Beach Terrace Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 25.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 182 beds and averages 173.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.97 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.13 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility did not ensure it maintained a comfortable and homelike environment with comfortable temperatures between 71 degrees Fahrenheit and 81 degrees Fahrenheit in the resident rooms and areas. This was identified for 18 (Room G28, 124, 125, 127, 128, 133, 136, 201, 216, 219, 222, 225, 226, 228, 230, 232, 233, and 236) of the 83 resident rooms during the Environment Task. Specifically, 18 resident rooms and the first-floor shower room ambient temperature was measured to be below 71 degrees Fahrenheit. Multiple residents complained of being uncomfortable due to the cold room temperature.The finding is: The facility's policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment dated 12/2025 documented comfortable and safe temperature levels mean that the ambient temperature should be in a relatively narrow range that minimizes residents' susceptibility to loss of body heat and risk of hypothermia/hyperthermia and is comfortable for the residents. The facility will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not maintain the heating system in proper working conditions to provide a healthy, functional, and comfortable environment for residents, personnel, and the public. This was identified for 19 (Room G28, 120, 124, 125, 133, 134, 136, 201, 216, 219, 222, 225, 226, 228, 230, 232, 233, and 236) of the 83 resident rooms during the Environment Task. Specifically, the heating system in multiple resident rooms did not function as intended to provide comfortable and safe environmental temperatures. Cross Reference-F584: Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment.The findings are:The facility's policy titled Building Management System Failure dated 05/2024, documented that problems with the Utilities Management system are typically indicated by: Comparing trend data of work requisitions; Alarms on major utility system components to provide immediate notification of problems on high priority systems; engineering incident reports; complaint calls; and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment was completed to accurately reflect each resident's current status. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #72) of two (2) residents reviewed for Dialysis. Specifically, 1) Resident #72 receives dialysis three times a week which was not identified in the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE]. The finding is:The undated facility policy titled, MDS (Minimum Data Set) 3.0 documented that every department will be responsible for accurate completion of the assigned Minimum Data Set sections.Resident #72 has diagnoses that include end stage renal disease (when chronic kidney disease - the gradual loss of kidney function - reaches an advanced state when your kidneys no longer work as they should to meet your body's needs) and Parkinson's disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system that worsens over time). The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility did not ensure that each resident who needs respiratory care is provided with such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. This was identified as one (1) (Resident #63) of four (4) residents reviewed for Oxygen administration. Specifically, Resident #63 had a physician order to receive supplemental oxygen therapy via a nasal cannula. During an observation on 01/21/2026, the resident was not utilizing the supplemental oxygen therapy and the oxygen tubing, and an oxygen mask was laying on top of an oxygen concentrator (a machine that delivers purified oxygen) adjacent to Resident #63's bed (not in use). There was no nasal cannula present at the resident's bedside. The inside of the mask was dirty, and the oxygen tubing had brown colored debris inside the tubing. There was no date label on the oxygen tubing indicating when the tubing was placed.The finding is:The facility's policy titled Care of Respirators/Oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00383402), the facility did not ensure that residents representative, for one of three residents reviewed for notification (Resident #1), who was designated as the emergency contact person was notified, provided education and given an opportunity to consent or decline prior to performing a treatment change/medical procedure. Specifically, Resident #1 was stated on intravenous antibiotic and Family Member#1 was not notified, additionally Resident #1 developed a facility acquired wound to left toe and Family Member #1 was not notified.The findings are:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Stroke, Hypertension, Diabetes and non-Alzheimer's dementia. The Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6/6/2025 documented a Brief Interview Mental Score of 9 indicating the resident had moderately-impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making.The resident's medical record included the resident face sheet which listed Family member #1 as the emergency contact person for making decisions for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/27/2024 and completed on 7/8/2024, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to provide nursing services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was identified for five of the five units reviewed for the Sufficient Nursing Staffing task. Specifically, 1) a review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report Quarter 1, 2024 indicated excessively low weekend staffing and 2) a review of the daily staffing sheets revealed that the facility did not provide sufficient numbers of Certified Nursing Assistants as indicated in the facility assessment. The finding is: The facility's Policy and Procedure on Staffing last reviewed 7/2024, documented the facility maintains adequate staffing on each shift to ensure that our residents' needs and services are met. Certified Nursing Assistants are available on each shift to provide the needed care and services of each resident as outlined in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/27/2024 and completed on 7/8/2024 the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations, including injuries of unknown source, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in a serious bodily injury, to the New York State Department of Health. This was identified for one (Resident #48) of three residents reviewed for skin conditions and one (Resident #83) of seven residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, 1) Resident #48 sustained a scrotal avulsion (a forcible tearing off the skin of the scrotum) on 1/25/2024 requiring surgical intervention. The cause of the injury was unknown, and the facility did not report the injury of unknown origin to the New York State Department of Health. 2)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/27/2024 and completed on 7/8/2024 the facility did not ensure that each allegation of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or injury of unknown origin was thoroughly investigated. This was identified for one (Resident #48) of three residents reviewed for skin conditions and one (Resident #83) of seven residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, 1) Resident #48 sustained a scrotal avulsion (a forcible tearing off the skin of the scrotum) that required surgical intervention on 1/25/2024. The cause of the injury was unknown. There was no investigation to determine the root cause of the injury. 2) Resident #83 sustained a discoloration to the right eye and right forehead on 6/22/2024. Resident #83's injury was of unknown origin. There was no investigation to determine the root cause of the injury. The findings are: 1) The facility's Accident/Significant Event policy dated 6/17/2019 documented that a significant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/27/2024 and completed on 7/8/2024, the facility did not ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised to meet each resident's current needs. This was identified for one (Resident #62) of two residents reviewed for Environment. Specifically, Resident #62, who resided on the second floor of the facility, had behaviors of stuffing the toilet with objects that clogged the toilet resulting in a leaked ceiling in other residents' rooms residing on the first floor. A comprehensive care plan was developed for the resident's behavior in 2014 with interventions to manage the resident's behavior. The resident continued to exhibit the behavior; however, the interventions on the comprehensive care plan remained unchanged since 2014. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled Comprehensive Care Plan, last revised on 11/28/2017, documented each resident will have an individualized interdisciplinary plan of care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/27/2024 and completed on 7/8/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. This was identified for two (Resident # 107 and Resident #138) of five residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, Resident #107 and Resident #138 had a physician's order for an alternating pressure relief air mattress. During multiple observations, the adjustable weight setting on the air mattress pump was not accurately set according to each resident's weight. The findings are: The facility's Pressure Ulcers policy and procedure last revised on 5/21/2019 documented that residents who have pressure ulcers receive the necessary treatment to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. Residents will be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY