No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Apex Rehabilitation & Care Center

78 Birchwood Dr, Huntington Station, NY 11746 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 195 certified beds · (631) 423-3200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (631) 423-3200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2025
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
Dr Frendo0.5 mi
(631) 847-0200 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
499 Jericho Tpke · (516) 633-7272 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
711 E Jericho Turnpike
Park
Engelke Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.6%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.0%5.8%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms73.1%19.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.2%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.3%13.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine45.8%95.3%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.4%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.4%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.2%13.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.5%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.1%78.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.7%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.6%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.471.701.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.681.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 299 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
74.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.50U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 74.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 169 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.0%CMS range 42.3–54.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 9.0–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge74.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge67.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge72.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 5.1–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.421.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.07
RN hours/ resident / day
0.31
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.31
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.69
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.79
RN hoursweekends
31.4%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 195 beds and averages 183.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.07 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.18 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-16)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey initiated on 4/8/2025 and completed on 4/16/2025, the facility did not follow proper sanitation practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness and did not store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was identified during the Kitchen Task. Specifically, during the kitchen observation on 4/8/2025, the final rinse cycle temperature of the high-temperature dishmachine was observed to be below 180 degrees Fahrenheit. The dietary staff did not operate and monitor the dishmachine temperatures for the rinse cycle as per the manufacturer's recommendation to ensure proper sanitization of the dishes. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled Dishwasher Temperature dated August 2024 documented that all items cleaned in the dishwasher will be washed in water that is sufficient to sanitize all items. Machine washing and sanitizing [procedures] should follow the manufacturer's instructions. Water temperature shall be measured.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/8/2025 and completed on 4/16/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent Pressure Ulcers. This was identified for two (Resident #152 and Resident #132) of four residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, 1) Resident #152 with multiple pressure ulcers utilized an air mattress as a care plan intervention. During multiple observations, the adjustable weight setting for the air mattress, which is meant to correspond to the resident's weight, was not set accurately. 2) Resident #132 utilized an air mattress according to their plan of care. During observation, the air mattress weight setting was set at 300 pounds while the resident weighed 85 pounds. The findings are: The facility policy titled Wound Care/Pressure Injury Management and Prevention, dated 6/2023 documented that pressure injury care requires an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY 00359457) initiated on 4/8/2025 and completed on 4/16/2025, the facility was not administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, facility administration did not ensure Medication/Treatment Nurse #1, Medication/Treatment Nurse #2, Medication/Treatment Nurse #3, Medication/Treatment Nurse #4, and Medication/Treatment Nurse #6 had approved limited permit or a current New York State Registered Nurse license to work at a health care facility as Registered Nurses. Cross Reference: F839 Administration-Staff Qualifications The finding is: Executive Order Number 4.22 dated 6/8/2023 documented the Executive Order number 4 was extended until 6/22/2023 which included a temporary Suspension and Modification of Subdivision 5 of Section 6907 of the Education Law and Regulations to the extent necessary to permit graduates of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0839 — pattern
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint# NY 00359457) initiated on [DATE] and completed on [DATE], the facility did not ensure professional staff were licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable State laws. This was identified for five (Medication/Treatment Nurse #1, Medication/Treatment Nurse #2, Medication/Treatment Nurse #3, Medication/Treatment Nurse #4, and Medication/Treatment Nurse #6) of six employees reviewed for Licensure and Certification. Specifically, Medication/Treatment Nurse #1, Medication/Treatment Nurse #2, Medication/Treatment Nurse #3, Medication/Treatment Nurse #4, and Medication/Treatment Nurse #6 were working as Registered Nurses at the facility; however, all five employees did not have the required New York State Registered Nurse license and or approved limited permit to work as a Registered Nurse under the supervision of a licensed Registered Nurses. The finding is: The facility's undated policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/8/2025 and completed on 4/16/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity and in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life. This was identified for one (Resident #136) of one resident reviewed for Dignity. Specifically, on 4/8/2025, during multiple observations, Resident #136 was observed from the hallway with a Foley Catheter drainage bag half filled with yellow-colored fluid (urine). The drainage bag was not covered with a privacy bag. Additionally, Resident #35's Jackson Pratt (defined as a surgical suction drain that gently draws fluids from a wound after surgery) drain bulb containing yellowish-orange drainage was also visible from the hallway without any privacy covering. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Catheter Care, last revised on 2/2024, documented that the facility will ensure residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews during the Recertification and abbreviated complaint (NY 00349884) survey initiated on 4/8/2025 and completed on 4/16/2025, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately to the facility administration and were reported to the Department of Health within 24 hours. This was identified for two (Resident #6 and Resident #34) of two residents reviewed for abuse and for one (Resident #29) of one resident reviewed for Skin Conditions. Specifically, 1) a resident to resident altercation between Resident #34 and Resident #6 that resulted in a scratch to Resident #34's right arm and Resident #6's fall was not reported to the New York State Department of Health timely. 2) Resident #29 alleged that a certified nursing assistant scratched them during care. The incident was not reported to the facility administration and an investigation was not initiated to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/8/2025 and completed on 4/16/2025, the facility did not have evidence that all alleged violations of abuse, neglect, and mistreatment were thoroughly investigated. This was identified for one (Resident #51) of two residents reviewed for Hospitalization. Specifically, Resident #51 with a recent history of left hip replacement and was dependent on staff assistance for Activities of Daily Living, was found in their room with their left hip internally rotated (rotated inward) with leg discrepancy (one leg was shorter than the other). The facility did not obtain statements from all employees involved with resident care to determine the root cause of the incident. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Accident/Incident, last revised in December 2023, documented an accident as an unexpected, unintended event that can cause a resident bodily injury. All accidents or incidents involving residents must be thoroughly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/8/2025 and completed on 4/16/2025, the facility did not ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was identified for one (Resident #136) of three residents reviewed for Catheter care. Specifically, Resident #136 had a Physician's Order to monitor and document the Jackson Pratt (a closed-suction medical device used after surgery to drain fluids from a wound or incision) drain and to keep the drain bulb at negative pressure (achieved by compressing the bulb to gently pull fluids from the surgical site). During multiple observations, Resident #136's Jackson Pratt drain bulb was not compressed, which indicated that the Jackson Pratt drain was not at negative pressure. Additionally, the facility staff were not knowledgeable about the care and monitoring of the drain. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Jackson Pratt Drain Policy last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/8/2025 and completed on 4/16/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident's environment remained free of accidents. This was identified for one (Resident #32) of five residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #32 resided in a unit that had three residents (Resident #24, Resident #77, and Resident #101) with wandering behaviors. During observation, one 16-ounce bottle of nail polish remover, three disinfectant spray bottles, and four air freshener spray bottles were observed in Resident #32's room on their nightstand. The finding is: The facility's undated policy, titled Accidents and Hazards, defined Hazards as elements of the resident environment that have the potential to cause injury or illness. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. This includes identifying hazards and risks, evaluating and analyzing hazards and risks,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/8/2025 and completed on 4/16/2025, the facility did not assist each resident in making an appointment for necessary dental services. This was identified for one (Resident #39) of one resident reviewed for Dental Services. Specifically, Resident #39 had an annual dental consult completed on 2/26/2025. The Dentist documented resident had broken teeth and recommended referral to an outside oral surgeon for full mouth extraction. There was no documented evidence that the recommendations made by the Dentist were addressed by the facility until 4/15/2025 after the Surveyor brought the concern to the facility's attention. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled Dental Consult revised in March 2024 documented the facility will, if necessary or requested, assist the resident with making dental appointments and arranging transportation to and from the dental services location. All action and information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/8/2025 and completed on 4/16/2025, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that were complete. This was identified for one (Resident #151) of one resident reviewed for Dialysis. Specifically, there was no documented evidence in the treatment administration record that Resident #151's right chest Permacath (a long-term catheter used for dialysis treatment) was monitored every shift for signs and symptoms of bleeding, placement, and skin integrity. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Dialysis last reviewed in July 2023, documented that the shunt site (a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein, used for hemodialysis) or vascular access site will be checked every shift and documented on the Treatment Administration Record by the Nurse. The Nurse will check for bruit/thrill ( signs that the fistula or graft is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/8/2025 and completed on 4/16/2025, the facility did not ensure it established an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #321) of one resident reviewed for Transmission-Based Precautions and for one (Resident #43) of five residents observed during the Medication Administration Task. Specifically, 1) Resident #321 had a Physician's order for Contact Precautions for Shingles (a rash caused by the virus that causes Chickenpox) with an antiviral medication; however, there was no Contact Precautions signage posted in a conspicuous location outside the resident's room that instructs staff and visitors for use of specific Personal Protective Equipment. 2) Medication/Treatment Nurse #2 did not perform hand hygiene before putting on and removing their gloves when performing a finger stick blood glucose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews conducted during a complaint investigation, Complaint # NY00313313 initiated on 2/21/2024 and completed on 2/27/2024, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive persons-centered care plan, and the resident's goal and preferences. This was identified for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for pain management. Specifically Resident #1 suffered pain following a fall, rating it at a level of 10 out of 10 (0 indicating no pain 10 indicating most severe). Resident #1 had an physician's order for pain medication to address moderate to severe pain, the nurse did not administer the medication nor notify the doctor of the resident's new pain after the fall. As a result, the resident endured three hours without any pain management until being transferred to the Emergency Department. The resident was admitted for hip fracture. The findings are: The facility's policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records review, and interviews during Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00319371) initiated on 2/6/2024 and completed on 2/14/2024, the facility did not ensure that a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was maintained for each resident. This was identified for four (Resident #146, Resident #85, Resident #104, and Resident #93) of four residents reviewed for Environment. Specifically, 1) Resident #146's room was observed on 2/6/2024 and 2/7/2024; the room furniture and the sink vanity were not in good repair with detached base molding, missing drawers, and rusty exposed metal parts. 2) Resident #85's room was observed on 2/6/2024 and 2/7/2024. The room furniture and the sink vanity were not in good repair with missing drawers and a nonfunctioning bureau. 3) Resident #104's room was observed on 2/6/2024 and 2/7/2024. The furniture in the room was not in good repair as evidenced by drawers without a handle, drawers that could not be opened, and missing drawers. 4)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during a Recertification and abbreviated Survey (NY 00318188) initiated on 2/6/2024 and completed on 2/14/2024, the facility did not ensure that the residents' environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible, and each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This was identified for one (Resident #146) of 11 residents reviewed for Accidents/elopement, 2) for six (Resident #93, Resident #104, Resident #146, Resident #103, Resident #112, and Resident #85) of eleven residents reviewed for Accidents hazards; and 3) for one Unit 1A of four units observed during the Medication Storage Task. Specifically, 1) Resident #146, who had a diagnosis of Dementia and was identified by the facility as an elopement risk/wanderer, wandered outside of the facility on 6/11/2023 after being directed to an outdoor area by the receptionist. The resident left the facility without staff knowledge and was brought back by the local police after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, records review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/6/2024 and completed on 2/14/2024 the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys. This was identified for one unit (Unit 1A) of four units observed during the Medication Storage Task. Specifically, during an observation of the medication storage on 2/14/2024, the medication closet on Unit 1A was observed without a lock. The medication closet door had no locking mechanism installed on the door. The storage closet had multiple medications, syringes, and intravenous medication bags stored. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Medication Storage last reviewed October 2023, documented all drugs and biologicals would be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms). Only authorized personnel would have access to the keys to locked compartments. During a tour of the facility's medication storage on Unit 1A on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/6/2024 and completed on 2/14/2024, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately to the New York State Department of Health, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. This was Identified for one (Resident #98) of 11 residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, on 11/24/2023 Resident #98 was identified with an injury of unknown origin. There was no documented evidence that the injury was reported to the New York State Department of Health as required. The facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention effective 11/2/2022 and last revised 6/1/2023 documented that an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/6/2024 and completed on 2/14/2024 the facility did not ensure that all incidents including the injury of unknown origin were thoroughly investigated . This was identified for one (Resident #98) of 11 residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, on 11/24/2023 at 8:00 AM Resident #98 was observed with an injury of unknown origin and the facility did not thoroughly investigate the incident to identify the root cause of the injury and to rule of Abuse, Neglect, and Mistreatment. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Accident/Incident last revised December 2023, documented that all injuries of unknown sources will be investigated. The facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention effective 11/2/2022 and last revised 6/2023 documented the facility will investigate all incidents of alleged and actual abuse, complaints/grievances, misappropriation, and injuries of unknown origin. The investigative process will include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/6/2024 and completed on 2/14/2024, the facility did not ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflects the resident's status. This was identified for one (Resident #61) of one resident reviewed for Dialysis. Specifically, the Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident #61 did not accurately capture that the resident was receiving dialysis treatment. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure titled, MDS 3.0, last reviewed 10/2023, documented that residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process, to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care plan. Resident #61 was admitted with diagnoses including Cancer, End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Section O of the Minimum Data Set for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/6/2024 and completed on 2/14/2024 the facility did not ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised to address each resident's needs. This was identified for one (Resident #152) of 35 sampled residents. Specifically, a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment was completed on 12/20/2023 for Resident #152. There was no documented evidence that a care plan meeting was held after each assessment including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. The resident or their representative were not provided notice of a care plan meeting for an opportunity to attend and participate. In addition, Resident #152's comprehensive care plan related to Resident/Family participation in assessment and care planning and Satisfaction with the current plan of care were not reviewed and revised upon the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE]. The finding is: The facility's policy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/6/2024 and completed on 2/14/2024 the facility did not ensure that each resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene. This was identified for one (Resident #122) of two residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, on 2/6/2024 Resident #122 was observed with long, dirty, and jagged fingernails with a brown substance under the nails on both hands. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Job Description-Certified Nursing Assistant, dated January 2015, documented the primary purpose of the Certified Nursing Assistant is to provide each of your residents with routine daily nursing care and services in accordance with the resident's assessment and care plan including assisting with nail care (clipping, trimming, and cleaning the finger/toenails). Note: does not include diabetic residents. Resident #122 was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/6/2024 and completed on 2/14/2024, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to provide nursing and related services to ensure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident. This was identified for three (Unit 1A, Unit 2A, and Unit C) of four Units during the Sufficient Staffing Task review. Specifically, a review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, the Facility Assessment, review of weekend staffing and staffing during the Recertification Survey revealed the facility had insufficient nursing staff on numerous occasions. The finding is: The Facility's Staffing Policy and Procedure dated October 2023 documented the facility will maintain safe staffing levels and that the nursing department will schedule and arrange staff according to the acuity and census of each unit to ensure quality of care is maintained. The employees who call out sick will always be replaced at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/6/2024 and completed on 2/14/2024 the facility did not ensure that nurse's aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care. This was identified for one (Resident #48) of two residents reviewed for Choices. Specifically, Certified Nursing Assistant #8 was observed utilizing a sink as a basin to store the water for providing care to Resident #48 in a semi-private room. The sink is also utilized by other residents for handwashing and other hygiene tasks. The finding is: The facility Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Policy dated 6/2023 documented to perform a bed bath, the nursing assistant will secure the bath supplies and clean bed linens as needed and bring them to the resident/patient's bedside. Resident #48 was admitted with diagnoses that included Vascular Dementia, Adult…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/6/2024 and completed on 2/14/2024 the facility did not ensure each resident received radiology services in a timely manner. This was identified for one (Resident #48) of two residents reviewed for Choices. Specifically, Resident #48 had a Physician's order for pacemaker checks every three months and there was no documented evidence that the pacemaker checks were completed as per the Physician's order since 10/4/2023. The finding is: The facility Pacemaker Policy, last reviewed on 6/2023, documented the charge nurse was responsible for ensuring that pacemaker/automated implantable defibrillator (AICD-a device inserted into the chest to help fix fast, abnormal heart rhythms) checks are conducted and reported in compliance with Physician's orders every 3 to 6 months. Resident #48 was admitted with diagnoses that included Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension, and Presence of a Cardiac Pacemaker. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey, initiated on 2/6/2024 and completed on 2/14/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received routine dental services to meet the needs of each resident. This was identified for one (Resident #147) of two residents reviewed for Dental Services. Specifically, Resident #147 was admitted to the facility with full upper and lower dentures. The resident lost the upper dentures while a resident at the facility. A dental consult dated 1/11/2023 documented that a preliminary impression for the lost dentures would take place at the next session. There was no documented evidence that the preliminary impression for the upper dentures was completed. In addition, the resident was not offered to use their lower dentures, as the lower dentures were being stored in the medication cart and the facility staff did not know the whereabouts of the resident's lower dentures. The finding is: The facility's Dental Policy dated October 2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/6/2024 and completed on 2/14/2024, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for one (Resident #383) of two residents reviewed for Transmission-Based Precautions, one (Resident #48) of two residents reviewed for Choices, and one (Resident #60) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, 1) the facility did not ensure that an employee (Certified Nursing Assistant #3) wore the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in Resident #383's room who was on Contact and Droplet Precautions for COVID-19 infection. 2) Certified Nursing Assistant #8 was observed using the room sink as a water basin to provide hygiene care to Resident #48. The resident shares a room with another resident who also utilizes the sink for hygiene and hand washing.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 2/14/2022 the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections was maintained. This was identified for two (Resident #4 and Resident #154) of four residents reviewed for Skin Conditions and one (Resident #53) of three residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, 1) during the wound care observation of Resident #4's right lateral leg wound, right heel, and plantar foot wounds the Registered Nurse (RN) #6 did not perform hand hygiene and did not change gloves after cleaning the leg wounds. Additionally, after cleaning the heel and plantar wounds, RN #6 allowed the wounds to come in contact with a dirty surface. 2) During an observation of Resident #53's left heel ulcer treatment, RN #6 allowed the cleansed wound to come in contact with a dirty surface; and 3) during Resident #154's head wound care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 2/14/2022, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person- centered care plan (CCP) was developed to meet the resident's medical and nursing needs to include the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This was identified for one (Resident #222) of three residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, Resident #222 who had a Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer to the sacral area upon admission and was identified as requiring two person staff assistance for bed mobility. The resident's CCP did not have specific interventions to address turning and positioning needs. The finding is: Resident #222 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer to the Sacral Region. The Five-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 2/14/2022, the facility did not ensure that each resident received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was identified for one (Resident #4) of four residents reviewed for skin conditions. Specifically, during the observation of Resident #4's right plantar foot wound care the Registered Nurse (RN) #6 did not pack the wound with the Iodoform wound packing as per the Physician's order. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Wound Treatment Administration, last reviewed 1/2022, documented to provide evidenced-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician's orders. The policy further documented that the wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician and physician-extender orders, including cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change. Resident #4 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 2/14/2022, the facility did not ensure that all resident's environment was free from accident hazards. This was identified for one (Resident #152) of eight residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #152, who was ambulatory, was not moved out of their room while there were repairs being made for an active leak. Staff did not ensure that signage indicating the wet floor was in place to alert the resident of the wet floor. The finding is: The Accident/Incident facility policy dated 1/2022 documented that it is the policy of the facility to maintain the safety of all residents. In compliance with the New York State Department of Health regulation, the resident environment remains free of accident hazards. Professional staff members will recommend, institute and update plan of care with preventative measures to ensure resident's safety. The policy documented hazards include wet floors that are not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey completed 2/14/2022, the facility did not ensure that each resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for one (Resident #17) of two residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #17 was observed receiving oxygen therapy without a physician's order. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, last reviewed in January 2022, documented oxygen administration shall be initiated under orders of a physician or physician-extender, except in the case of an acute need. In such cases, oxygen is administered and orders for oxygen are obtained as soon as is able. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Hypoxemia. The 11/7/2021 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS documented that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OBERLANDER, ZALMENIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/16/2007
EFROYMSON, DAVIDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/01/2016

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$30.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$5.7M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 23%Other / private 3%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $5.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$467per resident / day
operating cost
$14,208per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$468per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335067. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next