffing on each shift to ensure that our resident's needs and services are met. Certified nurseing assistants are available on each shift to provide the needed care and services of each resident as outlined on the resident's comprehensive care plan. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00334577) the facility did not ensure the residents right to a dignified existence inside the facility for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, on 2/26/2024 Resident #4 who was Resident #3's neighbor, went to Resident #3's room unzipped their pants and exposed themself to Resident #3. Resident #3 was upset and crying about Resident #4's behavior. The Findings are: The facility Residents Rights policy last revised 5/28/2024 documented Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to a dignified existence, to be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity and be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation. Resident #3 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder and Personal History of COVID-19. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00334577), the facility did not ensure the residents right to be free from abuse for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 2/26/2024 Resident #4, who was Resident #3's neighbor, went to Resident #3's room unzipped their pants and exposed themself to Resident #3. Resident #3 was upset and was crying about Resident #4's behavior and verbalized a fear of being raped. Subsequently, Resident #3's room was changed to another unit. The findings are: The facility Abuse policy last reviewed 6/1/2024 documented the facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect and abuse of residents/patients by anyone but not limited to staff, family, friends and residents of the facility. The facility prohibits any exploitation of the mentally and physically disabled resident in the facility. The facility has designed and implemented processes, which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident/patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00328066) from 2/12/24 to 2/27/24, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was consistently provided to meet the needs of residents on all shifts. Specifically, 1) multiple residents reported during confidential interviews and the group meeting that the facility was short staffed at times especially at night and on the weekends, there was a lack of timely staff response to call bells, and some stated that they smelled urine odors, 2) multiple nursing staff members reported a lack of sufficient staffing; and 3) analysis of the actual staffing schedule showed that on multiple occasions from January 13, 2024 through February 15, 2024, the facility was below the minimum levels documented on the Facility Assessment. Findings include: On 2/12/24 at 10:36 AM, Resident #92 stated they got a shower today after a month, and that the facility needed more help/needed to hire people. On 2/12/2024 at 10:21 AM, Resident #475 stated they have waited too long to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 2/12/24 to 2/27/24, the facility did not ensure that each resident was screened for a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual disability (ID). This was evident for 5 of 35 residents reviewed. Specially, Residents #34, #151, #105, #79, and #117 did not have the required pre-admission screening and resident review assessment completed prior to their admission to the facility. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure entitled PASARR/Screens last revised 12/2019 documented that prior to every resident's admission to the facility, they would have completed a level 1 pre-admission screening and resident review screen to ensure the residents are appropriate for the facility. In addition, residents that are identified with serious mental illness or intellectual disability would have a completed level 2 pre-admission screening and resident review screen. The facility will protect the rights of the residents with mental illness and/or intellectual disabilities by ensuring the delivery…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews during the Recertification Survey from 2/12/24 to 2/27/24, the facility did not ensure that Certified Nurse Aide performance reviews were completed at least once every 12 months. Specifically, performance evaluations were not conducted every 12 months for 9 of 10 Certified Nurse Aides (Staff #13, 14, 15,16,16, 38, 39, 40, and 41) records reviewed. The findings are: Facility documentation revealed the most recent performance evaluation for: - Staff #13 was dated 10/12/15. - Staff #14 was dated 1/14/15. - Staff #15 was dated 1/14/15. - Staff #16 was dated 10/12/15. - Staff #17 was dated 2/22/18. There was no documented evidence of any performance evaluations for Staff #38, 39, 40, and 41. On 2/15/2024 at 3:45 PM, the Human Resources Director stated they could not locate any current performance evaluations, and that perhaps the Certified Nurse Aide performance evaluations were located in the Director of Nursing office. On 2/15/2024 at 3:56 PM, the Director of Nursing stated they did the performance reviews annually in February. The Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review during a recertification survey from 2/12/24 to 2/27/24, the facility did not ensure that they store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, there were baking sheets on the floor in the kitchen, garbage was placed on top of a cart next to a pan storage rack with a whisk touching the garbage bags, thermometers used for food thermometers were not sanitized properly, sanitizer logs were not completed, a dining room resident refrigerator, freezer thermometer, was not working and resident's personal food items were not dated and labeled appropriately. Findings include: During a walk-through observation and interview with the Food Service Director on 02/12/24 at 09:56 AM, there were 4 baking pans on the floor in between equipment in the kitchen. The Food Service Director picked the baking pans up and stated they did not know why they were there. A cart with clear bags filled with garbage on top of it was observed in the middle of kitchen, near the red meat pans. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey 2/12/24 to 2/27/24, the facility did not ensure each resident was offered influenza and/or pneumococcal immunizations and received education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunizations for 4 (Residents #63, #96, #165 and #168) of 5 residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not ensure, Resident #63 was screened properly for influenza immunization, and/or Residents #96, #165, and #168 were screened for eligibility, offered and educated about pneumococcal immunizations. This was evidenced by: The facility policy titled Resident Immunizations dated 9/1/23 documented the facility will offer immunizations to residents who consent to aid in the prevention of infectious diseases/conditions in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices. The facility policy for Pneumococcal Vaccination dated 5/23/23 documented prior to or within 5 working days after admission residents will be assessed for eligibility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 2/12/24 to 2/27/24, it was determined for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #151) reviewed for dignity, the facility did not ensure all residents had the right to a dignified existence. Specifically, Resident #151 reported Staff #35 (Certified Nurse Aide) spoke to her in a derogatory manner on more than one occasion and Staff #35 was observed stating please to Resident #151 after Resident #151 made two requests for ice. Findings include: Resident #151 was admitted with diagnoses including Heart Failure, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and Adjustment Disorder. The 8/1/23 comprehensive care plan titled 'At Risk for Abuse' documented the resident was at risk for misappropriation, neglect, abuse and or exploitation. Interventions included monitor the resident for signs/symptoms of abuse, neglect, misappropriation, and/or exploitation and report to the facility's abuse officer and medical provider; refer for psychiatric evaluation and follow-up if indicated; and refer for psychology evaluation and ongoing services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during a recertification survey from 2/12/24 to 2/27/24, the facility did not ensure residents rights to a safe, comfortable, home-like environment for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #114) observed during dining. Specifically, Resident #114 was not provided an overbed table and was observed eating their lunch meal which was placed on a chair in their room. On another occasion, the resident was observed lying in bed and staff placed the resident's food tray on their bed by their feet. Findings include: Resident #114 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis and conditions of but not limited to Encephalopathy, Dementia and Depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required substantial/maximal assistance with eating. During an observation on 02/14/24 at 12:37 PM Resident #114 was eating their lunch meal from a tray that had been placed on a chair next to the bed. During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00330459) from 2/12/24 to 2/27/24, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were reported and/or reported timely to The New York State Department of Health for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse and/or misappropriation (Residents #129 and #156). Specifically, 1) the facility did notify the New York State Dept of Health when Resident #80 pushed Resident #129 to the floor resulting in Resident #129 hitting their head requiring medical evaluation; and (2) the facility did not notify the New York State Department of Health timely when Resident #156's wallet and cell phone were stolen. Findings include: 1) 1) Resident #129 admitted with diagnoses that included dementia, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. The Annual Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 11/7/23 documented Resident #129's cognition was severely impaired and no documented behavioral symptoms.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 2/12/24 to 2/27/24, the facility did not notify the ombudsman for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 105) reviewed for hospitalization. Specifically, the resident was transferred to the hospital and the facility could not provide evidence that notification was sent to the ombudsman. The findings are: Resident #105 was admitted with diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus, Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia. The discharge Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had an unplanned discharge, return anticipated. On 2/23/24 at 4:20 PM during an interview with the Director of Social Work, they stated they were not responsible for notifying the ombudsman of resident's transfers. On 2/27/24 at 8:37 AM during an interview the Ombudsman stated they did not receive notification that Resident #105 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. On 2/27/24 at 1:16 PM during an interview with the Administrator, they stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations record review and interviews, during the recertification survey from 2/12/24 to 2/27/24, the facility did not ensure that the Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed and revised in a timely manner for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #129 was involeved in a resident-to-resident altercation on 1/25/24 and the Behavior and Abuse Care Plans were not revised and/or updated to reflect new interventions to prevent reoccurrences. The findings are: Resident #129 was admitted with diagnoses that included non-Alzheimer's dementia, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. The Annual Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 11/7/23 documented Resident #129's cognition was severely impaired and the resident exhibited no documented behavioral symptoms. Facility Accident/Incident investigation for Resident #129 dated 1/25/24 documented that a Certified Nurse Aide observed Resident #129 being pushed to the floor by their roommate, Resident #80. Resident was transferred to emergency room for evaluation. There was no documented evidence that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated surveys (NY00320687) from 2/12/24 to 2/27/24, the facility did not ensure the resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #64) reviewed for antibiotic use. Specifically, Resident #64 did not receive intravenous antibiotic medication Meropenem as ordered by the medical provider at 12 AM, 6 AM, 12 PM and 6 PM on 7/22/2023 and the medical provider was not notified. Findings include: Policy and Procedure Admission, readmission revised 9/2022 documented it is the philosophy of the Facility to admit residents 24 hours per day, 7 days a week, based upon a clinical decision that considers the resident's needs, the Facility's ability to meet those needs. Policy and Procedure medication Administration revised 12/2019 documented medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during a recertification survey from 2/12/24 to 2/27/24, the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and that the environment remained as free from accidents as possible for 1 out of 4 residents (Resident #114) observed during dining. Specifically, supervision during meal intake was not provided as per care plan and staff did not ensure the resindent remained upright for 30 minutes after meals as per speech pathologist recommendation for Resident #114 with aspiration precautions. Findings include: Resident #114 was admitted to the facility with a diagnoses including dysphagia, dementia and depression. The care plan dated 10/1/21, documented the resident had potential for aspiration related to dysphagia. Interventions included to encourage resident to be out of bed for meals, keep/maintain upright sitting position when assisting resident with meals and at least 30 min after meal. Resident must be supervised for all intake solid or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review during the recertification survey conducted 2/12/24 to 2/27/24, the facility did not ensure each resident was offered the COVID-19 vaccine and provided education regarding the benefits, risks and potential side effects associated with the vaccine for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #165, #168) reviewed for infection control. Specifically, there was no documented evidence Resident #165, #168 was offered, declined, and/or were educated about the COVID-19 vaccination. Findings include: The facility policy titled COVID Vaccine: Residents and Healthcare Personnel, dated 12/4/23, documented upon admission/readmission, the facility shall obtain COVID 19 vaccine history to all extent possible and COVID 19 vaccine will be offered, promoted and encouraged to eligible residents and Healthcare Personnel. Prior to offering the vaccine Healthcare Personnel, residents or their representatives should be provided education regarding the vaccine. The Healthcare Personnel, residents, or their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00324940 and NY00295143) from 2/12/24 to 2/27/24, it was determined for 2 of 5 residents (Residents # 274 and 224) reviewed for personal property, the facility did not ensure grievances were resolved in a timely manner. Specifically, the facility lacked documentation of the completion of a thorough investigation and timely resolution of the residents' reports of missing chains with pendants. The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Grievances reviewed 2/1/23 documented that the facility would assist residents, representatives, family members, or resident advocates in filing a grievance/concern form when concerns are expressed, and the facility will investigate and resolve resident grievances in a timely manner to ensure resident's safety and protection of residents' rights. 1. Resident #274 was admitted with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus and a mental disorder. The Concern/Grievance-Resident Notification Summary dated 4/15/2022 documented a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview during recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00321475) from 2/12/24 to 2/27/24, the facility did not ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received services and assistance to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 out of 9 residents (Resident #234) reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that colostomy care, bed baths, hoyer lift transfer and bladder incontinence care were consistently provided for Resident #234 as per physician order and/or the comprehensive care plan. Findings include: Resident #234 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including intellectual disabilities, schizoaffective disorder and obstructive uropathy. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 7/3/2023, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment), inattentive and disorganized thinking at times. The resident had a colostomy and was totally dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review during a recertification and an abbreviated survey (NY00259391) conducted from 10/19/2020 through 10/26/2020 it could not be ensured that the facility reported timely or thoroughly investigated all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect or mistreatment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #118) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #118 sustained a laceration on his right hand after an interaction with a staff member. Supporting evidence to rule out abuse/neglect or evidence confirming that the incident was reported timely to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) was not available for review despite several requests. The findings are: Resident #118 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alcohol Dependence with Withdrawal, Cellulitis of Limb, and Major Depressive Disorder. According to the 6/25/2020 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool), the resident had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-26 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during a recertification survey it could not be ensured that the facility notified all residents or the residents' representative(s) of a transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. This was evident for 1 of 2 (Resident #140) residents reviewed for Hospitalization. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled, Discharge-Summary dated 9/2017 and revised 8/2019, describes the policy for anticipated discharges which includes writing a discharge summary and a post discharge plan. No policy or procedure was available for review regarding notification of unanticipated transfers and discharges. The facility Notice of Transfer/Discharge form was reviewed, which is completed by the nursing department at the time of an unanticipated transfer/discharge. Resident #140 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-10-26 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during a recertification survey, it cannot be ensured that the facility provided written notice of the facility's Bed Hold policy upon transfer to all residents or residents' representative(s). This was evident for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #140) reviewed for Hospitalization. The facility policy and procedure titled Bed Hold dated 3/2018 and revised 7/2019, documents the facility will provide written information regarding the bed-hold and return policy upon admission and prior to/at the time of hospitalizations or therapeutic leaves as soon as practicable following an emergency transfer. The findings are: Resident #140 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Hemiparesis, Dysphagia, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, and Diabetes. The Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) dated 10/8/2020 documented that the resident has moderately impaired cognition and that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-10-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, it could not be ensured that the facility provided the appropriate treatment and services to improve and /or prevent further decline in range of motion (ROM). Specifically, 1 of 4 residents (Resident # 29) reviewed for limited Range of Motion (ROM) did not have bilateral hand rolls in place to prevent further joint contracture as ordered by the physician. The findings are: Resident # 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but not limited to Quadriplegia, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Non-Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, and Disorder of the Autonomic Nervous System. The 8/4/2020 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) showed the resident's Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) could not be conducted and the resident required total dependence on staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). On surveyor observation, the resident was not responsive to verbal stimuli. Physician orders dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey it could not be ensured that the facility staff followed proper hand hygiene and gloving techniques to prevent cross contamination and the spread of infection for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #113 and #115) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, 1) cross contamination of wound/wound supplies was observed during dressing change and 2) hand hygiene after removal of used gloves was not observed during wound care. The findings are: 1. Resident #113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Major Depression, Generalized Muscle Weakness and Pressure Ulcer. The 7/1/2020 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) showed the resident as experiencing moderately impaired cognition, requiring extensive assistance of staff support with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and at risk for Pressure Ulcers (PUs). Alteration in Skin Integrity Care Plan updated 10/1/2020, documented that the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| STEINBERG, ARI | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 08/28/2017 |
| GINSBERG, HINDI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2008 |
| HAGER, HERSHEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2008 |
| KENNY, CHARLES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2009 |
| LAUBER, SIMON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2010 |
| ORZEL, ISRAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2010 |
| STEINMETZ, LEON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2008 |
| ZACHARAISH, ABRAHAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2008 |
| KLEIN, MORRIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/20/2015 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335418. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.