Livingston County Center for Nursing and Rehabilit

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 193 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 266 beds and averages 258.2 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (Incident #2610304) completed from 09/29/2025 to 10/10/2025, the facility did not ensure residents are free of significant medication errors for two (2) of five (5) residents (Resident #2 and #3) reviewed. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 prepared medications for Residents #2 and #3 at the same time, left the medications intended for Resident #3 at Resident #2's bedside, and Resident #2 mistakenly took the medications. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #2 that is not Immediate Jeopardy. The findings are:The facility policy Medication Administration, dated 02/12/2025, included medications may not be prepared in advance and may not be left for resident self-administration outside of the licensed nurse's view. Resident #2 had diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (rapid heart rate), and heart failure. The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 06/26/2025 documented the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for four (4) of nine (9) resident's reviewed (Residents #166, #176, #185, and #225). Specifically, Resident #166 was observed on multiple occasions with overgrown facial hair. Resident #176 had long facial hair on the upper lip. Resident #185 had long chin hair and facial hair at the corners of their upper lip. Resident #225 had long facial hair. Additionally, the facility lacked documented evidence staff consistently offered, provided, or documented grooming services or refusals in accordance with the residents assessed needs and preferences.The findings include, but are not limited to:The undated facility policy titled Shaving the Resident indicated it was the policy of the center to follow established techniques when shaving residents' facial hair. Persons with basic responsibility for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were treated with respect, dignity, and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of quality of life for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed (Residents #13 and #166). Specifically, Resident #13 waited more than 45 minutes for their lunch meal after all other residents had been served resulting in emotional distress, and Resident #166 was repeatedly visible from the hallway while unclothed. This findings include: The facility policy titled Meal Service, revised September 2001, included the responsibility of the Licensed Nurse and Certified Nursing Assistant was to distribute food trays to residents in resident rooms, dining rooms, and ancillary dining rooms in a timely manner. A tray sequence may be used in dining rooms, so all residents seated at a table were served at the same time. Resident #13 had diagnoses including diabetes, cerebral palsy, and anxiety disorder. The Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (Intake ID: 02610304) from 09/29/2025 to 10/10/2025, the facility did not ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for two (2) (Residents #2 and #4) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, medications were left unsupervised at the bedsides of Resident #2 and Resident #4, and there was no evidence the residents had medical orders or were assessed for their ability to safely and competently self-administer medications. Additionally, an unlocked medication cart was left unattended in a common hallway.The findings are:The facility policy Medication Administration last reviewed 02/12/2025 included, but was not limited to, medications may not be left for resident self-administration outside of the licensed nurse's view. During administration of medications, the licensed nurse must maintain line of sight of the medication cart and when not physically at the medication cart, it must be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey 11/2/23 to 11/8/23, it was determined that for 6 (Residents #'s 23, 54, 98, 128, 140, and 674) of 37 residents reviewed for care planning, the facility did not develop a person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the residents medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs and included goals, desired outcomes and preferences. Specifically, there was no CCP to address refusals of care (Resident #54), an indwelling urinary catheter (Resident #98), pressure ulcers and non-pressure skin conditions (Residents #'s 23, 140 and 674) and the use of psychotropic medications (medications to treat mental illness that can have severe side effects) and anti-coagulant medications (medications to prevent blood clots that require close monitoring) (Resident #128). This is evidenced by but not limited to the following: The facility policy, Care Plan- Baseline &…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/2/23 to 11/8/23, it was determined that for one (Resident #61) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), the facility did not ensure the resident received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. Specifically, Resident #61 was observed on multiple occasions with sharp, jagged fingernails. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Nails, Care of (Finger and Toe), dated 3/13/15, included that the facility would provide residents with fingernail and toenail care in order to promote health and good hygiene. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) could perform the procedure if the resident was not at risk for complications, and a licensed nurse would perform if the resident was high-risk. Additionally, a Podiatrist could perform the procedure on residents if nails were thick or if unable to be managed by nursing staff. Resident #61 was admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey 11/2/23 to 11/8/23 it was determined that for one (Resident #194) of two residents reviewed for pain management the facility did not manage the resident's pain to the extent possible in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care, current professional standards of practice, and the resident's goals and preferences. Specifically, there was a lack of consistent pain assessments, monitoring of the effectiveness of the pain management plan of care, and the lack of medical provider notification after continued verbalization of pain and refusals of pain medications. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Pain Management, dated 1/24/19, directed the staff to look for nonverbal signs of pain including facial expression, agitation, crying, combative, anxious, moaning, screaming, and calling out. The policy included pain not meeting the resident comfort goal by using pharmacologic or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/2/23-11/8/23 the facility did not ensure a resident who displayed or was diagnosed with dementia received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (Resident #128) of four residents reviewed for dementia care. Specifically, the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of a person-centered care plan that included interventions specific to Resident #128 dementia, did not address the resident's behaviors, goals, or interventions required and did not address the use of multiple psychotropic medications or the monitoring of. The is evidenced by the following: Resident #128 had diagnosis including non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, mental disorder, and repeated falls. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/10/23, documented that Resident #128 had severe impairment of cognitive function, had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey 11/2/23 - 11/8/23 it was determined that for two (Resident # 144 and Resident #727) of five residents observed during medication administration, the facility did not ensure it was free of a medication rate of 5 percent (%) or greater. There were 2 medications errors for 26 opportunities resulting in a 7.7% medication error rate. The issues included the administration of one medication at the wrong time and the crushing a delayed-release medication that was labeled on the box Do not crush. This is evidenced by the following: 1.Resident #727 had diagnoses that include hypothyroidism (a condition of the thyroid gland that can cause multiple health issues including heart issues), dementia, and congestive heart failure. Current Physician orders included, but not limited to: Synthroid 50 micrograms (mcg) daily at 6:00 AM for hypothyroidism with instructions to be given on an empty stomach before breakfast. During an observation on 11/7/23 at 8:30 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/2/23 to 11/8/23, it was determined that for one (Resident #132) of five residents reviewed for immunizations, the facility was unable to provide documentation that Resident #132 (who was eligible) had been offered, declined, and/or educated on the Pneumococcal immunization or had received it prior to admission. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Infection Control, Pneumococcal Vaccine (Pneumovax 23, Prevnar 13), dated 10/25/22 documented, it shall be the policy of the [NAME] County Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation that all residents will be offered the pneumococcal vaccine (Pneumovax 23, Prevnar 13) to aid in preventing infections and pneumonia. Prior to or upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the Pneumococcal vaccine, and when indicated, provided the vaccination within 30 days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident refuses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-01-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey, completed on 1/28/22, it was determined that for one (first floor- Lilac) of two units reviewed for medication storage, the facility did not ensure that an accurate reconciliation of all controlled substances was maintained. Specifically, the Controlled Substance Record sheets which included reconciliation of narcotic medications and the signatures of staff members for each shift-to-shift count were not completed to validate the correct controlled substance count. This is evidenced by the following: The undated facility policy titled Narcotic Count documented that the facility will ensure that narcotic count is complete, and the keys are reconciled. Each medication administered must be logged on a controlled substance administration sheet and the balance must be reconciled between nurses. The procedure for surrendering controlled substances will be in accordance with Public Health Law. During medication storage review on 1/27/22 at 9:00 a.m., the Lilac unit shift-shift narcotic count…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-10-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY