No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Heritage Park Rehab & Skilled Nursing

150 Prather Avenue, Jamestown, NY 14701 · Non profit - Corporation · 146 certified beds · (716) 488-1921 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (716) 488-1921 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0609) — most recent Apr 20261 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
320 Prather Ave · (716) 664-7855 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens<0.1 mi
10 Prospect St · (716) 661-9230 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
19 W 3rd St · (716) 664-2477 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Jamestown Riverwalk · (716) 397-9735 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
111 Prather Ave · (716) 484-7855

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.7%14.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.1%0.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.1%1.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.1%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.9%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.5%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.9%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%6.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.7%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.8%13.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.5%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine55.7%78.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.6%20.6%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.3%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.381.701.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.211.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 216 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

34.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 100 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF34.5%CMS range 27.6–41.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 7.0–12.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting82.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.5–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
0.60
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.46
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.34
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
46.3%
Total nursing turnover
53.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 146 beds and averages 116.3 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.46 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.46 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-30)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-01)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained as free of accidents as possible, and that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (1) (Resident #21) of four (4) residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, on 03/11/2026, the facility failed to assist Resident #21 when they were reheating liquid in the microwave oven, resulting in Resident #21 sustaining an 8.5 centimeter by 5-centimeter second degree burn (damage to both the outer (epidermis) and underlying (dermis) layers of skin, causing blisters, pain, and a shiny moist appearance) to their left upper hand. Additionally, the facility failed to develop the care plan to include Resident #21's history of burning self after heating items in the microwave oven. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #21 that was not immediate jeopardy.The findings include: The facility policy titled Food Safety Requirements, with a review date of 04/12/2024 documented education on safe food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for three (First floor, Second floor, Third floor) resident care units. Specifically, the facility did not ensure they met their minimum staffing numbers for each shift and there was a lack of sufficient nursing staff to provide timely care to meet the needs of the residents. This involves Resident's #4, #8, #9, #20, #21, #27, #30, #42, #43, #50, #51 #55, #63, #92, #96, #104, #106 and #119. The findings include: Refer to F 677 Activities of Daily Living Care for Dependent Residents, Scope and Severity = D Refer to F 684 Quality of Care, Scope and Severity = D Refer to F 689 Free of Accident Hazards, Scope and Severity = G The facility policy and procedure titled Emergency Staffing with a review date of October 2025 documented when the facility was at a crisis level impeding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review completed during survey, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for four (4) (Residents #20, 35, 40, and #55) of four (4) residents reviewed. Specifically, comprehensive care plans that did not accurately reflect resident's current Advanced Directives, including their code status (a medical order indicating a patient's preferences for life-saving interventions to guide staff on whether to perform resuscitation- full code (all efforts) or Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)). The findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Formation of the Resident Care Plan, dated [DATE] documented the comprehensive care plan will be developed within seven (7) days after the comprehensive assessment and will be prepared by an interdisciplinary team that includes, but was not limited to: Attending Physician, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one (1) of one (1) kitchen and two (2) (second and third floors) of three (3) resident floors reviewed. Specifically, in the kitchen there were various sticky food spills and sticky residue on the floor, the ceiling tile grid had a visible layer of black dust and there were dirty ceiling tiles, water damaged floor tiles near the ice machine, a broken faucet in the 3-bay sink, flies in the dishwasher and food preparation areas, and a damaged ceiling light cover held together by duct tape. Additionally, the kitchen, unit dining rooms, and activity room coolers/refrigerators/freezers were dirty with liquid spills and contained multiple undated, unlabeled food items. The findings include:The facility policy Food Safety Requirements revision/review date 04/12/2024 documented it is the policy of this facility to provide safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption of all food including food and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during an Onsite Post Survey Revisit #1 completed on 06/25/2026, the facility did not ensure that the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) Committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies and regularly reviewed, analyzed, and acted on available data to make improvements. Specifically, the facility did not maintain effective systems to maintain compliance, and there were repeated deficiencies observed from the Standard survey completed on 04/30/2026, in the areas of Right to be Free from Physical Restraints, Care Plan Timing and Revision, Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary, Emergency Lighting, and Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance. In addition, the facility did not follow their plan of correction from their Standard survey 04/03/2026 to provide education to staff in the areas of Activities of Daily Living Care Provided for Dependent Residents (F677); and Infection Control (I210). The findings include: Refer to: F 604- Right to be Free from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience that were not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms, used for the least amount of time and document ongoing re-evaluation of the need for restraints for one (1) (Resident #104) of one (1) resident reviewed for physical restraints. Specifically, there were no evaluations completed to determine if Resident #104's lap tray and seat belt devices were restraints or re-evaluations to assess their continued need, staff did not release the seat belt or lap tray devices for over five (5) hours, and there were no provider orders to release the devices. The findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Restraints and Safety Devices dated 10/07/2014 documented the objective of the policy was to maintain dignity of the resident at all times and promote greater functional independence. The policy documented that residents shall not be restrained unnecessarily or for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two (2) (Resident #43 and #104) of eight (8) residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Specifically, Residents #43 and #104 were not provided with timely incontinence care. The findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Care of Incontinent Resident dated 10/07/2014 documented that providing incontinent care was to keep a resident with problems of involuntary elimination, clean and dry to promote cleanliness, comfort and to prevent skin issues. An incontinent resident in bed should be checked and change incontinence product as per care plan The facility policy and procedure titled Activities of Daily Living dated 01/14/2015 documented the nursing staff will assist the resident with any of the activities that they were unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (NY00363355-806626 and NY00359730-806683) completed on 09/12/2025, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident. Specifically, the facility did not ensure there was sufficient nurse staffing to meet the needs of the resident in accordance with their preferences and plans of care.The findings are:Review of the Dear Administrator letter 23-11 dated 06/30/23 sent to the nursing home administrators informing them that starting 04/01/2022 nursing homes were required to have an average daily staffing of 3.5 hours of care per resident per day with 2.2 hours for Certified Nurse Aides and 1.1 hours for Licensed Practical Nurses or Registered Nurses.The Facility Assessment, review dated 01/30/2025, documented the assessment is required by the nursing home Requirements of Participation to identify and analyze the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (NY00308641) during the Standard survey completed on 3/1/24, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for three (First floor, Second floor, Third floor) of three resident care units. Specifically, the facility did not ensure they met their minimum staffing numbers. In addition, minimum staffing numbers were not included in the facility assessment. Resident #s 36, 52, 85 and 114 were involved. The finding is: The policy and procedures titled Nursing Policy & Procedure Benefit Improvement and Protection Act (BIPA) revised 8/22/18 and Emergency Staffing Strategies revised 1/6/24 had no documentation regarding minimum nursing staffing numbers. 1a. Review of the Facility Assessment completed in January 2024 revealed that the assessment did not include minimum staffing numbers. During an interview on 2/29/24 at 8:57 AM, Scheduler #1 stated they were instructed by administration to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the Standard survey completed on 3/1/24, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Issues included undated and outdated food in refrigerators, potentially hazardous foods in refrigeration above 41 degrees Fahrenheit, a refrigerator missing a thermometer, and multiple soiled surfaces. This affected two (First Floor, Second Floor) of three resident use floors and the kitchen. The findings are: The undated policy and procedure titled Refrigerated Food Storage Labeling and Dating documented coolers will be maintained below 41 degrees Fahrenheit. All opened and prepared food items will be covered, labeled and dated so as to indicate a consume by or expiration date. Once the product is opened or prepared, keep it a maximum of four days (with today as day one). Exceptions to this are refrigerated staples/ condiments, which may include catsup, mustard, relish, pickles, salad dressing, jelly, syrup, dried or candied fruit, salsa, horseradish,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (#NY00332288) during the Standard survey completed on 3/1/24, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations of abuse, were reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made, to the Administrator and other officials including the State Survey Agency for one (Resident #92) of five residents reviewed. Specifically, alleged resident to resident sexual abuse was not reported to the Administrator of the facility and the New York State Department of Health within the required time frame. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Resident Abuse Prevention Reporting System, revised 1/6/23, documented that it is the responsibility of employees to promptly report to facility management any incident or suspected incident of resident abuse. Any suspected abuse must be reported immediately. Immediately, in this context, means after ensuring the resident has been removed from any possibility of harm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 3/1/24, the facility did not ensure a resident who required respiratory care, including tracheostomy (an opening into the trachea (windpipe) to help air reach the lungs) care, provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #51) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, during an observation of tracheostomy care, the nurse did not perform adequate hand hygiene/glove changes and did not clean the stoma (a surgically made hole) area. The finding is: Review of policy and procedure titled Cleansing Inner Cannula (a tube within the outer tube that can be removed and cleaned easily without having to change the whole (outer) tracheostomy tube) of Tracheostomy Tube/Trach Care tube revised on 4/27/17, documented that the care should provide wiping and washing of the neck around and under the cannula with a gauze. Review of policy and procedure titled Procedure for Handwashing review date 12/22/14, documented that hands should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review completed during the Standard survey conducted from 5/2/22 to 5/6/22 the facility did not ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (Resident #270) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. Specifically, the pressure dressing was not removed from the AV fistula (arteriovenous - a tube or device surgically implanted to create an artificial connection between an artery and a vein) access site for greater than two hours as recommended by the dialysis center. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Hemodialysis dated 1/14/15 documented the hospital supplies a Nursing Home/Dialysis Communication sheet that is filled out and sent with the resident for every appointment. The hospital in turn completes their section and returns it after each visit. Upon return the nurse reviews the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-03-01 · tag F0836 — widespread
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the Standard survey completed on 3/1/24, the facility did not operate and provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes. Specifically, the facility was not in compliance with Section 915 of the 2020 Fire Code of New York State, which requires carbon monoxide detection in buildings with fuel-burning appliances and on-going preventative maintenance of carbon monoxide detectors. This affected three (First Floor, Second Floor, Third Floor) of three resident use floors and the Basement. The finding is: Observations during the building tour on 2/26/24 from 9:40 AM until 3:00 PM revealed fuel-burning appliances were located in the Main Kitchen on the First Floor and the Laundry Room and Boiler Room in the Basement. Further observation revealed single-station carbon monoxide detectors were located in the Basement corridor and the First Floor corridor. Review of the carbon monoxide detector manufacturer's User Guide revealed to keep the alarm in good working order, test the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HERITAGE MINISTRIES — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 2 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FERNANDEZ, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/25/2024
NOLL, PAMELAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/25/2024
SPANOS, MARY ANNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/25/2024
STARK, PETERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/25/2024
HAGLUND, LISAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/11/2020
BURKHOUSE, JESSICAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/14/2014
PERSIA, ALBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/24/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 10%Other / private 12%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$285per resident / day
operating cost
$8,671per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$265per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335142. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next