Friedwald Center For Rehab And Nursing, L L C

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 542 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 267 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 171.6 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.39 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00374854/801166), the facility did not ensure that all participants in the assessment process have the requisite knowledge to complete an accurate assessment. For 4 out of 4 residents (Resident #3, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8) reviewed for assessments. Specifically, (1) Resident #3 who had severe cognitive impairment and was unable to be interviewed had eight trauma informed care assessments completed by the facility Social Worker with a score of zero indicating no evidence of trauma; (2) Resident #6 who had severe cognitive impairment and was unable to be interviewed had eight trauma informed care assessments completed by the facility Social Worker with a score of zero on two assessments and a score of one on six assessment indicating no evidence of trauma; (3) Resident #7 had who had severe cognitive impairment and was unable to be interviewed had twelve trauma informed care assessments completed by the facility Social Worker, with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00368065, NY00356980) the facility did not ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented for 2 out of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #5) reviewed for care planning. Specifically, (1) Resident #1 with a known behavior of refusing care and being non-compliant, had documented refusals of care on three occasions. Review of Resident #1's care plans revealed they did not have a care plan initiated to reflect their refusal behaviors. (2) Resident #5 had a Stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer which resolved on 07/31/2024, the resident was hospitalized on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with the Stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer reopened. There was no documented evidence of Resident #5's pressure ulcer care plan being reactivated on readmission. The findings are: The facility Comprehensive Care Plan policy dated 09/24/2024 documented it is the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00368065/801164), the facility did not ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented for 1 out of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care planning. Specifically, Resident #1 with a known behavior of refusing care and being non-compliant, had documented refusals of care on three occasions. Review of Resident #1's care plans revealed they did not have a care plan initiated to reflect their refusal behaviors and noncompliance. The findings are:The facility Comprehensive Care Plan policy dated 09/24/2024 documented it is the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that incudes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident comprehensive assessment. 1)Resident #1 had diagnoses including but not limited to Hepatic Encephalopathy,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00368065, NY00374854), the facility did not ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 out of 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #4) reviewed for quality of care. Specifically, (1) Resident #1's representative reported they found Resident #1 covered in urine and feces on multiple occasions. Resident #1 was incontinent and dependent on staff for toileting. Review of Resident #1's certified nurse aide accountability revealed within a 2-month period, there were no signatures indicating toilet use was provided by direct care staff on 37 occasions; (2) Resident #3 is incontinent and dependent on staff for toileting. Review of Resident #3's certified nurse aide accountability record revealed within a 2-month period, there were no signatures indicating toilet use was provided by direct care staff on 26 occasions; (3)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00349754, NY00348426) the facility did not ensure that each resident was free from abuse for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 7/30/2024 Licensed Practical Nurse #1 was seen on surveillance video picking up a water pitcher with water off their medication cart and throw the pitcher and water in Resident #1's direction. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 then threw a small water bottle at Resident #1. An assessment of Resident #1 was conducted, and no injuries were identified. Findings include: The facility Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated 6/1/2021 and last reviewed/revised 10/1/2023 documented it is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Abuse is defined as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00349754, NY00348426) the facility did not ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised timely for 2 out of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #4) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (1) Resident # 1 with a history of known behaviors, had an incident on 7/30/2024 with Licensed Practical Nurse #1 and the risk for abuse, behavioral symptoms care plans were not updated to reflect the 7/30/2024 incident. (2) Resident # 4 reported to the Director of Social Services on 7/16/2024 that Registered Nurse # 1 had cursed at them and called them a name. Resident #4's risk for abuse care plan was not updated to reflect the allegation. Findings include: The facility's undated as comprehensive care plan policy documented it is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
  Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00349754, NY00348426) the facility did not ensure that nursing staff were in serviced in behavioral health care needs of residents for 1 of 4 residents. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide documented evidence that they provided education on behavioral health to Licensed Practical Nurse #1 before they were assigned to the dementia unit on 7/30/2024. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 engaged in a verbal altercation with Resident #1 with known verbal/physical aggressive behavior, and Licensed Practical Nurse #1 threw a pitcher of water at the resident during the verbal exchange. Finding include: A review of the Behavioral Health Policy dated 9/1/2022 documented it is the policy of this facility to ensure all residents receive necessary behavioral health services to assist them in reaching and maintaining their highest level of mental and psychosocial functioning. All facility staff, including contracted staff and volunteers,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0560 — isolated
  Protect a residents' right to refuse some types of non-requested transfers within the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, conducted during the recertification survey from 7/9/2024 to 7/16/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident's right to refuse a room transfer solely for the convenience of staff. This was evident for 1 (Resident #132) of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #132 was transferred from the 2nd Floor to the 3rd Floor after a staff member reported they were uncomfortable providing the resident care. The findings are: The undated facility policy titled Change of Room or Roommate documented the facility reserves the right to make resident room changes when found the facility deems it necessary. A resident has the right to refuse a transfer to another room. Resident #132 had diagnoses of a right femur fracture and end stage renal disease. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 dated 6/6/2024 documented Resident #132 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 07/10/2024 at 12:11 PM, Resident #132 stated that Certified Nursing Assistant #28 reported to the former Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 7/9/2024 to 7/16/2024, the facility did not ensure the resident's right to a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was evident for 1 (3rd Floor) of 3 resident units. Specifically, the 3rd Floor ad peeling wallpaper in the hallway and a dayroom with walls that were stained and damaged, missing and mismatched wallpaper, and with misshapen and bent window blinds. The findings are: The undated facility policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection documented routine cleaning will be performed in resident common areas and wall cleaning will be conducted when visibly soiled. On 07/09/2024 at 09:39 AM, the 3rd Floor dayroom was observed with window blinds containing several misshapen and bent slates, a quarter-sized hole in the wall next to the television that was crumbling and exposing white dusty plaster beneath, several areas along the wall with remnants of thick white tape, a missing section of wallpaper near the television, and dried food splatters and black scuff along the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during a recertification and abbreviated (NY00335338 and NY00341688) survey from 7/9/2024 to 7/16/2024, the facility did not ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve resident grievances for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for grievances (Resident #321 and #136). Specifically, 1) a grievance investigation was not conducted when the Designated Representatives for Resident #321 and Resident #136 expressed care concerns to facility staff. The findings are: The undated facility policy titled Grievances documented when a grievance is reported, the grievance officer and assigned social worker will be notified and an investigation will be conducted. All investigative findings will be discussed with the complainant in writing by the facility within 5 business days, 1) Resident #321 had diagnoses of Parkinson's disease and adult failure to thrive. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment tool dated 4/5/2024 documented Resident #321 had moderately impaired cognition. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $964K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY