St Luke Residential Health Care Facility INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 189 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 114 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 123.3 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 77 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.63 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.14 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification, abbreviated (NY00359628), and extended surveys conducted 3/4/2025 - 3/14/2025, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #85) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #85 was cognitively impaired, was at risk for elopement, and did not have a care plan in place addressing their elopement risk. Subsequently, Resident #85 eloped from the facility on 11/5/2024 through an unsecured window and was located at a skilled nursing facility approximately 1/4 mile away and across the street from a river. This resulted in the likelihood of serious harm, serious injury, serious impairment, or death that is Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care to Resident #85 and 2 additional residents (Residents #73 and #131) residing on the A and B units identified as risk for elopement. Findings include: The facility policy, Elopement Assessment, revised 8/28/2024, documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00330552) surveys conducted 3/4/2025 - 3/14/2025, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #136) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #136: - physician's order for gastrostomy (a tube placed in the stomach) tube feeding was not administered as ordered and when administered was the incorrect volume; - had an order to receive nothing by mouth and medications were ordered to be given orally; - was improperly positioned prior to having a tube feeding administered; - had an indwelling catheter collection bag in a permeable pillowcase laying on the floor; - did not receive their weekly shower or hair washing; - was left in their room with the door closed, their call bell on the floor and out of reach, and the resident was unable to use a traditional call bell and no alternative was given - did not have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-03-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00332457) surveys conducted 3/4/2025 - 3/14/2025, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for three (3) of four (4) residents (Residents #60, #67, and #113) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #60 developed a stage 4 (full-thickness skin loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle) pressure ulcer to their right hip. Care plan interventions were not consistently followed to prevent pressure ulcers from developing and when the pressure ulcer developed it was not adequately treated to prevent infection. Resident #67 developed a stage 4 pressure ulcer to their left heel while in the facility and there was no evidence the pressure ulcer was treated for 11 days after it was discovered. When the pressure ulcer was assessed by the wound physician consultant there was no evidence the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews during the recertification survey and abbreviated (NY00330552) surveys conducted 3/4/2025- 3/14/2025, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff to ensure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for all 149 residents in the facility. Specifically, during a confidential resident group meeting residents stated staffing was not sufficient, and call bells were not answered timely especially during the night shift. Deficiencies related to staffing levels were identified in the areas of Activities of Daily Living (F677), Quality of Care (F684), Treatment/Services to Prevent and Heal Pressure Ulcer (F686), and Nutrition/Hydration Status Maintenance (F692). Findings include: The Facility assessment dated [DATE] documented the facility was licensed for 200 beds with an average daily census of 136. Residents of the facility had both chronic illness and post-acute conditions. The residents of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated survey (NY00330552 and NY00359628) conducted 3/4/2025- 3/10/2025, and the recertification extended survey conducted 3/10/2025-3/14/2025, the facility did not ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, administration failed to ensure that residents received appropriate quality of care by allowing the following deficient practices to exist, placing residents at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death, F 689 Accident Hazards; failed to ensure policies and procedures were properly identified, communicated, and consistently implemented. Administration failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to ensure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being F725, leading to several deficient practices in the areas of F684 Quality of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 3/4/2024-3/14/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident had the right to a dignified existence for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #508) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #508's bedside commode was not emptied, and urine and feces were malodorous and visible in plain sight. Findings include: The facility policy, Resident Rights, revised 7/5/2024 documented the resident had the right to receive services with reasonable accommodation of needs and a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment. Resident #508 had diagnoses including fracture of right tibia (broken leg) and need for assistance with personal care. The 2/26/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident was cognitively intact, had lower extremity impairment on one side, and required partial to moderate assistance with toileting. The Comprehensive Care Plan initiated 3/6/2025 documented the resident was at risk for falls related to a tibia fracture. Interventions included increased staff assistance with intensity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0800 — isolated
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 3/4/2025- 3/14/2025, the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident for 2 of 2 meals observed. Specifically, Resident #25's lunch meal was not served at a palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature, and the 6th floor breakfast meal was delivered to the unit 30 minutes after the scheduled time with the last meal tray was passed at 9:07 AM, resulting in unappetizing food temperatures. Additionally, during the initial main kitchen tour multiple food items were not dated when opened; 1 cooler was not in working order, did not have signage to indicate it was not to be used, contained 1 oral nutrition supplement, and the temperature gauge read 57 degrees Fahrenheit. Findings include: The facility's revised 2/2024 Temperature/ Taste Test policy documented to take the temperature and taste all foods prior to service to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00330259), the facility did not ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means (tube fed) received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feed including but not limited to aspiration (inhalation of food/fluids into the lungs) pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, and metabolic abnormalities for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 experienced symptoms related to their tube feeding and the physician's orders to decrease the tube feeding rate and water flushes was not implemented timely. Findings include: The 2/2016 Medication Orders policy documented: - the nursing department will implement orders for medications according to a procedure that promotes accuracy. - The nurse will clarify any questions by consulting the Supervisor, nurse practitioner, or physician. - The 11 PM- 7 AM charge nurse will check all the charts on their unit nightly for all new orders. After comparing the physician's order with the electronic record, the licensed nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00278069) surveys conducted 4/6/23-4/13/23, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 5 of 5 occupied resident floors (1st floor, 4th floor, 5th floor, 6th floor, and 7th floor) reviewed. Specifically, the 6th and 7th floor medication rooms had nonfunctional sinks; the 4th and 6th floor dining rooms had damaged walls; the 6th floor tub room had a damaged wall; the 1st and 5th floor shower rooms had damaged walls; resident room B112 had a damaged ceiling; and the 1st floor women's staff locker room had a dangling overhead ceiling light. Findings include: There was no documented facility policy addressing the work order process for maintenance and repair of damaged or non-working items. 7th Floor: During an observation on 4/6/23 at 11:03 AM, the 7th floor medication room sink faucet was wrapped with gauze and tape and was non-functional. Licensed practical nurse (LPN) #27 stated the faucet had been wrapped with gauze…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00297818, NY00286515, NY00306767, NY00313104, and NY00313529) surveys conducted 4/6/23-4/13/23, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 4 of 7 residents (Residents #81, 84 and 95 and 110) reviewed. Specifically: - Resident #110 had ongoing wandering and aggressive behaviors and was not provided adequate supervision resulting in multiple physical altercations with other residents including Residents #81, 84 and 95. - Resident #81 had an impulse disorder and was not provided adequate supervision resulting in physical and verbal altercations with other residents including Residents #110. Findings include: The undated facility policy Quality Assurance Incident documented an adverse incident may be described as, but was not limited to, a fall with or without injury, an unexplained injury, and a resident altercation. All resident adverse incidents were to be reported immediately using the facility incident report form. The Nurse Manager…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/23-4/13/23, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, including Legionella (a type of bacteria usually found in water which causes Legionnaires' disease). Specifically, the facility did not have a policy and procedure to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella in the building water system; and Legionella culture sampling and analysis of the facility's potable water system was not conducted annually as required. Findings include: The New York State Department of Health's Survey and Certification Memo S & C 17-30-All, dated 6/2/17 (revised 6/9/17) documented Medicare-certified facilities were expected to have water management policies and procedures to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in building water systems. As per 10 NYCRR Sub-part 4-2,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/23-4/13/23 the facility failed to ensure a resident who displayed or was diagnosed with dementia, received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #137) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #137 did not have an individualized care plan with interventions in place that included the resident's customary routines, interests, preferences, and choices to enhance their well-being and to guide staff in managing the resident's care. Findings include: The undated facility policy Dementia documented the facility would assess, develop, and implement person-centered care plans through an interdisciplinary team (IDT) approach that included the resident, their family, and resident representative. The care plan goals would be achievable, and the facility would provide resources necessary for the resident to be successful in meeting their goals. The care plan interventions would be related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 7 of 7 nursing units (Units 1B, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7) reviewed. Specifically, resident areas including bedrooms, shower rooms, and common areas were found with loose handrails, stained ceiling tiles, discolored ice machines, missing wall tiles, unclean light fixtures, peeling paint, unfinished window framing and holes in the ceiling. Findings include: The 1/2012 Environmental Safety Round procedure documents the facility staff conducting environmental rounds/tours were to ensure resident rooms were maintained and resident units were in good repair. SHOWER ROOMS The following shower room observations were made: -on 4/6/21 at 11:58 AM, the Unit 5 shower room had a 2 foot x 6 inch section of peeling paint on the ceiling near the toilet; -on 4/6/21, between 2:10 PM and 2:45 PM, the Unit 3 shower room had a 3 foot x 6 inch section of peeling paint on the ceiling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY