Bethel Nursing Home Company Inc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 85.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 35.2 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that an injury of unknown origin was reported to the State Agency immediately, but not later than two hours for one of two residents (Resident #6) reviewed for injury of unknown origin. Specifically, on 08-30-2025 Resident #6 was transferred to the hospital after they complained of right hip pain with right leg swelling and abduction of the right knee. On 08-31-2025 at 2:26 AM the facility was made aware that Resident #6 was diagnosed with a right hip fracture. The State Agency was not notified until 09-01-2025 at 1:19 PM. The findings include: Resident #6 had diagnoses including dementia, osteoporosis, and anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (assessment tool) dated 06-27-2025 documented Resident #6 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for daily living activities. The Incident Report dated 08-30-2025 at 9:30 PM documented Resident #6 complained of right hip pain while being repositioned in a wheelchair and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that a thorough and/or accurate investigation was conducted for one of one resident (Resident #51) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, the Investigative Summary statement from Registered Nurse Supervisor #11 documented the wrong incident date and incorrect initials for Certified Nurse Aide #4 after Resident #51 called 911 on 05/01/2026 and accused staff of abuse.The findings include:The policy titled Abuse Prevention and Reporting last reviewed 3/2026 documented that any employee or volunteer that suspects hears about or witness's resident abuse, neglect or misappropriation of resident's property must complete an Accident/Incident Report.Resident #51 was admitted to facility with diagnoses of vascular dementia, anxiety and depression. The 4/29/2026 Baseline Care Plan for behavior documented that the resident had a history of trauma. Assist of one for bowel and bladder care, assist of one for transfer.The 5-day Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and/or that each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one of two residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, the comprehensive Care Plan did not include interventions to address supervision for Resident #1 who was assessed as at risk for elopement, was able to remove their wander guard and exit the building unsupervised on the morning of 06/22/2025. Additionally, there was no consistent documented evidence that every 15-minute monitoring x 48 hours was implemented as per the comprehensive Care Plan after Resident #1eloped on 06/22/2025. The Findings are:The Policy and Procedure for elopement prevention and follow up procedures last revised 11/22/2022 documented in the staff responsibilities: Staff who are assigned the responsibility of resident care must maintain constant awareness of the whereabouts of the resident(s)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and review of facility documents, it was determined that, the facility did not ensure each certified nurse aide received twelve hours in-service education per year based on their individual performance review. Specifically, (1) 4 out of 5 certified nurse aides did not have their mandatory annual 12 hour in services and (2) 5 out of 5 certified nurse aides (#2,6, 7, 8, 9) did not receive performance evaluations. Finding Include: Review of facility training records revealed: Certified Nurse Aide # 2 was hired on 2/28/2011 and received 10.25 hours of in-services in the last 12 months and had no documented evidence of an annual performance review. Certified Nurse Aide # 6 was hired on 12/17/2007and received 0 hours of in-services in the last 12 months and had no documented evidence of an annual performance review. Certified Nurse Aide # 7 was hired 8/23/1995, received 16 hours of in-services in the last 12 months, and had no documented evidence of an annual performance review. Certified Nurse Aide # 8 was hired 4/22/1998, received 10.5 hours of in-services in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 3/18/25 to 3/21/25, the facility did not store, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and did not maintain dishwasher heat for sanitation. Specifically, 1) expired foods were stored in dry pantry, walk in refrigerator and freezer; 2) unsealed, unlabeled and undated food were stored in dry pantry and walk in refrigerator; 3) the dishwasher wash and rinse did not maintain proper temperature standards; and 4) three (3) staff were observed not performing proper hand hygiene while serving the lunch meal. Findings include: The facility policy last revised 5/2018, Labeling and Dating stated any unopened food item will be discarded by the manufacturer labeled expiration date and all prepared menu items will be dated in compliance of a 3 day use by date. The facility policy last reviewed 11/2004, Food Storage stated contents of opened food packages will be stored in tightly sealed containers and all containers will be properly labeled as to contents. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey from 3/18/25 to 3/21/25, the facility did not ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for all residents. Specifically, the facility did not provide documentation of screening, administration, or declination and education provided for 5 of 10 staff (Certified Nurse Aide #1 and #4, Licensed Practical Nurse #1, Registered Nurse Supervisor #1, Dietary Aide #3) reviewed for influenza and 10 of 10 staff (Certified Nurse Aide #1, #2, #4, Licensed Practical Nurse #1, Registered Nurse Supervisor #1, Dietary Aide #3, Director of Environmental Services, Director of Housekeeping, Physical Therapist #1 and Housekeeping Aide #1) reviewed for pneumococcal vaccination. The findings are: The facility policy titled Prevention, Early Detection and Control of Influenza dated 6/2023 documents the purpose is to control the spread of respiratory infections which includes a preventative vaccination program. All…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a Recertification survey from 3/18/25 to 3/21/25, the facility did not ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for all residents. Specifically, the facility did not provide documentation of screening, administration or declination and education provided for 10 of 10 staff (Certified Nurse Aide #1, #2, #4, Licensed Practical Nurse #1, Registered Nurse Supervisor #1, Dietary Aide #3, Director of Environmental Services, Director of Housekeeping, Physical Therapist #1 and Housekeeping Aide #1), reviewed for COVID vaccination. The findings are: The facility COVID policy dated 12/24/20 documents newly hired staff will be asked to provide COVID vaccination information as part of their Human Resources medical record as they do with other vaccines. If they are unvaccinated, or not up to date, they will be provided education on COVID19 and offered the COVID vaccine. During the recertification survey the facility was asked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, during the recertification survey from 3/18/25 to 3/21/25 the facility did not ensured that the call bell system was accessible for 1 (Resident #16) of 35 residents reviewed for Environment. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that Resident's #16 call bell was within reach. Findings include: The Policy and Procedure titled Call Bells dated 6/16/03 documented it is the policy of the facility that each resident has a call bell at bedside within reach. The cord should be clipped to the bed. The Nursing Assistant assigned to the resident must check for malfunction of call bells on each shift and report such to the nurse in charge. Resident #16 had diagnoses including depression, diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Minimum Data Set Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required substantial assistance with roll left to right, and lying to sitting on side of bed; and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews during a recertification survey from 3/18/25-3/21/25 the facility did not ensure a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 1 out of 1 resident (Resident #12) reviewed for personal property. Specifically, Resident #12 was missing shirts which was reported to facility staff and the facility did not complete a timely and thorough investigation of the missing property. Findings include: The facility policy titled Missing Items, dated March 2012, documented the facility shall respond to all reports of resident missing property. Once a resident or their representative reports an item missing to any facility staff member immediate action will be taken. Procedure: Clinical staff member asks for details regarding the missing item and completes Missing Item Report form. The form is given to the unit Social Worker. The Social Worker reviews missing item report, interviews the resident and family as appropriate, summarizes steps taken to locate item and documents results of the search. Social Worker notifies…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during a recertification survey from 3/18/25 to 3/21/25, the facility did not ensure resident received treatment and care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #13) reviewed for skin conditions. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 failed to report a change in Resident #13's skin condition. Findings included: The facility policy titled Body Audits, reviewed 6/2017, documented body audits (skin checks) will be done on admission, re-admission and weekly thereafter per treatment order. The purpose is early identification for all potential and actual skin problems. Residents with additional factors such as bed mobility issues, paraplegia and cerebral vascular accident will be closely monitored. Resident #13 had diagnoses including cerebral infarction, flaccid hemiplegia right dominant side, and vascular dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (a Resident assessment tool) dated 1/24/25 documented Resident #13 had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY