Northern Manor Geriatric Center Inc
199 N Middletown Road, Nanuet, NY 10954 · Non profit - Corporation · 231 certified beds · (845) 623-3904 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Oct 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.8% | 14.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.3% | 5.8% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 56.6% | 19.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.5% | 12.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.3% | 13.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.9% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.9% | 6.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.0% | 19.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.0% | 13.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.1% | 78.8% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.7% | 20.6% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.8% | 9.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.47 | 1.70 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.38 | 1.36 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
36.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 106 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 100 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 36.0%CMS range 27.7–45.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 6.8–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 54.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 91.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 84.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 11.8%CMS range 7.7–16.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.31 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 231 beds and averages 227.7 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
During observation and interview during the Recertification Survey conducted from 12/3/24 through 12/10/24 the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and care in a manner and environment that promoted dignity while dining. Specifically, the facility did not avoid daily use of disposable cutlery and/or dishware for residents on [NAME] 1 and North 1. Residents were observed eating meals from styrofoam plates and/or using plastic utensils on 3 separate days. The findings are: During observation on 12/03/24 at 12:32 PM, of the lunch meal in [NAME] 1 Unit Dining Room, Residents #20, #19, #201, and #180 were served their food on styrofoam plates. During observation on 12/04/24 at 1:09 PM, of the lunch meal in the [NAME] 1 Unit Dining Room, Residents #201, #19, #17, and #180 were served their food on styrofoam plates and were given plastic utensils During observation on 12/06/24 at 8:46 AM, of the breakfast meal on the [NAME] 1 Unit, Resident # 45,#10, #202, #23, and #130 were served their food in styrofoam containers. During observation on 12/06/24 at 8:50 AM, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00340747) surveys from 12/3/24 to 12/10/24, the facility did not ensure residents' rights to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment on 4 units. Specifically, 1) Center 3 Unit, walls were chipped in 3 rooms, holes were observed in 2 rooms, wallpaper was peeling in one room, and paint was peeling in 11 rooms, 2)Resident #578 on the Center 1 Unit stated when showered they sat on a shower chair with a torn seat and wet exposed wood and 3) a dust covered fan was blowing on Resident #42 with a tracheostomy. The findings are: The facility policy, Homelike Environment dated 9/2022 documented residents were provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The facility policy, Maintenance Services Operations dated 10/12 documented Maintenance Department was responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times. Functions of the maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-10 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00340747) surveys from 12/3/2024 to 12/10/2024, the facility did not ensure each nurse aide received twelve hours of in-service education per year based on their individual performance review. Specifically, 1.) One of five Certified Nurse Aides (#12) did not have the required 12-hour mandatory in service education per year, and 2.) Four of five Certified Nurse Aides (#12, 13, 14 and 15) annual performance reviews were not up to date. Finding Include: Review of Certified Nurse Aides # 12, #13, #14, 15 and #16 in - service records revealed: Certified Nurse Aide #12 was hired 3/30/1998 and there was no documented evidence that inservice was provided in 2023. Review of Certified Nurse Aides # 12, #13, #14, 15 and #16 annual performance evaluations revealed: Certified Nurse Aide #12 was hired 3/30/1998, and there was no documented evidence that a performance evaluation was completed. Certified Nurse Aide #13 was hired 7/11/1993, and their performance evaluation was undated.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-10 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review during the recertification survey conducted 12/3/24-12/10/24, the facility did not ensure each staff and resident was screened, offered the COVID-19 vaccine and provided education regarding the benefits, risks and potential side effects associated with the vaccine for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 193) and 10 of 10 staff reviewed for COVID vaccines. Specifically, there was no documented evidence of immunization records for COVID vaccine for Resident #193. Additionally, there was no documented evidence of immunization records for COVID vaccine for the Director of Admissions, Certified Nurse Aide #6/#19/#21, Licensed Practical Nurse #22/#23, Occupational Therapist #24, Registered Nurse #25/#10 and Cook, #20. Findings include: The facility policy titled COVID-19 Vaccination for Residents and Staff last revised 11/27/24 documented the facility follows guidance from The Centers for Disease Control as well as Federal and State requirements among residents, staff and others. The facility shall provide education about the importance of receiving the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey from 12/3/24 to 12/10/24, the facility did not ensure residents and/or their designated representative were fully informed of their right to an expedited review of a service termination. Specifically, for one of three residents (Resident #300) reviewed for Beneficiary Protection, the facility did not ensure the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage form (CMS-10123) was provided to the resident and/or representative at a minimum of two days prior to the end of Medicare Part A covered services. The findings are: There was no documented evidence of a policy specific to the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage, and the two-day requirement to provide notice to the beneficiary or representative. The 8/27/24 progress note documented Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage was not provided to Resident #300 and family representative. There was no documented evidence the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage was provided to the designated representative/contact person for Resident #300. During an interview on 12/6/24 at 3:58 PM, the Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00360711) surveys from 12/3/24 to 12/10/24, the facility did not ensure residents or resident representatives were notified in writing of the facility bed hold policy for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #529, #179, #169, and #148) reviewed for hospitalization. Specifically, residents were transferred to the hospital and the facility was unable to provide evidence that written notice of facility bed hold policy was given to the residents or their representatives. The findings are: The facility Bed Hold policy dated 3/2018 documented, 'prior to or at the time of a transfer (or as soon as practicable following an emergency transfer), written information (bed hold information and agreement) will be given to the resident and/or the resident representative that explains in detail: the rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed-holds, reserve bed payment policy as indicated by the resident's primary insurance policy, the resident/representative's option to pay privately to reserve their bed if their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 12/3/24 to 12/10/24, the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals in 2 of 4 medication storage rooms were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards. Specifically, one bottle of over-the-counter medication and two bottles of tube feeding formula had past due expiration dates. The findings include: The revised-on January 2019 facility policy titled Medication- Storage documented expired, discontinued and/or contaminated medications will be removed from the medication storage areas and disposed of in accordance with facility policy. During observation on 12/05/24 at 1:28 PM, a bottle of Aspirin 325 mg tablets with an expiration date of 10/24 was on the shelf in the Center 1 Unit medication storage room. During an interview on 12/5/24 at 1:28 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse #2 stated the nurse manger was responsible for checking the medications in the medication storage room. During an interview on 12/05/24 at 2:02 PM, Registered Nurse Unit Manager #3 stated they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 12/03/24 to 12/10/24, the facility did not ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food safety practice. Specifically, there was undated food stored in the walk-in refrigerator and in 1 of 3 unit food refrigerators. Findings include: The facility policy titled Food Storage: Refrigerator Food Storage revised May 2024 documented all foods should be covered, labeled, and dated. All foods will be checked to assure that foods (including leftovers) will be consumed by their safe use by dates or frozen (where applicable) or discarded. The facility policy titled Unit Food Storage revised April 2023 documented all resident food items will be dated with a use by date. During observation and interview on 12/03/24 at 9:43 AM, the walk-in refrigerator contained two undated sandwiches on a tray. The Food Service Director stated the sandwiches were made today, and that was the reason there was no date on the sandwiches. Approximately five single cheese slices were observed on a plate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0841 — isolatedDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00348289, NY00348920) surveys from [DATE] to [DATE], the facility did not ensure the Medical Director fulfilled their responsibility for the implementation of resident care when a resident died. This was evident for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #379) reviewed for death. Specifically, the Medical Director was designated as the individual to sign the death certificate for Resident #379. In accordance with State Public Health Law 4041, this was required within 72 hours of death. Resident #379 died on [DATE] and the Medical Director signed the death certificate on [DATE]. Findings include: The facility policy titled - Death- documented for Resident Pronouncement and Release to Mortuary, the primary healthcare provider (or designee) will complete and sign a death certificate in accordance with state or county law (e.g., as soon as possible but not to exceed 72 hours). Resident #379 had diagnoses including subdural hematoma,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 12/3/24 to 12/10/24, the facility did not ensure each resident was offered pneumococcal immunizations and received education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunizations for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #193) reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence Resident #193 was offered, declined, or educated on the pneumococcal immunization. Findings include: The facility policy dated 8/22/24 and titled Resident Vaccines documented the facility will offer immunizations to the residents, following their consent to aid in the prevention of infectious conditions in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices. Prior to receiving vaccines, the resident will be provided information and education regarding the potential side effects of the vaccination. The facility should collect vaccination history on admission. A provision of education shall be documented in the resident medical record. Historical information data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00343390, NY00339693), the facility did not ensure the environment was functional, sanitary, and comfortable for residents, staff, and the public. Specifically, the kitchen floor by the washing machine had about 2 inches of water pooled, and staff were actively working in the area, multiple areas of the building had chipped paint, scratched paint, scuff marks, visible dirt and stains on the walls and floors, peeling wallpaper and foul odors. Finding include: During an observation in the kitchen on 9/6/2024 at 10:20AM, surveyor observed a pool of water about 2inches on the floor by the wash machine. During an interview on 090/06/2024 at 10:20 AM, the Dietary Aide stated an outside vendor was called to repair the leak from the wash machine which had been leaking for a week. The vendor came in on 9/4/2024 with their supervisor and the repairs was not completed. There was still water on the floor after they left. During a walk through on the units…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00333515, NY00331035, NY00327139, NY00321114) the facility did not ensure the resident representative was immediately informed of a significant change in the resident's physical status or a need to alter treatment significantly. This was evident for 3 out of 4 residents (Residents #17, #19, #20) reviewed for notification of changes. Specifically, (1) Resident #17 had an electrocardiogram on 12/22/2023 in the facility which revealed a low heart rate, and their anti-hypertension medication was discontinued, Resident #17's guardian was not informed. (2) Resident #19 on 10/05/2023 was discontinued from the tracheostomy collar oxygenation and was placed on a ventilator, Resident 19's daughter was not notified. (3) Resident #20 had an episode of respiratory distress with decreased oxygen saturation on 07/29/2023, and on 07/30/2023 they vomited x 1 and had decreased oxygen saturations and was placed on a ventilator. There was no documented evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-31 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00339693, NY00341303, NY00343390, NY00333515,) the facility did not ensure resident's right to be free from misappropriation of resident property. This was evident for 3 out of 3 residents (Resident #14, #16, #17) reviewed for personal property. Specifically, Resident #14's advocate stated the resident's glasses went missing during one of their hospitalizations and they have not been returned yet. 2) Resident #16's cell phone was not returned to the family after they expired in the facility on [DATE]. Resident #16's family stated the cell phone was being used by someone in the facility after they expired, and they have since had the service turned off. 3)Resident #17's guardian stated the resident's wallet was missing after their admission to the facility. They discovered a charge from the facility on the debit card shortly after their admission to the facility. There was no documented grievances or investigations, or local enforcement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00343390, NY00339693, NY00345193, NY00341303, NY00331035, NY00325315) the facility did not ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 6 out of 7 residents (Residents #1, #14, #15, #16, #19, #21) reviewed for quality of care. Specifically, (1) Resident #1's certified nurse assistant accountability documentation revealed that in a 2-month period, there were no signatures for bladder/incontinence care being provided on 9 occasions; (2) On 090/06/2024 Resident #14 was observed lying in bed with a catheter draining leg bag in place Review of Resident #15's certified nurse assistant accountability record revealed that in a 3-month period there were no signatures for bladder/bowel incontinence care being provided on 25 occasions; (4) Resident #16's certified nurse assistant accountability report for April 2024 revealed on 5 occasions there was no signature indicating bladder/bowel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00343390, NY00345193, NY00341303, NY00339693, NY00333515, NY00331035, NY00327139, NY00321114, NY00325315), the facility did not ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This was evident for 13 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13) out of 19 residents reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, the Residents on the Center 2 Unit did not receive their scheduled medications on 06/09/2024 during the 7:30 AM to 3:30 PM shift. There was no evidence in the Medication Administration record that the scheduled physician prescribed medications were administered to the residents and no notification to the physician the medications were missed or not administered. Findings include: The Facility Medication Administration policy dated 09/2015 and last revised 08/2019 documented Licensed Nurses must ensure that prior to the end of their shift all medications administered/refused/held etc., are properly documented on the Medication Administration Record. Failure to do so…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00341303) the facility did not ensure that services being provided meet professional standards of quality in clinical practice for 1 out of 16 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, Resident #16 was noted to have an elevated Prothrombin time (which measures the time it takes for liquid portion of blood to clot) and INR (International Normalizing Ratio (a blood test that measures how long it takes the blood to clot) PT/INR of 71.6/7.4(seconds) on [DATE] with a reference range of (PT-9.9-12.7/INR-0.9-1.1) indicating the blood is taking longer than normal to clot. Resident #16 was ordered to receive 10mg Vitamin K (vitamin needed for blood clotting) to be administered intramuscularly by the physician on [DATE] at 4:47PM. The Vitamin K was not readily available in the facility. Staff did not notify the physician that the Vitamin K was not available. Resident #16's Vitamin K was not administered until 12:58…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00339051), the facility did not ensure residents right to be free from abuse for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 4/12/2024, Resident #3 was transferred to a different unit due to verbal aggression with their roommate. The receiving unit was not notified of the incident of verbal aggression with their roommate which prompted the transfer. Resident #3 punched Resident #4 in the face and was transferred to the hospital and was admitted for psychosis. Findings include: The facility policy, 'Abuse' revised 12/2022 documented the facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation of resident/patient property by anyone including but not limited to staff, family, friends and residents of the facility. The facility prohibits any exploitation of the mentally and physically disabled resident in the facility. The facility has designed and implemented processes, which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews conducted during the abbreviated surveys (NY00339051), the facility did not ensure that appropriate behavioral care was provided to address the problem of refusals and delusions for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for the use of psychoactive medications. Specifically, Resident #3 refused their antipsychotic medication Haldol as ordered by the medical provider at 9 AM and 5 PM on 4/11/24, refused to eat, and stated they thought they were being poisoned, and the medical provider was not notified. The following day, Resident #3 punched their roommate in the face, Resident #3 was transferred to the hospital, and was admitted for psychosis. Findings include: The Facility Policy titled Psychotropic Medication revised 7/2019 documented that the facility supports the goal of determining the underlying cause of behavioral symptoms so the appropriate treatment of environmental, medical and /or behavioral interventions as well as psychopharmacological medications can be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00339051), the facility did not ensure that a resident was free of significant medication errors for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed. Specifically, on 4/11/2024 Resident #3 refused their significant medications that included antipsychotic medication, anticoagulant, cardiovascular, and steroid/bronchodilator. There was no consistent documentation on the Medication Administration Record of the refusal and that the medical provider was notified of the missed medications. Consequently, on 4/12/2024, Resident #3 punched their roommate in the face and was transferred and admitted to the hospital with admitting diagnosis of psychosis. The findings are: The facility policy, 'Medication Administration' revised 12/2019 documented medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required timeframe. If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall document as such in designated format (hard copy or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00312813), the facility did not ensure grievances were resolved in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 of 3 resident (Resident # 3) reviewed for grievances/complaints. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that a thorough investigation was completed after Resident #1 and family representative reported missing clothing's. The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Investigation of Grievance/concerns dated 3/2016, reviewed on 1/18/2023 documented that the facility residents and representatives may submit a grievance orally, in writing and anonymously. The Director of Social Work is the facility's Grievance Officer and is responsible for facilitating the complaint/grievance process, and the corresponding department will investigate the allegation(s) and submit a written report of such findings within 7 business days. Resident # 3 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to Urinary tract infection, benign neoplasm of the meninges (brain), and seizures. The admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY0333863), the facility did not ensure that an alleged violation involving abuse was reported to the New York State Department of Health. In addition, the results of all investigation were not reported within 5 working days of the incident with corrective action taken to the New York State Department of Health in accordance with State law. This was evident for 1 (Resident# 1) out of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #1 alleged they reported that they were sexually assaulted 3 times by facility staff on 12/2/23 and 12/3/23, there was no documented evidence that the allegation was reported to the New York State Department of Health. Findings include: Resident#1 had diagnoses that included dependence on respirator [ventilator] status, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and legal blindness. The Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 12/7/23 documented that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the an abbreviated survey (NY03333863) , the facility did not ensure that an alleged violation involving abuse was reported to the New York State Department of Health. In addition, the results of all investigation were reported within 5 working days of the incident with corrective action taken to the New York State Department of Health in accordance with State law. This was evident for 1 (Resident# 1) out of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #1 alleged they were sexually assaulted 3 times by facility staff on 12/2/23 and 12/3/23, there was no documented confirmation or receipt of reporting of the allegation or the results of the allegation to the New York State Department of Health. Findings include: Resident#1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on respirator [ventilator] status, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and legal blindness. The Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00312813), the facility did not ensure that a resident was given the opportunity to participate in their care plan meeting. This was evident for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for care plans. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that the resident and resident representative/family was invited and/or attended a care plan meeting during their stay in the facility. The findings are: Resident # 3 was admitted with a diagnosis including but not limited to Urinary tract infection, benign neoplasm of the meninges (brain), and seizures. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 1/30/2023 documented the resident was cognitively intact and was able to make self-understood and understands others. Record review of the Social Services Progress Notes revealed no documented evidence that Resident #3 participated in any interdisciplinary care plan meeting during their stay in the facility from 01/30/2023 to 03/16/2023. During an interview on 4/30/24 at 11:04 am, Social Worker…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY0333863), the facility did not ensure a resident that had an indwelling catheter received appropriate treatment and services as evidenced for 1 (Resident #1) out of 3 residents reviewed for indwelling catheter care. Specifically, Resident #1 who had a history neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder had no documented evidence of receiving indwelling catheter care every day and every shift as ordered on 7 occasions in December 2023 and subsequently was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection. Findings include: Review of the catheter care policy dated 7/2016 and last revised 5/2019 documented that the purpose of the procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections and provide required care of resident's who have an indwelling catheter. Resident#1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on respirator [ventilator] status, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and legal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the abbreviated survey (NY00334847), the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing care to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 7 of 7 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7). Specifically, on 3/3/2024 during the 11:30 PM to 7:30 AM shift the residents who resided on the third-floor dementia unit did not receive their scheduled medications due to inadequate staffing. The scheduled licensed practical nurse for the unit did not arrive for their shift and the night nursing supervisor was not able to administer the resident's medications, due to being called to other units. The findings include: Review of the facility Policy and procedure titled, Staffing Hours revised on 04/2019 documented 1. Our facility maintains adequate staffing on each shift to ensure that our resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00334847), the facility did not ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors. This was evident for 7 of 7 Residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7) reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, a registered Nurse did not follow physician orders to administer scheduled medications during the 11:30pm to 7am shift on 2/2/2024, 2/3/2024, 2/4/2024, 2/5/2024, 2/8/2024, 3/2/2024, 3/3/2024, 3/4/2024, and 3/7/2024. There was no evidence in the Medication Administration record that the scheduled physician prescribed medications were administered to the residents. The findings are: The facility Policy titles Medication Errors dated 10/2015 and revised 8/2019 stated the staff and practitioner shall try to prevent medication errors and adverse medication consequences and shall strive to identify and manage them appropriately when they occur. The Director of Nursing should investigate the error. Counsel staff members as needed. Educate staff members on how to avoid making similar errors in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00319194), the facility did not ensure residents rights to be free from neglect for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 had a physician's order for two-person physical assistance with transfers via Hoyer lift that was also documented on the facility Task List and Care Flow Sheet for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNAs). CNA #1 transferred Resident #1 by themselves on 6/28/2023. During the transfer, Resident #1 slid out from the Hoyer lift pad and fell sustaining laceration and bleeding to the left eyebrow and swelling to the left eye. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and was diagnosed with intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain). The findings are: The Facility Policy on Neglect last revised on 02/2022 documented that the facility has designed and implemented processes which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and / or misappropriation of property. Neglect was defined as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00319194), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, and neglect are reported immediately but no later than 2 hours to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH). This was evident for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for neglect. Specifically, Resident #1 fell out from the Hoyer lift pad during transfer sustaining laceration and bleeding to the left eyebrow and swelling to the left eye on 06/28/2023 at 10:40 AM. The facility reported the incident to the NYSDOH on 06/29/2023 at 11:44 AM. The findings are: The Facility Policy on Abuse last revised on 02/2022 documented that the facility has designed and implemented processes which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and / or misappropriation of property. Neglect was defined as failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness. Notify the appropriate State Agency (s) immediately (no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview conducted during and abbreviated survey (NY00317907), the facility did not ensure that a resident was cared for in a manner that maintained or enhanced their dignity. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 6) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, Resident #6's foley catheter bag and tubing were not covered and was visible from the hallway. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Resident Rights created on 9/2013, last revised 2/2020 documented employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Residents of this facility has the right to privacy and confidentiality. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, sepsis, schizoaffective disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 6/27/2023, documented Resident #6 was severely impaired of cognitive function. Resident #6 had a foley catheter and required extensive assist of 2 staff for bed mobility, dressing, and toileting. During an observation conducted on 7/27/2023 at 10:45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00317907), the facility did not ensure residents were provided a clean, safe, and homelike environment for residents who resided on the dementia unit. Specifically, the dining room on center 3 where residents were being monitored was dirty, with multiple puddles of liquid and trash on the floor, and body fluids on the table. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure on Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces created 10/2015, last revised 6/13/2023 documented that the facility will clean and disinfect environmental surfaces according to current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for disinfection of healthcare facilities. Floors and tabletops will be cleaned and disinfected on a regular basis when spills occur and when the surfaces are visibly soiled. During an observation conducted on 7/26/2023 at 11:15AM on Unit Center 3 (dementia unit) dining room, the survey team observed 9 residents present, 4 were sitting at the table and others were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00317907), it was determined that for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for Quality of Care, the facility did not ensure the resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and their comprehensive person-centered care plan. Specifically, Residents on enteral feedings did not have the appropriate labeling of the enteral feeding and free water supply. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Infection Prevention and Control created 10/2015, last revised 4/26/2023 documented this facility follows infection prevention and control policies, procedures, and practices intended to maintain a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment while helping to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This facility follows standards of practice in regards to infection and prevention and control guidance. The facility policy and procedure titled Enteral Feedings created 1/2015, last revised 4/2020…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the 6/27/2022-7/6/2022 Recertification Survey, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for one of three residents (resident #97) reviewed for ADL's. Specifically, resident #97 had long and dirty fingernails during multiple observations. The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled ADL Support dated 10/2019, revised 3/2022 documented residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Additionally, if residents with cognitive impairment or dementia resist care, staff will attempt to identify the underlying cause of the problem and not just assume is refusing or declining care. Resident #97 had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (unspecified),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey started on 6/27/22 and completed on 7/6/22, the facility did not ensure the Consultant Pharmacist reported irregularities to the attending physician and the facilities Medical Director and Director of Nursing (DON) for one (Residents #68) of five residents reviewed for drug regimen reviews. Specifically, the lack of Consultant Pharmacist's identification and recommendation regarding the continued use of Risperdal (antipsychotic medication) without attempt of a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for resident #68. The findings are: The policy and procedure (P&P) titled Antipsychotic Medication Use revision dated 2/2022 documented antipsychotic medication will be prescribed at lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review. Diagnoses alone do not warrant the use of antipsychotic medication. Antipsychotic medications will generally only be considered if the following if the following criteria are also met: a. The behavioral symptoms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey started on 6/27/22 and completed on 7/6/22, the facility did not meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines and follow the prepared menus. Specifically, three (North 1, Center 1, and South 1) of seven units were not served proper portion size of starch (mashed potatoes) during the lunch meal on 6/29/22. The finding is: The policy and procedure (P&P) titled Portion Control Policy updated 9/2021 documented menu items shall be served according to pre-determined portion size. Portion size on spreadsheet reflects the amount of the menu item required to provide nutrient standards for that item when prepared according to the standardized recipe. Appropriate serving utensil is used to accurately serve designated portion size. The undated Portion Control Guide documented the portion size for starches, including mashed potatoes, was ½ cup, #8 scoop (gray scoop) or 4 oz (ounce) spoodle (green spoodle). The undated Scoops, Ladles & Proper Portion Control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident has the right to make choices about aspects of life that are significant to the resident. Specifically, a resident who requested more than one shower a week was not accommodated by the nursing staff. This was evident for 1 resident reviewed for choices.(Resident #86). The findings are: Resident # 86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and traumatic brain injury During an interview on 12/31/18 at 10:00 AM the resident stated that he only gets one shower per week, though he had requested 2 showers weekly. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 11/9/18 revealed that the Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score was a 15 out of a possible score of 15 indicating the resident is cognitively intact. The interview for daily preferences documented that it was very important to the resident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during the most recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that advance directives regarding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) formulated for 3 of 10 would be honored at all times. Specifically, staff did not consitently implement the system developed by the facility to readily identify each resident status regarding CPR in the event that CPR was indicated. The findings are: According to the facility's policy on Advanced Directives a resident with a written consent not to be resuscitated should be identified by the wearing of a red identification band/bracelet. Observation revealed that this policy was not implemented for the following residents: 1. Resident #5 is an [AGE] year old wheelchair bound female with diagnoses to include dementia. The resident has had a written consent for a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order since at least [DATE]. On [DATE] at 12:15 PM and on [DATE] in the morning the resident was on observed without any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not develop and implement a person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and time frames in accordance with comprehensive assessments for 1) one of three residents' (R #4) reviewed for behavioral/emotional problems, 2) one of two residents' (R#113) reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence, and 3) one of two resident's (R#127) reviewed for dementia care. The findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted with diagnoses including Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Schizophrenia and Diabetes. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment and screening tool) of 1/5/19 indicated the resident was receiving antipsychotic and antidepressant medications during the last 7 days of the assessment period. The January 2019 physician's orders indicated the resident's current psychotropic medications included Risperdal, an antipsychotic and Wellbutrin, an antidepressant. Review of the comprehensive care plan (CCP) revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that care plans were reviewed and revised based on the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #214) reviewed for tube feeding, 1 of 3 residents (#30) reviewed for respiratory care, and 1 of 5 residents (R#74) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, no new interventions were initiated to address the 1. care and placement of a g-tube for R#214, 2. to address tracheostomy care for R#30 and 3. to prevent further skin breakdown for R#74. The findings include: 1.Resident #214 had diagnoses and conditions including Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Anemia, and Atrial Fibrillation. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident screening and assessment tool) of 10/23/18 indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition, received extensive assist x one staff support for eating, had a feeding tube and was on a mechanically altered therapeutic diet. Current Physician's orders included;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-09 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure discharge planning needs were addressed for one of two residents (Resident #87) reviewed for discharge. Specifically, the resident's discharge plan, which noted that he would reside in the facility long term was not updated to address the resident's desire to leave the facility. The findings are: Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Acute Respiratory Distress, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Schizo-affective Disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment instrument) dated 4/5/18 revealed that the resident achieved a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which suggested that the resident's cognition was intact for daily decision making; required limited assistance of one-person for bed mobility, transferring, dressing, toileting and hygiene; participated in the assessment process; and expected to remain in the facility long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that safe and effective assistive devices were provided to each resident when indicated to prevent accidents. Specifically, one of three residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #33) reported a fall that occurred 12/4/2018 during transfer out of bed to wheelchair with a mechanical (Hoyer) lift utilizing a sling. The facility did not ensure that 1) the sling was laundered according to the manufacture's instructions, 2) staff was trained on how to check the sling for functionality and durability before use, 3) and that a system was in place to routinely inspect all slings. As a result of the fall, the resident sustained a fracture of the left femur revealed by an x-ray and was transferred to a hospital where an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) procedure was done. Complaint ID #: NY00230705 The findings are: Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during the re-certification survey, the facility did not ensure that one of two residents reviewed for urinary incontinence (resident #113) was provided the necessary care to decrease his level of urinary incontinence. Specifically, the nursing staff did not develop and implement a person-centered toileting program for the resident who is cognitively impaired and had multiple episodes of incontinence in order to attempt to decrease the frequency of incontinence. The findings are: Resident #113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia and Diabetes Mellitus. The Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 7/2/18 revealed that the resident had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance with transfers, ambulation and toileting, used a wheelchair at times for locomotion, was frequently incontinent of bladder, and was not placed on a toileting program. The most recent quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, it was determined that for one of three residents reviewed for respiratory care, the facility did not provide care consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. Specifically, the resident was performing self suctioning without physician's orders and without a Comprehensive Care Plan. (Resident #30). The findings are: Resident #30 had diagnoses and conditions including Hemiplegia, Cerebrovascular Accident and Respiratory Failure. Review of the 7/9/18 Significant Change MDS (minimum data set-a resident assessment tool) indicated the resident was cognitively intact, received total assist x two for personal hygiene, had diagnoses including Pneumonia, CVA, and Hemiplegia, and received oxygen, ventilator, suctioning and tracheostomy cares. The 10/9/18 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact, received total assist x one staff support for personal hygiene, had diagnoses including Hemiplegia, CVA, and Respiratory Failure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview conducted during the most recent recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that nursing staff followed proper hand hygiene while administering medications. The findings are: On 1/3/19 at 1:05 PM a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #4) was observed administering Medication to Resident #190. LPN #4 used hand sanitizer prior to pouring the resident's medication. After administering the medications to Resident #190, LPN#4 discarded the empty medication and water cups, wiped top of the resident's night stand and pushed the medication cart to the front of resident #140's room. Without washing her hands LPN #4 proceeded to administer medications to Resident #140. Immediately after the LPN finished administering medications to Resident #140, the surveyor informed the Director of Nursing (DON) of the failure of the LPN to wash her hands before administering medications to Resident #140. The DON then proceeded to address this matter with LPN #4. The DON later that day informed the surveyor that the LPN stated that she was not aware that she should have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| SILBERMINTZ, SAUL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/21/2020 |
| GINSBERG, HINDI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2008 |
| HAGER, HERSHEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2008 |
| KENNY, CHARLES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2009 |
| KLEIN, MORRIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/20/2015 |
| LAUBER, SIMON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2010 |
| ORZEL, ISRAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2010 |
| STEINMETZ, LEON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2008 |
| ZACHARAISH, ABRAHAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2008 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335046. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.