Presbyterian Home For Central New York INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 201 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated (NY00348553) survey conducted 3/21/2025, the facility did not ensure an elopement incident was reported to the State Agency as required for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 eloped 6/29/2024 when they removed a window panel from an unoccupied room on their unit, climbed out the window and were discovered standing in the fenced-in courtyard with their walker. The facility did not report the elopement incident to the New York State Department of Health as required. Findings include: The August 2016 New York State Department of Health Incident Reporting Manual documented at least one of the following elements must be present for an incident to be reportable to the New York State Department of Health: - Resident with cognitive impairment or elopement risk left the facility undetected, or eloped from physician, other outside appointment, or facility outing. - Resident, despite cognition, was at risk for elopement and remained missing after a search of the building was conducted. - Resident with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0813 — pattern
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 4/22/2024-4/26/2024, the facility did not ensure a policy and procedure regarding the use and storage of food brought to residents from outside the facility to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption for 2 of 6 resident units (Broadway and Rodeo units) reviewed. Specifically, staff did not know the policy and procedure to properly reheat, and measure temperatures of food brought to residents from outside the facility. Additionally, there was undated resident food in the Broadway and Rodeo Unit kitchenette refrigerators. Findings include: The facility policy Food from Outside Sources revised 4/10/2024, documented: - Safe food handling practices were to be followed by visitors and staff regarding handling, storage, and reheating of food brought in from the outside. - It was the responsibility of the person bringing food in for the resident to assure that items were handled properly. - Any staff or visitor may heat food items in a closed, microwave safe container. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 4/22/2024-4/26/2024, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 7 of 8 residents (Residents #17, #22, #33, #82, #89, #267, and #278) reviewed. Specifically, -Resident #17 had clostridioides difficile (a contagious germ that causes diarrhea and inflammation of the colon) and transmission-based precautions were not implemented timely. - Resident #22 had extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (enzyme resistant to most antibiotics) in the urine and transmission-based precautions were not properly maintained. - Resident #33 had colonized extended-spectrum beta-lactamase in the sputum and enhanced barrier precautions were not properly maintained. - Residents #82 and #278 had indwelling medical devices and were not placed on enhanced barrier precautions as required. - Residents #89 and #267 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00338896 and NY00310300) surveys conducted 4/22/2024-4/26/2024, the facility did not treat each resident with respect and dignity and did not provide care for each resident in a manner that promoted enhancement of quality of life for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #3) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #3 was asked to use a bed pan rather than being taken to the toilet as requested. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Rights last reviewed 4/8/2024, documented the facility would assure that all Federal and State laws which guaranteed rights of our residents were followed. These rights included a dignified existence, and to be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity. The facility policy Activity of Daily Living- Supporting last reviewed 10/2023, documented appropriate care and services would be provided for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living independently, with the consent of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 4/22/2024-4/26/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident's ability to safely self-administer medications was clinically appropriate for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #19) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #19 was observed with glucose tablets (medication to increase low blood sugar) at their bedside and there was no documented evidence the interdisciplinary team had assessed the resident's ability to safely self-administer the medication. Findings include: The facility policy Self-Administration of Medication/Treatment reviewed 7/12/2022 documented as part of the resident's overall evaluation, the nursing home staff and practitioner would assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications was clinically appropriate for the resident. If the team determined that a resident could not safely administer medications, the nursing staff would administer the medications. Staff would identify and give the charge nurse any medications found at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 4/22/2024-4/26/2024, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet the resident's medical and nursing needs for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #4 and #32) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #4 did not have a comprehensive care plan developed with interventions for reoccurring urinary tract infections; and Resident #34 did not have a comprehensive care plan developed for wandering risk. Findings include: The facility policy Interdisciplinary Care Plans, dated 4/12/2022 documented the facility must develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the needs of each resident. The plan of care should include individual preferences, desires, and goals of care to meet the resident's medical, psychosocial, and nutritional needs. The interdisciplinary team must maintain the person-centered plan of care and update as indicated with new or changing interventions to achieve the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 4/22/2024-4/26/2024, the facility did not review and revise the comprehensive care plan based on changing goals and needs for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #79) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #79's meal tickets and comprehensive care plan included a fluid restriction of 2,000 milliliters daily which was previously discontinued by the medical provider. Findings include: The 4/12/2022 facility policy Interdisciplinary Care Plans documented the interdisciplinary team would maintain a person centered plan of care at all times and update as indicated with new or changing interventions developed to achieve the desired outcome. Resident #79 had diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease (poor circulation), and congestive heart failure (the heart does not pump efficiently). The 4/3/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had intact cognition, required assistance with activities of daily living, and received a therapeutic diet. The comprehensive care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00310300, NY00321040) surveys conducted 4/22/2024-4/26/2024, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 3 of 5 residents (Residents #2, #12 and #35) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #2 was not assisted with removal of unwanted facial hair; Resident #12 had unclean and untrimmed fingernails; and Resident #35 had unclean fingernails. Findings include: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL) reviewed 10/1/2023 documented appropriate care, treatment, and services were provided for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living independently in accordance with the plan of care, including support and assistance with hygiene, mobility, elimination, dining, and communication. 1) Resident #2 had diagnoses including fracture of the right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 4/22/2024-4/26/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #12) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #12 did not have their resting palm (hand) guards applied appropriately as recommended by occupational therapy for hand and finger contractures. Findings include: The facility policy Orthotic Devices reviewed 8/1/2023, documented the facility assured residents received appropriate services and interventions in response to physical and functional needs with the purpose that joint range of motion and elasticity were maintained and provided proper body alignment. Resident #12 had diagnoses including dementia, rheumatoid arthritis (an autoimmune inflammatory disease), and contracture (tightening of tissue) of the right hand. The 3/14/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 4/22/2024-4/26/2024, the facility did not ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #276) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #276 had a significant weight loss, nutritional status and interventions were not reassessed, and there was no documented evidence the medical provider was made aware of the significant weight loss. Findings included: The facility policy Residents Weights /Height and Significant Weight Loss last reviewed 10/25/2022, documented regular monitoring of weights was necessary to screen residents for significant weight changes, which may indicate a resident was at nutritional risk. Each resident weight and height were measured upon admission (within 48 hours). The height and weight were recorded into the electronic medical record. New admissions were weighed weekly for 4 weeks. The Unit Manager/Charge Nurse would review the weight and determine if a reweight was indicated. Nursing would indicate verified weight…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $210K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY