Central Island Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 526 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 83.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 163 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 202 beds and averages 154.6 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/10/2025 and completed on 6/16/2025, the facility did not develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meets professional standards of quality care. This was identified for one (Resident #305) of one resident reviewed for Urinary Catheter. Specifically, Resident #305 was admitted on [DATE] with the use of an indwelling Foley catheter. The baseline care plan, completed on 6/9/2025, did not document the use of the Foley catheter. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Baseline Care Plans, last revised on 1/2025, documented that a baseline care plan that meets the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight hours of admission. The baseline care plan must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/10/2025 and completed on 6/16/2025, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed or implemented for each resident to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs. This was identified for one (Resident #93) of four residents reviewed for Skin Conditions Non-Pressure. Specifically, Resident #93 had a Physician's Order to put on a compression bandage wrap in the morning and remove at bedtime, for bilateral (both) lower extremities. Resident #93 was observed multiple times without the compression bandage wrap on the right lower extremity. Additionally, there was no care plan developed to address Resident #93's use of the compression bandage wrap for both lower extremities. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, last revised on 4/1/2024, documented that within 14 days of the resident's admission, a comprehensive assessment of the resident's needs will be prepared and developed by the interdisciplinary team.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) The facility's policy titled Maintenance Book, revised 1/2025, documented that the maintenance books and daily work orders will be inspected and completed by the end of the shift daily unless an outside vendor must be involved. As the Maintenance Technician arrives and starts the assignment, all maintenance books located on all units at the nurse's station will be checked. As work orders are written in the maintenance log books on each unit, Maintenance Technicians are to do daily rounds and check and complete work orders. The Maintenance Technician must sign off on any work orders completed. If unable to complete, report to the [Maintenance] Director for further assistance and direction. Resident #142 was admitted with diagnoses including Cerebrovascular Accident, Heart Failure, and Malnutrition. The 5/13/2025 admission Minimum Data Set assessment documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact; was at risk for pressure ulcer development but had no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on [DATE] and completed on [DATE], the facility did not ensure each resident received pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet their needs. This was identified for one (Unit 2 North medication cart) of ten medication carts observed during the Medication Storage Task. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 administered the Lantus Insulin to Resident #128 on [DATE] and [DATE] from a a multidose vial that was dated [DATE]. As per the manufacturer's recommendations, the Lantus insulin multidose vial should be discarded after 28 days from opening. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Storage and Discard Dating of Drugs and Biologicals, last revised on [DATE], documented that all drugs and biologicals shall be stored appropriately as per manufacturer guidelines, facility policy, and applicable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) Resident #93 was admitted with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder, Congestive Heart Failure, and Sjögren Syndrome (an immune system illness that mainly causes dry eyes and dry mouth). The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated that Resident #93 had intact cognition. The Minimum Data Set assessment documented that Resident #93 had shortness of breath or trouble breathing when lying flat. A Physician Order dated [DATE] documented Breyna 160 micrograms-4.5 micrograms/actuation aerosol inhaler, inhale 2 puffs by inhalation route every 12 hours for Asthma. A review of Resident #93's Electronic Medical Record indicated Resident #93 did not have a Physician Order and was not assessed to self-administer their medications. A Comprehensive Care Plan titled, Respiratory Disorder: Asthma/Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease dated [DATE], documented interventions including administering medications as per the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/10/2025 and completed on 6/16/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident's medical records were in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices and were complete and accurately documented. This was identified for one (Resident #94) of five residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, Resident #94 had a physician's order for sliding scale insulin (adjusting the insulin dose based on the current blood glucose reading) coverage. Review of the June 2025 medication administration record revealed multiple instances when the insulin was administered based on the sliding scale order; however, the dosage and the injection site were not documented. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Administration of Medication, effective 4/1/2024, documented that the Electronic Medication Administrative record shall serve as the source from which all medications are poured and administered and on which medication doses are charted. The Electronic Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/10/2025 and completed on 6/16/2025, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for one (Resident #303) of three residents reviewed for Transmission-Based Precautions. Specifically, Resident #303 was placed on Contact and Droplet Precautions as per the physician's order for a diagnosis of Bronchitis (inflammation of the lining of the airway) due to Rhinovirus (common cold). Registered Nurse # 1 was observed entering Resident #303's room without wearing appropriate Personal Protective Equipment. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Infection Control, effective 1/2024 and last revised 1/2025, documented that Droplet Precautions are intended to reduce the risk of transmission of infectious microorganisms spread primarily by coughing, sneezing, or talking and during certain procedures. A Contact/Droplet Precaution is used for infections…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00367963) the facility did not ensure that each resident receive an accurate assessment reflective of the resident's status. This was evident for one (Resident #1) resident reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) Accuracy. Specifically, the Minimum Data Assessment Assessments dated 12/16/2024 with a look back period of 12/09/2024 to 12/16/2024 documents the resident had 1 (one) unstageable pressure ulcer due to coverage of wound bed by slough and eschar present on admission and 1 (one) unstageable pressure injuries presenting as deep tissue injury that were present on admission/entry (12/09/2024). The Nursing admission Progress Noted dated 12/10/2024 at 11:58PM documented redness to the sacrum no openings, bilateral heals red and dry. The finding are: The centers for Medicaid / Medicare Resident Assessment instrument manual dated 10/20/2025 documents pressure injuries must be coded in the 7-day look back period based on review of the medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 1/2/2024 and completed on 1/9/2024 the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated. This was identified for one (Resident #129) of five residents reviewed for Accidents and one (Resident #174) of three residents reviewed for Skin Care (Non-Pressure Related). Specifically, 1) on 10/2/2023 a skin tear to Resident #129's left leg was identified by a Certified Nursing Assistant and reported to the nursing supervisor. There was no documented evidence that the facility initiated an investigation to identify the root cause of the skin tear, an injury of unknown origin, to rule out abuse, neglect, and mistreatment; and 2) Resident #174 had a Physician's order to treat a skin tear to the left lower leg. There was no documented evidence that the facility initiated an investigation to identify the root cause of the skin tear, an injury of unknown origin, to rule out abuse, neglect, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 1/2/2024 and completed on 1/9/2024 the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed or implemented for each resident to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs. This was identified for one (Resident #62) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and one (Resident #80) of three residents reviewed for Skin Condition. Specifically, 1) Resident #62 had a physician's order and care plan intervention to float heels while the resident was in bed. On multiple occasions the resident was observed in bed with their heels directly on the mattress; and 2) Resident #80 had a physician's order to elevate all extremities and to wear heel booties at all times. There was no Comprehensive Care Plan developed for the use of pillows to elevate all extremities or the use of heel booties. The resident was observed on two occasions without the use of pillows or the heel booties. The findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY