Schofield Residence

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 114 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 103.9 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.44 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 4/9/25, the facility did not ensure a resident was assessed by the interdisciplinary team to determine a resident's ability to safely administer their own medications if clinically appropriate for one (1) (Resident #66) of one (1) resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #66 was observed with medications in their room, and they self-administered the medications without being evaluated as to whether they could safely do so. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Resident Self-Medication/Self-Treatment Instructions dated 8/2012 documented at the request of the resident to self-medicate, complete an assessment to determine if the resident has the ability to self-administer. Once it has been determined the resident can self-administer safely, obtain a physician's order to store medication or medicated preparation at the bedside. Inappropriate use should be addressed with the resident and physician by the nurse. An assessment of resident's ability to self-administer medications or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a Compliant investigation (#NY00354229) during the Standard survey completed on 4/9/25, the facility did not ensure that all residents comprehensive person-centered care plans were implemented as planned, consistent with resident's rights and meet their preferences, goals and medical, physical, and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for one (1) (Resident #8) of four (4) residents reviewed. Specifically, the resident was not provided with a maximal assist by two staff members for bed mobility as care planned. The finding is: The facility provided document titled Certified Nurse Aide Job Description dated 1/2021 the Certified Nurse Aide was responsible for knowing and following resident's plan of care via verbal report, door cards and review of care plans. Duties and responsibilities consisted of but were not limited to; assisting resident with exercise, ambulation, and range of motion directed by their total plan of care,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 4/9/25, the facility did not ensure that each resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for one (1) (Resident #26) of five (5) residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, Resident #26 was observed on multiple days with dark brown debris under their fingernails on both hands and the resident was observed eating with their hands. The finding is: The policy titled Resident hygiene dated 2/2022, documented the purpose of the facility was to maintain cleanliness and comfort. Residents received sponge baths with morning care and evening care in bed, bathroom, or at resident's bedside. Body parts were cleansed in twice daily sponge baths included face (including shave/removal of facial hair), hands and nails, axilla (arm pit), back, perineal area, and any other areas indicated. The facility provided document titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview. record review, conducted during the Standard survey completed on 4/9/25, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive centered care plan for one (1) (Resident #52) of one (1) resident reviewed. Specifically, a wound treatment was initiated without a physicians order, and lack there was a delay in assessment of the wound. The finding is: The policy titled Skin Care dated 10/2017 documented the purpose was to identify altered skin integrity, facilitate adequate assessment of skin integrity, determine need for preventative/therapeutic intervention, and ensure proper treatment was provided to residents with altered skin. Staff would remain alert to skin changes on a daily basis and report areas of concern immediately to ensure prompt intervention. Every resident would have a weekly full-body skin inspection completed by a nurse. Documentation and evaluation would be completed in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 4/9/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents who receive a psychotropic medication have gradual dose reductions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs for one (1) (Resident #60) of five (5) residents reviewed for psychotropic medication use. Specifically, there was no gradual dose reduction attempted for a resident started on an antidepressant medication and there was no documented evidence that a gradual dose reduction was contraindicated. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Tapering of a Medication Dose/Gradual Dose Reduction-GDR, dated 11/2017 documented the purpose of tapering a medication is to find an optimal dose or to determine whether continued use of the medication is benefiting the resident. Within the first year after the facility has initiated a psychotropic medication, the facility must attempt a gradual dose reduction in two separate quarters, unless clinically contraindicated. Resident #60 had diagnoses including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review completed during a complaint investigation (Complaint #NY00317688), the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for two (Residents #1 and #4) of three residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #1 and Resident #4 both had dementia with wandering behavior, were not accurately assessed and care planned for wandering/elopement, and subsequently eloped through the front door of the facility. The findings are: Review of the Elopement Risk Assessment policy dated 10/04 revealed an Elopement Risk Assessment Form requires completion within 24 hours of admission, or when newly identified wandering behavior is identified and staff are to review or complete this assessment with each Minimum Data Set/Care Plan review. If the resident is identified at risk, a comprehensive care plan for wandering requires initiation. Review of the policy titled Wanderguard Departure Alert System dated March 2022…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review during a complaint investigation (#NY00285020) on a Standard survey completed on 7/12/23, the facility did not immediately inform the resident's representative of a change in their physical/ mental status and a decision to transfer the resident from the facility to the hospital for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for notification of change. Specifically, Resident #1 was noted to have a change in condition on the morning of 10/16/21 and was transferred to the hospital and the health care representative was not notified. The findings are: The policy titled Physician and Responsible Party Notification dated 1/2012 documented the purpose is to ensure the resident, physician, and/or the responsible party is notified when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status. The Registered/ Licensed Nurse will notify the resident, physician, and/or responsible party immediately if there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status and a need to transfer the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 7/12/23, the facility did not ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing for one (Resident #41) of two residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #41 did not receive a pressure ulcer treatment as ordered by physician. The finding is: The policy and procedure (P&P) titled Clean Dressing Techniques dated January 2004 documented to check the physician's order for specific wound care and medication order. 1. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) of sacral region, pressure-induced deep tissue damage of sacral region, and type 2 diabetes. The Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 5/8/23 documented Resident #41 was cognitively intact, was understood and was able to understand others. The MDS documented the resident was admitted to the facility with a Stage 4 (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 7/12/2023, the facility did not ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #76) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #76 did not receive oxygen (O2) at a flow rate of 2 liters via nasal canula (NC) as ordered by the physician. The finding is: The policy and procedure (P&P) titled Oxygen Administration Of, revised 11/2015, documented oxygen may be administered to a resident, with the permission of the physician, using either of the following items of equipment: Oxygen concentrator, or liquid cylinder. 1. Resident #76 had diagnoses that included pneumonia, chronic respiratory failure, and hypertension (HTN). The Minimum Data Sets (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 5/31/23 documented Resident #76 was cognitively intact and received oxygen. The Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) revised 6/2/2023, documented Resident #76 received oxygen therapy related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 7/12/23, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for two (Residents #67 and 132) of two residents reviewed for infection control practices during personal care. Specifically, there was a lack of proper hand hygiene after providing incontinence care (Resident #67) and staff emptied the water basin twice during incontinent care (Resident #132) into a shared bathroom sink, which is used by the roommate. The findings are: The policy and procedure (P&P) titled Guidelines for Hand Hygiene dated 3/2020, documented all healthcare workers must follow hand hygiene guidelines to reduce transmission of pathogenic microorganisms to residents, personnel, and visitors in the healthcare setting. Hand hygiene (hand washing with soap and water…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $226K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY