Oneida Health Rehabilitation And Extended Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 161 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 150.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.554 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00377944), the facility failed to ensure that Advance Directives were implemented in a manner that was consistent with residents' wishes for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 had a physician order for a Full Code (consent to receive life-saving measures in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest). When the resident was found unresponsive, facility staff failed to timely initiate a Code Blue (signal indicating a medical emergency) and perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Resident #1 was subsequently transferred to the emergency department where they expired. This resulted in Resident #1's death that is Immediate Jeopardy past non-compliance, and likelihood of serious harm, serious injury, serious impairment, or death to all residents in the facility who had Advance Directives in place. Findings include: The facility policy, Advance Directives: Advance Care Planning for Healthcare…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for four (4) out of twelve (12) kitchen staff (Dietary Aides #14, #15, #16, and #17). Specifically, Dietary Aides #14, 15, 16, and 17 had improper hair restraints while preparing food and meal trays in the main kitchen. Findings include:The facility policy Sanitation and Infection Control, revised 05/2023, documented employees would wear hair restraints. Men with beards and/or mustaches would wear beard restraints. The following observations of improper hair restraints were made in the main kitchen on 01/20/2026 at 11:02 AM: -Dietary Aide #14 was walking through food preparation areas with an unrestrained long ponytail. -Dietary Aide #15 was preparing food in the front of the kitchen wearing only a cap on their head, with long, shoulder length hair untied or restrained.-Dietary Aide #16 was preparing lunch trays for residents wearing only a cap on their head, with long…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility failed to establish mechanisms for documenting and communicating the resident's choices regarding Advance Directives to the staff responsible for the resident's care for one (1) of thirty-three (33) residents (Resident #63) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #63's electronic Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment form (a medical order for wishes for life-sustaining treatment completed by a medical provider) documented the resident consented to do not resuscitate (allow natural death) and the resident's electronic medical record documented to attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (attempt to restart the heart). Findings include: The facility policy Advance Directives: Advance Care Planning for Healthcare Decisions, revised 7/2024, documented medically appropriate care would be provided to every patient and patient's wishes regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and do not resuscitate and other life sustaining treatment and end of life health care decisions would be honored.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey (complaint #466496) the facility failed to ensure a resident's designated representative was notified of changes in condition for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #175) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #175 was hospitalized , and their designated representative was not notified of their hospitalization.Findings Include:The facility policy Transfer and Discharges. dated 09/16/2016, documented the proper notification of a transfer or discharge would be made to the resident and/or representative. Notification included the reason for the transfer, and the reason would be documented in the resident's clinical record. The facility would provide the resident and/or representative notice of the bed-hold policies and readmission policies prior to the transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave. In the case of an emergency transfer, notice at time of transfer meant that the resident representative would be provided with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to include services provided to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical well-being for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #144) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #144's person-centered comprehensive care plan did not include the diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus (the body does not use insulin properly causing high blood sugars), the use of insulin (used to treat high blood sugars), or the use of an anticoagulant (blood thinner).Findings include:The facility policy Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 04/2024, documented the facility would develop a comprehensive individualized plan of care for each resident that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Care plans would be reviewed and updated at least quarterly, when there was a significant change in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (IQIES 466495) surveys, the facility failed to ensure residents' medications were administered in accordance with accepted professional standards and the prescriber's order for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #1 and #39) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1's and #39's physician orders did not include the amount of fluid used with medication instillation; and Resident #1 was administered ginger ale with medications without a physician order.Findings include:The facility policy Enteral Nutrition, last revised 02/2025 documented adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition (feeding tube) would be provided to residents as ordered. The dietitian, with input from the provider and nurse calculates the fluids to be provided. Complete orders include instructions for flushing (solution, volume, frequency, timing and 24-hour volume). Documentation of the feedings and flushes will be under the medication administration record in the electronic medical record. 1)Resident #39 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews during the recertification survey (Complaint #2699879), the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #76) reviewed. Specifically Resident #76 had two Stage 2 pressure ulcers (partial-thickness skin loss) on the buttocks and an unstageable (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered with dead tissue) pressure ulcer on the right heel that did not have timely treatment orders or interventions; the medical orders for wound treatments were not followed; and the resident was not turned and positioned as planned. Findings include: The facility policy Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Injuries, last reviewed 9/2025, documented the facility would develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #123) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #123 was at risk of falls, and their call light was not within reach as care planned.Findings include:The facility policy Falls, revised 08/2016, documented on admission, a fall risk assessment would be completed along with a fall care plan with specific individual interventions necessary to prevent resident falls. Fall interventions would be added to resident's care plan, certified nurse aide assignment sheet, and communicated through the 24-hour nursing office report. Nursing supervisors, unit managers, and team leaders would be responsible for ensuring the care plan was being followed.Resident #123 had diagnoses including right side paralysis and weakness and need for assistance with personal care. The 09/12/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment (screening tool) documented the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the survey conducted 01/27/2026-01/27/2026, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter (removes urine from the bladder) was not used unless there was valid medical justification for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #18) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #18 had an indwelling catheter without an order, indication, or care plan for its usage.Findings include:Resident #18 had diagnoses including congestive heart failure (the heart does not pump efficiently), chronic kidney disease, and acute cystitis (inflammation of the bladder). The 12/05/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment (screening tool) documented the resident had severely impaired cognition, required maximum/dependent assistance for all activities of daily living and transfers, and did not have an indwelling catheter.Resident #18 was observed with a urinary catheter on 01/20/2026 at 11:58 AM and 01/21/2026 at 8:45 AM. The unsigned 01/16/2026 admission Assessment documented Resident #18 did not have an indwelling urinary catheter.There was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #101) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #101 had significant weight loss and did not have a timely nutritional assessment. Findings include: The undated facility policy Nutritional Assessment and Reassessment, documented residents would receive timely and accurate nutrition assessments, including residents with significant nutritional changes.The facility policy Weights, revised 03/2022, documented nursing staff measured resident weights on admission, and weekly for four weeks. If no weight concerns, weights were then measured monthly. Dietary and medical providers would be notified of any weight discrepancies. Weight loss greater than five percent in one month or greater than ten percent in six months were severe.Resident #101 had diagnoses including dementia, chronic respiratory failure, and vascular disease. The 08/19/2025 Minimum Data Set (assessment tool)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/9/2024-4/12/2024, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 4 of 8 residents (Residents #12, #38, #40 and #58) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #12 had unclean and untrimmed fingernails; Resident #40 was not assisted out of bed for toileting; Resident #58 was not assisted with toileting every 2 hours as care planned; and Resident #38 had unclean fingernails. Findings include: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL) revised 10/2023 documented appropriate care and services would be provided for residents who were unable to carry our activities of daily living independently in accordance with the plan of care, including support and assistance with hygiene, mobility, elimination, dining, and communication. 1) Resident #12 was admitted to the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,153 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $16,153 — penalty dated 2025-04-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in NY