No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hempstead Park Nursing Home

800 Front Street, Hempstead, NY 11550 · For profit - Individual · 251 certified beds · (516) 705-9700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 immediate-jeopardy citation$15,445 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,445 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-20)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
680 Fulton Ave · (516) 486-2669 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
634 Fulton Ave · (516) 280-2260 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
940 Front St · (516) 279-4774 · Call to confirm hours
Park
645 Cedar St · (516) 483-2287 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.8%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%5.8%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.8%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.2%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.2%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.6%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%6.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.4%19.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.2%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine47.2%78.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.5%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.5%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.371.701.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.231.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
31.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 31.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.7–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge31.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge26.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge31.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.4–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.451.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.01
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
28.9%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 251 beds and averages 240.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-05)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case #NY00321006) the facility failed to ensure that a resident identified as an elopement risk received adequate supervision to prevent elopement from the facility. This was evident in 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for elopement (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 who was cognitively impaired, was initially assessed as an elopement risk on 07/07/2022. At that time, the resident was placed on 15-minute monitoring, and a wander alert device was placed on the left ankle. Subsequently, on 02/19/2024 at 4:54 PM, Resident #1 walked through the front door undetected, and was returned to the facility by relatives and local police on 02/20/2024 at 12:57 PM. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy with the likelihood for a serious adverse outcome to Resident #1 and 31 other residents who were at risk for elopement. The findings include. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of non-Alzheimer's dementia (defined…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review during a survey, the facility failed to ensure that the residents' right to personal privacy, including the right to send and promptly receive unopened mail and other letters, packages, and other materials delivered to the facility for the residents, including those delivered through a means other than a postal service, was maintained. This was identified for one (Resident #8) of seven residents reviewed Resident/Patient/Client Rights. Specifically, a mailed package for Resident #8 was delivered from outside to the facility; however, the package was not received by the resident.Complaint #273787 The findings include: A facility policy and procedure titled Resident Main Services documented the facility shall ensure that each resident is afforded the right to send and receive mail promptly, privately, and without interference. The facility shall not delay, withhold, censor, open, or otherwise interfere with resident mail except when assistance is specifically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review during the abbreviated survey, the facility failed to ensure resident rights to be free from abuse for two (Resident #11 and Resident #12) of three residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, Staff observed Resident #12 having a physical altercation with Resident #11. Resident #12 was on top of Resident #11 with both hands placed around Resident #11's neck. Resident #12 stated they were attempting to retrieve a belt they alleged Resident #11 had taken. Assessment of Resident #11 revealed bleeding from their nose, mouth, and the right second toe.Incident # 2693929The findings include:The facility's Abuse Prevention Policy, dated 09/19/2022 and revised on 05/10/2025, documented that it is the facility's policy to provide a safe resident environment that protects residents from abuse, including verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse. This includes staff-to-resident abuse of any type, resident-to-resident abuse of any type, and visitor-to-resident abuse of any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that each resident had a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was identified for four (2 North, 2 South, 3 North, and 3 South units) of six units observed for environment. Specifically, during observations the day rooms and hallways in units 2 North, 2 South and 3 North had ripped sheetrock and peeling wallpaper; the shower rooms in units 2 South, 3 North and 3 South had torn privacy curtains; Unit 3 South resident bathroom was in an unsanitary condition with debris on the floor and had a foul odor; and unit 3 North resident bathroom was observed with missing wall tiles.Complaint #2717918The findings include:The facility policy titled Preventative Maintenance /Safety, dated 07/23/2025 documented the objective of the preventative maintenance /safety program is to assess, inspect, evaluate, and inventory equipment used for patient care. It is the policy of this facility to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and visitors. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 07/28/2025 and completed on 08/05/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents' drug regimens were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. This was identified for one (Resident #14) of five residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, Resident #14 had a Physician's Order to receive Olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) 5 milligrams once a day from 04/16/2025 to 05/15/2025. On 05/16/2025, the Physician lowered the resident's Olanzapine dose to 2.5 milligrams once a day. On 06/04/2025, the facility changed its Electronic Medical Record (EMR) to another vendor company. Resident #14's Olanzapine order was inadvertently reverted to 5 milligrams of Olanzapine daily without the consent or knowledge of the resident or the resident's Physician.The finding is:The facility's policy titled Psychoactive Medications, last reviewed on 03/06/2025, documented the Psychiatrist will attempt to reduce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 07/28/2025 and completed on 08/05/2025, the facility did not ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was identified on one (1) (Unit 4 South) of six (6) units reviewed for the Sufficient Nursing Staffing Task. Specifically, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year Quarter Two 2025 (January 1st-March 31st) indicated that the facility had a one (1)-star staffing rating. Additionally, there were multiple occasions when the facility had insufficient Licensed Practical Nurses assigned to Unit 4 South, as specified on the Facility Assessment. The finding is:The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year Quarter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #697429) initiated on 07/28/2025 and completed on 08/05/2025, the facility did not ensure resident rights to be free from abuse. This was identified for two (Resident #83 and Resident #98) of three residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, on 04/25/2025, Resident #83, with intact cognition, was using a common bathroom. Resident #98, with severely impaired cognition, attempted to enter the same bathroom, and Resident #83 told Resident #98 to get out. Resident #98 made a fist and swung at Resident #83. Resident #83, in turn, punched Resident #98 in the right eye; Resident #98 was sent to the emergency room for evaluation for complained of pain and redness in the right eye.The finding is:The facility's Abuse Prevention Policy, dated 9/19/2022 and revised on 2/3/2025, documented to provide a safe resident environment that protects residents from abuse, including verbal, mental, sexual, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 07/28/2025 and completed on 08/05/2025, the facility did not ensure that the resident representative and Ombudsman were notified for each resident discharged from the facility. This was identified for one (Resident #241) of two residents reviewed for Discharge. Specifically, Resident #241 had a planned discharge from the facility on 04/20/2025 to another facility. There was no documented evidence that the resident's representatives and the Ombudsman were notified of the discharge.The finding is:The facility's policy titled Transfer and Discharge Planning and Documentation, effective 4/28/2025, documented notifying the resident/family/ombudsman in writing before a transfer or discharge. The unit Social Worker will be responsible for ensuring that the resident (and representative when applicable) receives written notice of any discharge. The Director of Social Work will be responsible for ensuring that the Ombudsman receives notice of all discharges. When the discharge is planned, the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 07/28/2025 and completed on 08/05/2025, the facility did not ensure it developed and implemented a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #65) of two (2) residents reviewed for Rehabilitation and one (1) (Resident #11) of two (2) residents reviewed for Positioning/Mobility. Specifically, 1) Resident #65 had a right above-the-knee amputation and was in the process of getting a prosthetic limb device. There was no comprehensive care plan regarding the amputation, including the status of the prosthetic device; and 2) Resident #11 had a Physician's order to apply a hand roll at all times or as tolerated. On 07/28/2025 and 08/01/2025, the resident was observed without any hand roll to the right hand.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 07/28/2025 and completed on 08/05/2025, the facility did not ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #232) of three (3) residents reviewed for Choices. Specifically, Resident #232 returned to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] after a Pacemaker (a small implanted medical device that helps regulate a slow heart rate by sending electrical impulses to the heart) Implantation. Resident #232 had a recommendation from the hospital for a follow-up consultation with an Electrophysiologist (a Cardiologist who specializes in diagnosing and treating heart rhythm disorders) after three weeks. There was no documented evidence that a follow-up consultation with the Electrophysiologist was scheduled; the direct care nurses were not aware that the resident needed to be connected to the Pacemaker transmitter; no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 7/28/2025 and completed on 8/5/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences. This was identified for one (Resident #6) of two residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #6 had a Tracheostomy (a surgical procedure where a hole is made in the windpipe (trachea) to create an opening in the neck, allowing a tube to be inserted for breathing assistance). The facility converted to a different electronic medical record company in June 2025. When this occurred, the orders for daily tracheostomy care did not carry over to the new electronic medical record, and therefore, the nurses did not document that daily tracheostomy care and suctioning were being done. In addition, the physician's order was for the resident to receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 07/28/2025 and completed on 08/05/2025, the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in a locked compartment. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #208) of eight (8) residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, a tube of unlabeled Hydrocortisone (a steroid cream to treat inflammation and allergies) cream 0.5 percent, and a labeled Triamcinolone (a prescription steroid cream to treat allergies and inflammation), 0.1 percent, cream were observed on Resident #208's overbed table. Additionally, there was a labeled Chlorhexidine Gluconate (anti-microbial mouthwash to treat inflammation of the gums) 0.12 percent bottle, a labeled Fluticasone (nasal spray for allergy) nasal spray, a labeled Patadine (eye drop for allergy) 0.1 percent eye drop bottle, and an unlabeled Refresh (eye lubricant) eye drop bottle on Resident #208's nightstand. There was no Nursing staff in the vicinity of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review during the recertification survey initiated on 07/28/2025 and completed on 08/05/2025, the facility did not ensure If the facility did not employ a qualified professional person to furnish a specific service to be provided by the facility, services were furnished to residents by a person or agency outside the facility under an arrangement described in section 1861(w) of the Act for each resident. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #179) of one (1) resident reviewed for Vision/Hearing. Specifically, Resident #179 was seen by the Optometrist on 04/28/2025 and recommended a referral for an Ophthalmology consult for Cataract (a clouding of the lens of the eye) surgery. The facility did not arrange an appointment with the Ophthalmologist until 08/04/2025, approximately three (3) months after the recommendation was made. The finding is:The facility policy titled Consultants, last reviewed on 02/2025, documented the nurses on the unit will pick up an order for a consultant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the Recertification Survey initiated on 07/28/2025 and completed on 08/05/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident's bedside was adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system that relayed the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area. This was identified for one (Resident #40) of three (3) residents reviewed during the Environmental Task. Specifically, on 07/28/2025 and 07/29/2025, Resident #40's call bell was not functioning, and the annunciator system at the nursing station did not register the calls from Resident #40's room. The finding is:The facility's policy, titled Resident's Use of Call Bells, last reviewed on 07/29/2025, documented call bell functioning will be checked monthly and as needed by the Maintenance Department. A supply of tap bells/hand bells will be available in the event of a call bell system malfunction. Any staff member who hears or sees a call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review in an abbreviated survey (Complaint # NY00340378), the facility did not ensure that Residents were appropriately supervise and implement interventions to prevent resident to resident sexual abuse for one Resident (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for sexual abuse. Specifically, Resident #1 (Brief Interview Mental Status score 11) who is cognitivly impaired was observed behind closed doors engaging in sexual activities with Resident #2 (Brief Interview Mental Status score 0) The findings are. The Review of the facility policy dated 9/19/2022 entitled Abuse Prevention documented the resident has the right to be free from abuse. Sexual Abuse-nonconsensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. This includes non-consensual sexual intrusion, touching intimate body parts. The facility will evaluate an individual resident's capacity to consent to sexual activity when indicated. Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizoaffective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 11/28/2023 and completed on 12/5/2023 the facility did not ensure the residents had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was identified for one (Resident #29) of one resident reviewed for the Environment. Specifically, Resident #29's bed rail, wheelchair arm rest, and left side of the wheelchair were observed soiled with a cream colored and crusty substance on multiple occasions (11/28/2023, 11/29/2023 and 11/30/2023). The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Wheelchair/Gerichair/Cleaning Monitoring dated 10/12/2021 documented the 3 PM - 11 PM shift will prepare and have all wheelchairs and Geri chairs ready for cleaning. Any wheelchair designated by nursing which needs additional cleaning will be cleaned and returned to the unit by housekeeping staff. The facility policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfecting Resident Rooms dated 5/2020 documented to ensure that all resident's rooms are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY003183311) initiated on 11/28/2023 and completed on 12/5/2023 the facility did not ensure that each resident was free from abuse. This was identified for three (Resident #61, Resident #71 and Resident #84) of eight residents reviewed for resident to resident altercation. Specifically, on 6/13/2023 Resident #61 threw a can of soda at Resident #71. Resident #71 then threw a can of soda at Resident #61. Resident #61 was assisted to their room by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #9. CNA #9 exited Resident #61's room to get a Hoyer (Mechanical) lift. Resident #61 exited their room with a broomstick and hit Resident #71 and Resident #84 with the broomstick. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled, Abuse Prevention effective 9/19/2022 and last reviewed on 9/19/2023 documented the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY00327941), initiated on 11/28/2023 and completed on 12/5/2023 the facility did not ensure that all incidents were investigated thoroughly. This was identified for one (Resident #16) of 12 residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, Resident #16 was observed with a discoloration to the lower left eyelid, an injury of unknown origin, on 11/11/2023 at approximately 4 AM. The facility investigation did not include the assigned Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1's statement to determine the root cause of the injury. The finding is: The facility Accident and Incident Investigation and Reporting policy and procedure dated 10/20/2023 documented that investigation statements are to be obtained from the assigned CNA, any witnesses to the occurrence, and the person who reported the occurrence. Resident #16 was admitted with diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Insomnia, and Psychosis. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 11/28/2023 and completed on 12/5/2023 the facility did not ensure that all services provided by the facility met professional standards of quality. This was identified for one (Resident #140) of five residents reviewed for Medication Regimen Review (MRR). Specifically, Resident #140's Insulin injections sites and Nitroglycerin (Heart medication) transdermal (through the skin) 24-hour patch application sites were not documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) on multiple occasions. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Special Considerations for Medication Administrations, effective 10/10/2022 documented nurses administering medications will adhere to professional standards of practice as stipulated by the American Nurses Association, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the Centers for Disease Control. There were no procedures specific to Insulin injections and medicated patch application other than the Fentanyl (controlled substance) patch. Resident #140 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during a Recertification Survey initiated on 11/28/2023 and completed on 12/5/2023, the facility did not ensure that the residents' environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible, and each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This was identified for one (Resident #186) of 14 residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #186 was observed on 11/28/2023 with multiple medication pills in a medication cup, including an antipsychotic medication, on their overbed table with no staff member in the vicinity. The resident was not assessed to safely self-administer medications. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Medication Administration dated 9/20/2023 documented a nurse will watch the resident swallow the medication and offer appropriate liquid. Resident #186 was admitted with diagnoses that included Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder and Constipation. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 11/28/2023 and completed on 12/5/2023 the facility did not ensure that the medical care of each resident was supervised by the Physician including monitoring changes in the resident's medical status. This was identified for one (Resident #38) of four residents reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, Resident #38 had an unplanned significant weight loss of 5.8% over a 30-day period. There was no documented evidence that the resident's weight loss was addressed by the Physician. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Notification of Clinical Nutrition Changes, last reviewed on 12/1/2023, documented to inform the resident and/or representative and the resident's Physician when there is a change in the resident's clinical nutrition status or diet. The clinical dietician will communicate with the resident's Physician when there is a clinical nutritional status change or an indication for a diet change. The date and time of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 11/28/2023 and completed on 12/5/2023 the facility did not ensure each Pharmacy Consultant Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendation was addressed by the resident's attending physician. This was identified for two residents (Resident #140 and Resident #79) of five residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, 1) Resident #140 was prescribed Lantus Solostar U-Insulin subcutaneously (beneath the skin) once daily, a Nitroglycerin (Heart medication) transdermal (through the skin) 24-hour patch, Budesonide suspension for nebulization (a mist that is inhaled into the lungs), and Fluticasone nasal spray on 7/18/2023. On 8/10/2023 the Pharmacy Consultant recommended the Lantus and Nitroglycerin patch application site should be documented and rotated. There was no documented evidence that the MRR recommendations were addressed before 11/21/2023. The Pharmacy Consultant also recommended to evaluate the use of both the Budesonide nebulizer and Fluticasone nasal spray because both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY 00325593), initiated on 11/28/2023 and completed on 12/5/2023, the facility did not ensure each resident obtained radiological services timely. This was identified for one (Resident #6) of 10 residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, Resident #6 complained of pain to the right leg on 9/29/2023 and 9/30/2023. STAT (immediate) x-rays were ordered on 10/1/2023; however, the x-rays were not completed as ordered. On 10/2/2023 Resident #6 was found on the floor and continued to complain of pain to their right leg. New orders for the STAT x-rays were obtained on 10/2/2023. The x-rays were not completed until after five days on 10/6/2023, after the original order on 10/1/2023. The x-ray results revealed a right hip fracture. Subsequently the resident was transferred to the hospital. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Diagnostic Testing, dated 9/30/2022, documented the Registered Nurse (RN) supervisor will contact the diagnostic company for all STAT orders; the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 11/8/2021, the facility failed to ensure that it maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for four (Resident #203, #86, #112, and#197) of four residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, 1) Resident #203's oxygen (O2) tubing connected to their concentrator was not accurately dated and laying on the floor, and the O2 tubing on their wheelchair was undated, 2) Resident #86's O2 tubing connected to their concentrator was undated, 3) Resident #112's O2 tubing connected to their concentrator was undated, and 4) Resident #197's O2 tubing connected to their concentrator was not accurately dated and the O2 tubing on their wheelchair was undated. The findings include, but are not limited to: The facility's policy titled Oxygen Therapy, last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the Recertification Survey and the Abbreviated survey (Complaint #NY00283512), completed on 11/8/2021, the facility did not ensure that all resident representatives were informed of significant change in the resident's status for 1 (Resident #355) of 1 resident reviewed for change in condition. Specifically, Resident #355 had a decline in ambulatory status identified on 7/7/2021. The resident was referred to physical therapy and was placed on rehabilitation services. The resident representative was not notified of the resident's change in condition which resulted in a need to commence physical therapy treatment. The finding is: The facility's policy on Family Communication of Staff to Resident Family dated 12/2020 documented that the Nursing Department will update residents' families or representatives on any change in resident condition or upon request by family or representative for any clinical concerns. Documentation of this communication will be present in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY00284403), the facility did not ensure resident rights to be free from abuse for two (Resident #57 and Resident #70) of four residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, Resident #57, who had Dementia, kicked Resident #70. Resident #70, who was assessed with intact cognition, in turn threw a garbage can at Resident #57 which resulted in two small lacerations to Resident #57's legs. The finding is: The facility Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure, dated 11/2018 and revised 10/2020, documented the resident has the right to be free from abuse in the facility. Physical abuse is inappropriate physical contact resulting in injury or harm to a resident. It includes the willful infliction of injury with resulting physical harm. Physical abuse includes but is not limited to hitting, slapping, and kicking. Resident #57 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY00261845 and # NY 00270792) completed on 11/8/2021, the facility did not ensure that injuries of unknown origin were reported immediately (no later than 24 hours) for one (Resident #304) of three residents reviewed for Change of Condition, and did not ensure that an accident and injury involving potential staff neglect was reported immediately (no later than 24 hours) for one (Resident #305) of 10 residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, 1) Resident #304 was identified by facility staff on 7/13/2020 and 7/16/2020 to have injuries of unknown origin; however, the injuries were not reported to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) until 8/7/2020; and 2) Resident #305 was injured while being transferred by staff via a mechanical (Hoyer) lift on 1/8/2021; however, the incident was not reported to the NYSDOH until 1/29/2021. In addition, the facility did not ensure that the results of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 11/8/2021, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed and implemented for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs. This was identified for one (Resident #148) of five residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, Resident #148 received Clopidogrel, an anticoagulant; however, there was no Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) developed for anticoagulant medication use. The finding is: Resident #148 was admitted with diagnoses including Myocardial Infarction, Essential Hypertension, and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating the resident had severely impaired cognition. A Physician's admission order dated 5/25/2021 and active as of 11/5/2021 ordered Clopidogrel 75 milligrams (mg)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and the Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY 00273149), the facility did not ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (Resident #75) of one resident reviewed for Physical Restraints and that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards for one (Resident #112) of four residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, 1) Resident #75, who was assessed at high risk for falls, sustained a fall with injury when left unsupervised in a facility dining room on 3/16/2021; and 2) two Intravenous (IV) kits with 23-gauge needles and one IV kit with an 18-gauge needle was observed unattended in Resident #112's room. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Fall Prevention, last reviewed 1/2021, documented that a Fall Risk Assessment is completed upon admission, readmission, significant changes, quarterly, and as needed. Preventative measures shall be initiated immediately based on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 11/8/2021, the facility did not ensure that each resident who needs respiratory care is provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #196) of 6 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #196, with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), was administered oxygen without a Physician's order. Additionally, the resident's oxygen saturation rate was not monitored to assess the resident's respiratory status and need for oxygen use. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Oxygen Therapy, dated 7/30/2021, documented the Primary Medical Doctor (PMD) will order supplemental oxygen therapy. The PMD will specify the route, the flow rate, and whether or not the oxygen is continuous or on an as needed basis (PRN). Resident #196 was admitted with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Diabetes Mellitus, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 11/8/2021, the facility did not label drugs and biologicals used in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, including dating the medication when first opened. This was identified during the medication storage task for two of six medication storage room/medication cart observations. Specifically, Resident #4, #177, and #29 had medications in the unit medication cart that were not dated when first opened. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure for Medication Labeling and Storage last reviewed 12/2020, documented that the nurse initiating a stock medication must ensure that the medication is dated upon opening. The policy did not include procedures to ensure dating of prescription medications upon opening. The Latanoprost Ophthalmic (eye drops used to treat high pressure inside the eye) solution manufacturer guideline last revised 8/2011 provided by the facility documented that once a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-08 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey and the Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY00261845 and NY 00270792) completed on 11/8/2021, the facility did not report an injury of unknown origin and an incident involving a mechanical lift to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) in accordance with the NYSDOH Nursing Home Incident Reporting Manual for one (Resident #304) of three residents reviewed for Change of Condition and for one (Resident #305) of 10 residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, 1) Resident #304 was identified by facility staff on 7/13/2020 and 7/16/2020 to have injuries of unknown origin; however, the injuries were not reported to the NYSDOH until 8/7/2020; and 2) Resident #305 was injured while being transferred by staff via a mechanical lift (Hoyer lift) on 1/8/2021, however, the incident was not reported to the NYSDOH until 1/29/2021. The findings are: The New York State Department of Health Nursing Home Incident Reporting Manual dated August…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-08-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the Recertification Survey initiated on 07/28/2025 and completed on 08/5/2025, the facility did not ensure the Facility Assessment considered specific staffing needs for each resident unit for each shift, such as day, evening, and night. This was identified during the Sufficient Nursing Staffing Task. Specifically, the Facility Assessment, last reviewed in June 2025, did not indicate staffing needs for Certified Nursing Aides, Monday to Friday, for each unit and each shift. Additionally, the Facility Assessment did not specify the staffing needs for Licensed Practical Nurses for each unit for the 3:00 PM-11:00 PM shift and the 11:00 PM-7:00 AM shift during the weekdays. The finding is:The facility's policy, titled Facility Assessment, last reviewed/revised on 8/1/2024, documented the facility will conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for residents competently during day-to-day operations and emergency services.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,445 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,445 — penalty dated 2024-03-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MELNICKE, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER100%since 06/03/1998
MELNICKE, ISRAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/13/2013
SIRKIS, AVROMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/30/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$27.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$532K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 3%Other / private 23%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $532K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$374per resident / day
operating cost
$11,380per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$343per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335808. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next