Medina Memorial Hospital SNF

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 29.0 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on [DATE], the facility did not ensure the system developed for advance directives was implemented in a manner that was consistent with residents' wishes for three (Resident #6, #21, and #24) of 16 residents reviewed for advance directives. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that all advance directive identifiers were consistent with the resident's advance directives. Facility staff were utilizing a process that was not consistent with the facilities current documented processes. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Advanced Directives RHCF (Residential Health Care Facility) dated [DATE] documented the facility is committed to honoring the wishes of their patients' regarding their treatment. The Social Worker will inform the patient and/or health care agent and/or surrogate that the patient has a full code order. The Full Code status will be communicated through the application of a Blue Star…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 5/24/24, the facility did not ensure residents were free from physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience that were not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms, used for the least amount of time and document ongoing re-evaluation of the need for restraints for three (Resident #9,23, and 24) of three residents reviewed for physical restraints. Specifically, Residents #9, #23 and #24 had no assessments for the initiation or ongoing re-evaluation of the continued use of position change alarms. Additionally, there were no provider orders or notes to address the medical reason that warranted the use of the device. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Alarm Use dated 11/1/2020 documented position change alarms are defined as chair and bed sensor pads, bedside alarmed mats, and alarms clipped to resident clothing. Position change alarms are never to be used as a restraint.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a Standard survey conducted 7/28/22 through 8/2/22, the facility did not use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. Specifically, one of one resident care unit (skilled nursing facility (SNF) independent of the hospital) reviewed for staffing revealed an RN was not scheduled for eight consecutive hours per day on the weekends and holidays for the past four months. The finding is: Review of a facility Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled RN Staffing for [NAME] Memorial Hospital SNF dated 9/1/2020 documented an RN will be scheduled to be on the SNF unit for eight consecutive hours/day, seven days a week. The P&P documented in the event that a RN is not available on the unit for eight consecutive hours/day, seven days a week the SNF will seek a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) RN staffing waiver. Regardless of the waiver status the hospital RN nursing supervisor will continue to provide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-02 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Standard survey started 7/28/22 and completed 8/2/22 the facility must attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail. If a bed or side rail is used, the facility must ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance of bed rails. Assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation. Review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation. Specifically, one (Resident #3) of one resident observed for side rail use the facility did not ensure the resident was assessed for the risk of entrapment prior to installation, and ensure risks versus benefits of the bed rails were reviewed with the resident or if applicable the resident's representative on an ongoing basis. The finding is: The policy and procedure (P&P) entitled Bed Entrapment dated 8/29/17 documented to provide a safe environment for all patients and residents within the facility to reduce life- threatening…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2020-01-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interiew and record review conducted during an Standard survey completed on 1/6/20, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations including abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment including injuries of unknown origin source, are reported immediately, but not later than two hours later after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury to the Administrator and other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and the Adult Protective Services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State Law through established procedures. Specifically, one (Residents #26) of one resident reviewed for reporting of alleged violations of abuse were involved in a resident to resident altercation. The incident was not reported timely to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) as required. Resident #11 involved. The finding is: Review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2020-01-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview completed during the Standard survey completed 1/6/20, the facility did not ensure that a resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and equipment to prevent further decrease in range of motion. Specifically, one (Resident #5) of one resident reviewed for range of motion (ROM) services was not provided with a palm guard (assistive device that positions the fingers away from the palm) to their right hand as recommended by Occupational Therapy (OT). The finding is: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, depression and contractures (loss of joint mobility). The Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 11/6/19 documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired, and was rarely/never understood, sometimes understands. Review of the comprehensive Care Plan dated 10/19/18 revealed the resident had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 1/6/20, the facility did not use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. Specifically, one of one resident care unit (skilled nursing facility independent of the hospital) reviewed for staffing revealed an RN was not scheduled for eight consecutive hours per day on the weekends and holidays for the past four months. Specifically, one of one resident care unit (skilled nursing facility (SNF) independent of the hospital) reviewed for staffing revealed an RN was not scheduled for eight consecutive hours per day on the weekends and holidays for the past three months. The finding is: Review of a facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled RN Staffing for Hospital SNF dated 3/1/19 revealed an RN will be scheduled to be on the SNF for eight consecutive hours/ day, seven days a week. The acute care (hospital) RN Nursing Supervisor will continue to provide care, as needed, when the SNF RN is not on the unit. Review of the facility Daily Staffing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · B2022-08-02 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review during the Standard survey from conducted from 7/28/22 through 8/2/22, the facility did not provide the appropriate liability and appeal notices to Medicare beneficiaries at the termination of Medicare coverage for three (Residents #11, 17, and 20) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not provide responsible party (RP) with a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) and a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) (#11), the facility did not provide the resident or RP with a SNF ABN and there was no documented evidence the NOMNC was mailed to RP after telephone contact (#17) and there was no documented evidence the NOMNC was mailed to the RP after telephone contact (#20). The findings are: The Form Instructions Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN Form CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)-10055 (2018) documents Medicare requires skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) to issue the SNFABN to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in NY