Ten Broeck Commons

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 588 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 77.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 336 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 258 beds and averages 246.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, 1) unlabeled and undated foods were stored in the kitchen refrigerator and unit pantry, and eight (8) cups of pre poured undated almond milk at the bedside of Resident #160; 2) expired foods were stored in the dry pantry, walk in cooler, and reach-in refrigerator; 3) staff were observed not wearing hair and beard restraints while in the kitchen; 4) ice packs were observed in the Catskill unit pantry freezer; and 5) staff were observed not changing gloves between tasks.The findings include: The policy last revised 10/2025 titled Storage of Non-Perishable Foods documented, Dry goods (grains) shall be stored for a period not to exceed three months. All foods must be labeled and dated to ensure foods are being used in a proper timeframe, and any unopened food item will be discarded by the manufacturer labeled expiration date.The policy dated 2025 titled Storage of Perishable Goods documented, Left-over food items…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  F880 AMBased on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for all residents. Specifically, the annual water sampling report for the year 2025 was missing, the annual facility assessment for legionella and required components were missing and not provided at time of survey. The findings are: During a review of facility records on 01/05/2026 at 10:00 AM, a water temperature log documented chlorine was added. A vendor service report dated 11/2025 had a sticker attached that documented the water report was due 12/2024. A lab report for legionella testing was dated 11/27/2024. When requested, the Maintenance Director was unable to provide a legionella lab report for 2025, a Water Management Plan and the annual facility assessment/ Department of Health form for Environmental Assessment of Water Systems in Healthcare Settings.The facility provided a policy and procedure for Water…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 1/5/2026-1/22/2026 the facility did not ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #43) reviewed for Dignity. Specifically, Resident # 43 was observed out of bed wearing socks that were labeled with the resident's name in front of the sock clearly visible to other residents, visitors and staff. The findings include:Resident #43 had diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, Cardiomyopathy (enlarged heart, makes it harder to pump blood) and an Immunodeficiency condition.The Facility Policy titled Quality of Life dated 2025 documented residents shall always be treated with dignity and respect. The residents will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his self-esteem and self-worth.The admission Minimum Data Set (assessment) dated 11/26/2025, documented Resident #43 had moderately impaired cognition, could usually understand others and could make himself…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification survey from 01/05/2026-01/12/2026, the facility did not ensure that the Comprehensive Care Plan was revised to reflect changes and/or new interventions for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #71) reviewed for Accidents, and one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #139) reviewed for Activities. Specifically, 1) Resident #71 had a behavior of wandering, entering other residents' rooms and laying in other residents' beds, and the behavior care plan did not reflect this behavior or interventions for the behavior; 2) Resident #139's care plan had not been revised to reflect their current activities they participated in.The findings included:The facility policy Care Planning last reviewed 02/2025 documented that the comprehensive care plan includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that care was provided to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 of 5 residents (#9) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, Resident #9 had a physician order for offloading gel boots, to be worn at all times, and was observed without the gel boots. The findings include: Resident #9 had diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented the resident's cognition was intact, the resident required substantial to max assist with all activities of daily living. The resident was at risk for pressure ulcers and pressure relieving devices for both the chair and bed were used. A Braden Scale assessment completed on 12/15/2025 documented a score of 16 indicating the resident was at risk for pressure injuries. The Care Plan titled At Risk for Skin Breakdown dated 8/27/2025, revised 12/9/2025, documented interventions included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 01/05/2026 through 01/12/2026, the facility did not ensure proper disposal of garbage and refuse. Specifically, the garbage/recycle dumpster was left open and there were cardboard boxes spilling over the top and debris on the ground around the dumpster.The findings are:The facility policy titled Disposal of Refuse reviewed 12/2025 documented outside dumpsters or compactors provided by waste management services will be kept closed and free of surrounding debris.During an observation of the garbage area on 01/05/2026 at 11:39 AM with the Food Service Director, the recycle dumpster lid was open with cardboard boxes spilling over the top; pieces of cardboard box; used gloves; plastic packing material; and plastic drink lids laying on the ground surrounding the dumpster.During an interview with the Food Service Director on 01/05/2026 at 11:39 AM, they stated the garbage and recycle is picked up once weekly. They do not think the lid to the recycle dumpster is ever closed, and stated, it is too…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the abbreviated survey (NY00371242) the facility did not ensure that the resident environment was free of accident hazards and/or that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, on 02/04/2025 Resident #1 who was severely cognitively impaired and required a two person assist for transfers via mechanical lift as per their care plan, was transferred by Certified Nurse Aide #1 from chair to bed alone and unassisted. Resident #1 was found with flaccidity and deformity to right hip/leg and was ordered by the Nurse Practitioner to be transferred to the hospital. According to report received by the facility from the hospital, Resident #1 sustained a right spiral hip fracture requiring surgical intervention. Certified Nurse Aide #1 admitted transferring Resident #1 via mechanical lift without assistance.The Findings are: The policy titled Mechanical Lift revised 2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, it was determined the facility did not ensure all residents had the right to a dignified existence for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #116) reviewed for personal property. Specifically, the facility did not ensure Resident #116 received a dignified existence as they were transferred to the facility from an assisted living home without their belongings, and actions were not taken to ensure the resident was able to receive their personal property. Findings include: Resident #116 was admitted to facility with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, cerebral vascular attack, and acquired absence of left leg above knee. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 7/21/23, documented Resident #116 was cognitively intact. A psychosocial note dated 6/23/22 documented the social worker and the resident contacted the assisted living facility and spoke with the Administrator. The Administrator believed the resident's belongings were still in storage and would follow up with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review during the recertification survey completed on 9/20/23, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #226) of six residents reviewed for skin care. Specifically, Resident #226 received active ice temporary pain relief cream to the perineal area by a certified nurse aide (CNA). There was no order for this cream; the treatment cart was not locked, and were no documented evidence that the resident was assessed by a registered nurse (RN) or Resident #226's physician was notified. Findings include: The facility policy Certified Nursing Assistant undated documented CNAs are not allowed to perform certain tasks that are considered invasive, dangerous, or neglectful. Supplies within the CNAs scope of practice must be retrieved from the locked treatment cart by a licensed nurse. Only licensed nurses can assess and remove any treatment supplies from the treatment cart. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00313960), the facility did not ensure 1 of 5 residents (Residents #450) reviewed for pressure ulcers received care and services to promote healing and to prevent new pressure ulcers from developing. Specifically, Resident #450 had a pressure ulcer worsen, there was no documented turning and positioning and the medical provider was not notified timely of a change in condition. Findings include: Resident #450 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for short term rehabilitation with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA, stroke), urinary tract infection (UTI), and diabetes (unstable blood sugar). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, assessment tool) dated 8/22/22, documented Resident #450's cognition was intact and the resident required extensive assistance of 2 staff for transfers, bed mobility and toilet use, and extensive assistance of 1 staff for personal hygiene and dressing. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $6.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY