Susquehanna Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L L C

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 166 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 147.9 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-09-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00350839) surveys conducted 9/9/2024-9/16/2024, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #88 and #195) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #88's wound treatments were not consistently documented as completed; and Resident #195 developed impaired skin integrity on the sacrum (the triangular bone at the base of the spine) that was not assessed by a qualified professional to determine interventions and routine monitoring, and treatments were not consistently applied as ordered. Subsequently, the area progressed to a Stage 4 (full thickness skin loss exposing muscle, bone, or tendon) pressure ulcer and the resident developed sepsis requiring hospitalization. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #195 that was not immediate jeopardy. Findings include: The facility policy,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for one (1) resident unit. Specifically, the temperature of the facility's hot water was not maintained.Findings include:An undated resident bathing training form documented:- if the resident refused to take a shower or bath because the water was too cold, the supervisor was required to be notified immediately; and- anytime a supervisor was notified of cooler than normal water temperatures the Director of Nursing and the Administrator must be notified immediately. An undated creating maintenance requests training form documented how staff can enter work orders. An 09/09/2025 loss of hot water policy documented the following:- Notify the maintenance department of the loss of hot water by either entering a work order, or directly contacting the maintenance department;- Take water temperatures at identified locations of water loss, if the water temperatures were outside of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00371419), the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and 7) reviewed. Specifically: -Resident #1 had a feeding tube (a device that delivered liquid nutrition into the stomach or intestine through a surgically created opening in the abdomen) and had physician orders to verify placement and check residuals. There was no documented evidence that placement and residuals were checked for 4 months. The resident developed new onset diarrhea and nausea, and there was no documented evidence the resident was assessed to determine if the resident's tube feeding should have been held. Approximately 8 hours later, the resident was found deceased with vomit on their face. -Resident #7 had an order for lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (a controlled substance medication for anxiety) by mouth every day at bedtime and the resident did not receive the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00371419), the facility was not administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2). Specifically, facility Administration, including the Director of Nursing, did not ensure a complete and accurate investigation was completed following an allegtion of abuse. Additionally, the staff statements provided to the Department of Health (as part of the abuse investigation) were falsified. The staff that provided statements stated they did not author the statements or provide a verbal statement to anyone at the facility, they did not sign the statements, and the signatures on the documents were not theirs. Findings include: The facility policy, Facility Incident/Abuse Investigation and Reporting revised 6/7/2023, documented should a resident be observed with unexplained injuries or suspected/alleged abuse, neglect or mistreatment, the employee notified the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00314894 and NY99331169) conducted 09/9/2024-9/16/2024, the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 of 4 resident areas (Main Lobby, Second floor resident room [ROOM NUMBER]A, Third floor nursing station, and Third floor day room area) reviewed; and for 2 of 2 oxygen storage rooms (Third and Fourth floor oxygen storage rooms) reviewed. Specifically, there were multiple walls with peeling wallpaper and unclean floors with dust and food debris. Additionally, Resident #36's right wheelchair brake was broken and not repaired timely. Findings include: The facility policy, Daily Cleaning, dated 6/1/2000, documented the facility was cleaned daily and would be always kept clean; VCT (vinyl composition tile) flooring was dust mopped and then wet mopped with the specified cleaner; walls and doors were spot washed with a disinfectant cleaner when soiled; and all repair work…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00350839 and NY00331169) surveys conducted 9/9/2024-9/16/2024, the facility did not ensure maintenance of acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #2, #88, and #195) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #2, #88, and #195 developed pressure ulcers and their nutritional needs were not reassessed timely to accommodate increased requirements for wound healing. Findings include: The facility policy, Nutritional Screen/Assessment, revised 5/2017, documented the dietetic technician and registered dietitian were responsible for nutritional screening, assessment, setting of measurable goals and implementing the nutritional plan of care to obtain the resident's optimal nutritional status. The screening included but was not limited to skin intervention as indicated. The resident would be continually assessed, and findings were documented in the dietary progress notes and nutritional care plan. Estimated needs were documented as 30 - 35 calories/ kilograms of body weight for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 9/9/2024-9/16/2024, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the expiration date when applicable for 3 of 3 medication carts (Second floor short hall, Second floor long hall, and Third floor long hall) reviewed. Specifically, - the Second floor short hall medication cart contained 49 loose, unidentified pills; eye drops for Resident #446 without an opened or expired/discard date; inhalers for Residents #127, #118 and #47 without an opened or expired/discard date; and an inhaler without any resident identifiers. - the third-floor long hall medication cart had one loose pill; 2 opened medicated pain patches and a vial of nitroglycerin (treats chest pain) tablets without resident identifiers; an insulin (treats blood sugar) pen for Resident #14, eye drops for Resident #33, and inhalers for Residents #63, #18, and #16 that did not have opened or expired/discard dates. Findings include:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00336546) surveys conducted 9/9/2024-9/16/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for 1 of 2 meals (the 9/10/2024 dinner meal) reviewed and for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #15, #93, and #112). Specifically, food was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures during the dinner meal on 9/10/2024. Additionally, Residents #15, #93, and #112 stated the food was served cold, and Resident #36 stated the food was not palatable and was served cold. Findings include: The facility policy, Food Preparation, Service and Distribution, revised 10/2022, documented: - Holding foods in the tray line or alternate meal preparation and service areas may include steam tables, where hot foods were held and served, and chilled areas where cold foods were held and served, would not hold foods in the danger zone (temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and less than 135 degrees Fahrenheit). - Dining locations included any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/9/2024- 9/16/2024, the facility did not ensure food was prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service in the facility's main kitchen and Third floor kitchenette. Specifically, in the main kitchen, there was debris on the floors and counters, unclean areas, a drain back up, gloves were not used properly, and food was not cooled properly. The Third floor kitchenette was unclean. Findings included: The facility policy, Grease Traps, revised 12/2006, documented the facilities safety elements of the environment were maintained, tested, inspected, and included checking the grease traps monthly. Staff should maintain the sanitation of the kitchen through compliance with a written, comprehensive cleaning schedule. The facility policy, General Kitchen Cleaning, revised 6/1/2023, documented staff shall maintain sanitation of the kitchen through compliance with a written comprehensive cleaning schedule. The facility policy, Food Cooling Temperature…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 9/9/2024-9/16/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident had the right to a dignified existence for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #37 and #137) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #37 was not provided with a requested shower prior to attending a significant family event, and Resident #137's urinary collection bag was visible in plain sight. Findings include: The facility policy, Activities of Daily Living, revised 10/2023, documented the facility would provide each resident the necessary care and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care. The facility policy, Resident Rights and Responsibilities, revised 4/2/2024, documented the facility functioned on the premise that the service it rendered would demonstrate its belief in the dignity and worth of every individual, and the objective of the facility was to provide the resident with optimal nursing and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted [DATE]-[DATE] the facility did not ensure that residents were assessed to determine their ability to safely self-administer medication, when clinically appropriate for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #38, #41, and Resident #95) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #38, #41, and #95 had prescription medications at their bedsides without physician orders for self-medication administration or resident assessments to determine their ability to safely self-administer medications. Additionally, Resident #95 had a discontinued prescription medication at their bedside. Findings include: The facility policy, Inhalers, revised 3/2011, documented licensed nurses would administer inhaler medications as indicated and ordered by the physician. Inhalers were stored (labeled) in the medication cart and discarded when empty or expired. The facility policy, Medication/Treatment Labeling and Storage, revised 7/2013 documented medications, when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$32,321 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $32,321 — penalty dated 2024-09-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY