The Eleanor Nursing Care Center
419 North Quaker Lane, Hyde Park, NY 12538 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (845) 229-9177 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (91) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $132,957 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-17)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.2% | 14.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 5.8% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.5% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.0% | 19.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.6% | 12.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.9% | 13.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.4% | 6.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.3% | 19.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 32.9% | 13.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.8% | 78.8% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.6% | 20.6% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.7% | 9.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.88 | 1.70 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.66 | 1.36 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
35.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 154 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 74.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 35.6%CMS range 28.1–43.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.4–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 74.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 62.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 4.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 79.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.0%CMS range 5.7–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.28 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 98.1 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.67 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.58 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.81 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
91 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 80 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-09-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00345570) from 9/5/2024 through 9/17/2024, the facility failed to adequately equip the facility to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside and toilet and bathing facilities, or that each resident was consistently provided an alternate method for communicating needs to staff on 1 of 3 units (Unit 3). Specifically, on 9/10/2024 it was revealed there was no functioning centrally located audible call bell system and the current interim system was not functioning throughout the unit. The sound of the tap bells (desk bells with a black base) was not audible at the central nursing station or throughout the hall for 37 residents housed on the Unit 3 Dementia/Long Term Care Unit. Additionally, Resident #31, assessed at moderate risk for falls (fall with no injury on 8/27/2024), was observed on 9/10/2024 at 3:15 PM and 3:42 PM sitting on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-28 · tag F0573 — widespreadLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during a survey, the facility did not ensure the resident's legal representative upon written request was provided with a copy of the resident's medical records within 2 working days for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #117) reviewed for medical records. Specifically, on 3/10/25 Resident #117's representative requested copies of Resident #117 complete medical record. Resident #117's representative submitted an Authorization for Release of Health Information form to the facility on 3/10/25. The facility did not provide Resident #117's representative with copies of the medical records until 4/22/25. The Findings are:The facility policy titled Resident Medical Record, dated 5/2025, documented the facility will maintain records for each resident and ensure each resident's information is identified, records are secured and maintained in accordance with federal and state regulations. The facility did not have a written policy or procedure that directs staff to furnish records upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations,, interviews, and record reviews during the survey, the facility did not ensure that there was adequate staffing to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident as determined by the facility assessment and individual plans of care. Specifically, the actual staffing was reviewed from 03/20-04/20/2026. During that time the staffing did not meet the minimal staffing numbers for nurses on 03/24/2026, 04/01/2026, 04/05/2026, 04/07/2026, and 04/13/2026 for at least one shift. Additionally, the facility had minimal staffing numbers of certified nurse aides on at least one unit and one shift on 28 of the 30 days reviewed. Staff reported working with the minimum number of certified nurse aides could be challenging and could affect the amount and timeliness of work that could be completed. The findings included:The Facility Assessment tool last updated 11/12/2025 documented a facility capacity of 120 residents but had averaged between 90 and 95…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the Governing Body failed to ensure consistent and responsible management of the facility. Specifically, 1) the facility has had a change in Director of Nursing seven times in the last two (2) years. 2) the facility has had 3 Administrators in the last two years. 3) The facility had 11 repeat deficiencies from the recertification survey of 05/06/2025, and 12 repeat deficiencies from the recertification survey of 09/17/2024. 4) The facility has had one (1) elevator that has been out of service for at least 3 years, and a 2nd elevator that has not been functional at times and has caused residents to miss appointments (see F698).Findings include:1) Notifications from the facility to the New York State Department of Health dated 07/30/24 to 02/02/2026, documented 7 changes for the Director of Nursing. The facility hired four (4) Directors of Nursing during this period and had three (3) interim Directors of Nursing. The longest tenure of a Director of Nursing was less than 6 months. At time of survey, the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review during the post-survey revisit from 06/24/2026 to 06/29/2026, the facility did not ensure an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. Specifically, the Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist was unable to provide documentation of facility antibiotic surveillance / line listing from 06/18/2026 through 06/25/2026. Findings include:During an interview on 06/25/2026 at 3:15 PM, the Director of Nursing stated they could not provide antibiotic surveillance/line list for the month of June 2026 for the facility. They stated the unit managers were responsible for the completion of the surveillance reports, and they did not receive reports for May or June 2026. They stated the last time a full monthly antibiotic surveillance report was completed in the facility was in April 2026. The Director of Nursing stated that a full house audit of residents prescribed antibiotics was not completed as stated in the plan of correction (F684 recertification surevey). The Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the survey, the facility did not ensure residents' rights to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on three (3) of three (3) units (Unit 1, 2 and 3). Specifically, 1. On Unit 2, room [ROOM NUMBER] had stains on the floor, a puddle of water near the radiator, spackle stains, molding peeling under the window, and the closet door was missing. In the bathroom, brown stains were on the toilet, wall tiles were missing. There were brown stains on the ceiling, and insect or debris accumulation inside the light fixture. room [ROOM NUMBER] had unpacked cardboard boxes, no closet doors, and broken drapes. 2) On Unit 1, room [ROOM NUMBER] had a hospital bed electrical power cord plugged into an electrical outlet that did not have an outlet cover in place. Exposed wires were observed in the electrical outlet. 3) On Unit 3, rooms [ROOM NUMBER] had either no curtains or curtains in disrepair. room [ROOM NUMBER] had broken dresser drawers.The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the survey, the facility did not ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for three (3) of nine (9) residents (Resident #114, Resident #6, Resident #1) reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, 1) Resident #114's did not receive showers or assistance as planned for activities of daily living. 2) Resident #6 did not receive showers as scheduled; and 3) Resident #1 was observed with scruffy stubble whiskers and stated they wanted to have their face shaved.The findings included: A policy titled Activities of Daily Living/AM/PM Care, last revised 05/2025 documented residents of the facility will be maintained at the highest practicable of well-being and will receive hygienic care at routine intervals during a 24-hour period as well as when needed to achieve above stated goal. A facility policy titled Certified Nurse Aide Documentation, last revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review during the Recertification Survey conducted from 04/20/2026 to 04/28/2026, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and to prevent worsening of pressure ulcers for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #115) reviewed for pressure ulcer. Specifically, Resident #115 was assessed at risk for pressure ulcers, had excoriation to the coccyx on admission and developed a Stage 3 sacral wound. The resident had deep tissue injury to both heels and a right post-surgical metatarsal toe amputation wound. Wound care treatments were not completed as ordered. The resident was not seen on wound rounds and there was no wound assessments documented from 04/21/2025 until 06/18/2025.The findings included:A facility policy titled Pressure Ulcer Identification, Prevention and Treatment, last updated 05/2025 documented Residents with actual pressure ulcers will be provided preventative measures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision/assistance to prevent accidents for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for falls. Specifically, Resident #116 required two (2) person assistance for bed mobility and was provided one (1) staff assistance by Certified Nurse Aide #10 which resulted in a fall from bed. 2) Resident #114 sustained an unwitnessed fall on 06/04/2025. A thorough investigation to prevent re-occurrence was not completed, the Accident/Incident report dated 06/04/2025 did not document injuries sustained due to the fall, or notification of the resident representative and physician. Neurological checks were not completed as per facility policy for a head injury. The Accident/Incident Report was not reviewed by the Medical Director. The findings Include: 1) The May 2025 policy titled 'Activities of Daily Living Care' documented it was the procedure to assist residents to appropriate positions for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the survey, the facility did not ensure that residents that receive dialysis receive such services consistent with professional standards of practice for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for dialysis. Specifically, Resident #46 missed dialysis appointments that needed to be rescheduled due to a malfunctioning elevator. Additionally, the hemodialysis communication book for Resident #46 was reviewed from 03/13 to 04/27/2026. The documentation of the assessments before and after dialysis was inconsistent with no documentation in the electronic medical record elsewhere. The findings include:The Care of Resident receiving Hemodialysis Policy last reviewed 05/2025 documented that the nursing responsibilities were to assess the resident pre and post hemodialysis. The pre-hemodialysis assessment included making sure that the residents have had daily care and entering pretreatment information in the communication book as indicated. The post…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the survey, the facility did not ensure the attending physician documented in the resident medical record, review of identified drug regimen review recommendations, and completion of any actions taken to address the recommendations for two (2) of five (5) residents (Resident #4 and Resident #23) reviewed for unnecessary medications, psychotropic medications, and medication regimen review, and one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #13) reviewed for psych/opioid medications. Specifically, 1) Resident #4 had five (5) drug regimen reviews from 11/19/2025to 03/22/2026, with no documented evidence the Medical Director reviewed; 2) Resident#23 had five (5) drug regimen reviews from 10/28/2025 to 03/18/2026 and there was no documented evidence that the Medical Director reviewed; and 3) Resident #13 had six (6) drug regimen reviews from 10/27/2025 to 03/18/2026 and there was no documented evidence that the Medical Director reviewed or responded. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 80 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility did not ensure residents were provided with food and drink that was palatable, and at an appetizing temperature. Specifically, 1) during a lunch observation on Unit 1, temperatures take at the time the last resident tray was served, revealed the chicken parmesan had a temperature of 107.6 degrees Fahrenheit, the pasta was 95.5 degrees Fahrenheit, the green beans were 105 degrees Fahrenheit and milk was 63 degrees Fahrenheit; and 2) for the lunch meal on 04/20/2026, hotdogs and french fries were served with no condiments (ketchup and/or mustard) available. The findings include: The facility policy, Dietary Department Policy and Procedure, documented that hot food should be held at 140 degrees Fahrenheit above and cold food at 46 degrees Fahrenheit or below. 1) During an observation on 04/23/2026 at 11:59 AM, with the Food Service Director, temperatures of the lunch tray line were tested before being served. Temperatures of the hot food were tested, and all were above 140 degrees Fahrenheit. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility did not store food or maintain equipment with food contact surfaces in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, 1) unlabeled and undated food were stored in the kitchen freezer, and dry storage; 2) insufficient supply of emergency food; 3) food, water and supplies were not stored six (6) inches off the floor; and 4) food preparation and service equipment was not maintained. The findings are: The undated facility policy titled Dietary Department documented No boxes of food shall be stored on the floor. Food must be covered when stored. Cutting boards should be inspected frequently for wear and replaced as needed.During the initial tour of the kitchen on 04/20/2026 at 10:25 AM with the Food Service Director an observation of frozen hashbrowns, box of farina, pan of thickener, pan of instant potato and pan of sugar all unlabeled and undated; an opened box of cornstarch undated; and an open box of salt unsealed. The emergency food supply was short cans of tuna, beef stew,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the survey, the facility did not ensure the residents right to participate in care planning meeting for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #68) reviewed for Activities. Specifically, Resident #68's quarterly care plan meeting was cancelled due to snow in January 2026 and not rescheduled.Findings include:Resident #68 had diagnoses that included, but not limited to Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Multiple Sclerosis, and depression.The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #68 had moderately impaired cognition, and required set-up assist for eating, and was dependent on staff for rolling, sit to lying and transfers.During an interview on 04/21/2026 at 11:26 AM, Resident #68 stated they were supposed to have had a care plan meeting, and it was canceled due to snow, and not rescheduled. Resident #68 stated care plan meetings were important to them for communication with their family members.During a record review of social work progress notes, there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview during the survey, the facility did not ensure residents needs and preferences were considered to create an individualized home-like environment for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #6) reviewed for choices. Specifically, Resident #6 purchased a shelf for their room and asked about purchasing a recliner for their room. The were waiting for approval to install the shelf and purchase a recliner; there was no documented evidence the facility responded to their request. The Personal Items in Resident Rooms policy dated 03/31/2026 documented that the Facility will accommodate, within reason, items of resident choice within the room environment that will enhance the homelike atmosphere. Items that may be considered for screening and approval may include: floor standing shelving unit (1) that does not extend outward from the wall at a distance that impedes safe passage, does not extend upward at a height that is at risk for tipping forward and does not extend along the wall at a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a grievance process that was clear and consistent, and prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances for one (1) of nine (9) residents (Resident #114) reviewed for activities of daily living, and 3 of 12 residents (Resident #61, Resident #107, and Resident #121) at a Resident Council meeting. Specifically, 1) Resident #114's resident representative reported a grievance on 06/16/2025 and there was no documented evidence that a thorough investigation was conducted, and the complainant was notified of the resolution. 2) Resident #7 filed a grievance on 04/07/2026 and did not receive a response. 3) Resident #61, Resident #107, and Resident #121stated at the Resident Council meeting that the grievance process was unclear and inconsistent.The findings included: An undated facility policy titled Grievance/Complaint Procedure documented that the Administrator was the Grievance Officer and that the Nursing and Social Service Departments participate in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not ensure that residents remained free from abuse from one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #23) reviewed for behavioral-emotional concerns. Specifically, Resident #37 was not kept free from abuse when Resident #23 was observed by staff touching Resident #37's breast on 08/23/2025. Additionally, Resident #23 had psychiatric diagnoses that included sexual disorders there were no interventions in place prior to the incident that would ensure Resident #37 and other residents were free from being abused by Resident #23.The findings include:Resident #37 had diagnoses including dementia, anxiety and bipolar disorder. The Minimum Data Set (resident assessment tool) dated 06/10/2025 documented Resident #37's cognition was severely impaired, had no behavior symptoms and mobility devices included a walker and wheelchair.Resident #23 had diagnoses that included dementia, hydrocephalus (chronic condition of accumulation of fluid within the brain),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the survey, the facility did not ensure that alleged violations involving abuse were reported no later than two hours after the incident for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for behavioral emotional. Specifically, Resident #23 was witnessed touching another resident inappropriately on 08/23/2025 and the incident was not reported to the State Agency.Findings include:The facility policy titled Resident Abuse Prevention and Reporting, last revised 05/2025, documented upon suspicion of abuse of any kind, all employees are required to stop the abuse, protect the residents, immediately notify immediate supervisor or person in charge of the building (if during off-hours), make immediate statement of observations or cause for suspicion and provide to above-identified person. If deemed a reportable incident, reporting of the incident is to be made in accordance with the requirements stated in manual for specific incident. Resident #23 had diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the survey, the facility did not ensure that they initiated and completed a thorough investigation to determine if alleged abuse could have been prevented and to prevent further abuse while the investigation was in progress for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #23) reviewed for behavioral-emotional concerns. Specifically, Resident #23 was observed touching another resident inappropriately on 08/23/2025. The Accident/Incident report dated 08/23/2025 did not document a thorough investigation to prevent reoccurrence of the situation and protect other residents during the investigation. Additionally, the Medical Director was not aware of the nature of the incident, and the report was signed by the supervising nurse and only reviewed and signed by the Administrator. Findings included: Resident #23 had diagnoses that included dementia, hydrocephalus, and anxiety. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented severely impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review during the survey, the facility did not ensure notification to the resident representative or ombudsman regarding transfer or discharge, including the reason for the transfer/discharge, in writing and in a language and manner understood, for three (3) of three (3) residents (Resident #111, Resident #3, and Resident #5) reviewed for hospitalization. Specifically, 1) Resident #111 was hospitalized on [DATE] and the facility did not complete a discharge notice or bed-hold notification, and the ombudsman did not receive notification; 2) Resident #3 was hospitalized [DATE] and the facility did not provide a discharge notice or bed-hold notification to Resident #3's representative and did not notify the ombudsman; and 3) Resident #5 was hospitalized [DATE] and the facility did not provide a discharge notice or bed-hold notification and did not notify the ombudsman. Findings include: The Policy and Procedure titled Notice of Transfer/Discharge, last revised 05/2024, documented that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during survey, the facility did not electronically transmit encoded and completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system within 14 days of the final MDS completion date, as required for payment information and quality measure purposes. This was evident for one (1) resident (Resident #101).The findings are: The facility policy titled Minimum Data Set, last revised 07/2025, required each resident to have a comprehensive functional capacity assessment recorded on a designated Minimum Data Set (MDS) form and electronically submitted to the State Department of Health in accordance with federal and state regulations. Review of facility Minimum Data Set assessment data completion and submission activities conducted on 04/27/2026 revealed the following. The Minimum Data Set record exceeded fourteen (14) days from the date of completion. It was not electronically transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services system within the required timeframe. The 12/22/2026 Discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the survey, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed and/or implemented, to meet a resident's needs for two (2) of three (3) residents (Resident #46 and #106) reviewed for Respiratory, one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #29) reviewed for Urinary Catheters and Urinary Tract Infections, and one (1) of three (3) resident reviewed for Dental. Specifically, 1) Residents #46 and #106 received oxygen and did not have a respiratory care plan; 2) Resident #29 had an indwelling catheter placed on 04/01/2026 and did not have a care plan in place for catheter care; and 3) Resident #98 did not have a comprehensive care plan to address dental issues.The findings include: The facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plans, last reviewed 05/2025, documented that it is to ensure that each resident is provided with individual goal directed care that was reasonable, measurable and based upon a resident's needs. A resident's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review during the survey, the facility did not ensure that activities were provided based on the comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences of each resident that met the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for two (2) of three (3) residents (Resident #3 and Resident #68) reviewed for activities. Specifically, 1) Resident #3 was observed in their room on 04/20/2026 and 04/21/2026 and there was no documented evidence of attendance to group or in room visits on those days. 2) Resident #68 was observed in bed on 04/21/2026 and 04/24/2026 and there was no documented evidence of in-room activities on those days. Furthermore, there was no documented evidence of consistent activity attendance on any days.Findings include:A policy titled Activity Programs reviewed 05/2024 documented Activity programs designed to meet the needs of each resident are available on a daily basis; individual [NAME] group activities are included in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the survey, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 2 (Resident # 117) residents reviewed for antibiotics. Specifically, the resident was to receive 18 doses of Amoxicillin for a urinary tract infection, but three doses were omitted, resulting in receiving 15 of 18 doses.The findings include: The policy titled Administering Medications dated 5/2025 documented a licensed nurse will be responsible for passing medications to residents in accordance with techniques approved for use in the Facility, in compliance with New York State Codes, rules and regulations and with other applicable Federal and State LawsResident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses Acute Urinary Tract Infection, Parkinson's Disease, Lewy Body Dementia.The admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented the resident had severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure care consistent with professional standards of practice was provided for two (2) of three (3) residents (Resident #46, #106) reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Residents #46 and #106 were administered oxygen at a liter flow greater than the physician order.The findings included: The facility policy, Oxygen Administration, last updated 5/2025, documented oxygen is administered by licensed nursing staff to patients requiring oxygen therapy in the presence of a physician order with a pertinent diagnosis relating to blood oxygenation. 1) Resident #46's diagnoses included chronic kidney disease-stage 4, cirrhosis of liver and acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia. The Annual Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 02/20/2026 documented Resident #46 had intact cognition and was short of breath when lying flat. A physician order dated 03/11/2026 documented three (3) liters/minute of oxygen via nasal cannula as needed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolatedEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the survey, the facility did not ensure that they had sufficient staff to provide nursing related services for residents with mental and psychosocial disorders to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #23) reviewed for behavioral emotional concerns. Specifically, the facility determined that Resident #23 required one-to-one supervision during the day and evening shifts after an incident involving another resident and inappropriate touch on 08/23/2025. However, the need for one-to-one supervision was not documented clearly or consistently and the staffing sheets from 04/01/2026 to 04/27/2026 documented insufficient numbers of staff to cover the one (1) to one (1) supervision. The findings include:Resident #23 had diagnoses that included dementia, hydrocephalus (chronic condition of accumulation of fluid within the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility did not ensure infection control practices and procedures were maintained when handling linens on two of three units (Unit 1 and 2). Specifically, 1) On Unit 2, room [ROOM NUMBER] had bagged soiled linens on the floor that had been there for a prolonged period; Certified Nurse Aide #14 was observed with soiled linens unbagged directly on the floor while changing the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]; and carts holding clean linen were observed uncovered in the clean linen room. 2) On Unit 1, Certified Nurse Aide #15 was observed drinking and placing their personal drink cup into the clean linen and supply cart in hallway and then leaving the immediate area with the clean supply cart flaps open. The findings include: The facility Linen Management policy, last reviewed 05/2025, documented that clean linens are to be kept covered and protected from dust and other contaminants prior to use. Soiled linen is to be placed in a bag at the point of care, within the resident room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews during an abbreviated survey (2596130) the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff were available to meet the needs of residents as determined by the facility's own assessment. Specifically, the facility assessment date reviewed 03/25/2025 by Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement documented that the day shift would have a Charge Licensed Practical Nurse and a Med nurse per unit, this was not reflected in the staffing assignments. This staffing pattern contributed to medications being administered late for residents on the units with only 1(one) nurse providing care. The facility's documented assessment dated [DATE] indicated that on day shift each unit would be staffed with a medical nurse and a Charge Licensed Practical unit manager. However, on multiple dates including the observed date of 09/18/2025, units were staffed for the day shift with only one nurse responsible for approximately 30 residents. This staffing pattern did not align…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, during an abbreviated survey (2596130) the facility did not ensure that residents received care in a safe, clean, and comfortable environment. Specifically, multiple ceiling tiles in multiple rooms had visible dark water stains: on Unit 1 (one) room [ROOM NUMBER],109, & 110; on Unit 2 (two) in 218 the community room, the bathroom in 220, and room [ROOM NUMBER] & 227; on Unit 3 (three) room [ROOM NUMBER], 325 and 326. There were also multiple rooms with window curtains that were torn as well as tiles missing from under the bathroom sinks. The undated policy titled Policy and Procedure Manual Work Orders documents that maintenance work orders shall be completed in order to establish a priority of maintenance. The policy further documents that in order to establish a priority of maintenance service, items of concern to be addressed by the Maintenance Department are to be entered into the Maintenance Binder on each floor. Items that must be addressed immediately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during an abbreviated survey (2596130) the facility did not ensure that the facility assessment accurately reflected the resources and staff needed to care for residents. Specifically, the facility assessment dated [DATE] reviewed by Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement documented that the day shift would have a Charge Licensed Practical Nurse and a Med nurse per unit, but this was not reflected in the staffing assignments. This staffing pattern contributed to medications being administered late for residents on the units with only 1 (one) nurse providing care. Review of the facility's assessment dated [DATE] reviewed by Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement indicated that each unit would be staffed with a medical nurse and a Charge Licensed Practical Nurse unit manager for the day shift. Review of the staffing assignment sheet for 09/18/2025 the 3rd floor and 2nd floor units were observed to be operating with only one nurse assigned to work…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated survey (NY00360576) from 04/29/25 to 05/06/25, the facility did not ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, 1. Upon review of the nursing staffing schedule from 3/29/25-5/29/25, for multiple days, on all three shifts of staffing for each unit, the facility did not provide adequate staffing to meet the needs of the residents and as per their Facility Assessment and, 2. Resident Council meeting attendees expressed concerns the facility did not staff enough nurse aides to provide them with necessary activity of daily living care. The findings included:The facility Staffing Policy reviewed 9/2024 documented the facility shall have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility shall further assure that staffing levels enable each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/29/25-5/6/25, the facility did not ensure certified nurse aides had the specific competencies and skills necessary to care for residents' needs as identified through resident assessments and described in the plan of care for 5 of 5 recently hired certified nurse aides reviewed. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aides #6, #7, #8, #9, and #10) did not receive a facility orientation upon hire and did not receive documented skills competency training that covered key skill-set areas as outlined in the facility assessment. The findings included: The 2/25/25 Facility Assessment Tool documented an orientation package is given to all new hires after they have been hired. The orientation package details all the education topics that are presented to newly hired employees. This general orientation is scheduled for the first Wednesday of every month for all new hires. Day two is with the department for specific coverage of department information. Education is provided to staff mostly through the Assistant Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews conducted during the recertification survey from 4/29/25 to 5/06/25, the facility did not ensure proper storage, preparation, distribution, and service of food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Specifically, 1) there were multiple containers of unknown food observed in the walk-in refrigerator, 2) the dishwasher did not achieve proper temperatures for the wash and rinse cycles and 3) the stovetop controls and large portable exhaust fan were dirty and covered in dirt and dust. The findings include: The facility policy Food Receiving and Storage which was last revised on 09/2024 documented all opened items would be labeled and dated and discarded after three days once opened. An undated facility policy titled Cleaning Dishes, Dish Machine documented dishes and cookware will be washed and sanitized after each meal. The policy further notes to check the dish machine gauges throughout the cycle to assure proper temperatures. The facility dishwasher installation and operating manual for the EcoLab model ES-4000…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 4/29/2025 to 5/6/2025, the facility did not ensure the views, grievances, and recommendations of the resident group were considered and promptly acted upon. This was evident for 10 of 10 (Residents #103, 48, 46, 90, 86, 66, 29, 31, 10, and 28) residents who attended the resident council meeting. Specifically, the attendees of the resident council meeting expressed concerns during consecutive monthly meetings without receiving a facility response. The findings are: The facility policy titled Grievance/Complaint Procedure dated 6/2024 documented the facility must consider the views of a resident group. The policy was implemented by the Social Services Department and the Administrator was listed as the Grievance Officer. The Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 2/27/2025 documented attendees reported that nurse aides refused to take them out of bed in the morning saying they were short of staff. The attendees also requested for more mechanical lifts on the 1st Floor. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00370712) from 4/29/25 to 5/6/25, the facility did not ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was evident for 3 of 3 (1st, 2nd, and 3rd Floors) resident units during environmental observation. Specifically, 1) Resident #93 had a broken closet bar preventing clothing from being hung on top of closet unit, 2) Resident #35 was not provided with a lock box resulting in the loss of funds, 3) each resident unit contained heat/air conditioning radiators were dusty, rusty, and had exposed conductor fins that were damaged and bent, 4) room [ROOM NUMBER] had missing closet doors, 5) the 3rd Floor dayroom had inadequate lighting, and 6) the 3rd floor was noisy due to a defective beeping call bell system. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Right - Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment, revised 5/2024, documented: It is the policy of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 4/29/25 to 5/6/25, the facility did not ensure certified nurse aides were provided the required 12 hours of training to ensure safe delivery of care. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide evidence that 5 of 5 Certified Nurse Aides (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) reviewed for nurse aide in-service training were provided 12 hours of mandatory annual in-service training or an in-service on dementia. The findings included: The facility policy titled 12 hours Certified Nurse Aide Training documented certified nurse aides required to receive 12 hours a year of in-services.During an interview on 05/01/25 at 12:53 PM, the Infection Control/Staff Educator stated today was their first day in the position. They stated they were not aware of status or location of annual in-service training documentation for certified nurse aide staff. During an interview and observation of annual in-service documentation on 05/01/25 at 3:32 PM, the Interim Director of Nursing stated they were unable to provide 12 hours of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 4/29/2025 to 5/6/2025, the facility did not ensure the attending physician, the medical director, and the director of nursing received and acted upon pharmacy irregularity reports. This was evident for and 4 (Resident #s 38, 83, 81, and 80) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication and 1 (Resident #3) of 2 residents reviewed for psych/opioid medication side effects. Specifically, pharmacy recommendations for Resident #38, #83, #81, #80 and #3 were not addressed by the attending physician.The findings are:The facility policy titled Pharmacy Services - Drug Regimen Review dated 1/2024 documented the licensed pharmacist will report and drug regimen review irregularities to the attending physician/nurse practitioner and these reports will be acted upon. The irregularities will be sent to the director of nursing for the attending physician/nurse practitioner. The policy did not document a timeline for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 4/29/25-5/6/2025, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were maintained in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for storage, labeling, and the expiration date. Specifically, expired medications and incorrectly labeled eyedrops were found in the medication cart on one of three units (Third Floor Unit), the medication storage refrigerator was observed unlocked and not affixed on two of two units (Second and Third Floor Units), and the medication rooms on two of two units (Second and Third Floor Units) were observed unlocked on two occasions. The findings are: The facility policy, Storage of Drugs, reviewed 8/2024 documented that all drugs requiring refrigeration are stored in the refrigerator locked in the medication room, drugs shall be accessible only to personnel designated by the facility, drugs shall not be kept on hand after the expiration date, and drug storage areas in the medication cart should not contain nondrug items. During an observation on 04/29/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 4/29/2025 to 5/6/2025, the facility did not ensure menus were followed. This was evident for 10 of 10 (Residents #103, 48, 46, 90, 86, 66, 29, 31, 10, and 28) during Resident Council Meeting and 2 (Floor 1 and 3) of 3 resident units during Dining Observation. Specifically, 1) the Resident Council consistently reported concerns related to meal tray item accuracy in accordance with the posted menu and meal ticket, 2) multiple residents were observed at mealtime with meal tickets that did not match the items served on their meal tray. The findings are: The undated facility policy titled Dining Services documented if an incorrect meal was served to a resident nursing staff will report it to the Food Service Director/Cook Supervisors that a new food tray can be issued. The undated facility policy titled Menus documented if a food group is missing from a resident's daily diet, the resident is provided an alternate means of meeting nutritional needs. The undated facility policy titled Dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during a recertification survey, from 4/29/2025 - 5/6/2025, the facility did not adequately establish and/or maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment. Specifically, (1) the facility did not provide a site-specific water management plan for legionella; (2) During wound care the Licensed Practical Nurse and the Certified Nurse Aide did not wear a gown; and (3) During medication administration the nurse did not practice hand hygiene prior to administering eye drops.Findings include:The policy and procedure titled Enhanced barrier Precaution, dated 4/2024, documents this facility's policy is to implement enhanced barrier precautions for preventing transmission of novel or targeted multidrug-resistant organisms. The Policy and Procedure titled Legionella undated documents it is the policy of the facility to remain in compliance with ASHRAE 188, Section 7 to reduce Legionella growth and spread;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-06 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 4/29/25 to 5/6/25, the facility did not ensure annual performance reviews for nursing staff were completed at least once every 12 months. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide annual performance reviews for 5 of 5 Certified Nurse Aides (#1, #2, #3, #4, and 5) reviewed. The findings included: A facility policy titled Annual Performance Review, last revised March 2025, documented: the facility is committed to ensuring that all employees have a clear understanding of performance expectations and are provided with the necessary support to achieve their goals. Managers/supervisors will perform the review on at least an annual basis. During an interview on 05/01/25 at 12:53 PM, the Infection Control/Staff Educator stated it was their first day in the Staff Educator position. They were not aware of status or location of annual performance appraisals for staff. During an interview on 05/01/25 at 3:32 PM, the Interim Director of Nursing stated they were unable to provide annual performance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 4/29/2025 to 5/6/2025, the facility did not ensure reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 (Resident #6) of 27 sampled residents. Specifically, the door to Resident #6's bathroom was nailed shut and Resident #6 had to ambulate down the unit hallway to the bathroom located in a shower room to toilet themselves. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Rights dated 8/2024 documented residents had the right to dignity, respect, and a comfortable living environment. Resident #6 had diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and psychosis. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #6 was severely cognitively impaired, did not display inappropriate behavior, was continent of bladder and bowel, and was able to toilet and dress themselves without staff assistance. On 5/1/2025 at 6:56 PM and 5/02/2025 at 2:30 PM, the bathroom door in Resident #6's room was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00376085 and NY00370712) from 4/29-5/6/2025 , the facility did not ensure the resident representative/emergency contact was notified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #8 and Resident #201) reviewed for notification of change. Specifically, Residents #8 and #201 were transferred to the hospital and their resident representative was not notified. Findings include:1) Resident #8 had diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, respiratory failure, and atrial fibrillation.Resident #8's family member was listed as the emergency contact on the contact page of the medical record.The Five Day Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #8 had intact cognition and required maximum assistance, or dependent on staff, for most activities of daily living except eating and oral hygiene. The Facility Policy titled Notice of Transfer or Discharge, last revised October 2024, documented the facility must notify…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews during a recertification survey from 4/29/25-5/6/25 the facility did not ensure a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 1 out of 1 resident (Resident #35) reviewed for personal property. Specifically, Resident #35 was missing money which was reported to facility staff and the facility did not complete a timely and thorough investigation of the missing money. Findings include: Resident #35 diagnoses included parkinsonism, left leg above knee amputation, and peripheral vascular disease. An annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #35 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 04/30/25 at 9:48 AM, Resident #35 stated approximately $45 which they kept in wallet on bedside table was missing. They stated they kept a bag on bedside table which contained cash and credit/debit cards. They stated they checked the bag at end of last week and noticed that cash was missing. Resident #35 stated they reported the missing cash to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review during the recertification survey from 4/29/25 to 5/06/25, the facility did not ensure that a resident-to-resident physical altercation with injuries was reported to the State Survey Agency for one of three residents (Resident #13) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #81 entered Resident #13's room and struck Resident #13 causing injuries to their nose and eye. The facility did not report this incident to the State Survey Agency. Findings include: The undated facility Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation Policy and Procedure Manual documents that reporting of all allege violations to the administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified times and the administrator will follow up with government agencies, during business hours, to confirm the initial report was received and to report the results of the investigation when final within 5 working days of the incident, as required by state agencies. Resident #13 had diagnoses including dementia, bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00376085 and NY00370712) from 4/29-5/6/2025, the facility did not ensure that the resident, resident's representative(s), or ombudsman was notified of the transfer or discharge, and the reasons for the move, in writing and in a language and manner they understand for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #8 and Resident #201) reviewed for hospitalization. Specifically, 1) the facility did not complete a discharge notice or notification of bed hold for Resident #8 when they were hospitalized on [DATE], 3/3/2025, and 3/17/2025. The ombudsman was not notified of Resident #8's 2/2/2025 hospitalization. 2) The facility did not complete a discharge notice or notification of bed hold for Resident #201 when they were discharged to the hospital on 1/21/2025. Findings include:Resident #8 had diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, respiratory failure, and atrial fibrillation.The Five Day Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure the Resident Assessment was accurate for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (Resident #1, Resident #8). Specifically, for Resident # 1 and #8, the toileting hygiene coding was incorrectly, coded as not applicable. Findings include: 1) Resident #1 had diagnoses that included heart failure, dementia, and schizophrenia. The Annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition, toileting hygiene not applicable, and always incontinent of urine. The Activities of Daily Living Care Plan last updated 3/4/2025 documented resident dependent for cares. Interventions included maintaining optimal hygenic cleanliness as evidenced by freedom from odor, soil, and wetness. The Bowel and Bladder Continence Care Plan updated 3/4/2025 documented resident incontinent of bowel and bladder. Interventions included providing routine toileting and prompt incontinence care. 2) Resident #8 had diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the recertification survey from 4/29-5/6/2025 the facility did not ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for Activities. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that a care plan was developed for Resident #38's activity preferences or involvement. Findings include: The facility policy, Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plans last reviewed 1/2025 documented that the care plan will identify priority problems and needs to be addressed by the interdisciplinary team, and will reflect the resident's strengths, limitations and goals. The care plan will be complete, current, realistic, time specific and appropriate to the individual needs for each resident. Resident #38 with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, Anxiety Disorder, Depression, and Psychotic Disorder. During an interview on 04/29/25 at 01:40 PM, Resident #38 stated the activities offered at the facility are not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00376085) conducted from 4/29-5/6/2025, the facility did not ensure that the Comprehensive Care Plan was revised to reflect the resident's current condition for 3 of 8 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #8, Resident #9, and Resident #38). Specifically, Resident #8, Resident #9, and Resident #38's Comprehensive Care Plan was not updated to reflect falls that occurred, and the effectiveness of interventions or new interventions implemented after the falls. Findings include: The facility policy, Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plans, reviewed 1/2025 documented it is the policy of the facility to promote interdisciplinary care for our residents by utilizing the interdisciplinary plan of care based on assessment, planning, treatment, service and intervention. Care plans are modified between care plan conference when appropriate to meet the resident's current needs, problems and goals. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey from 4/29/2025 to 5/6/2025, the facility did not ensure residents who required dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) received services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #53) reviewed for Dialysis. Specifically, there was no documented evidence of consistent assessment and oversight before, during and after dialysis treatment for Resident #53 who received hemodialysis treatments at a community-based dialysis center. The findings included: An undated facility policy titled Care of Resident Receiving Hemodialysis documented: Prompt attention must be given to the resident when they return to unit. Nursing responsibilities after hemodialysis include obtain vital signs, observe shunt site for bleeding or redness. Observe site for erythema, local warmth, swelling, exudate and unusual tenderness at graft, fistula or shunt site. Notify physician to report drainage and obtain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the recertification survey from 4/29/25-5/6/2025, the facility did not ensure a medication error rate of no more than 5% during a medication administration observation when 4 of 28 opportunities of error were observed (14%) for 4 of 9 residents (Resident #1, Resident #45, Resident #74, Resident #80). Specifically, Resident #1 was administered latanoprost eye drops instead of timolol eye drops. Resident #45 was administered chewable aspirin instead of delayed release aspirin. Resident #74 was going to be administered 10 milliters of Potassium instead of 7.5 milliters until they were asked to confirm the correct amount of liquid in the cup just prior to administration. Resident #80 was going to be administered two 500 milligram tablets of Tylenol instead of two 325 milligram tablets of Tylenol until asked to confirm the dose was correct just prior to administration. Findings include: The facility policy, Administration of Medications, last reviewed 5/2024 documented that a licensed nurse will be responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey from 4/29/2025 to 5/6/2025, the facility did not ensure that an ongoing review of antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use was completed for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for antibiotic use. Specifically, (Residents #95 and #205), the facility could not provide an infection/antibiotic tracking report as requested on 5/5/2025 at 4:00 PM, ensuring that their antibiotic program was implemented to monitor antibiotic use protocols when prescribed to residents. The findings are: The policy and Procedure titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program, undated, documents that it is the facility's policy to maintain an Antibiotic Stewardship Program to promote the appropriate use of antibiotics to treat infections and reduce possible adverse events associated with antibiotics. 1. Resident #95 had diagnoses of Urinary Tract Infection, Pressure Ulcer of the Sacral Region, and Dysuria (pain when urinating). The physician's order dated 4/12/2025 documented Ciprofloxacin (antibiotic) 250 milligrams give one tablet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 04/29/2025 to 05/06/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident was offered pneumococcal immunizations and received education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunizations for 3 of 5 residents (Residents #14, #57, #204) reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that residents were offered, declined, or educated on the pneumococcal immunization. Findings include: The undated facility policy titled Infection Control Immunizations for Residents documents that the facility's policy ensures that the residents are offered COVID-19, Influenza, and Pneumococcal immunizations by state and federal regulations and national guidelines. 1. Resident #14 had diagnoses of Dysphagia, Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and Depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool dated 2/26/2025, documented that the resident had severe cognitive impairment and needed Partial Moderate assistance with activities of daily living. The pneumococcal vaccine was not up to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review during the recertification survey conducted 4/29/2025 to 5/6/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident was offered the COVID-19 vaccine and provided education regarding the benefits, risks and potential side effects associated with the vaccine for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #57, #204) reviewed for infection control. Specifically, there was no documented evidence they were offered, declined, or educated about the COVID-19 vaccination. Findings include: The Policy and Procedure titled COVID-19 vaccination, revised 2/26/2025, documents that the Facility's Policy supports and facilitates compliance with Infection Control best practice regarding routine vaccinations, including the COVID-19 vaccine. Resident #57 with diagnoses of Cognitive communication deficit, Depression, and Basal cell Carcinoma of the skin (Skin Cancer). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 3/2/2025, documented the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #204 with diagnoses of fracture of the right femur, Depression, and Type 2 Diabetes. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 9/5//2024 to 9/17/24, the facility did not ensure residents' right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 2 of 3 units. Specifically, during environmental observations on Unit 2, room [ROOM NUMBER] D had missing/broken floor molding, room [ROOM NUMBER] had a rusted/ scratched heater, and the walls had damaged sheet rock/ large gouges. The Unit 3 heater (outside the elevator) was rusty and holes were noted in the wall. The Unit 3 floor tiles near the elevator were dirty and dusty with particles. There was a strong odor of urine noted on the Unit 3 hallway on 9/11/24 and Resident #3, #27, #13 had dusty wheelchairs with ripped arm rests and caked on food. Additionally, One of two passenger elevators on the first floor was out of service and not accessible to residents and staff. The findings are: During observation on 9/05/24 at approximately 9:20 AM and through out the duration of the onsite survey, there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00324750) from 9/5/24-9/17/24, the facility did not protect 5 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse from resident-to-resident abuse/mistreatment. Specifically, the facility did not implement interventions for Resident #84 after escalating behaviors were documented starting on 9/16/23 and Resident#84 punched a Staff in the face and punched Resident #73 in the face on 9/22/23. Resident #84 was sent to the hospital for evaluation. Upon return, there were no new interventions to address Resident #84's unprovoked combative behaviors and on 10/7/23 Resident#84 became combative and hit Resident #70 while being transported in a wheelchair from a shower (no injury), hit Resident #49 on the head while they were sleeping, jumped on Resident #65's bed and scratched them on the chest ripping shirt, jumped on Resident #103's bed and repeatedly punched them in the face and arms opening an abscess on Resident #…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated Surveys (NY 00327092, NY 00324750 and NY 00333010) from 9/5/24-9/17/24, the facility did not ensure for 3 (Residents #104, #45, and #73) of 9 residents reviewed for abuse, that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, were reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made, to the State Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures. Specifically, 1) For Resident #104 there was no documented evidence that an injury of unknown origin was reported by the facility to the state agency after the family representative reported bruises to the resident's hands; 2) For Resident #45 the facility did not report a 2/4/24 resident reported allegation of staff to resident abuse to the State Agency until 2/7/2024; and 3) For Resident #73 the facility did not report an allegation of resident to resident abuse to the State Agency within the two hour timeframe for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated Surveys (NY 00327092,), the facility did not ensure for 1 (Residents #104) of 9 residents reviewed for abuse, that all alleged violations involving abuse, mistreatment, or neglect, were thoroughly investigated. Specifically, Resident #104's family member reported to nursing on multiple occasions that they observed bruises to Resident 104's hands which resulted in x rays being done, and the injuries of unknown origin were never investigated by the facility. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Accident/Incident Report Policy that was undated documented that if a cause of injury is unknown, the Nursing supervisor is responsible for initiating the investigation into the possible cause. Resident #104 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to Anxiety Disorder, Dementia, and Hypokalemia. The 8/2/23 Significant Change Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated Surveys (NY 00324324) from 9/05/24 to 9/17/24, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision was provided and that the residents environment remained as free of accidents hazards as possible for 1(Residents #10) of 10 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #102 who had a history of exit seeking behaviors, eloped on 9/18/23 during the night shift, and was found in the early morning hours by the police department at an address away from the facility's property. The findings are: The facility policy titled Elopement/Missing Resident dated 04/2017 and updated on 8/2022 documented that immediately the resident unit is to be searched thoroughly, including bathrooms, closets, behind and under beds, behind privacy curtains, and in any room that is accessible. The facility policy titled Elopement Screening Policy and Procedure dated 04/2017 and updated 8/2022 documented the Individualized Care Plan will include the following interventions at minimum: identification of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during a recertification survey from 9/5/24 to 9/17/24, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a dignified experience for 3 of 6 residents. (Residents #80, #401 and # 97) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, 1.) A Registered Nurse was observed standing over Resident #80 and Resident #97 while assisting the residents with their meals. 2.) Resident #401 was observed in the dining room with other residents while wearing a hospital gown and/or sweatshirt with no pants. and 3.) On 9/12/24 on the first floor hallway outside room [ROOM NUMBER] (a resident's room on unit one) Certified Nurse Aide #11 verbally labelled the residents who needed to be fed as Feeders. The findings include: The Facility policy titled Residents' Rights dated 8/22 documented protect the dignity and well-being of the residents by providing a dignified, respectable and a comfortable living environment. 1. Resident # 80 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 9/05/2024 to 9/17/2024, the facility did not ensure residents had a right to organize and participate in resident groups in the facility. Specifically, during a Resident Council meeting on 9/9/2024 at 11:32 AM, Residents #96, #66, #88, #70, #30, #4, #33 and #10 stated it had been a couple of months since they last attended a resident council meeting, because they did not know who should be assisting them. There were no documented resident council minutes for April-July 2024. The findings are: Policy and Procedure dated 10/2020 documented per the regulation found at §483.10(f)(5), residents of a skilled nursing/long term care facility have a right to organize and participate in resident groups in the facility. The Facility promotes the residents' participation in the Resident Council meeting. During a survey scheduled Resident Counsel meeting on 09/09/24 at 11:32 AM attending residents stated it had been a couple of months since the last Resident Council meeting. The residents stated the activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 9/05/24 to 9/17/24, the facility did not ensure resident Comprehensive Care Plan was reviewed and revised upon each assessment. This was evident for 2 of 10 residents reviewed for care planning (Resident #31, Resident #88). Specifically, 1) Resident #31 at risk for falls did not have their comprehensive care plan related to falls updated to reflect current interventions in place to prevent falls. 2) Resident #88 did not have documented evidence of quarterly care plan meetings or updates since 2/27/24. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure Comprehensive Care Plan dated 2/2024 documented the care plan will contain information about the physical, emotional/psychological, psychosocial, spiritual, educational and environmental needs as appropriate. The Interim Interdisciplinary Care Plan will be located in the care plan section of the Medical Record. It is our purpose to ensure that each resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (#NY 00345570) from 9/5/24-9/17/24 the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was consistently provided to meet the needs of residents on all shifts. Specifically, 1) Several residents reported in a group meeting (Resident Council) that the facility was short staffed especially on various shifts and weekends which resulted in a lack of timely staff response to call bells 2) several nursing staff reported a lack of sufficient staff. 3) resident family members reported staff were not visible during their visits to the facility and 4). an analysis of the actual staffing schedule showed that on multiple occasions from the month of June 2024, and August 5 2024 through September 5 2024, the facility was below their minimum staffing levels. The Facility Assessment documentation for nursing staff was below the minimum requirement to care for a capacity of 120 residents. The findings are: The 8/12/24 Facility Assessment Tool reviewed and approved by the Administrator was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0837 — patternEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey on 9/5/2024 - 9/17/2024, it was determined that the facility did not have a process and frequency by which the administrator reported to the governing body, the method of communication was not recorded, and the governing body did not establish and implement procedures for a clear line of communication regarding the management and operation of the facility. Furthermore, due to this lack of communication to the governing body, they did not ensure that the call bells on unit 300 (3rd floor) were in working order and in regulatory compliance. Specifically, it was revealed during the survey that the call bell system had been non-functional since April of 2024 and there were no plans in place to correct the issue, as well as no documentation to show that this issue was brought up or addressed in any Quality Assurance Performance Improvement meetings. The facility did not provide documented evidence of a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement plan/action to address identified issues related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 9/5/24 to 9/17/24, the facility did not ensure the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee developed and implemented an appropriate plan of action to address identified issues that impacted resident safety or ensured corrective actions addressed gaps in systems, and were evaluated for effectiveness; and that clear expectations were set around safety, quality, rights, choice, and respect. Specifically, the centralized call bell system had not been working since April of 2024. The facility did not ensure the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee developed and implemented an appropriate plan of action to address identified issues related to the central call bell system being out of service. On the 3rd Floor Unit residents were unable to call for assistance when necessary while in their rooms or when using their bathrooms. Family that were visiting were unable to call for staff assistance if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey and abbreviated survey (NY 00345570) from 9/5/24-9/17/24, the facility did not ensure that a copy of the Notice of Transfer and Discharge was sent to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman or that a resident's representative was immediately notified when the decision was made to transfer the resident from the facility to the hospital, for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #100 and # 34) reviewed for notification requirement before transfer/discharge. Specifically, 1. Resident #100 was discharged to another facility in July 2024 and there was no documented evidence the Ombudsman had been notified and 2. Resident # 34 was transferred to the hospital on 6/10/24 and there was no documented evidence in the electronic medical record to indicate the resident's Health Care Proxy was notified. The findings are: The facility policy titled Notice of Transfer or Discharge11/2023, revised 3/4/24 documented the facility would adhere to the office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman practices…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the Recertification Survey from 9/5/2024 to 9/17/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident received an accurate assessment, reflective of the residents status for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Respiratory Care (Resident #22). Specifically, the 8/8/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment for Resident #22 did not accurately code/capture the residents impaired vision and use of oxygen. The Findings Are: Resident # 22 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and adult failure to thrive. The 3/12/24 admission Minimum Data Set documented Resident #22 was cognitively intact and had highly impaired vision. The 5/27/24 Physician Order documented continuous oxygen 2 liters continuous. The 8/24 Administration Record documented continuous oxygen 2 liters via nasal cannula was administered. The 8/8/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set documented Resident #22 was cognitively intact,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 9/05/2024 through 9/17/2024, the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 7 residents (Residents # 40) reviewed for pressure ulcers, and 1 of 5 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, 1.) Resident #40 was not care planned for an actual Pressure Ulcer and 2.) Resident #19 did not have a plan of care in place to address the residents needs for Psychotropic drug use. Findings Include: Policy and Procedure: dated 2/2024 The care plan will contain information about the physical, emotional/psychological, psychosocial, spiritual, educational and environmental needs as appropriate. The Interim Interdisciplinary Care Plan will be located in the care plan section of the Medical Record. It is our purpose to ensure that each resident is provided with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY 00327092 and NY 00337480) from 9/5/24 to 9/17/24, the facility did not ensure residents received the necessary assistance for bathing to maintain personal hygiene for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #104, and #105), reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, 1. Resident #104 did not receive 41 scheduled showers between May 2023 and September 2023 and 2. Resident #105 did not receive 12 scheduled showers between December 2023 and January 2024. Additionally, there was no documented evidence that skin checks were consistently done as per physician order for Resident #105. Findings include: The facility policy for showering dated 2015 and updated 6/23 documented each resident will be offered a shower minimally twice a week, with consideration of personal preferences and facility care routine (i.e. appointment) when scheduling. The purpose of weekly showering is to promote good hygiene, cleanliness, freedom from odor, stimulation of skin and protection of resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 9/5/2024 to 9/17/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #401) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, For Resident #401 with a left foot wound, treatments and weekly skin checks were not consistently documented as per physician order and/or care plan, a physician order was not obtained as per wound round recommendations for the implementation of heel booties and an air mattress, and Resident #401 was observed wearing a left air heel boot with velcro straps without a physician order. The Findings Are: Resident #401 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Repeated Falls, Unspecified Dementia, and Pressure Ulcer of Left Heel. The 8/21/24 Care Plan titled Skin Integrity related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during a recertification survey conducted (9/5/2024-9/17/2024), the facility did not ensure the provision of nutrition and hydration care and services for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Nutrition (Residents # 22). Specifically, the facility did not ensure that For Resident #22 with a 9.79 % weight loss over 6 months, that meal intake was consistently monitored as per care plan. Additionally, Resident #22 with impaired vision was not reassessed to determine the level of assistance needed during meal intake. This is evidenced by: Resident # 22 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, and Adult Failure to Thrive. The 3/5/24 Activities of Daily Living Care Plan documented eating supervision set up. The 3/6/24 Dietary Nutrition Risk Care Plan documented at risk for altered nutrition related to advanced age, variable by intake 25-75% and Body Mass Index of 17.2 indicative of underweight status interventions continue ensure plus three times daily,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview during the Recertification Survey the facility did not ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Respiratory Care (Resident #22). Specifically, Resident #22 with a physician order to receive continuous oxygen 2 liters/min was administered oxygen 3 liters/min via nasal cannula. The findings are: Resident #22 was admitted with diagnoses including Coronary Artery Disease, Congestive Heart Failure and Asthma. The 3/5/24 Care Plan titled Cardiovascular Disease documented provide oxygen as ordered, encourage resident to elevate head as needed. The 5/27/24 Physician Order documented continuous oxygen 2 liters/min The 8/08/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set documented Resident #22 was cognitively intact, and did not receive oxygen therapy. The September 2024 Medication Administration Record documented continuous oxygen 2 liters/min was administered every shift. There was no documented evidence in the Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated Surveys (NY 00324324 and NY 00327092) from 9/05/24 to 9/17/24, the facility did not ensure that the Physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, including medications, and treatments, at each visit for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for Accidents (Residents #102) and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Change of Condition (Resident #104). Specifically, 1.) Resident #102 who was assessed at high risk for elopement during the 8/12/23 admission, had no physician order in place for placement and checking the function of a wander guard 2.) Resident #104 who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital, had no physician order for Oncologist follow up within 1-2 weeks and repeat Computed Tomography Scan within 3-6 months as per Hospital Discharge Instructions. The findings are: The facility policy titled Physicians Visits and Responsibilities dated 10/2023 documented that the intent of these visits is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 9/5/24-9/17/24, the facility did not ensure each Certified Nurse Aide received twelve hours in-service education per year based on their individual performance review for 8 of 8 Certified Nurse Aides (#6, #11, #22, #31, #32, #33, #34, and #35) randomly selected for review of 12-hour yearly mandatory in-services and yearly performance reviews The findings include: The 8/12/24 Facility Assessment documented education was provided to staff mostly done by the Director of Nursing/Staff Educator. Several sessions were scheduled to allow the staff to attend on all shifts. The sessions were held regularly to include mandatory education per regulation, as well as new topics or topics needing re-education. There was no documented evidence that Certified Nurse Aides #6, #11, #22, #31, #32, #33, #34, and #35 had performance reviews completed at least once every 12 months. During an interview on 9/13/24 at 10:00 AM, the Director of Nursing stated the Certified Nurse Aide education was done by the cooperate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 9/5/24-9/17/24, the facility did not ensure that the pharmacist reported irregularities to the attending physician, the facility's Medical Director and the Director of Nursing or that the attending physician documented in the medical record that the identified irregularities had been reviewed and what action should be taken for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (# 89, #83, and #19 ). Specifically, 1) Resident # 89 had no documented follow up for drug regimen reviews from 3/24-8/24. 2) Resident # 83 had no documented follow up for drug regimen reviews from 3/24-8/24 and 3)Resident #19 had no documented follow up for drug regimen reviews dated 3/21/24 and 4/15/24. The findings are: 1)Resident # 89 had diagnoses including but not limited to Metabolic Encephalopathy, Type 2 Diabetes, and Dysphagia The 1/29/24 Care Plan titled Psychiatric Drug Use documented assess behavior daily, and psychiatric management. The 7/16/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Surveys(NY 00337480) from 9/05/24 to 9/17/24, the facility did not ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for medications (Residents #105 and #19). Specifically, 1.) Resident #105 had multiple medication omissions on the Medication Administration Record including antihypertensive's, antibiotics, antidepressants, antianxiety, and thyroid hormones and 2.) Resident #19 had multiple missed does of Insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar levels in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus). The findings are: The facility policy titled Administrations of Medications last reviewed on 10/23 documented that Medications administration must be charted in the Medication Administration Record immediately before going on to the next resident. If a medication is not given for any reason, the nurse must document appropriately; the reason medication was not given…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted from 09/5/24-09/17/24, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards. Specifically, 1) a cupful of morning medications was left for Resident #45 on their bedside table while the resident was in the bathroom and 2) Dakins' solution and a tube of Silver Sulfadiazine were left on Resident # 90s bedside table. The findings are: 1. Resident #45 had diagnoses of hepatic encephalopathy, hypothyroid and neoplasm of breast. The 9/5/24 Physician Order documented Resident #45 received Aldactone 25 mg, Vitamin E 268 mg, Ursodiol 300mg capsule, Tramadol 250mg, Propranolol 10 mg, Amlodipine 5mg, Gabapentin 100 mg and Acidophilus at 09:00 AM. During an observation on 9/05/24 at 10:35 AM Resident #45 was in the bathroom and a cup with approximately ten pills were observed on the resident's bedside table. The nurse was not in the resident room. During an interview on 9/5/24 at 10:40 AM Resident #45 poured the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey 09/05/24-09/17/24, the facility did not ensure that the necessary dental services were provided in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #70) reviewed for dental services. The findings are: Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses and conditions including Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, and Cerebrovascular Accident. The 6/22/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) of 6/22/24 documented Resident #70 had intact cognition, performed oral care independently and had no natural teeth. During interview on 9/6/24 in the late morning Resident #70 stated that they did not have teeth and had not seen a dentist. During an interview on 09/17/24 at 10:30 AM Licensed Practical Nurse #27 stated when a resident is admitted to the unit they will be seen by the dentist on their next routine visit. When the in-house dentist arrives, they will ask the nurses for a list of new residents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 9/05/24 to 9/17/24, the facility did not ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, there was open and undated food located in the walk-in refrigerator, there were two metal trays with chicken and tuna salad that passed length of storage and expired half pint boxes of low-fat milk. There were two opened and expired orange juice boxes. In the walk-in freezer there were two boxes of frozen chicken thighs without expiration dates. One of these two boxes was opened to air without the date of opening. In the dry food storage there were Mac orzo and egg noodle pastas' loose in plastic bags without expiration dates. Finding include: The facility policy Food Receiving and Storage which was last revised on 09/2024 documented expired items will be discarded, refrigerator storage of potentially hazardous foods or time/temperature control for safety foods, required time/temperature control for safety to limit the growth of pathogens or toxin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 9/05/2024-9/17/2024, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #3 and # 63) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, 1) Signs identifying resident needs for enhanced barrier precautions or any personal protective equipment were not placed outside the room of Resident #3 with a pressure ulcer and 2) staff were observed not wearing the required personal protective equipment while completing a dressing change for Resident #63 with a stage 4 pressure ulcer. Findings include: A Policy and Procedure titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions date 4/2024 documented; it is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions. Enhanced Barrier Precautions require the use of gowns and gloves for certain residents for high contact resident care activities.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F656-Care Plan Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00315819), the facility did not ensure that a Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) were followed for 3((Residents #4, #5 & #6) of 11 residents reviewed. Specifically, during observation on 4/4/2024 from 12:09 PM to 12:27 PM Residents #4, #5 and #6 who were care planned as needing supervision and/or limited assistance when eating lunch without staff present for supervision. The findings are: Review of facility Quality of Care Policy and Procedures revision date 4/2024, documented the intent to ensure each resident receive the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment plan of care, in accordance with state and federal regulations. (7.) The facility will ensure the resident environment remains free of accident hazards as is possible; and each resident receives adequate supervision and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00315819), the facility did not ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent an avoidable accident from occurring. This was evident for three (Residents # 4, #_5, & #_6) of eleven residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically during an observation on 4/4/2024 from 12:09 PM to 12:27 PM Residents #4, #5 and #6 was eating lunch with no staff supervision in the dinning rom during lunch. The findings are: Review of facility Activities of Daily Living Policy and Procedures revision date 9/2023, documented the intent of policy to specify the responsibility to create and sustain an environment that humanizes and individualizes each resident's quality of life by ensuring all staff, across all shifts and department understand the principles of quality of life and honor and support these principles for each resident: and that the care and services provided are person-centered, and honor support each resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-29 · tag F0620 — widespreadNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00331049, NY00330977, NY00330997, NY00331846), it cannot be ensured that the facility disclosed the service limitations to residents and potential residents. This was evident for 7 (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7) out of 10 residents reviewed for notification. Specifically, on 11/28/2023 a water restriction was issued due to the presence of legionella bacteria in the facility's water system. There was no evidence of consistent notification to residents and their families regarding water restriction implementation, the potential risk for legionnaires disease, and the steps being taken by the facility to resolve the issue. The findings are: Review of the Resident Council Minutes dated 11/28/2023, and 12/28/2023 revealed that the issues legionella contamination in the facility water system was not discussed, the water restriction implementation, steps taken by the facility to resolve the issue or guidelines on proper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview during an Abbreviated survey(NY00331049, NY00330977, NY00330997, NY00331846), the facility did not ensure that sanitary conditions were being maintained in the kitchen. Specifically, on a tour of the kitchen, the single rinse water temperature gauge on the dishwashing machine was not reaching appropriate temperature, specifically the wash cycle was not meeting temperatures of 165 degrees Fahrenheit (°F). The findings are: On 1/26/24 at 2:05 PM, observed use of the dishwashing machine twice with maximum wash cycle temperatures of 142 °F. The facility did not provide a policy and procedure on kitchen sanitary procedures or dishwashing procedures. A manual with manufacturer's instructions for the dishwasher was not provided during the survey. Without the manual, it could not be determined if the machine was a high temperature machine or if the sanitizing solution was at the appropriate levels. Documentation of the dishwasher temperature logs were not located during the survey. Documentation of the sanitizing solution logs were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00331049, NY00330977, NY00330997, NY00331846), the facility was not administered in a manner that enables the use of its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, on 11/28/2023 a water restriction was issued due to positive legionella bacteria in the facility's water system: (1) the Facility Assessment (FA) was not reviewed or updated to address how the facility can meet the needs of the residents and facility staff; and (2) the facility did not ensure the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified issues with the facility's water system; The findings are: (1) Review of the Facility Assessment submitted by the facility revealed an assessment/update date on 11/30/2020 and 08/15/2023. There was no documented evidence that the Facility Assessment was reviewed/revised after 08/15/2023.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00331049, NY00330977, NY00330997, NY00331846), the facility did not ensure that it updated and reviewed their facility assessment (FA) annually, or updated any changes in the facility resources and services necessary to provide for the needs of residents. Specifically, (1) the Facility Assessment was not reviewed or updated from 11/31/2020 to 08/14/2023; and (2) the Facility Assessment was not reviewed or updated to address how the facility will meet the needs of the residents and facility staff after they determined on 11/28/2023 that the potable water system was contaminated due to the presence of legionella and were directed by the state and local health departments to implement water restrictions throughout the building. There was no documented evidence that the Facility Assessment was reviewed/revised after 08/15/2023. The findings are: Review of the Facility Assessment submitted by the facility revealed an assessment/update date on 11/30/2020 and 08/15/2023. There was no documented evidence that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00331049, NY00330977, NY00330997, NY00331846), the facility did not ensure the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified issues with the facility's water system. Specifically, a water restriction was implemented due to water system contamination with legionella bacteria on 11/28/2023, and members of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee were made aware that the water system was not functional. No quality assurance measures were put in place to identify or address the water issue and to ensure clinical staff and residents were educated on interventions/plans to address the problem during their meeting on 12/19/2023. The facility did not provide documentation for any meetings held to address the ongoing water problem. The findings are: The facility undated Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Plan documented that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00331049, NY00330977, NY00330997, NY00331846), the facility did not ensure infection control prevention practices and procedures were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, on 11/28/2023 the facility detected Legionella in their water system. As a result, the facility was directed by state and local health departments to implement water restrictions throughout the building. 1) On 01/26/2024 the kitchen staff were observed using unfiltered tap water for hand washing. There was no signage instructing staff not to use unfiltered tap water to prevent the spread of legionella; 2) During an observation on 01/29/2024 at 1:20 PM of medication administration performed by Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (Staff #10), water bottles were not readily accessible in resident rooms in case hand washing became necessary; 3)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00331049, NY00330977, NY00330997, NY00331846), the facility did not implement an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide an infection/antibiotic tracking report as requested on 01/25/2024. In addition, the Infection Control Preventionist (Staff #13) stated that there was no infection / antibiotic tracking in place in the facility. The findings are: The facility policy titled Infection Control - Antibiotic Stewardship reviewed/revised on 08/2021, 09/2022, 04/2023 documented that it is the intent of the facility to support the judicious use of antibiotics in accordance with Stage and Federal Regulations, and national guidelines. The Policy Procedure documented the following: (1) the facility will establish protocols for antibiotic prescribing in accordance with national guidelines and treatment protocols; (2) The facility will establish algorithms for appropriate diagnostic testing (i.e.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00323727) the facility failed to provide diabetic management according to acceptable standards of care to ensure residents remained free from hypoglycemic( caused by lw blood sugar) reactions for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. Specifically, Resident #1 had a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and had a physician order for blood sugar (BS) testing twice a day, to notify provider if BS less than 70 or above 250. The facility did not provide monitoring of Resident #1's (BS) levels as ordered on 9/8/2023 at 4PM and no BS levels documented on 9/1, 9/2/, 9/3, 9/4 and 9/5. There was no evidence that the physician or nurse practitioner was notified. Resident #1 was transported to the hospital on 9/8/2023 where they were admitted and diagnosed with Hypoglycemia. The Facility Undated Policy and Procedures titled Diabetes Management documented Physician/NP will review resident's diabetic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 4/29/2025 to 5/6/2025, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set Assessments were submitted within 14 days after the facility completed the resident's assessment for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set (Resident #41, Resident #59, Resident #76). The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Assessment Instrument/Minimum Data Set, revised in 2022, documents the Minimum data set Coordinator will be responsible for scheduling initial Minimum data set quarterly review,significant changes,annual assessment reference dates ,all necessary interdisciplinary meeting and keep assessment data current. Review of the submissions revealed: - Resident #41 Quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0, with an assessment reference date of 11/4/2024 and completion date of 11/15/2024, was submitted on 5/6/2025. - Resident #59 Quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0, with an assessment reference date of 2/1/2025 and completion date of 2/28/2025, was submitted on 5/6/2025. - Resident # 76 Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$132,957 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $132,957 — penalty dated 2024-09-17
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALBRECHT, BARBARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/15/2017 |
| IMPERATI RAMSEY, ALEXANDRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/31/2020 |
| JONES, ROXANNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/27/2025 |
| KOSCHITZKI, ELLIOT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/21/2023 |
| KOVACS, ANDREA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/07/2020 |
| MAUS, RENEE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/20/2025 |
| NEGRON, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/19/2025 |
| PATEL, DEEPESH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/13/2021 |
| SANTIAGO, RALPH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/04/2025 |
| TARAZONA, FERNANDO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/23/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335323. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.