Chasehealth Rehab And Residential Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 68.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 2/11/2025-2/13/2025, the facility did not ensure residents were provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for 2 of 2 meals reviewed (the 2/11/2025 1st floor dining room lunch meal and the 2/12/2025 1st floor dining room breakfast meal). Specifically, food was not flavorful and was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures during the lunch meal on 2/11/2025 and breakfast meal on 2/12/2025. Additionally, 11 anonymous residents during a resident council meeting and four residents (Residents #8, #12, #51 and #54) interviewed stated the food did not taste good, it was often served cold, and the vegetables were overcooked. Findings include: The facility policy, Nutrition and Food Service Department, revised 2/2019, documented the food service department provided high quality, nutritious, palatable, and attractive meals in a safe sanitary manner. The facility policy, Sanitary Conditions, dated 12/2024, documented food must be kept in hot-holding equipment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 2/11/2025-2/13/2025, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards in the main kitchen. Specifically, the main kitchen had multiple uncleanable surfaces, a leaking sink drain, stored pet beds, and unclean dishware. Findings include: The facility policy, Sanitary Conditions, dated 5/2024, documented food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served under sanitary conditions to prevent the spread of food borne illness and reduce practices which resulted in food contamination and compromised food safety. The following observations of the main kitchen were made on 2/11/2025: - at 10:10 AM there were rusty shelves in the walk-in cooler. - at 10:12 AM there were pet beds under the dry storage room racks. - at 10:15 AM clean dishware was stored in soiled pan on a rack by the hand sink. - at 10:15 AM the hand sink had bare wood holding it to the walls. - at 10:44 AM there was leaking plumbing into a bus pan under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 2/11/2025 - 2/13/2025, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #57) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #57 was observed wearing their thoracolumbar sacral orthosis brace (TLSO brace, a spinal brace worn to limit movement of the spine to help with healing of spinal fractures) incorrectly, the comprehensive person-centered care plan did not address interventions for the thoracolumbar sacral orthosis brace, and staff involved in Resident #57's care were not educated on the application of the thoracolumbar sacral orthosis brace. Findings include: The undated facility policy, Durable Medical Equipment, documented the facility would ensure residents received medically necessary durable medical equipment as part of their comprehensive care plan and included: - A physician, nurse practitioner or therapist would assess the residents' medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 2/11/2025-2/13/2025, the facility did not review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation of bed rails for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #12) reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence risks and benefits were reviewed and informed consent was obtained prior to the placement of bilateral bed rails on Resident #12's bed. Additionally, the comprehensive care plan did not include the use of bed rails. Findings include: The facility policy, Bedrail Determination, dated 2/1/2024 documented the use of side rails or bed rails on beds would be permitted to provide greater independence however had the potential for entrapment and harm. The process included: - The resident was screened upon admission, readmission, or change of condition determining level of independence with bed mobility and transfers. - The resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 2/11/2025-2/13/2025, the facility did not ensure the safe and secure storage of medications in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 3 medication carts (Unit 1 medication cart) reviewed. Specifically, multiple eye drops in the Unit 1 medication cart were not appropriately labeled or dated. Findings include: The facility's policy, Equipment and Supplies for Administering Medications updated 4/2022 did not address pharmaceutical labeling or medication safety. During a medication storage observation on Unit 1 on 2/11/2025 at 11:13 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse # 2 the medication cart had the following medications with no pharmacy labels and the tops of the boxes ripped off: - Resident #8's latanoprost eye drops (used to treat glaucoma, high pressure in the eye) with an open date of 12/24 and the resident name written on the inside of the box in black magic marker - Resident #12's artificial tears with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 2/11/2025-2/13/2025, the facility did not ensure they were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized work area for 1 of 23 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] on Unit 1) reviewed. Specifically, resident call bell systems did not function as designed and residents did not have a means to contact direct caregivers while in the bathroom. Findings include: The facility policy, Call Bell, last reviewed 2025, documented all staff were responsible for responding promptly to resident call bells. Failure to do so would result in disciplinary action. Staff must verbally acknowledge the resident upon entering the room. If the call bell was an emergent situation and required an immediate response, staff should call for back up and not leave the resident unattended. During a Resident Meeting on 2/11/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-06-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification conducted on 6/13/23 - 6/16/23, the facility did not ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 2 of 2 resident units (Units 1 and 2) and for 2 of 2 (Residents #15 and 57) resident wheelchairs reviewed. Specifically, hot water temperatures were outside the acceptable range of 95-120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) on 6/15/23; and Residents #57's and #15's wheelchair armrests were in disrepair. Findings include: The undated facility policy Incident and Accident Reports documented hot water may reach hazardous temperatures in hand sinks, showers, and tubs. Burns related to hot water/liquids may also be due to spills and/or immersion. Many residents in long term care facilities have conditions that may put them at increased risk for burns caused by scolding. These conditions include decreased skin thickness, decreased skin mobility, and decreased ability to communicate. The degree of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 6/13/23-6/16/23, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for 2 of 2 medication carts (1st and 2nd floor) and 2 of 2 medication rooms (1st and 2nd Floor) observed. Specifically, the 1st and 2nd floor medication carts and the 1st and 2nd medication storages room had expired medications. Findings include: The facility policy Storage, Maintenance, Labeling, Initialing and Dating of Medications dated 5/2019 documented: - Once a medication had been opened, the nurse should write the date it was opened, and initial so that medications would be used in the accepted time frame which was 30 days (except for insulin which had a shelf-life of 28 days), unless otherwise indicated by the pharmacy. - If medications were past the open expiration date written on the bottle, they were to be disposed of per policy and a new container of medication was opened, dated & initialed. - If the medication was past the manufacturer's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 6/13/23-6/16/23, the facility did not ensure each resident had the right to a dignified existence for 5 of 13 residents (Residents #9, 24, 28, 41, and 226) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #9, 24, 28, 41, and 226 waited for their meals to be served 24-28 minutes after their tablemates were served and eating their meals. Additionally, Resident #24 did not receive assistance with eating for 39 minutes after their meal was served and placed in front of them. Findings include: The facility policy Tray Delivery/In Room Dining revised 1/2019, documented food would be delivered within 20 minutes of plating. Trays would be set up and all food uncovered. For those residents who were identified to have supervision requirements or assistance, the trays would be left on the tray cart for a certified nurse aide (CNA) or nursing staff to deliver the tray and supervise/assist the resident during the meal. The facility policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-16 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 6/13/23-6/16/23, the facility did not determine if a resident's right to self-administer medications was clinically appropriate for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #65) reviewed. Specifically, there was a medication cup filled with several pills on Resident #65's walker and there was no documented evidence the resident was assessed to determine their ability to safely self-administer medications, or a physician order for self-administration of medications. Findings include: The facility policy, Medication Administration-General Guidelines dated 3/17/22 documented residents were allowed to self-administer medications when specifically authorized by the medical provider and in accordance with the procedures of medication administrations. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including diabetes, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, and coronary artery disease (CAD). The 3/21/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented the resident was cognitively intact and was independent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY