St Johnland Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 482 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 80.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 206 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 250 beds and averages 205.4 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00372994 and NY00364939) the facility did not ensure that resident's received adequate supervision to remain free from sexual abuse for three (3) of three (3) residents (Resident #2, #3, and #4) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 12/16/2024 at approximately 8:00 AM, License Practical Nurse #2 responded to a call for help from the dining room and observed that Resident #1 was touching the genital area of Resident #2. License Practical Nurse #2 intervened and removed Resident #2. Resident #1 was left unsupervised and immediately began rubbing the genital area of Resident #3. Additionally, on 02/22/2025, Registered Nurse #4 heard Resident #4 yelling get out, and when they entered Resident #4's room they observed Resident #4 in bed, the bed linens were pulled down, Resident #4's pants were pulled down below the waist, and Resident #1's hands were at the genital area of Resident #4. This resulted in actual harm for Resident #2, #3, and #4 which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated survey (Complaint #NY00278415) initiated on 5/11/2023 and completed on 5/18/2023, the facility did not ensure that each resident received assistive devices to prevent accidents. This was identified for one (Resident #124) of nine residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #124, who was cognitively intact was pushed by Physical Therapist (PT) #1 from the patio to the resident's room on 6/21/2021. PT #1 pushed the wheelchair without the leg rests in place contrary to the facility's leg rest policy. Subsequently, Resident #124's left leg got caught under the wheelchair. Resident #124 was transferred to the hospital and was diagnosed with a left femur (thigh bone) fracture. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #124 that is not Immediate Jeopardy. The finding is: The Facility's Leg Rest policy dated October 2017 documented all residents are issued wheelchairs with leg rests as appropriate. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review during an abbreviated survey intake number 2707253 the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and timely risk assessment for an elopement for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 verbalized the desire to leave the facility to a provider who reported it to facility staff, the facility failed to follow the elopement prevention policy and assessed for elopement risk or implement supervision. Resident #1 eloped from the facility and was found outside on the facility grounds 30 minutes later. Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, hemiparesis, and urinary tract infection. A Minimum Data Set Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) completed on 12/09/2025 documented a score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment.Facility policy titled Elopement Prevention (dated 2020) required that upon a significant change in condition, each resident be assessed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the abbreviated survey 2645588 , the facility did not ensure the residents right to be free from abuse and neglect for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, during a transfer Certified Nursing Assistant #1 needed to lower Resident #1 to the floor when their (Resident #1) legs became weak. This resulted in an injury to Resident #1's left knee requiring first aid. Certified Nursing Assistant #1 completed the transfer by themselves although the comprehensive care plan and Kiosk Nursing instructions documented Resident #1 was to have two staff member assistances with transfers.The finding is :The facility Abuse Prevention Identification Investigation and Reporting policy dated October 2016 reviewed April 2025 documented neglect defined as means failings provide timely, consistent, safe, adequate, and appropriate services, treatment, and/or care to a resident of a residential care facility, while the resident is under the supervision of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00358060, NY 00355385, NY 00357476, and NY 00358655) initiated on 12/3/2024 and completed on 12/10/2024, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to provide nursing services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident. This was identified for four (Inn, Head Injury Rehabilitation Unit, Muhlenberg, and [NAME] Hall) of seven nursing units reviewed during the Sufficient Nursing Staffing Task. Specifically, during an observation on 12/8/2024 (Sunday) 13 of 15 residents in the Head Injury Unit were still in bed at 11:38 AM due to insufficient staffing. Resident #38, who resided in the Inn unit, did not receive showers as scheduled on 11/28/2024 and 12/2/2024 due to understaffing. On 11/29/2024, the [NAME] Unit had only one Certified Nursing Assistant (#13) assigned for a unit census of 46. Certified Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification initiated on 12/3/2024 and completed on 12/10/2024, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was identified during the Kitchen task observation on 12/4/2024. Specifically, the facility did not monitor the temperature of cold food items (sandwiches, potato salad, pudding) at the time of meal service. The finding is: A facility policy and procedure titled Food Preparation, documented time/temperature control for safe food (formerly known as potentially hazardous food) means a food that requires time/temperature controls for safety to limit pathogenic organism growth or toxin formation. The Dining Services Director/Cook(s) is responsible for food preparation techniques, which minimize the amount of time food items are exposed to temperatures greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit and/or less than 135 degrees Fahrenheit or per state regulation. The Cook(s) ensures that all foods are held at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 12/3/2024 and completed on 12/10/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and provided care in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life. This was identified on one ([NAME] Unit-secure dementia unit) of seven nursing units observed during the dining task. Specifically, during the lunch meal observation on 12/4/2024 on the [NAME] unit, there were 11 dining tables in the room. At least 3 to 4 residents were seated at each table. The lunch meal was being served by the nursing staff from the first meal transport rack. At all of the tables, some residents had received their lunch trays and were eating, while other residents at the same table had not received their lunch trays because the second lunch transport rack and smaller cart had not arrived on the unit from the kitchen. The finding is: The facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 12/3/2024 and completed on 12/10/2024, the facility did not ensure it developed and implemented a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet each resident's medical and nursing needs. This was identified for one (Resident #152) of one resident reviewed for Accommodation of Needs. Specifically, Resident #152 had a physician's order for a wheelchair with bilateral leg rests. Resident #152 was observed on multiple occasions sitting in the wheelchair without the leg rests. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Wheelchair Safety, effective March 2017, documented you must never transport a resident without foot pedals regardless of locomotion status. Make sure feet are on foot pedals when the resident is in the wheelchair. The facility's policy titled Wheelchair Transport, dated March 2017, documented that foot pedals must be on the chair if staff are pushing a resident. The feet must…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification initiated on 12/3/2024 and completed on 12/10/2024, the facility failed to ensure, to the extent practicable, the participation of the resident and the resident's representative(s) for the development of the resident's care plan. This was identified for one (Resident #66) of three residents reviewed for Care Planning. Specifically, the facility did not conduct interdisciplinary care plan meetings and did not provide notice of invitation to the resident or the resident's representative to participate in the quarterly assessments. The finding is: A facility policy and procedure titled Care Planning, effective 7/2016, revised 10/2024, documented creating a comprehensive, individualized care plan for each resident based on the assessments performed using the Minimum Data Set and ensuring compliance with Federal and State regulations. Quarterly and annual updates to the care plan, or as required due to significant changes in a resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated survey (NY 00361065) initiated on 12/3/2024 and completed on 12/10/2024, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and the residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. This was identified for one (Resident #73) of six residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #73 required two-person assistance with bed mobility and for a mechanical lift transfer to and from the bed. On 11/18/2024, Certified Nursing Assistant #14 turned and positioned Resident #14 by themselves and used a mechanical lift transfer to transfer Resident #73 from bed to their wheelchair without assistance. The finding is: The Facility Policy for Hoyer Lift Transfer last revised on 4/2023 documented Lift transfers must be completed by two employees using the following procedure to ensure the safe transfer of residents and protect employees from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated survey (NY 00361065) initiated on 12/3/2024 and completed on 12/10/2024, the facility did not ensure that nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for resident needs, This was identified for one (Resident #73) of six residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #73 required two-person assistance with bed mobility and mechanical lift transfers. On 11/18/2024, Certified Nursing Assistant #14 turned and positioned Resident #14 by themselves and used a mechanical lift transfer to transfer Resident #73 from bed to their wheelchair without assistance. The finding is: The Facility Policy for Hoyer Lift Transfer last revised on 4/2023 documented Lift transfers must be completed by two employees using the following procedure to ensure the safe transfer of residents and protect employees from injury. The procedure documented nursing staff will explain the procedure to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey initiated on 12/3/2024 and completed on 12/10/2024, the facility did not ensure that all medications and biologicals were stored properly and labeled in accordance with currently accepted pharmaceutical principles and practices. This was identified for one (Resident #19) of six residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that medications were properly labeled and stored. Two tubes of Voltaren analgesic cream, which were not labeled with the resident's name or directions of application, were observed in Resident #19's room on their nightstand. There was no staff in the vicinity. The findings are: Resident #19 had a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and Peripheral Vascular Disease. A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 15 indicating the resident had intact cognition. The Minimum Data Set documented Resident #19…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$30,817 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $30,817 — penalty dated 2025-03-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY