Oceanside Care Center Inc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 180 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.70 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 47% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 96.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #5) of one (1) resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #5 was observed multiple times with long, dirty fingernails. There was no documented evidence that the resident refused to have their nails cut and/or cleaned by staff.The finding is: The facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living last revised 03/03/2025, documented residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility did not ensure that each resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #105) of three (3) residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, Resident #105 had multiple pressure ulcers to the right heel, right lateral (side) leg, and left buttock and utilized an air mattress as an intervention as per the plan of care. During multiple observations, the adjustable weight setting on the air mattress pump was not set according to the resident's actual weight.The finding is:The facility's policy titled, Skin Prevention: Air Mattress dated 03/03/2025 documented to ensure that all staff involved in the use of air mattresses for skin prevention are knowledgeable about the care and maintenance of the air mattresses and proper positioning of the resident on the air mattress. The Wound Care Nurse/designee will obtain the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility did not ensure each resident admitted with an indwelling urinary (Foley) catheter is assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization is necessary. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #1) of one (1) resident reviewed for urinary catheter. Specifically, Resident #1 had a Foley catheter; however, there was no clear indication in the medical record regarding when the catheter was first inserted, there was no physician's order for the use of the catheter, and no documented evidence that a trial of void was attempted.The finding is:The facility policy titled Catheterization, last revised 03/20/2025, documented that catheterizations are used only when essential and medically indicated. Catheterizations require a physician's order. Indwelling catheters are used only when medically necessary, as in neurogenic bladder, or Stage IV pressure ulcer to decrease urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility did not ensure that medications and biologicals were stored in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice. This was identified for one of one medication storage room. Specifically, upon observation of the medication storage room on 12/30/2025, the medications were stored in a disorganized manner with boxes containing discontinued medications and medications that belonged to residents who expired or were no longer in the facility.The finding is:The facility's policy titled Medication Storage, last revised 03/12/2025, documented medications must be stored in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and secured in a locked storage areas in compliance with state and federal requirements and accepted professional standards of practice.On 12/30/2025 at 09:45 AM, during an observation of the medication storage room on Unit 2 with Licensed Practical Nurse #6 (medication nurse/charge nurse), the following observations were made: the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure that each resident's medical records were in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices and were complete and accurately documented. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #39) of five (5) residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, Resident #39 had a physician's order for Tramadol (a controlled substance used to treat pain). A review of the narcotic tracking sheet for December 2025 revealed Tramadol 50 milligrams tablet was removed from the blister pack on 12/12/2025, 12/23/2025, and 12/27/2025; however, there was no documentation on the medication administration record to indicate the medication was administered to Resident #39.The finding is:The facility's policy titled Medication Administration and Documentation, effective 4/10/2025, documented that the Medication Administration Record is the form onto which all medication orders are transcribed, from which medications are poured and administered and on which medication doses are charted. The Medication Administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 11/7/2024 and completed on 11/14/2024, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident during the Kitchen observation conducted on 11/13/2024. Specifically, the facility did not monitor the temperature of cold food items (sandwiches, tartar sauce), at the time of meal service. The finding is: A facility policy and procedure titled Food Distribution and Service dated August 2024 documented the facility will distribute and serve food items to the residents in a safe manner, thereby maintaining holding temperatures and safe, covered transportation of food to the resident population. Cold food items will be bathed in ice, except for sandwiches which will be refrigerated for the duration of the tray line. Whether hot or cold holding, all foods will be kept out of the danger zone. Cold holding temperatures will be sampled and recorded. An observation of the kitchen on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews and during the Recertification Survey initiated on 11/7/2024 and completed on 11/14/2024, the facility did not ensure an assessment was completed to accurately reflect a resident's status. This was identified for one (Resident #55) of one resident reviewed for Physical Restraints. Specifically, Resident #55 had physician orders for the use of a floor mat alarm and a wheelchair alarm. Resident #55's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments dated 10/29/2024 and 8/3/2024 did not accurately reflect the use of the chair alarm and the floor mat alarm. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Comprehensive Assessment and Comprehensive Care Planning Process effective 1/2000 and last revised in 12/2023 documented the interdisciplinary team is responsible for Resident Assessments and completion. The Minimum Data Set Coordinator is responsible for coordinating the assessment and care planning process in order to ensure the timely and accurate completion of the Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 11/7/2024 and completed on 11/14/2024 the facility did not ensure that each resident who was prescribed psychotropic drugs (drugs that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior by altering the chemical makeup of the brain and nervous system) received gradual dose reductions unless clinically contraindicated. This was identified for one (Resident #25) of five residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, Resident #25 was receiving Risperidone (also known as Risperdal, an antipsychotic medication) 0.5 milligrams in the morning and 1.25 milligrams at bedtime. On 3/6/2024 the Psychiatrist and on 9/12/2024 a Pharmacist recommended a gradual dose reduction. There was no documented clinical contraindication to attempt Risperdal gradual dose reduction for Resident #25. The facility did not attempt the gradual dose reduction because the resident's representative did not agree with the Psychiatrist's and the Pharmacist's recommendations. The finding is: The facility's policy, titled Psychotropic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY00287822) initiated on 3/5/2023 and completed on 3/10/2023, the facility did not notify the resident's Designated Representative (DR) when a new form of treatment was started. This was identified for one (Resident #145) of one resident reviewed for notification of change. Specifically, on 11/15/2021 at 5:41 AM Resident #145 had episodes of vomiting and was assessed to have a low oxygen saturation rate. Resident #145's physician ordered antiemetic (medication to treat vomiting) medication and to administer oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM). The facility staff did not notify the resident's family of the changes in the resident's condition. The family became aware of the resident's status when they (family member) visited the resident at 3 PM and found the resident in bed, shivering. The finding is: The facility's policy for Family Notification dated 9/11/2014 documented to promptly notify…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated survey (NY00279474), initiated on 3/5/2023 and completed on 3/10/2023, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are thoroughly investigated. This was identified for one (Resident #244) of one resident reviewed for Abuse and one (Resident #43) of four residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, 1) Resident #43 required the assistance of two persons for bed mobility. On 2/25/2023, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 provided care to the resident in bed by themselves, resulting in the resident sliding out of bed. The incident investigation did not include statements from all staff who assisted the resident during the incident. 2) On 7/22/2020, Resident #244 alleged that staff members were talking about them (Resident #244) and making fun of them (Resident #244) which hurt their feelings. There was no documented evidence that an investigation was completed. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY