Nottingham R H C F

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 38.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/8/2025 - 9/12/2025, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #23) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #23 did not have a positioning device placed as ordered. Findings include:The facility was unable to provide a policy referencing positional devices. Resident #23 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia and pain in the right-hand joints. The 8/7/2025 quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had severely impaired cognition, usually made themself-understood, usually understood others, and required maximum assistance with upper body dressing and personal hygiene.The 3/31/2025 unsigned Therapy Trigger form documented the resident had hand discomfort, and weakness of the right 3rd and 4th fingers. The 4/7/2025-5/4/2025 Occupational Therapist #13 Evaluation and Plan of Treatment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 3/04/2024-3/07/2024, the facility did not care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of quality of life for 1 of 1 resident (Residents #21) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #21 did not receive regular foot care and their toenails were long and uncomfortable for the resident. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Rights & Notice of Resident Rights and Responsibilities, revised 8/8/2022, documented all residents of the facility had a right to a dignified existence and would be supported by the facility in exercising their rights. The residents also had the right to self-determination and to participate in their care planning and treatment. The facility policy Resident Nail Care, revised 8/8/2022, documented all residents would receive toenail care from licensed staff. If a licensed staff member was unable to provide proper toenail care, the resident would be seen by podiatry (foot care practitioner). Resident #21 had diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 3/4/2024-3/7/2024, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 of 1 treatment cart. Specifically, the treatment cart was unlocked and contained scissors and potentially hazardous medications in an area accessible to residents. Findings include: The facility policy Storage of Medications, revised 8/2000, documented medications and biologicals were stored safely, securely, and properly, and accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Additionally, medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies were locked when they were not attended by persons with authorized access. During an observation on 3/5/2024 at 1:57 PM the treatment cart was in the hallway between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 140 and was unlocked. The top drawer contained scissors and the remaining drawers contained medicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 3/4/2024-3/7/2024, the facility did not ensure residents who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #9) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #9 was not administered oxygen as ordered and did not have a care plan that included oxygen. Findings include: The facility policy, Oxygen Therapy dated 11/2023 documented oxygen could be administered by a licensed nurse and all as needed oxygen use will include the number of hours used on the shift under the supplemental documentation on the treatment administration record. Resident #9 had diagnoses of pleural effusion (a buildup of fluid between the lungs and chest), chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. The 1/2024 Minimum Data Set documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition, required total assistance for transfers with a mechanical lift, used a wheelchair for mobility, and did not use oxygen.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0882 — isolated
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 3/4/2024-3/7/2024, the facility did not ensure the designated Infection Preventionists completed specialized training in infection prevention and control for 2 of 2 Infection Preventionists (Director of Nursing and the Assistant Director of Nursing). Specifically, the Director of Nursing and the Assistant Director of Nursing who shared the role of Infection Preventionist, did not have documented evidence of a certificate of completion or equivalent documentation to meet the requirement for specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings include: The facility policy Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 10/2023, documented authority for the Infection Prevention and Control Program has been delegated by the Director of Nursing to the Infection Preventionist. The ultimate responsibility for overseeing the Infection Prevention/Control Program is delegated to the Infection Preventionist along with the Quality Assurance Committee. The facility's Infection Preventionist is a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-12-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 12/1-12/3/21, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #4 and 7) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #4 was not assisted with timely nail care and facial grooming and Resident #7 was not assisted with timely nail care. The facility policy Resident Nail Care dated 8/2020 documented the facility was to ensure that residents received fingernail and toenail care to prevent potential infection, discomfort and or injury. It was the task of the facility that all residents will have their fingernails trimmed (clipped and shaped) as needed. The facility policy ADLs dated 1/21/20 documented the resident will be given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his/her ability to carry out the activities of daily living, to include: Hygiene - bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care. 1) Resident #4 had diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-12-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 12/1/21-12/3/21, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #28) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #28 did not receive their care planned contracture device and their hand was observed to be unclean. Additionally, the device was recommended for both hands and the care plan documented placement for one hand. This is evidenced by: The facility policy Range of Motion dated 1/21/20 documents when a resident is observed with decreased ability with range of motion (ROM), a therapy trigger will be generated by the nursing unit. The therapy department will perform an assessment and commend any ROM and/or equipment necessary of the resident and document on the plan of care. The information from the therapy assessments and plan of care will be transcribed by nursing to the certified nurse aide (CNA) assignment sheet for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-12-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted from 12/1/21-12/3/21, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms reviewed. Specifically, there were two boxes of expired loperamide HCl (antidiarrheal) 2 milligram (mg) tablets observed in the medication room. This is evidenced by: The facility policy Storage of Medications revised 8/2020 documents outdated medications are to be immediately removed from inventory, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal, and reordered from the pharmacy if a current order exists. On 12/1/21 at 2:00 PM the medication storage room was observed with two boxes of loperamide HCl 2 mg tablets with expiration dates of 10/2021. One of the boxes had been opened. During an interview on 12/1/21 at 2:14 PM, licensed practical nurse (LPN) #11 stated the nurses were responsible for checking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY