Northern Metropolitan Res Health Care Facility Inc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 131 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 118.3 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Surveys (2663420 and 2700684), the facility did not ensure residents had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. Specifically, Resident #3, who was assessed by therapy for wheelchair use and whose most recent Minimum Data Set documented wheelchair as the resident's primary mode of locomotion, was observed seated in a wheelchair in the dining room labeled with the name of another resident who no longer resided in the facility. Resident #3 was visibly upset and pointed at the armrest of the wheelchair. The wheelchair was too wide for Resident #3. The right armrest pad was missing, and the left armrest pad was observed frayed. The Director of Rehabilitation stated the wheelchair was not assigned to Resident #3 and observed the wheelchair was damaged and not appropriate for resident use.The findings include:A review of the facility policy titled Resident Seating Recommendations, last revised 10/20/2025, documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-09 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Surveys (2663420 and 2700684), the facility did not ensure that the facility-wide assessment determined the required resources to provide the care and services to its residents during day-to-day operations, did not address what is considered sufficient, particularly on weekends, and did not include behavioral health services necessary to meet resident needs for three (3) of three (3) units reviewed. Specifically, the Facility Assessment provided during the onsite survey did not include minimum staffing requirements for weekends for certified nurse aides and licensed practical nurses, did not identify the number of staff needed to provide behavioral health care and services, and listed zero registered nurses on the day, evening, and night shifts for all three resident units.The findings are:Review of the Facility policy titled Facility Assessment revised 11/19/2025, documented that a facility assessment is conducted at least annually and as needed to determine and update the facility's capacity to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview conducted during Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (NY00330514) conducted from 7/23/24-7/30/24 the facility did not ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was provided on 1 of 4 units (2 West). Specifically, walls in multiple resident rooms had stains, scuffs, chipped paint, missing moldings, and the floor had visible dirt, dust, food particles and dried food stains. The findings are; The following observations were made on 2 West: On 07/23/24 at: 9:50 AM Forks, food crumbs and paper were on the floor in resident rooms. Floors were dull and dirty. 10:33 AM Empty sugar packets, ketchup wrappers, cherry pits were observed on the floor in the resident dining room. 12:21 PM Dried up food, and bottle caps were on the floor by the nurse's station. On 07/24/24 at: 9:27 AM Crumbs, and paint chips were on the floor in the high side hallway. 3:47 PM Crumbs, plastic food wrappings, paper towels and dust balls were on the floors. On 07/25/24 at: 9:58 AM Crumbs, and food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the Recertification Survey conducted from 7/23/24 through 7/30/24, the facility did not ensure menus were followed for 5 of 32 residents, (Residents #2, #18, #20, #46, and #96) reviewed for food. Specifically, 1. on 2 occasions Resident # 2 did not receive a hardboiled egg and 4 ounces of split pea soup as per meal ticket, 2. Resident #96 did not receive 4 ounces of strawberry yogurt as per meal ticket. 3. Resident # 20 did not receive 6 ounces of split pea soup, ice cream and a frosted cupcake as per meal ticket,. 4. Resident # 18 did not receive 4 ounces of split pea soup as per meal ticket, and. 5. Resident # 46 did not receive 6 ounces of split pea soup and tossed salad as per meal ticket. The findings include: The facility policy titled Food and Nutrition Services, last revised 12/23 documented nursing personnel would ensure that residents were served the correct food tray. In addition, nursing staff would report to the Food Service Director if an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview during the Recertification Survey conducted from 7/23/2024 to 7/30/2024, the facility did not ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food safety practice. Specifically, 1) kitchen equipment (mixer) was noted with dry and crusted food 2) undated unlabeled and expired foods were in the refrigerator/s. 3) there was peeling paint above the pot storage shelves 4) logs to document testing of chemicals in the 3 bay pot sink were incomplete and 5) refrigerator temperature/s were above acceptable range. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Food Preparation and Service, last revised 12/2023 documented that food and nutritional service employees shall prepare and serve food in a manner that complied with safe handling practices. During initial tour of the kitchen on 07/23/2024 at 09:18 AM the following were observed: -The dairy refrigerator contained three trays of undated food. - The dairy kitchen equipment (mixer) was noted to be unclean and contained dried food. -There were undated and unlabeled trays of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 7/23/24-7/30/24, the facility did not ensure that a resident's dignity was maintained for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #109 and #84) reviewed for Dignity. Specifically, during multiple observations, the catheters for Residents (# 109, #84) did not have privacy bag/s and were visible to roommate/s and/or visitors. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Catheter Guidelines: Urinary, dated 9/11/23 documented urinary catheter use would adhere to principles of dignity to include discrete use and privacy (e.g., covering urinary catheter drainage bags). 1. Resident # 109 had diagnoses that included Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidus, Morbid Obesity, and Diabetes Mellitus. The 6/19/24 Physician Orders documented foley catheter. The Care Plan: Indwelling Foley Catheter, dated 6/19/24, documented maintain privacy bag. The admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 6/27/24 documented Resident #109 had severely impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during a Recertification Survey from 7/23/2024 through 7/30/2024, the facility did not ensure that the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman was given written notice of the transfer or discharge of residents. This was evident for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #2 and #96) reviewed for hospitalization. The findings are: Resident #2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes, Hyperlipidemia, and Hypertension. On 4/1/2024, the resident experienced a change in medical status and generalized weakness and the physician ordered that the resident be transferred to the emergency room for evaluation. During an interview with the facility Director of Social work on 7/30/2024 at 10:39 AM, they stated they did not have documented evidence that Ombudsman notification of discharge and/or transfer had been provided to the Office of Long Term Care Ombudsman. Resident #96 was admitted with diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of the Prostate, Joint…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey from 7/23/24-7/30/24, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed for 1 of 1 resident (#364) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter. Specifically, there were no care plans in place to address care of indwelling urinary catheter for Resident #364. Findings include: The facility policy titled Care Plans - Comprehensive created on 10/2015 and last reviewed on 10/2029 documented a comprehensive, person - centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Resident # 364 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including fracture of the Left Femur, Fracture of the Left Radius, and Obstructive Uropathy. The Hospital Note dated 7/16/2024 documented follow up appointment with Urology, Surgery for voiding trials. The 7/18/24 Nursing Note documented the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter size 18 French 5-10 cc…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY00321083), it was determined that for one of five residents (Resident #263) reviewed for unnecessary medication, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided for each resident who required such services consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals. Specifically, for Resident # 263 there was a lack of consistent pain assessment and monitoring of effectiveness of pain medication. The findings is:: The current facility policy, titled Pain Assessment, last revised 3/2023 documented each resident would be assessed for pain and if present would have an effective pain management plan in place that would allow for optimal independence and an improved quality of life. The Licensed Nurse would document the following for PRN (as needed) pain medications: location of pain, pain level prior to medication, pain scale used, non-pharmacological interventions, pharmacological…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted from [DATE] to [DATE], the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards, including expiration dates when applicable for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms, and 1 of 3 treatment carts reviewed. Specifically, the treatment cart on 1 [NAME] had two boxes of DynaGinate AG, Silver Calcium Alginate rope dressings containing the name of a discharged resident (one box had a [DATE] expiration date and the second box had a [DATE] expiration date) and the Medication Storage Room on 2 East, had a box containing Ear Wax Removal Drops with an expiration date of 12/23. The findings are: The facility policy titled Medication - Storage revised on 1/2019 documented expired, discontinued and/or contaminated medications would be removed from the medication storage areas and disposed of in accordance with facility policy. During an observation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY