Montgomery Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 313 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 106 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.70 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 91.8 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted from 1/7/25 to 1/14/25, the facility did not ensure a clean and home like environment was maintained for 1 of 2 nursing units (South unit). Specifically, (1) the floor and radiators in room [ROOM NUMBER], #129 and #130 were dirty, the walls and closet trim in room [ROOM NUMBER] had chipped and scuffed paint, room [ROOM NUMBER] had feces on the toilet and room [ROOM NUMBER] had a brown liquid spill on the floor and (2) a meal tray was provided to Resident #24 and contained a hot beverage cup and utensils with a build up of lime deposit stains. The findings include: The policy and procedure titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces effective 9/30/2020 last reviewed 3/2024 documented environmental surfaces will be cleaned and disinfected according to current CDC recommendations for disinfection of healthcare facilities and the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard. Walls, blinds, and window curtains in resident areas will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 1/7/25 to 1/14/25, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility did not meet minimum staffing requirements for Certified Nurse Aides as documented on the Facility Assessment on 10 of 28 days reviewed. The findings are: The Facility Assessment Staffing Plan Minimum Staffing documented Day shift: 3 Licensed Nurses on both units and 3 Nurse Aides on both units. Evening shift: 2 Licensed Nurses on both units and 3 Nurse Aides on both units. Night shift: 1 Licensed Nurse on both units and 2 Nurse Aides on both units. Actual staffing from December 9 2024 to January 6 2025 documented: 12/14/24 South Unit 11:00 PM-7:00 AM one Certified Nurse Aide, and North Unit 11:00 PM-3:00 AM one Certified Nurse Aide. 12/22/24 North Unit 7:00 PM-9:30 PM two Certified Nurse Aides. 12/25/24 South Unit 7:00 AM-12:00 PM two Certified Nurse Aides. 12/28/24 North Unit 10:00 AM-1:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey from 1/7/25 to 1/14/25, the facility did not ensure Certified Nurse Aide performance appraisals were completed at least once every 12 months for 5 of 5 Certified Nurse Aides reviewed. Specifically, performance appraisals were not documented every 12 months for Certified Nurse Aides #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5. The findings are: There was no documented evidence that performance appraisals were completed every 12 months for Certified Nurse Aide #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5. During an interview on 1/08/25 at 9:25 AM the Director of Nursing stated they were aware that performance appraisals should be completed for the Certified Nurse Aides and stated they were responsible for writing the performance appraisals. 10 NYCRR 415.12(h)(1)

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 1/7/25 to 1/14/25, the facility did not ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, 1. the refrigerators contained food and/or packages that were unlabeled, had no received on date, and did not contain an expiration date, 2. the walk-in freezer contained food and/or packages that were unlabeled and not properly sealed to prevent freezer burn, and 3. the dry storage pantry contained food products that did not contain expiration dates. The findings are: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 1/7/25 at 09:52 AM accompanied by the Director of Food Services, the following was observed in the food service refrigerators/walk in freezer and dry storage area: The Refrigerator contained: -Six 80 individual slice packs of American Cheese with no expiration date -One unlabeled container of beef meatballs -Three and one-half trays of eggs with no received date and no expiration date -One unlabeled/undated container of thawed chicken thighs -One…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey from 1/7/25 to 1/14/25, the facility did not ensure infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection was maintained for 2 of 8 residents ( #49, and #66) reviewed for Infection Control. Specifically, 1) the facility did not properly implement transmission-based precautions for Resident #49 and 2) the facility did not ensure an infection surveillance plan was implemented for identifying, tracking, and monitoring infections, communicable diseases, and outbreaks for Resident #49 and # 66, The findings are: The Policy titled Transmission-Based Precaution last updated 7/8/20/24 documented transmission- based precautions shall be used when caring for residents who are documented or suspected to have communicable diseases of infections that can be transmitted to others. Droplet precautions are to be implemented for residents known to be infected with microorganisms that can be transmitted by droplets which includes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00359070 ) from 1/7/2025 to 1/14/2024, the facility did not ensure that an effective pest control program was maintained so that the facility was free of rodents on 1 of 2 units (South) and the physical therapy department. Specifically, there was no documented evidence of facility follow up/monitoring to assess ongoing need and/or effectiveness of interventions put in place by the pest control company to eradicate and/or contain mice. The findings are: The policy and procedure effective 3/2019 last reviewed 3/2024 titled Pest Control documented this facility maintains an ongoing pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. The Pest Control Logbook dated 2/7/24 to 1/8/25 documented mice were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] and #106 on 4/16/24, a mole was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER], and maintenance shop on 10/15/24, a mouse was in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 10/15/24, and a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a recertification survey from 01/07/25 to 01/14/25, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a dignified experience for 2 of 2 residents (Residents # 65 and Resident # 341) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, 1) Licensed Practical Nurse # 31 was observed standing over Resident # 65 while feeding them their lunch meal and 2) Resident # 341's urine collection bag was observed uncovered and visible to other residents and visitors. The findings include: 1)The facility policy titled Assistance with Meals dated 3/2/24 documented residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident. Residents who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention to safety, comfort, and dignity for example, not standing over residents while assisting them with meals. Resident # 65 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarct, Diabetes, and Atrial Fibrillation. The 7/17/23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey from 1/7/25 to 1/14/25, the facility did not ensure that a Level 1 Screen was thoroughly completed prior to admission to the nursing home for 2 of 23 residents (Resident #1 and #30) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening. Specifically, questions #23 through #27 were left blank on the Level 1 Screen for Resident #1,and questions #27 through #35 were left blank on the Level 1 Screen for Resident #30. The findings include: The facility Policy and Procedure titled PASRR Screening effective 3/2019 last reviewed 3/2024 documented, it is the policy of the facility that all residents must have a PASRR Screen upon admission to this facility and, thereafter, when there is a significant change that has a bearing on the resident's specialized service needs. The screen assesses residents for mental illness, dementia and mental retardation. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Cerebral Palsy Seizure Disorder and Dysphagia. The Quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 1/7/25 to 1/14/25, the facility did not ensure that the comprehensive person-centered care plan was followed for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, for Resident #11, the use of Bilateral Fall Mats were not implemented as per Care Plan after a 10/8/24 fall. The Findings Include: The undated Policy and Procedure titled Accident/Fall Prevention documented a plan of care to prevent falls/injury would be developed. The plan of care would include but not limited to floor mattress, low bed. Each resident would be provided a fall prevention device as needed and the staff would ensure that they were in working order. Resident #11 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to Encephalopathy, Dementia, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The Care Plan titled Risk for Falls effective 10/5/24 last updated 1/5/25 documented an actual fall on 10/8/24, Bilateral Fall Mats. The 5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 1/07/2025 from 1/14/2025, the facility did not ensure residents who required dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) received services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #68) reviewed for Dialysis. Specifically, there was no documented evidence of consistent assessment and oversight before, during and after dialysis treatment for Resident #68 who received Hemodialysis treatments at a community-based Dialysis Center. Additionally, communication and collaboration between the facility and the Dialysis Center was not consistently documented Findings include: Policy & Procedure titled Hemodialysis dated 3/2019 last reviewed 3/2/2024 documented there will be ongoing communication between the interdisciplinary team and the dialysis center. To ensure exchange of information required to care for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY