No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Medford Multicare Center For Living

3115 Horseblock Road, Medford, NY 11763 · For profit - Corporation · 320 certified beds · (631) 730-3000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jun 20262 immediate-jeopardy citations$134,713 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jun 2026
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (24) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $134,713 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-26)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
12 Platinum Ct · (631) 504-6800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2975 Horseblock Rd · (631) 286-1854 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI0.4 mi
2799 Rte 112 · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Town Park0.7 mi
2151 Horseblock Rd · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.9%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.1%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms85.0%19.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.2%0.2%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.0%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.3%13.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.2%95.3%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%6.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.2%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.6%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.9%78.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.5%20.6%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.8%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.251.701.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.181.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 187 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 166 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.2%CMS range 28.7–44.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.8–13.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.5%CMS range 6.7–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.461.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
1.22
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.20
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.91
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
36.2%
Total nursing turnover
46.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 320 beds and averages 293.9 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-02)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-28)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review during a Recertification Survey initiated on 4/17/2024 and completed on 4/26/2024, the facility failed to ensure that allegations of sexual abuse were reported to the Administrator or other officials immediately (or within two hours) after the allegations were made. This was identified for one (Resident #26) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 3/30/2024 Resident #26, with intact cognition, reported to Licensed Practical Nurse #1 they were sexually abused by Certified Nursing Assistant #1. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 failed to report the allegations to the facility Administrator/designee or other officials. Resident #26 again reported the same allegation of sexual abuse to Certified Nursing Assistant #3 on 4/01/2024. Certified Nursing Assistant #3 informed Registered Nurse #1 of the allegation. Registered Nurse #1 failed to report the allegation to the facility Administrator/designee, or other officials. Certified Nursing Assistant #1 continued to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review during a Recertification Survey initiated on 4/17/2024 and completed on 4/26/2024, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations of abuse, neglect, and mistreatment were thoroughly investigated. This was identified for one (Resident #26) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 3/30/2024 Resident #26 reported to Licensed Practical Nurse #1 that they were sexually abused by Certified Nursing Assistant #1. There was no documented evidence Licensed Practical Nurse #1 took steps to initiate an investigation into the allegation. On 4/1/2024, Resident #26 reported the same allegation to Certified Nursing Assistant #3. Certified Nursing Assistant #3 informed Registered Nurse #1 of the allegation. There was no documented evidence Registered Nurse #1 took steps to initiate an investigation into the allegation. Through 4/18/2024, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 continued to be assigned to and worked on the same unit where Resident #26 resided. As of 4/18/2024, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. This was identified for one (Resident #111) of three residents reviewed for falls. Specifically, Resident #111 was totally dependent on two staff members for bed mobility and for personal hygiene as per the comprehensive care plan. On 12/09/2025, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 did not follow the resident's plan of care and provided toileting care by themselves while the resident was in bed. The resident fell out of bed and sustained a fracture to the right lower leg bones. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #111 that was not Immediate Jeopardy.The findings include: The facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living effective 01/2026 documented the resident will be expected to maintain reasonable standards of hygiene and grooming during their stay at the facility and will be offered all necessary supplies and assistance to do…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of infectious diseases. This was identified for one (Resident #260) of five residents reviewed for infection control; two (Unit 1C medication cart and Unit 3C medication cart low side) of nine medications carts reviewed during the Medication Storage Task; and for two residents (Resident #75 and Resident #234) during the lunch meal dining observation. Specifically, 1) Resident #260 had a physician's order for contact precautions related to an infection with a carbapenem-resistant organism. Certified Nursing Assistant #3 was observed in Resident #260's room assisting the resident in the bathroom and to the wheelchair without wearing the required personal protective equipment; 2) Registered Nurse #4 and Licensed Practical Nurse #2 cleaned the glucometer machine with alcohol wipes instead of the manufacturer recommended Protection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that injuries of unknown origin were thoroughly investigated to rule out abuse, neglect, and mistreatment. This was identified for one (Resident #141) of five residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #141 was observed on the floor secondary to an unwitnessed fall. The facility investigation did not include statements from all involved staff to determine the root cause and rule out abuse, neglect, and mistreatment. The findings include: The facility's Accident and Incident policy revised 04/21/2026 documented within 24 hours of the reported incident or accident, the risk manager or nurse supervisor must complete the Resident Accident & Incident Summary Report to determine if there is reason to believe that abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation has occurred and to determine the underlying cause of the reported accident or incident. The policy documented to properly document all events surrounding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during survey, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented for each resident to meet each resident's medical and nursing needs. This was identified for one (Resident #310) of five residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #310 had a physician's order for padded half side rails with for seizure precautions. On two separate occasions, Resident #310 was observed without the padded side rails.The findings include: The facility policy for Person Centered Care Planning: Care Plan Process last reviewed on October 2025 documented the care for each resident will be delivered according to the identified goals and interventions on the comprehensive care plan. The facility policy titled Seizure Precautions last revised in 2025 documented that staff members will maintain seizure precautions to minimize the risk of injury or complications associated with seizure activity. Siderails may be needed on an ongoing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during survey, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. This was identified for one (Unit 3 C, low side Medication Cart) of nine medication carts reviewed for the Medication Storage Task and for one (Resident #194) of five residents reviewed for Accident Hazards. Specifically, 1) a Novolog FlexPen (insulin medication to control high blood sugar) was observed unopened and stored in the medication cart. The manufacturer's guidelines indicated that the Novolog FlexPen should be stored in the refrigerator before opening. 2) Resident #194 was observed on multiple occasions with Biotin supplement (helps the body convert food into energy) bottles at their bedside. The findings include: The facility policy titled Medication Storage and Handling last revised June 2025 documented medications and biologicals are stored in locked compartments under proper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Abbreviated Survey (NY00377991) initiated on 6/2/2025 the facility did not ensure that all incidents including allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This was identified for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on the morning of 4/14/2025 Resident #1 stated they had been punched in the ribs by nursing staff. There was no documented evidence that the facility obtained statements from the overnight staff to rule out abuse. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program with a revised date of September 2024 documented the residents have the right to be free from abuse and all alleged or suspected incidents will be thoroughly investigated and findings documented in a report format. The investigative process will include, but is not limited to, statements from staff, witness, resident, interviews with staff, witness, resident, medical record review if applicable and review of employee records.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation of the facility videotape, record review and interviews, during an abbreviated survey (Complaint # NY00378355), the facility did not ensure one of three residents (Resident#1) ) reviewed for abuse were free from physical abuse by a staff member. The review of video surveillance dated 04/09/25 at 11:00:56 AM showed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 using both hands to hold Resident #1's shoulders while seated in wheelchair and the Certified Nurse's Aide was pulling the resident back and forth in a shaking motion. There was no other staff or resident present in view of the surveillance video at the time of the incident. Findings include: The Review of the facility policy dated 9/2024 entitled Abuse documented Physical abuse is defined as hitting, slapping, punching, and kicking. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that include neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and Parkinson's Disease. Resident #1 had a Minimum Data Set Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/24/2025 and completed on 2/28/2025 the facility did not ensure that a Baseline Care Plan for each resident included instructions needed to provide effective person-centered care that meets professional standards of quality care. This was identified for one (Resident #519) of three residents reviewed for Infection Control. Specifically, Resident #519 was admitted with Coronavirus (COVID-19) positive infection and had a physician's order for Droplet and Contact Precautions for ten days. There was no care plan developed and implemented for the Droplet and Contact Precautions. The finding is: The facility's policy, titled Person-Centered Care Plan last reviewed 10/2024 documented upon admission the facility shall conduct a comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan, including an accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity. All care planning begins upon admission. The care of each resident will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/24/2025 and completed on 2/28/2025 the facility did not ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent with current professional standards of practice, physician orders, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was identified for one (Resident #242) of three residents reviewed for Hydration. Specifically, Resident #242 was admitted to the facility with a Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) in their right arm from the hospital. There was no documentation the facility was Monitoring the Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) site or measuring the length of the external catheter. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line last reviewed 6/2024, documented to assess the insertion site and surrounding tissue for any inflammation, tenderness, or drainage and if observed, report the findings to the physician. The policy did not include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/24/2025 and completed on 2/28/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was identified for one (Resident #32) of three residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #32 was observed receiving oxygen therapy without a Physician's order. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration dated February 2024 documented to ensure adequate oxygenation of the body's vital organs. Residents with a clinical diagnosis or clinical indication will receive concentrations of oxygen in doses higher than those found in the atmosphere. Oxygen [therapy] is administered by licensed nursing staff on the written order of the attending Physician. The Physician writes an order for oxygen therapy with a rationale. Resident #32 was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the Recertification survey initiated on 2/24/2024 and completed on 2/28/2025, the facility did not ensure the Physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments, at each visit. This was identified for one (Resident #32) of five residents reviewed for Respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #32 received Oxygen therapy without a physician's evaluation and physician's order. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration dated February 2024 documented to ensure adequate oxygenation of the body's vital organs. Residents with a clinical diagnosis or clinical indication will receive concentrations of oxygen in doses higher than those found in the atmosphere. Oxygen [therapy] is administered by licensed nursing staff on the written order of the attending Physician. The Physician writes an order for oxygen therapy with a rationale. Resident #32 was admitted with diagnoses including Cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 11 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 2/24/2025 and completed on 2/28/2025, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for one (Resident #521) of three residents reviewed for the Infection Control Task, and one (Resident #147) of five residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, 1) Resident #521 had a physician's order for Contact Precautions due to Clostridium difficile infection. On 2/25/2025 at 8:09 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant #3 was observed coming out of Resident#521's room carrying two meal trays without wearing any Personal Protective Equipment including a gown or gloves. 2) Specifically, Resident #147 was ventilator dependent and was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with a Multidrug-Resistant Organism (MDRO) Pneumonia infection. On 2/27/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/17/2024 and completed on 4/26/2024, the facility did not ensure that drug records were in order and accounted for all controlled drugs. This was identified in three (Unit 1C, Unit 3C, and Unit 3B) of seven nursing units reviewed for Medication Storage. Specifically, 1) the daily control drug count sheet on Unit 1C was not signed by two Licensed Nurses to reflect a physical count of the available controlled medications. Additionally, the daily control drug count sheet was not reconciled to reflect the available controlled medications in the medication blister pack for Resident #130 (Unit 1C). 2) the daily control drug count sheet on Unit 3C was not signed by two licensed nurses to reflect a physical count of the available controlled medications. Additionally, the Controlled Drug Record form on Unit 3C was not reconciled to reflect the available controlled medications in the medication blister pack for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/17/2024 and completed on 4/26/2024 the facility did not ensure that each resident is treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner that promotes or enhances the resident's quality of life. Specifically, on two separate occasions, Resident #92 was observed in bed from the hallway with their urinary bag attached to the bed frame. The urinary bag had no privacy bag and was observed to contain urine. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure on Resident Privacy revised 4/2024 documented the goal of the policy is to ensure that all residents' right to privacy is respected and maintained in all aspects of care delivery and that all staff members respect the privacy and dignity of residents at all times. Resident #92 was admitted with diagnoses that included Hypertension, Renal Insufficiency, and Renal Failure. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident's Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/17/2024 and completed on 4/26/2024, the facility did not ensure that the interdisciplinary team had determined that self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for each resident. This was identified for one (Resident #186) of five residents reviewed for choices. Specifically, resident #186 was observed with multiple inhalers (Ventolin, Atrovent, Breo Ellipta) medications, on top of their room dresser. There was no documented assessment by the interdisciplinary team to determine if the resident could safely self-administer and store these medications in their room. The finding is: A facility policy and procedure titled, Medication: General Administration Guidelines last revised in October 2023, documented the facility maintains clinical records on all residents and assures that all Medication Administration Records note residents identifying information. Only physicians or licensed nurses may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/17/2024 and completed on 4/26/2024, the facility did not ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised to address each resident's needs. This was identified for 1) one (Resident #114) of two residents reviewed for rehabilitation and restorative services; 2) one (Resident #227) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care; and 3) one (Resident #186) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that the comprehensive care plans for Resident #114, Resident #227, and Resident #186 were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly review assessment. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled, Comprehensive Care Planning: Initial/Interim Care Plan effective 6/1/2002 and last reviewed in 4/2024, documented that an assessment will be completed on each newly admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/17/2024 and completed on 4/26/2024 the facility did not ensure each resident's environment was free from accident hazards and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. This was identified for one (Resident #226) of four residents reviewed for accident hazards. Specifically, Resident #226 was assessed as at risk for falls and had a history of falls. The resident's comprehensive care plan indicated a high floor mat as an intervention and a Dycem non-slip mat under the floor mat to prevent the high floor mat from slipping away from the resident's bed. During multiple observations, the Dycem non-slip mat was not observed under the high floor mats in Resident #226's room as indicated in the resident's comprehensive care plan. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Resident Incidents and Accidents dated 2/2024 documented that the safety of the residents we serve is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/17/2024 and completed on 4/26/2024 the facility did not ensure that a resident who is fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment, care, and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding. This was identified for two (Resident #148 & Resident #69) of three residents reviewed for Tube Feeding. Specifically, 1) on 4/17/2024 at 10:49 AM and again on 4/25/2024 at 12:05 PM Resident # 148's tube feeding bottles were not labeled including nursing's initials, date, and time the feeding was initiated. 2) Certified Nursing Assistant #7 was observed providing care to Resident #69 while the resident was lying flat on their back in the bed. The resident was receiving the tube feeding while the lying flat. The findings are: 1) The facility policy titled, Enteral Feeding Via Gastrostomy Tube last reviewed February 2024 documented to replace disposable formula bottles, tubing sets, and syringes every 24 hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/17/2024 and completed on 4/26/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was identified for one (Resident #152) of two residents reviewed for dialysis. Specifically, the dialysis center recommended holding Resident #152's blood pressure medications before the dialysis treatments. The facility staff did not follow the recommendations made by the dialysis center and did not notify the resident's Physician of the recommendations. The finding is: The Policy and Procedure for Hemodialysis: Transporting the Resident, last revised in January 2022 documented the Licensed Nurse sends a communication book to the dialysis center with the resident and includes requests for blood tests and any other pertinent information in the communication book. The Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/17/24 and completed on 4/26/24, the facility did not ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors. This was identified for two (Resident #79 and Resident #143 ) of seven residents reviewed for choices. Specifically, 1) Resident #79 did not receive their physician-ordered Insulin injection timely 2) Resident #143 had a physician's order to check blood sugar via a fingerstick before meals. The blood sugar via a fingerstick was not performed in the ordered time frame, and Insulin was not administered according to the Physician's order before meals. The finding is: 1) Resident #79 was admitted with diagnoses that included Type II Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #79 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The Minimum Data Set assessment documented that Resident #79…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/17/2024 and completed on 4/26/2024 the facility did not ensure each resident in a semi-private room had ceiling suspended curtains, which extend around the bed to provide total visual privacy. This was identified for two (Resident #108 and Resident #111) of two residents reviewed for privacy. Specifically, Resident #108 and Resident #111 shared a semi-private room. The privacy curtain separating Resident #108 and Resident #111 was not long enough to allow full visual privacy. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Privacy Curtains effective 4/2024 documented the purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for the use and maintenance of privacy curtains in our nursing facility to ensure the privacy and dignity of our residents. The curtains should cover the entire length of the resident's bed area and provide full privacy. Resident #108 was admitted with diagnoses that included Cerebral Vascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-06-02 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the survey, the facility failed to accurately document the resident population, the overall acuity, the care required by the resident population, and the resources needed, in the facility assessment. This was identified for one (Unit 1C) of eight nursing units reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing task. Specifically, the facility has a dedicated ventilator unit with certified ventilator beds, occupied by ventilator dependent residents who receive ventilator-related respiratory care. The facility assessment did not include the ventilator dependent residents to determine what resources were necessary to care for those residents including the use of competent and qualified Respiratory therapists. The findings include:The facility policy titled Facility assessment dated [DATE] documented the facility will conduct and document a facility wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$134,713 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $134,713 — penalty dated 2024-04-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KLEIN, MORDECHAIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 01/01/2002
RAUSMAN, NORMANIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2002
BRASKA, LAURENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2025
KUMAR, NEERUIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2023
LOEB, MARTINIndividualGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/19/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$48.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 11%Other / private 21%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$524per resident / day
operating cost
$15,921per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$514per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335840. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next