Hillside Manor Rehab & Extended Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 218 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 90 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 400 beds and averages 380.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated and Partial Extended Survey (NY00354577), the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse. This was evident for one out of six residents reviewed (Resident #1) for abuse. Specifically, on 09/16/2024 at 7:20 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 did not intervene or remove Certified Nursing Assistant #1 from providing care to Resident #1 or any other residents assigned to Certified Nursing Assistant #1 when on 1) 09/16/2024 at around 7:20 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 witnessed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 physically force Resident #1 to sit in a chair in the hallway; 2) between 8:15 PM - 8:30 PM Licensed Practical Nurse #1 and Certified Nursing Assistant #2 both witnessed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 grab and push Resident #1 to sit in a wheelchair and then wheel Resident #1 into their room; and 3) shortly after 8:30 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 heard noises coming from Resident #1's room,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during an Abbreviated and Partial Extended Survey (NY00354577), the facility failed to remove Certified Nursing Assistant #1 from resident care after witnessed abuse. This was evident for one out of six residents reviewed (Resident #1) for abuse. Specifically, 1) On 09/16/2024 at around 7:20 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 witnessed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 physically force Resident #1 to sit in a chair in the hallway; 2) between 8:15 PM - 8:30 PM Licensed Practical Nurse #1 and Certified Nursing Assistant #2 both witnessed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 grab and push Resident #1 to sit in a wheelchair and then wheel Resident #1 into their room; and 3) shortly afterwards Licensed Practical Nurse #1 heard noises coming from Resident #1's room, entered the room and observed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 hitting Resident #1 multiple times on their right thigh with a closed fist. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 did not intervene or remove Certified Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00385241), the facility failed to ensure that a resident's Advance Directives for Do Not Resuscitate were followed. This was evident for one (1) out of ten (10) residents sampled. Specifically, Resident #1 had a signed Medical Order for Life Sustaining Treatment indicating Do Not Resuscitate. Resident #1 was observed not breathing and without vital signs on [DATE] at 8:30 AM and staff performed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. According to several staff interviews, Resident #1 received Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation efforts until staff members learned that Resident #1 was a Do Not Resuscitate. Emergency Medical Services had previously been called, and they pronounced the resident at 8:53 AM after they learned that the resident had a Do Not Resuscitate order in place. Findings include: Facility policy and procedure titled Resident expiration with Do Not Resuscitate order in place/pronouncement of death revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/24/2025 to 03/31/2025, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs. This was evident in 2 of 2 residents reviewed out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1.) Resident #27, who was on palliative care and had been receiving pain medications, had no care plan developed to address pain management and palliative care. 2.) Resident #123, who had a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and had been receiving medications to help control their blood sugar level, had no care plan developed for diabetes. The findings are : The facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan with a revision date of 12/2023 documented it is the policy of the facility that all residents will have a comprehensive care plan completed in accordance with Federal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 03/24/2025 to 03/31/2025, the facility did not ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality. This was evident for 1 (Resident #320) of 3 residents observed during Medication Administration. Specifically, 1) Licensed Practical Nurse #3 was observed administering the medication Janumet 50 mg-500 mg 1 tablet by mouth at 10:05 AM, however, review of the Medication Administration Record documented the medication had been administered at 7:49 AM, and 2) Licensed Practical Nurse #3 was also observed administering Centrum Silver Ultra Men's 300 mcg-60 mcg-600 mcg-300 mcg 1 tablet by mouth that was dispensed for Resident #318 to Resident #320 instead of Centrum Silver 0.4 mg-300 mcg 250 mcg 1 tablet by mouth as ordered by the physician. The findings are: Resident #320 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus, Coronary Artery Disease, and Hypertension. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 03/24/2025 to 03/31/2025, the facility did not ensure that the medication error rate was not less than 5 percent. This was evident for 2 of 28 medications given during the Medication Administration task. Specifically, 1) Licensed Practical Nurse #3 was observed administering the medication Janumet 50 mg-500 mg 1 tablet by mouth at 10:05 AM, however, review of the Medication Administration Record documented the medication had been administered at 7:49 AM, and 2) Licensed Practical Nurse #3 was also observed administering Centrum Silver Ultra Men's 300 mcg-60 mcg-600 mcg-300 mcg 1 tablet by mouth that was dispensed for Resident #318 to Resident #320 instead of Centrum Silver 0.4 mg-300 mcg 250 mcg 1 tablet by mouth as ordered by the physician which resulted in a medication error rate of 7.14%. The findings are: The facility policy titled Medication Administration, dated 01/2019 documented the following that it is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (NY00342691) conducted from 03/24/2025 to 03/31/2025, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made to the New York State Department of Health. This was evident in 1 (Resident #230) of 3 residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, Resident #230 had an unwitnessed incident on 05/17/2024 at approximately 4:00 AM, when the resident was observed sitting on the floor gym mat on the left side of their bed. Hospital x-ray report showed right pelvic fracture. Resident #230 was unable to explain the occurrence. This incident was not reported to the New York State Department of Health. The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention with a revised date of 09/26/2024 documented the facility will report any incident and/or violation where abuse,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-30 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during an Abbreviated and Partial Extended Survey (NY00354577), the facility's administration failed to ensure that the facility was operated in a manner that use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was evident in one out of six residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, on 09/16/2024, the facility did not intervene or remove Certified Nursing Assistant #1 from the unit resulting in further abuse to Resident #1. Administration failed to ensure in-service lesson plans provided guidance to facility staff on how to protect residents from suspected or witnessed abuse. The findings are: The facility's Policy and Procedure entitled, Abuse Prevention, with revision date 11/07/2022, documented residents will be protected from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, Exploitation, or Misappropriation of resident property in accordance with State and Federal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 12/6/2023 to 12/13/2023, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity. This was evident for 1 (Resident #256) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 were observed standing over Resident #256 while feeding them. The findings are: The facility policy titled Feeding the Resident dated 10/2023 documented staff should be sitting down facing the resident while feeding. On 12/6/2023 at 12:02 PM, LPN #2 was observed in the 5th Floor dining room standing over Resident #256 while feeding them during the lunch meal service. On 12/8/2023 at 12:00PM, CNA #1 was observed in the 5th Floor dining room standing over Resident #256 while feeding them during the lunch meal service. On 12/8/2023 at 12:15PM, CNA #1 was interviewed and stated they stood over the residents for a short time while feeding them to see if the resident likes the food. Then CNA #1 would sit down to feed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview conducted during the Recertification survey from 12/6/2023 to 12/13/2023, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessments were electronically transmitted to the Centers of Medicare/Medicaid Services Data System (CMSDS) within 14 days of completion. This was evident for 1 (Resident #138) of 17 residents reviewed for resident assessment out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #138's MDS assessment was not transmitted within 14 days of completion. The findings are: The facility policy titled MDS dated 09/2023 documented all MDS assessments must be transmitted in a timely manner. The MDS assessment for Resident #138 with completion date of 3/21/2023 was not transmitted to CMSDS until 4/7/2023, more than 14 days after completion. On 12/11/2023 at 10:43 AM, the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) was interviewed and stated they were the only staff member responsible for submitting MDS assessments to the CMSDS. The MDSC checked the dashboard of the electronic medical record (EMR) every day to monitor if any MDS assessments…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 12/06/2023 to 12/13/2023, the facility did not ensure that the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment accurately reflect the resident status. This was evident for 2 (Resident # 342 and # 80) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) the MDS assessment for Resident # 342 did not accurately capture their discharge to the community, and 2) the MDS assessment for Resident # 80 did not accurately capture behaviors of refusal and rejection of care and treatment. The findings are: 1.) Resident # 342 had diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus and Malignant Neoplasm of Bronchus and Lung. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #342 had an anticipated planned discharge to the hospital. Social Work Note dated 10/09/2023 documented Resident #342 wa discharged to their home in the community on 10/9/2023. The Discharge summary dated [DATE] documented Resident #342 was prepared for discharge home with their family on 10/9/2023. There…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 12/6/2023 to 12/13/2023, the facility did not ensure separately locked, permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled drugs. This was evident for 1 (5th Floor) of 5 units observed for medication storage. Specifically, the Controlled Medications (CM) cabinet on the 5th Floor was observed with 1 lock that was not functional. The findings are: The undated facility policy titled Management of Current CM Records documented proper storage of CM is in a double door, double locked, double keyed, steel, wall mounted, cabinet. On 12/8/2023 at 10:33 AM, the medication storage room on the 5th Floor was observed in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2. The CM cabinet affixed to the wall had 1 locked closed inner door and 1 unlocked outer door that was ajar. LPN #2 attempted and was unable to lock the outer door of the CM cabinet. LPN #2 stated the lock on the CM cabinet was broken. The inner compartment of the CM cabinet contained 1 medication blister pack with 24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$34,947 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $34,947 — penalty dated 2024-09-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY