No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hudson Valley Rehabilitation & Extended Care Ctr

260 Vineyard Ave, Highland, NY 12528 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 203 certified beds · (845) 691-7201 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (845) 691-7201 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0603) — most recent Jul 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Jul 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1 Pine St · (845) 483-0447 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3732 US Highway Route 9W · (845) 691-8246 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3650 US-9W · (845) 691-9155 · Call to confirm hours
Park
286 Haviland Rd · (914) 245-4434 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
126 Chapel Hill Rd · (845) 691-2677

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.2%14.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%0.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.1%1.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.2%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.1%12.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.5%13.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%6.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control35.9%19.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table28.1%13.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.3%78.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission33.2%20.6%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.6%9.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.721.701.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.341.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.3%CMS range 51.5–67.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.0%CMS range 6.0–13.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge33.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.2%CMS range 6.2–15.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
47.2%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 203 beds and averages 125.7 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 77 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.550 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-27)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-07-23 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00383624, NY00369540) the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from involuntary seclusion for one (1) (Resident #2) out of six (6) residents reviewed for seclusion. Specifically, on 01/19/2025, Certified Nurse Aide #7 was observed on surveillance video following Resident #2 down the hallway to their room, closing the door and placing disposable washcloths in the corner of the door to prevent the resident from easily opening the door and exiting the room. This occurred at approximately 12:25 PM and was not discovered until 2:55 PM by the Housekeeper Lead and Housekeeper #2. Resident #2 who was assessed as requiring maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort, helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort) with toileting, was found naked, with urine and feces observed on floor. According to the Housekeeping Lead, resident #2 was observed to be anxious to exit the room as evidenced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (NY00622225) from 2/19/26 to 2/27/26, it was determined that for one (1) of four (4) resident care units (2 East), the facility did not have sufficient nursing staff levels to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, on 02/08/2026 during 3:00 p.m. -11:00 p.m., there was no documented evidence that medications were administered to 35 residents when Registered Nurse Supervisor #17 was also assigned to work on unit 2 East and 2 West. The findings include The Facility assessment dated [DATE] -10/31/2025 documented the following staff levels 2 East: 3:00 p.m.,-11:00 p.m., 2 Licensed Practical Nurses, with a minimum of 1 Licensed Practical Nurses, 1 Registered Nurse Supervisor as the minimum and the 3 [NAME] 3:00 p.m.,-11:00 p.m., 2 Licensed Practical Nurses with a minimum of 1 Licensed Practical Nurse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-27 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (2677034) from 02/19/2026 to 02/27/2026 the facility did not provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of food and nutrition services. Specifically, 1) observations of incomplete refrigerator temperature log documentation in the kitchen and on the units; expired food in unit 3W and 3E pantry refrigerators, and during the Resident Council Meeting held on 02/20/2026 residents stated they had missing food items on their meal trays, and 2) Resident #15's representative stated Resident #15 frequently did not receive 9:00 AM and / or 2:00 PM nutritional supplement snacks. The findings include The policy and procedure titled Refrigerator Temperatures and Checks issued 06/19/2025 documented dietary staff are to perform and document temperature checks at least twice daily using the Refrigerator Temperature Logs; ensure food is labeled, dated, covered and stored properly; and discard expired or unlabeled items. Nursing staff are to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 02/19/2026 to 02/27/2026, the facility did not store, prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, 1) unlabeled and undated food were stored in the kitchen and unit pantry refrigerators, and 2) expired foods were stored in the kitchen, unit pantry refrigerators, and dry pantry.The findings includeThe policy dated 06/19/2025 titled Refrigerator Temperatures and Checks documented temperatures must be monitored, documented, and staff are responsible for ensuring safe storage, and proper labeling.During the initial tour of the kitchen on 02/19/2026 at 9:17 AM Kitchen refrigerators contained 1/2 roll of uncut bologna, storage container of peaches, (13) individual portions of pineapple, (15) jello, (5) butterscotch pudding, (11) applesauce, (2) egg salad, (1) cottage cheese, and (16) prune juice that were unlabeled and undated. Kitchen refrigerators and the dry pantry storage contained a storage container of fruit cocktail dated 02/12/2026 and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for three (3) of eight (8) residents (Resident #23, Resident #28, Resident #72) reviewed for the environment. Specifically, 1) Resident #23 was observed in their room with garbage and linens scattered on the floor and a disconnected catheter bag containing urine was hanging on the bed rail. 2)Resident #28 was observed sitting in a wheelchair with dust and dirt on the frame, the wheelchair cushion had brown stains on it, and the room bathroom had sticky floors and a smell of urine; 3) Resident #72's bathroom had an approximately 20-inch by 10-inch opening in the wall which allowed plumbing underneath the bathroom sink to be exposed. The findings include: 1)When observed on 02/19/2026 at 12:13 p.m., Resident #23's room had a dirty sheet on the floor, a disconnected catheter bag was on the bed rail and there were empty water bottles on the bedside table and bureau. When observed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview conducted during the Recertification survey from 02/19/2026 to 02/27/2026, the facility did not ensure residents were provided food that was safe and/or at an appetizing temperature. Specifically, a test tray revealed lasagna that was being served to residents on the 3 W unit had a temperature of 120.5 degrees. The findings include:According to USDA Food Code and CDC guidelines for food safety, food safety requires consistent temperature control from the time food leaves the kitchen, to transport and distribution to prevent contamination (e.g., covering food items). Timely distribution is essential to ensure food and beverages are served at the proper temperature.During an interview on 02/19/2026 at 4:00 PM with Resident #104, they stated the food was delivered to the unit cold and the only way to get a hot meal was to eat in the dining room. During an observation and interview on 02/25/2026 at 11:15 AM the Food Service Director stated lunch tray line would start at 11:30 AM. Temperature of the lasagna was tested within normal limits at 150 degrees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 02/19/2026 to 02/27/2026, the facility did not ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 4 (four) residents observed during dining (Residents #63, #58, #39 and #30), one (1) of seven (7) residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident #84), and one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #23) reviewed for bladder and bowel incontinence. Specifically, 1) During lunch tray delivery and tray set-up on 02/24/2026, Certified Nurse Aide #7 was observed touching the tops of straws and buttering a resident's roll with their bare hands 2) Resident #84 was lying in bed with their catheter collection bag hanging on the bed rail and touching the floor; 3) Resident #23's was lying in bed with their catheter collection bag lying on the floor between the bedside table and bed frame.The findings included: The policy titled Infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification survey from 02/19/2026 to 02/27/2026, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect for three (3) residents (Resident #47, Resident #55, and Resident #90) observed during dining. Specifically, on 02/24/2026, Certified Nurse Aide #7 placed a clothing protector on Resident #47, Resident #55 and Resident #90 without asking the residents permission to do so.The findings included:A facility policy titled Dignity and Resident Rights revised 08/01/2025 documented all residents of facility are treated with dignity and respect in all aspect of their care. In practice, staff must communicate courteously, maintain confidentiality, and involve residents in decisions affecting their lives. Proper attention to residents' choices reinforces autonomy and enhances well-being.During observation and interview on 02/24/2026 at 12:00 p.m., Certified Nurse Aide #7 was observed placing clothing protectors on Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the resident's right to formulate an advanced directive was documented in a manner to prevent those wishes from being followed for one (1) of 38 residents reviewed for advanced directives. Specifically, Resident #136 completed a Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment form specifying their wishes as Do Not Resuscitate and Do Not Intubate, but the orders in the electronic medical record and the resident's wrist band did not all match the form. The findings include:The policy titled Advanced Directives and Advanced Care Plan Policy, last reviewed 08/2025, documented all residents have the right to formulate an advanced directive. Advanced directives are reviewed at admission, quarterly, annually, and with any significant change in condition. Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment or medical orders are updated when preferences change. [NAME] band means resident has a valid Do Not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility did not ensure that a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge was sent to the State Long Term Care Ombudsman for four (4) of five (5) residents (Resident #15, Resident #2, Resident #84, and Resident #132) reviewed for Hospitalization. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that a notice of transfer was sent to the New York State Ombudsman and a bed hold policy was provided to the resident representative when 1) Resident #15 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], 2) Resident #2 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and, 3) Resident #84 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Additionally, Resident #132 was hospitalized on [DATE] and a bed hold policy was not provided. The findings include: The policy titled Transfer and Discharge, last reviewed 11/11/2022, documented the facility will provide notice of the transfer or discharge to the resident and resident representative along with a copy to the ombudsman. It must be sent to the ombudsman…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated survey (#2677034) from 02/19/2026 to 02/27/2026, the facility did not ensure Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed and/or revised as needed to reflect changing needs for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #15) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, care plan interventions were not updated to reflect the hand-written note on the 03/28/2025 smoking evaluation that indicated Resident #15 must wear an apron at all times. The undated policy titled Resident Care Planning Procedure documented the care plan is updated according to resident needs, hospitalizations, illness, behavioral issues, nutritional needs, activity level, changes in activity of daily living status or any change in which the interdisciplinary team feels is a change in the resident's status. The unit nurses update the care plan as changes occur.1) Resident #15's diagnoses included unspecified dementia. A significant change Minimum Data Set (assessment tool) dated 12/08/2025 documented Resident #15 had severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviate survey (#2677034) the facility did not ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for three (3) of seven (7) residents (Resident #15, Resident #115, and Resident #18) reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, 1) Resident #15's resident representative stated they observed Resident #15 double briefed on 02/08/2026 2), Resident #115 was observed double briefed on 02/19/2026, and 3) Resident #18 was observed on multiple occasions with poor oral hygiene. The findings include: A policy titled Activities of Daily Living last reviewed 09/04/2025 documented the purpose to ensure that all residents receive safe, appropriate, and consistent assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) while preserving dignity, promoting independence, and following individualized care plans. Certified nurse aides shall provide assistance,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview conducted during recertification and abbreviated survey (NY00622225) from 2/19/26 to 2/27/26, it was determined the facility did not ensure that they provided an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on the comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences of each resident, for one (1) of one (1) resident (#90) reviewed for activities. Specifically, Resident #90 was not provided with the opportunity to consistently attend activities of their choice or attend activities specified for residents with dementia. The findings includeResident #90 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Anxiety, and Depression.The Care Plan for activity dated 02/10/2022 documented Resident #90 was able to make most needs known and make their own decisions on activity participation. Resident #90 was frequently confused and needed help to get from place to place. Identify previous activities and interests as possible, coordinate treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview during the recertification survey conducted from 02/19/2026 to 02/27/2026, the facility did not ensure that necessary services, and/or equipment were provided to assure that a resident with limited range of motion and mobility maintained or improved function based on the resident's clinical condition for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #44) reviewed for position and mobility. Specifically, Resident #44 was observed on three (3) occasions without the use of a right ankle-foot orthosis as per physician order.The policy and procedure titled Splinting/Bracing, reviewed on 05/01/2025, documented a valid physician order was required before the application of splints or braces. Therapy staff were responsible for evaluating fit, and position, and for establishing a schedule of wear. Residents were to receive care and monitoring to prevent avoidable harm. Resident #44 had diagnoses of muscle weakness, hemiplegia of the right dominant side (paralysis of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and or assistance devices consistent with resident needs to prevent accidents for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #103) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, after Resident #103 had a documented 05/19/2025 intact blister on the left hand second digit related to smoking, care plan interventions were not updated to reflect Resident #103 smoking cigarettes down to the butt and/or the use of a cigarette extender as per a 05/21/2025 hand-written note. Subsequently, Resident #103 was observed on 02/25/2026 smoking without the use of a cigarette extender. The findings includeThe policy titled Residents Smoking last reviewed 01/10/2025 documented the smoking plan of care is evaluated quarterly and revised as needed.Resident #103's diagnoses included unspecified psychosis, left femur fracture and post-traumatic stress disorder.A Care Plan for smoking dated 04/03/2025 documented Resident #103 was a dependent smoker and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 2/19/2026 to 2/27/2026, the facility did not ensure care consistent with professional standards of practice, was provided for one (1) of one (Resident #5) reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #5 was administered oxygen without a valid medical order from 01/29/2026 to 02/19/2026.The findings include:The policy titled Oxygen, last reviewed on 10/29/2025, documented oxygen is a medication and a specific physician's order is necessary to administer the same. Resident #5's diagnoses included lung cancer, pulmonary embolism, and acute respiratory failure. The significant Change Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 12/19/2025 documented Resident #5 had moderate cognitive impairment and had shortness of breath when lying flat.A nursing progress note dated 01/29/2026 documented Resident #5 returned from the hospital and was admitted back into the facility while receiving oxygen at two (2)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during a recertification survey conducted from 02/19/2026 to 02/27/2026, the facility did not ensure that medical supervision was provided for one (1) resident of five (5) residents reviewed for drug regimen review. Specifically, the pharmacy consultant recommended discontinuation of the drug Megace, an appetite stimulant, due to the resident's weight of 415 pounds. The physician agreed to discontinue the medication; however, the nurse practitioner reordered the medication, and the resident continued to receive the medication. The findings include The policy and procedure titled Medication Administration, revised 08/11/2025, documented the consultant pharmacist provided drug information and conducted monthly drug regimen reviews. The consultant pharmacist flagged or addressed unnecessary medications with the medical director. The facility established standards for physician countersignatures on orders and ensured they were completed promptly.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with dementia were receiving the appropriate treatment and services to attain and maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for dignity. Specifically, Resident #28 was observed soiled and in the same clothing on consecutive days. The resident had a history of refusals of care and poor hygiene. The activities of daily living and behavior care plans both contained interventions including a referral to social services as needed for evaluation and follow-up but that was never completed. The findings included:Resident #28 had diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, dementia, and major depressive disorder. The Activities of Daily Living Care Plan effective 12/13/2025 documented that Resident #28 has compromised status and at risk for decline and/or lack of improvement related to congestive heart failure with edema, difficulty walking, mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 02/19/2026 through 02/27/2026, the facility did not ensure proper disposal of garbage and refuse. Specifically, 1) the recycle dumpster lid was broken, unable to be completely closed and left open which allowed cardboard boxes to spill over the top, 2) the compactor had food debris puddled in front of the compactor door, and litter on the ground between the compactor and the dumpster.The findings are:The policy titled Waste Handling issued 3/2024 documented, the facility will maintain a clean, safe, and sanitary environment by ensuring that all garbage, recyclable materials are properly disposed of in compliance with regulatory requirements. During an observation of the garbage area on 02/19/2026 at 10:03 AM with the Food Service Director, the recycle dumpster was open with cardboard boxes spilling over the top. There were boxes and other litter on the ground surrounding the dumpster and trapped under it. The waste management company arrived during this time to empty the dumpster. Once completed it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys on 02/19/2026 to 02/27/2026, the facility did not ensure that rehabilitative services were provided for two (2) of two (Resident #79 and Resident #10) reviewed for Rehabilitation. 1) Specifically, an occupational therapy screen was not completed for Resident #79 as per physician order and 2) an occupational screen was not completed to evaluate and treat leaning to the right side for Resident #10 as per physician order. The findings included The facility policy titled Rehab Evaluation revised 04/02/2022 documented the evaluation must occur following admission with physician orders for evaluation. The evaluation should be performed within 48 hours following the physician order. 1)Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 12/30/2025 documented Resident #79 had moderate cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00369540, NY00369602), the facility did not ensure residents right to be free from abuse for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #2, Resident #5) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (1) on 1/19/2025 Resident #2 was involuntarily secluded in their room by Certified Nurse Aide #7 for approximately three hours. Certified Nurse Aide #7 placed wash cloth wipes wedged in the corner of the resident's door preventing them from exiting the room. During a rounding of resident rooms Resident #2 was found by Housekeeper #2 and House Keeping Lead in their room with a puddle of urine on the floor and feces all over the room. Resident #2 was unclothed and had a pair of pants in their which they pulled up over their chest. Resident #2 was cleaned up by Certified Nurse Aide #6 and brought to the day room after the incident. (2) On 1/18/2025 Resident #5 was video recorded by Certified Nurse Aide #3 and Certified Nurse Aide #4 while washing their incontinence brief in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00369540, NY00369602), the facility did not ensure a reasonable suspicion of a crime against a resident was reported to law enforcement or an allegation involving abuse was reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse for 2 out of 6 residents (Resident #2, Resident #5) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (1) on 1/19/2025 Resident #2 was barricaded in their room by Certified Nurse Aide #7 by placing wash cloth wipes in their door frame preventing the resident from exiting. Resident #2 was found by the Housekeeping Lead and Housekeeper #2 after getting the door opened. The facility Administrator was not informed of the incident until 1/20/2025, the incident was reported to the New York State Department of Health on 1/27/2025, and the incident was never reported to local law enforcement; (2) Resident #5 was video recorded by Certified Nurse Aide #3 and Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00318055, NY00383624) the facility did not ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 out of 3 residents (Resident #3, Resident #6) reviewed for quality of care. Specifically, (1) Resident #3 had a wound care treatment ordered for their left below the knee area to be completed daily. Review of Resident #3's treatment administration record for March 2025 revealed their treatment was not signed as completed by the Licensed Practical Nurse on 3/9/2025, 3/11/2025, 3/16/2025. (2) Resident #6 had a known history of constipation and a history of small bowel obstruction in 2020. Review of Resident #6's certified nurse aide accountability revealed direct care staff did not consistently document the resident's bowel movement activity, the February 2025 documentation had certified nurse aide signature omissions on 25 occasions and March 2025 on 19 occasions. The findings are:The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00369540, NY00369602), the facility did not ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality of care deficiencies. Specifically, there was no documented evidence of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee convening to discuss, develop and prioritize actionable plans for the reportable incidents that occurred on 1/18/2025 and 1/19/2025. On 1/18/2025 Resident #5 was videorecorded by staff; the recording was posted on social media by Certified Nurse Aide #3. On 1/19/2025 Resident #2 was barricaded in their room by Certified Nurse Aide #7, the resident was found in their room by Housekeeper #2 and the Housekeeper lead approximately three hours later.The findings are:The facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement policy last revised 10/7/2024 documented the purpose is to promote high-quality care and ensure compliance with federal and state regulations through continuous quality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00369602), the facility did not ensure the residents right to a dignified existence or to be treated with respect and care in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 out of 7 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, (1) Resident #5 was video recorded by Certified Nurse Aide #3 and Certified Nurse Aide #4 while cleaning their briefs in the sink. Certified Nurse Aide #3 then posted the video on social media (Tik Tok). Certified Nurse Aide #3 was terminated by the facility for violating abuse policy.The findings are:The facilities undated Resident Dignity policy documented the purpose is to ensure that all residents in the facility are treated with dignity and respect in every aspect of their care. All staff must recognize and uphold each resident's right to dignity, regardless of physical or cognitive ability. This includes respecting privacy during personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00369540) the facility did not ensure in response to allegations of abuse that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated for 1 out of 7 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 1/19/2025 Resident #2 was barricaded in their room by Certified Nurse Aide #7 by stuffing wash cloth wipes in the door of their room preventing the door from opening. There was no documented evidence of Resident #2 being assessed for injury after the incident and statements were not obtained from all staff on duty at the time of the incident. There was also no available video footage to review for the incident that occurred on 1/19/2025. The findings are:The facility Abuse policy last revised 1/20/2025 1) Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, Parkinsonism and Bipolar disorder.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #2 had severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00383624) the facility did not ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 out of 3 residents (Resident #2, Resident #4) reviewed for assessments. Specifically, Resident #2 was a known wanderer and always has a wander guard in place. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] (under section E) did not document the resident had wandering behavior. (2) Resident #4's was care planned as having a known behavior of rejecting medications and cares. Known to the facility staff as rejecting medication and cares. The Comprehensive Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] did not accurately reflect the resident's behavior.The Findings are:The facility Completion of the RAI/MDS Process policy last revised 5/25 documented it is the policy of the facility to assure that all residents achieve their highest level of functioning possible and maintain their sense of individuality. Assessments will be completed within the guidelines…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00383624), the facility did not ensure residents were free from medication errors and accepted professional standards and principles which apply to professionals providing services for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for medications. Specifically, Resident #3 was prescribed some narcotic pain medication (Morphine-medication used to help relieve severe pain) to be administered (while on comfort care) at the following scheduled times: 12 AM, 9 AM and 7 PM. Review of Resident #3's administration record for April 2025 and May 2025 revealed the standing doses were not administered within regulated times of one hour before or one hour after scheduled time. There was also no documented evidence of Resident #3 receiving three standing doses of their narcotic pain medication on 5/4/2025 and 5/9/2025 when they were on comfort care. There was pain assessment documented and there was no documentation that the physician was notified of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00383624), the facility did not ensure enhanced barrier precautions were followed by staff for 2 out of 3 residents (Resident #4, Resident #15) reviewed for infection control. Specifically, (1) on 6/17/2025 Certified Nurse Aide #1 and Certified Nurse Aide #2 provided care to Resident #4, who was on enhanced barrier precautions and did not don gowns; (2) On 6/18/2025 Resident #15 was observed walking down the hallway from their room to the nurse's station with their Foley catheter drainage bag in their hand and used the telephone at the nurse's desk. Resident #15 was noted to be on enhanced barrier precautions.The findings are:The facility Infection Control: Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy last revised 4/8/2024 documented it is the policy that Enhanced Barrier Precautions, in addition to Standard and Contact Precautions will be implemented during high-contact resident care activities when caring for residents that have an increased risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00349142), the facility did not ensure the services provided adhered to accepted standards of practice for medication administration (including right time) for 24 (Residents #26 and #18) of 40 residents reviewed. Specifically, 1) on 08/12/2024 at 12:30 PM Licensed Practical Nurse #1 was observed attempting to administer 13 medications to Resident #26, where the physician ordered these medications to be given at 9:00 AM. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 did not notify the physician prior to changing the medication administration time; 2) on 08/13/2024 from 10:05 AM to 10:12 AM Licensed Practical Nurse #4 was observed passing 10 medications for Resident #18 where the physician ordered them to be given at 9:00 AM. Licensed Practical Nurse # 4 did not notify the physician prior to changing the medication administration time. During interviews both nurses stated that they did not have the time to notify the attending physician that they are administering the medication late. The findings are: The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00349142), it was determined that the facility did not ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 23 (Residents #18, #4, #14, #19, #24) of 40 residents reviewed for late medication administration. Specifically, the Residents on the Second Floor Dementia Unit did not receive medications including but not limited to Antianxiety, Antidiabetic (Insulin), Anticoagulant, Antihypertensive, Antipsychotic, Anti-Parkinson's, and Antiseizure timely from 07/01/2024 to 08/13/2024 in accordance with prescriber's order and accepted health standards established by national boards and councils. The findings include but are not limited to: The facility policy titled Medication Administration dated 08/06/2024 documented that the purpose of the policy was to establish guidelines to promote the health and safety of residents by ensuring the safe assistance and administration of medication and treatments. Medications will be administered to residents as prescribed and by persons lawfully…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00349142), the facility did not ensure Resident Primary Care Physicians (Attending Physician) comprehensively reviewed the resident's total program of care, including the Residents' medications and treatments for 24 of 40 residents reviewed. Specifically, a review of the medication administration detailed report from 07/01/2024 to 08/13/2024 revealed residents received their medications late including 19 Residents with significant medications (Antianxiety, Antidiabetic (Insulin), Anticoagulant, Antihypertensive, Antipsychotic, Anti-Parkinson's, and Antiseizure). During an interview with the Medical Director, they stated they were unaware of the consistent late medication administration in the facility. There was no documented evidence that facility staff communicated to the Resident' Primary Care Physician and/or the Medical Director that significant medications were not administered as prescribed by the physician. The Findings are: The facility policy titled By-Laws, Rules and Regulations of the Medical Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    F725 - Sufficient Nursing Staff Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00349142), the facility did not provide sufficient numbers of personnel to meet the care needs of all residents on the Second Floor Dementia Unit. Specifically, an observation conducted on 08/13/2024 at 9:35 AM revealed that there was no additional medication nurse to pass medications on the north side of the unit. Consequently, 23 residents received their physician ordered 9 AM medications (see associated tag F760) late. Further review of the Medication Administration History Detailed Report from 07/01/2024 to 08/13/2024 revealed consistent pattern of late medication administration on the second floor. Facility daily shift schedule and Director of Nursing interview revealed one medication nurse assigned to pass meds to all forty residents on the second-floor dementia unit. The findings include but are not limited to: Review of the facility assessment last updated 08/01/2024 and last reviewed by the Quality Assurance and Performance committee on 08/06/2024 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00349142), the facility did not ensure that the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies and regularly review, analyzed, and act on available data to make improvements and to ensure improvements are sustained. Specifically, 1) On 06/28/2024 the facility received feedback from Bureau of Narcotics representative regarding facility staff not administering medications according to prescriber's order; 2) a complaint from the facility's Resident Council indicated residents received their medications late on 07/20/2024 and 07/21/2024, the facility did not conduct a thorough investigation, and/or audit the medication administration practice in the facility; 3) during an observation on 08/13/2024 on the Second Floor Dementia Unit and further record review from 07/01/2024 to 08/13/2024 revealed that 23 Residents did not receive significant medications including but not limited to Antianxiety, Antidiabetic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 1/19/23 to 1/26/23, it was determined for 1 of 3 resident (Resident #30) reviewed for personal property, the facility did not ensure grievances were resolved in a timely manner. Specifically, the facility lacked documentation of the completion of a thorough investigation and timely resolution of the resident's report of a missing shoe. The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Loss of Resident Clothing documented when an article of clothing is reported lost, a Missing Personnel Belongings Form is generated. The 1/2019 facility Grievance Policy and Procedure documented a specific procedure and a specific form to address missing items. The policy also documented all complaints and grievances were to be addressed promptly and in a timely manner. The 12/4/22 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) documented Resident #30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. During an interview on 1/19/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey #NY00263725 from 1/19/23 to 1/26/23, it was determined for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #6 and #15) reviewed for accidents, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision to maintain resident safety. Specifically, Resident #15 was not provided the planned assistance and rolled out of the bed and when Resident # 6 was assessed as unsafe to smoke, the facility did not implement consistent communication to ensure the resident's safety The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Accident/Incident/Occurrence/Wound Policy and Procedure dated 7/2013 documented it is the facility intention to provide an environment that is free from accident hazard's and provide supervision and assistive devices to each resident to prevent avoidable accidents. The facility Policy and Procedure titled CNA Assignment Sheet/Cares Policy and Procedure dated 2020, revised 7/15/22 documented the Resident Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 1/19/23 to 1/26/23, the facility did not ensure the monthly medication review by the pharmacist was followed up by the attending physician/medical director for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for Unnecessary Medications The finding is: During a review of facility policy titled The Pharmacy Drug Regimen Review revised 10/2/2018 documented the Consultant Pharmacist shall identify, document and report possible medication irregularities for review and action by the attending physician when appropriate. The attending physician or licensed designee shall respond to the drug regimen review within 7 days of receipt. Resident #9 was admitted with diagnoses including Heart Failure, Osteoporosis, and Asthma. The 8/10/22 admission MDS (Minimum Data Set; a resident assessment tool) documented the resident's BIMS score (Brief Interview for Mental Status) was 15 out of 15/cognitively intact. The 8/5/22 Physician's order documented Alendronate 70 mg to be given at 6:00 am every week on Monday for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 1/19/23-1/26/23, the facility did not ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Specifically, food was stored on the floor of the refrigerator, freezer, and non-perishable food storage area, and the unit refrigerator temperature logs were not completed. The findings are: During the initial kitchen observation on 01/19/23 at 9:22 AM, food was observed on the floor in the food storage area, freezer, and refrigerator #1. During an observation on 01/19/23 at 11:48 AM, unit 3E refrigerator temperature logs were not completed for 1/17/23, 1/18/23, and 1/19/23. During an observation on 01/19/23 at 2:15 PM, food was observed on the floor in the food storage area, freezer, and refrigerator #1. During an observation on 01/24/23 at 11:04 AM boxes of food were observed on the freezer floor. During observations on 01/24/23 at 12:16 PM, 12:20 PM and 12:33 PM, Unit 1E, 2E and 3E had refrigerator temperature logs that were not completed for 1/20/23, 1/21/23, 1/22/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 1/19/23 to 1/26/22, the facility did not ensure infection prevention and control standards were maintained. This was evident for the facility's Legionella Sampling and Management Policy and Procedure and Environmental Assessment of Water Systems reviewed during the Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) review. Specifically, the facility did not complete the Legionella Risk Assessment and lacked a diagram of the facility water system to determine possible areas where Legionella could grow and spread in the water system. In addition, only one controlled location (water heater) for legionella was tested on [DATE] and 6/30/22. The Findings Are: Review of the facility Legionella Sampling Plan documented the sampling sites shall include, but not limited to the following locations: at least three samples should be collected from each floor. This is normally done as follows; tap closest to first delivery of hot water from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that housekeeping and maintenance services provided a comfortable home-like environment. Specifically, there were numerous instances of disrepair observed in multiple rooms. This was evident for 4 resident rooms including, but not limited to rooms #101, #113, #120, and #302. The findings are: Resident room observations were conducted on 2/22/2019 between 2:16 PM and 2:30PM on the first floor unit. The following was observed: - room [ROOM NUMBER] had chipped wall paint. The electrical heater/AC unit had a brownish substance on the outside. - room [ROOM NUMBER] had brownish water stains on the ceiling, cracked floor tiles, chipped wall paint, and cracked wall plaster near the heater/AC unit. - room [ROOM NUMBER] had scuff marks on the walls, cracked floor tiles, a soiled bathroom door, soiled, rusty bathroom door frame, and cracked floor tiles where the wardrobe was located. The Director of Maintenance (DOM)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-27 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that 4 out of 12 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment had the required Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) conducted within the regulatory time frames using the CMS-specified (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) resident assessment instrument process. The findings are: The MDS records of the following residents were reviewed and revealed that the following comprehensive assessments were not completed within the ARD (assessment reference date) +14 days or 366 days from the most recent comprehensive assessment. 1-Resident #06 -Had an Annual MDS assessment with an ARD date of 1/18/19 indicated the last section was completed on 2/23/19. 2-Resident #16- Had an Annual MDS assessment with an ARD date of 1/10/19 indicated the last section was completed on 2/23/19. 3-Resident #25- Had an Annual MDS assessment with an ARD date of 1/18/19 indicated the last section was completed on 2/17/19. 4-Resident #114-Had an Annual MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-27 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    F 638 Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the required Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) was conducted within the regulatory time frames using the CMS-specified (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) resident assessment instrument process. This was evident for 7 of 12 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment. The findings are: The MDS records of the following residents were reviewed and revealed that Quarterly assessments were not completed within the ARD (Assessment Reference Date) +14 days or 92 days from the last Quarterly Assessment. 1-Resident #02 -Had a Quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD date of 12/18/18 indicated the last section was completed on 2/16/19 2-Resident #03- Had a Quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD date of 12/23/18 indicated the last section was completed on 2/16/19. 3-Resident #04- Had a Quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD date of 12/24/18 indicated the last section was completed on 2/25/19. 4-Resident #08- Had a Quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-27 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not electronically transmit encoded and completed MDS (Minimum Data Set; a federally-mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid-certified nursing homes) to the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) system within 14 days of the final MDS completion date as indicated in section Z0500 ( date the Registered Nurse (RN) assessment coordinator signed assessment as complete). This was evident for 11 of 12 residents reviewed for resident assessment. The findings are: 1--Resident #03- Had a Quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD date of 12/23/18 indicated the assessment was complete on 1/2/19 and was submitted on 2/26/19. 2-Resident #04- Had a Quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD date of 12/24/18 indicated the assessment was complete on 12/31/18 and was submitted on 2/26/19. 3-Resident #06 -Had an Annual MDS assessment with an ARD date of 1/18/19 indicated the assessment was complete on 1/28/19 and was submitted 2/26/19 4-Resident #08- Had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not implement interventions for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, a pressure relieving device was not implemented according to the physician's order. (Resident #71). The findings are: Resident #71 was admitted with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, neuropathy and quadriplegia. Review of the 12/14/18 significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set: an assessment tool) indicated the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status: a tool to assess cognition) score of 5/15 (severe cognitive impairment), received extensive assist of 2 for bed mobility, had impairment to both lower extremities,had a stage 2 pressure ulcer that was not present on admission, had pressure relieving devices for the bed and chair, was on a turning and positioning schedule, and received pressure ulcer care. Physician's orders dated 6/7/18 included heel lift ongoing at all times, ongoing positioning while out of bed and in the geri recliner. Review of the comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that residents or their representatives and the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman were given written notification of the resident's transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident #152). Findings are: Resident #152 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension and unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance. On 1/10/19 the resident notified nursing of right leg pain. Upon completion of the nursing assessment, the physician and the family were notified and the resident was transferred to the hospital. Resident #152 returned from the hospital on 1/21/19 with a diagnosis of status post right hip open reduction internal fixation. Interviews were conducted with two Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN #1 and LPN #2) on 2/28/19 at 2:00 PM. When asked how family members or resident representatives are notified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not implement interventions to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, pressure relieving interventions were not implemented per the physician's order. ( Resident #71). The findings are: Resident #71 was admitted with diagnoses including Non Alzheimer's Dementia, Quadriplegia and Multiple Sclerosis. Review of the 12/14/18 significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set: a resident assessment tool) indicated Resident #71 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 5/15 (severe cognitive impairment), received extensive assist of 2 staff support for bed mobility, had impairment to bilateral lower extremities, had a stage 2 pressure ulcer that was not present on admission, had pressure relieving devices for the bed and chair, was on a turning and positioning schedule, and received pressure ulcer care. Review of the Physician's Orders dated 6/7/18 included; Heel Lift ongoing at all times, ongoing positioning while out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the re-certification survey, it was determined that treatment and care was not provided to meet a resident's physical needs. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that a resident was provided proper leg rests for positioning. This was evident for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. (Resident #178). The findings are: Resident #178 was admitted with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, toxic encephalopathy and heart failure. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set: an assessment tool) dated 8/1/18 indicated Resident #178 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3/15 (indicating severe cognitive impairment), received extensive assist of one for bed mobility, extensive assist of 2 for transfers, had functional limitation ROM (range of motion) to both upper extremities and had no limitation to lower extremities. The physician's orders dated 8/6/18 revealed an order for Dermasavers to be worn at all times to both lower extremities; may remove during cares. (Dermasavers are worn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the call bell was in reach for one of two residents (Resident #81) reviewed for accidents. Resident #81 had diagnoses including dementia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 12/28/18 indicated the resident had severely impaired cognitive status, required extenisive assistance for transferring and toilet use, was occasionally incontinent of urine and had no history of falls. A Fall assessment dated [DATE] and noted to be signed on 1/24/19 identified the following interventions: bilateral side rails, call bell within reach and bed at proper height. Environmental rounds were conducted on 2 [NAME] on 2/21/19 at 9:30 AM. Resident #81, assigned to the A bed in room [ROOM NUMBER], was seated between the bathroom door and the head of the resident's bed. The resident's call bell was on the floor on the other side of the bed. During rounds on 2/22/19 at 9:45 AM, the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-27 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    483.70 (b) Compliance with Federal, State, and Local laws and Professional Standards. The facility must operate and provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards and principles that apply to professionals providing services in such a facility. Based on observation and interview, the facility was not in compliance with Section 915 of the 2015 edition of the International Fire Code as adopted by New York State, which requires the installation of carbon monoxide detectors in buildings with fuel-fired appliances. A carbon monoxide monitor was not installed in the room housing the facility's diesel-powered emergency generator. The findings are: On 2/26/19 at approximately 12:10 PM, a tour of the generator room was conducted, and a carbon monoxide detector was not observed in the room. The emergency generator housed in this room is diesel-powered. In an interview with the Director of Facilities on 2/27/19 at approximately 12:30 PM, he confirmed that a carbon monoxide detector was not in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-02-27 · tag F0642 — pattern
    Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the completion date as indicated in section Z0500 ( date Registered Nurse (RN) assessment coordinator electronically signed the assessment as complete) reflected the actual completion date. Specifically, section Z0400 (signature and date for persons completing the assessment) was later than the completion date indicated by the RN coordinator in section Z0500. This was evident for 11 of 12 residents reviewed for resident assessment. The findings are: 1--Resident #03- Had a Quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD date of 12/23/18 indicated the last section of the MDS was completed on 2/16/19 and the RN assessment coordinator signed the assessment was completed on 1/2/19 2-Resident #04- Had a Quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD date of 12/24/18 indicated the last section was completed on 2/25/19 and the RN assessment coordinator signed the assessment was completed on 12/31/18. 3-Resident #06 -Had an Annual MDS assessment with an ARD date of 1/18/19 indicated the last section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ESTATE OF MARCIA TRUPINOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST46%since 04/15/2020
DICKER, MERYLIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF46%since 01/01/2004
WISSMANN, DOUGLASIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF5%since 01/01/2004
JACKSON, JEFFREYIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2004
ALBERT RIDDLE M.D. LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2004
COSTELLO, KATHRYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2025
RIDDLE, ALBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2004
ESTATE OF JUDITH DICKEROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/07/1972
ESTATE OF STANLEY DICKEROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/07/1972
HMM & CO., LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2007
VINEYARD HIGHLAND ASSOCIATES, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/07/1972

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-45.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$721K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 15%Other / private 10%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $721K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$445per resident / day
operating cost
$13,515per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$305per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335399. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next