No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Schoellkopf Health Center

621 Tenth Street, Niagara Falls, NY 14302 · Non profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (716) 278-4578 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (716) 278-4578 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0610) — most recent Aug 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (19) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
533 10th St · (716) 278-4151 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1202 Pine Ave · (716) 285-0286 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1104 Niagara St · (716) 299-0148 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Niagara Falls Canada Ontario · (877) 999-7521 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.3%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.7%5.8%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.1%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.4%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.5%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.3%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.6%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.3%78.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission8.6%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.9%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.421.701.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.441.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.2%CMS range 46.4–62.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 8.1–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.0–13.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.731.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.31
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.76
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
54.3%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-22)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 08/22/2025, the facility did not maintain a pest- free environment and an effective pest control program. Specifically, there was of evidence of rodents (dead rodents, rodent droppings) and complaints of rodent sightings in resident rooms. The findings are:The policy and procedure titled Pest Control, revised 11/2024, documented pests can present significant health risks, including the spread of disease, contamination of supplies, and deterioration of hospital infrastructure. The Environmental Services Department is responsible for daily cleaning and maintenance of facilities to minimize conditions conducive to pest infestations. Facilities Management will ensure the physical infrastructure is secure and free of entry points for pests. Food Service will implement sanitation and food handling procedures to prevent pest attraction and contamination in food storage, preparation, and service areas. When an infestation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 08/22/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident was assessed by the interdisciplinary team to determine a resident's ability to safely administer their own medications if clinically appropriate for one (1) (Resident #45) of one (1) resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #45 was observed with medication in their room. Self-administration was determined through interviews despite the lack of an assessment to determine the resident's ability to safely do so. The finding is: The policy titled Self-Administration of Medications undated, documented residents have the right to self-administer medications if they choose and the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. Any medications found at the bedside that are not authorized for self-administration are turned over to the nurse in charge. If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this is documented in the medical record and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 8/22/2025, the facility did not provide services consistent with professional standards of quality for one (1) (Resident #119) of one (1) resident reviewed for change in condition. Specifically, Resident #119, who had a recent history of seizures, did not receive Levetiracetam (anti-seizure/anti-convulsant medication) as ordered by the physician and the physician was not notified of the omission.The finding is:The policy titled Unavailable Medication last revised 09/27/2016 documented that residents would receive necessary medications as ordered by the physician, if medications were not available the physician would be notified and would adjust medications accordingly. The nurse would indicate on the MAR (medication administration record) that drug was not given and document that physician was notified and when indicated the directive for alternate administration time or medication. The nurse would notify the pharmacy of unavailable medication and notify supervisor. The nurse must document on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Standard Survey completed on 08/22/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident who was unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (one) (Resident #126) of 2 (two) residents who were reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, Resident #126 was not assisted/provided with nail care and was observed with dirty long jagged fingernails. The finding is:The undated policy and procedure titled Nail Care documented that nails are observed daily by staff providing direct care. Nails are to be inspected weekly by a nurse and CNA on bath day and trimmed as indicated. The procedure included but was not limited to gently cleaning under nails with an orange stick, trimming with nail clippers, clipping nails straight across, and shaping nails with a nail file as needed.The policy and procedure titled Activities of Daily Living revised 03/2011 documented that residents are provided with care, treatment, and services as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 08/22/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident received proper treatment to maintain vision for one (1) (Resident #30) of one (1) resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #30's optometrist appointment on 06/06/2025 required an outside consult visit that was not scheduled. Additionally, Resident #30 complained that they were unable to see well with their current eyeglass prescription.The finding is:The policy titled Dental, Hearing, and Vision Evaluations, dated 03/2011, documented that the facility will assure residents can function at their highest practical level of oral health, vision, and hearing. The policy states to assess functional status on admission, quarterly, as per the MDS schedule, and when concerns are reported. If a resident or surrogate decision-maker agrees to a consult/evaluation, the facility is to arrange for the consult as soon as possible.Resident #30 had diagnoses including unspecified fracture of the shaft of the left fibula (the smaller of the two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 08/22/2025, the facility did not ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance of bed rails including assessing the resident for risk of entrapment for one (1) (Resident #12) of one (1) resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #12's bed cane bedrail was loose, not secured to the bedframe, and there was no documentation of routine inspections. In addition, there was no care plan developed for use of the bed cane. The finding is:The policy titled Mobility Assist Rails or other Assist Devices revised 06/22/2023, documented therapy screens each resident to determine bed mobility and what, if any, mobility assist device is warranted. The Comprehensive Care Plan and Closet Care Plan will indicate what mobility assist devices are to be used. A new Evaluation for Mobility Assist Rail/Device Use is to be initiated with each therapy screen if use remains warranted. Nursing Supervisor is to be contacted if mobility assist devices are not available on the unit, and maintenance is to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 08/22/2025, the facility did not establish and maintain an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections one (1) (Resident #30) of four (4) residents reviewed. Specifically, the resident had a draining Stage 3 pressure ulcer (a full-thickness skin loss that extends into the subcutaneous tissue but does not involve muscle, tendon, or bone) and was not placed on enhanced barrier precautions (infection control strategy designed to the reduce transmission of multidrug resistant organisms in nursing homes, involving staff to wear a gown and gloves during high contact care). Additionally, staff did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment during pressure ulcer care/treatment.The findings are:The policy and procedure titled Infection Prevention, Transmission-Based Precautions, dated 12/14/2024, documented the staff were to use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during a Complaint Investigation (Complaint #NY00370870), the facility did not maintain an effective pest control program for two (second and third floors) of four resident use floors and the Main Kitchen. Issues included observations of evidence of rodents (dead rodents and rodent droppings) and complaints of rodent sightings in resident rooms. Additionally, on the exterior of the building, used kitchen grease was stored in a manner that had the potential to attract rodents. Residents A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K were involved. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Pest Control, effective 11/2024, documented pests can present significant health risks, including the spread of disease, contamination of supplies, and deterioration of hospital infrastructure. The Environmental Services Department is responsible for daily cleaning and maintenance of facilities to minimize conditions conducive to pest infestations. Facilities Management will ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review completed during a Complaint (#NY00339959) investigation, the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate treatment and services for a Foley catheter (tube that drains urine) for one (Resident #2) of two residents reviewed for catheter care. Specifically, staff did not keep the urine collection bag below the level of Resident #2's bladder during care and the resident had a history of frequent urinary tract infections. The finding is: Review of the policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary obtained from the Med-Pass Nursing Services Policy and Procedure Manual for Long-Term Care dated 2001, provided by the Director of Nursing, revealed staff are required to always position the drainage bag lower than the bladder to prevent urine flowing back into the urinary bladder. The purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections. Resident #2 had diagnoses including hydronephrosis (enlargement of the kidney) with obstructive uropathy (obstruction in urinary tract),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review completed during a Complaint (# NY00339959) investigation, the facility did not ensure provision of a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for infection control practices. Specifically, Resident #2 was on enhanced barrier precautions (interventions designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms including mask, gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) and staff did not wear proper personal protective equipment during care while emptying a urine drainage bag. The finding is: Review of the policy titled Infection Prevention dated 12/2024 revealed procedures for isolation and universal precautions will be placed for residents suspected or confirmed to have a contagious or infectious disease. Masks, gowns and gloves should be used as protective barriers when needed to reduce the risk of exposure of the health care worker's skin or mucous membranes to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 9 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during a Complaint Investigation (Complaint #NY00351197), the facility did not maintain an effective pest control program for three (First, Second, and Third Floors) of four resident use floors and the Main Kitchen. Issues included observations of evidence of rodents (droppings) and complaints of rodent sightings in resident rooms. Additionally, on the exterior of the building, garbage and used kitchen grease were stored in a manner that had the potential to attract rodents. Residents A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, and P were involved. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Pest Control, effective 10/1/14, documented efforts will be made to ensure that pests are controlled throughout the facility, including the food service department. Regular inspections will be performed by a pest management professional. The inspector will note situations that are conducive to pest populations and recommend repairs, sealing of pest entry points,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review during the Standard survey completed on 8/22/23, the facility did not implement written policies and procedures for screening employees that would prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property. Specifically, the facility did not provide documentation that verified seven (three Housekeeping Attendants, one Diet Technician, one Registered Nurse, one Social Worker, and one Activities Leader) of eleven employees that worked in the facility and were subject to the New York State (NYS) Nurse Aide Registry, had been screened through the NYS Nurse Aide Registry prior to their employment. The finding is: Per Part 415 - Nursing Homes - Minimum Standards: Nursing home shall develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit mistreatment, neglect or abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property. The facility shall not employ individuals who have had a finding entered into the NYS Nurse Aide Registry concerning abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 8/22/23, the facility did not ensure maintenance of an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for one (Resident #15) of two residents reviewed for infection control practices during personal care and one of one facility water management system. Specifically, staff did not perform adequate hand hygiene and change gloves after touching Resident #15's colostomy (an artificial connection of the bowel to the skin surface) bag and urine collection bag, then proceeded to wash the resident's face and touch items in the environment. Additionally, for facility water samples that were positive for Legionella, the facility did not notify New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH) and institute short-term control measures when control limits were not met. Also, staff that administered the facility's Potable Water Sampling and Management…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 8/22/23, the facility did not ensure that it promoted and facilitated resident self-determination through the support of resident choice for one (Resident #29) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, the preferred number of showers per week were not obtained and not provided in accordance with Resident #29's wishes. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Resident Choice and Preference revised 12/2016 documented each resident's personal preferences would be honored to maintain quality of life, dignity and maintain a comfortable living environment. Staff will inquire with residents and/or their representative as to residents' personal preferences regarding daily routine such as frequency of showers/baths. Unit Managers or designee will ensure that each resident's preference and choices are included in the development of the Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan. 1.Resident #29 had diagnoses including bipolar affective disorder, depression, and diabetes mellitus. The Minimum Data Set (MDS,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 8/22/23, the facility did not ensure that the pharmacist reported irregularities to the attending physician, the facility's Medical Director and Director of Nursing (DON), and that these reports were acted upon for one (Resident #85) of five residents reviewed for drug regimen reviews. Specifically, the Consultant Pharmacist did not identify the continued use of a PRN (as needed) Ativan (a psychotropic antianxiety medication) for two months and report the irregularity. The finding is: The policy and procedure (P&P) titled Use of Psychoactive Medications dated 12/2021 documented each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs. These guidelines shall illustrate the processes in long term care to ensure that each resident is free from unnecessary psychoactive drugs while maintaining his or her optimal physical and mental health. A psychoactive medication is defined as any medication whose primary function is to treat disorders of thought process, mood, behavior, or sleep. The P&P…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 8/22/23, the facility did not ensure that PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days except if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, they should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order for one (Resident #85) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, PRN Ativan (a psychotropic antianxiety medication) was ordered longer than 14 days and there was no documented provider rationale to extend the order or the duration of the order. The finding is: The policy and procedure (P&P) titled Use of Psychoactive Medications dated 12/2021 documented each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs. These guidelines shall illustrate the processes in long term care to ensure that each resident is free from unnecessary psychoactive drugs while maintaining his or her optimal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (Complaint NY#00278522) during the Standard survey completed on 11/23/21, the facility did not ensure that all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, there was an incomplete investigation completed by the facility to rule out abuse, neglect or mistreatment for a reported allegation that Resident #25 was handled roughly by staff. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, misappropriation revised 10/19, documented reports of abuse (mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, exploitation, and misappropriation of property) were promptly and thoroughly investigated. The investigation would try to determine what happened and designated personnel would begin the investigation immediately. The investigation would include resident's statements, involved staff and witness statements of events, observation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 11/23/21 the facility did not ensure that residents who use psychotropic drugs received gradual dose reductions (GDR), and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs for one (Resident #35) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, the resident received Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) 50 milligrams (mg) every 12 hours since 1/13/2020 without GDR attempts or a documented reason why a GDR was clinically contraindicated. Also, there was lack of documented behaviors for the ongoing use of the antipsychotic medication. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Antipsychotic Drugs revised 2/19 documented residents who use antipsychotic drugs receive gradual dose reduction and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs. Within the first year when an antipsychotic ordered the facility will attempt a GDR in two separate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-08-22 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 08/22/2025, the facility did not ensure Certified Nurse Aide performance reviews were completed at least once every 12 months for three (3) (Certified Nurse Aides #3, #4, and #5) of five (5) Certified Nurse Aide files reviewed. Specifically, there was no evidence Certified Nurse Aides #3, #4, and #5 who had worked at the facility more than 12 months had performance reviews completed at least once every 12 months. The findings are:The facility policy titled Non-Management Employee Performance Evaluation Program with an effective date of 11/78 and a revision date of 12/24 documented the purpose of the program was to improve work performance of individual employees, recognize and correct work deficiencies, and identify individual training and education needs.Review of Certified Nurse Aide #3's employee file revealed they were hired 12/03/2023 and their file contained a 90-day performance evaluation dated 03/05/2024. There was no evidence in the employee file that a performance evaluation had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DUBOIS, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/08/2022
SAUVAGEAU, PHILIPIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
ABRAMS, TINAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022
BAJWA, RAJINDERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
BIANCO, CYNTHIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 08/22/2016
BRADLEY, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 08/23/2016
CAMPBELL, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 08/23/2016
FELDMAN, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022
GORMAN, GERALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022
GRECO, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022
KING, DONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 08/23/2016
LAVIGNE, MARIONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 08/23/2016
MUSCARELLA, PETERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
NEFF-PROKOP, MARISAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/15/2023
NOLAN-POWELL, JUDITHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 08/23/2016
PERRY, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 08/23/2016
PRIDGEN, CRAIGIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022
RADER, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 08/22/2016
ROSCETTI, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 08/22/2016
RUFFOLO, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/23/2016
TOOHEY, MARGARETIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 08/22/2016
ABBOTT, SARAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/21/2024
HARVEY, KATHYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/14/2000
KOMULA, ANNEKEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/17/2024
MERTZ, BONNIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/19/2022
SCARBROUGH, KAYLAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/17/2024
SHANLEY, PATRICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/17/2023
STOM, ELIZABETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/09/2010
TEIXEIRA, GIANNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/07/2024
VILARDO, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/27/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 55 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-22.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 4%Other / private 32%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$359per resident / day
operating cost
$10,899per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$294per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335376. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next