Meadowbrook Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 476 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 201 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 287 beds and averages 236.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 51 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during recertification and abbreviated survey (NY00329299), the facility did not ensure that the development and implementation of comprehensive person-centered care plans included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet residents' medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for 5 (Residents #76, 104, 119, 139, and 177) of 44 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Specifically, (a.) Resident #76 care plan interventions were not implemented based on recommendations from the interdisciplinary team to reduce falls and injuries after a fall and the resident had subsequent falls, (b.) Resident #104 care plan did not include interventions and goals for dementia care, (c.) Resident #119 had fallen several times and the care plan was not developed for falls, (d) a Certified Nurse Aide did not follow care plan and transferred Resident #139 alone that caused injury, and (e) Resident #177 fell when staff did not follow resident care plan for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed after each assessment and revised based on changing goals, preferences and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions for 4 (Resident #'s 50, 53, 76, and #177) of 44 residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) for Resident #53, the comprehensive care plan for Clotridoides or Clostridium difficile infection (a bacterium that causes diarrhea and inflammation of the colon) was not updated when the infection had resolved; (b.) for Resident #76, the fall care plan was not revised after the most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment; the comprehensive care plan for behaviors did not include a psychiatric consult or on-going psychiatric services; the comprehensive care plan for altercations was not updated after visiting restrictions were lifted for spouse; and the comprehensive care plan for wandering/elopement was not updated to reflect removal of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #s NY00326260, NY00329259, NY00334623, and NY340304), the facility did not ensure provision of sufficient nursing staff to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident throughout the facility. Specifically, the facility's minimum staffing levels of Certified Nurse Aides were not met every day on multiple shifts and multiple units, from 10/05/2024 to 10/20/2024. This is evidenced by: The Facility assessment dated [DATE], documented budget and minimum nursing staffing levels needed for each unit during the 7-3 shift (day), 3-11 shift (evening), and 11-7 shift (night), when the resident census was 233: Certified Nurse Aide Shift Unit Beds Budget Minimum 7-3 Shift The Orchards - LTC 38 5 4 Oak Woods - LTC 39 5 4 Chestnut Grove - LTC 38 5 4 Aspen View - LTC 41 5 4 Pine Ridge - LTC 40 5 4 Sub-Acute 37 5 4 3- 11 Shift The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that its medication error rate did not exceed 5% for 3 (Resident #s68, 182 and 199) of 6 residents observed during a medication pass for a total of 34 observations. This resulted in a medication error rate of 38.24%. This is evidenced by: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled Medication Administration reviewed 2/2020 documented Nurses were required to adhere to the following: Medications must be administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified by the physician. Nurses must take every safety precaution when administering medications. The Five Rights are safety rules to be implemented each time a drug is administered: o Right Medication o Right Patient/Resident o Right Time o Right Route o Right Dose. Resident #68 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of bacterial Infection, limited mobility and depression. The Minimum Data Set, dated 8/2024, documented resident was cognitively intact, could be understood, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labelled and stored in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, (a.) opened medications had no open and/or expiration dates, and (b) a medication cart was left unattended and unlocked. This was evident for 3 (Aspen, Subacute, and Orchard Units medication carts) out of 3 medication carts reviewed. This was evidenced by: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled Medication Administration reviewed 2/2020 documented Nurses were required to adhere to the following: The expiration date on the medication label must be checked prior to administering. When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened should be recorded on the container. During administration of medications, the medication cart would be kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse. The cart must remain clearly visible to the nurse administering medications. and all outward sides must be inaccessible to others passing by. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, or served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 6 of 6 resident unit kitchenettes and main kitchen. Specifically, area of the main kitchen and resident kitchenettes were not clean. This is evidenced by: During observations in the main kitchen on 10/20/2024 at 5:45 PM, the rolling toaster appliance had a large amount of buildup and debris on the device. In a follow up observation on 10/22/2024 at 9:34 AM the rolling toaster was not cleaned and still had a large buildup of debris on the device. During observations on the Orchards 1st Floor Unit on 10/22/2024 at 10:34 AM, the resident kitchenette microwave had food particles along the door and on the interior of the appliance. Door, shelving units, and the bottom of the unit refrigerator was soiled with food and liquid particles. During observations on the Orchards 2nd Floor Unit on 10/22/2024 at 10:46 AM, the resident kitchenette microwave had food particles…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure infection prevention control practices were followed to help prevent the spread, development, and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for all residents and staff in facility reviewed for infection control. Specifically, facility staff did not properly use personal protective equipment on units with COVID. This is evidenced by: The Infectious Disease Outbreak Control policy, revised 07/19/2024, all employees would maintain transmission-based precautions as indicated During an observation on 10/22/2024 at 10:34 AM on the subacute unit, a nurse exited a resident room wearing a cloth gown. The nurse removed the gown in the hallway outside of the resident's room. The resident in the room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) was on transmission-based precautions for COVID. During an interview on 10/24/2024 at 10:46 AM, Director of Nursing #1 stated personal protective equipment was located on each unit and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the resident representative and the physician was notified when there was a change in condition that required a change in the residents' plan of care, medication, or treatment regimen for 3 (Resident #s 7, 58, and 198) of 3 residents reviewed for resident notification issues. Specifically, (a.) for Resident #7, provider was not notified when resident had a fall with a fracture on 8/20/2024 until the next day. For (b.) Resident #58, representative was not notified of a fall on 8/29/2024 and the need for x-rays for 9 hours; (c.), for Resident #198, representative was not notified when Haldol Lactate Solution 5 MG/ML, give 0.5 mg intramuscularly was ordered and given 4 times on 6/26/2024, 7/12/2024, 7/28/2024 (1 mg), and 7/29/2024. This was evidenced by: The facility policy and procedure titled, Notification of Change in Condition, dated 1/2022 documented, in accordance with State and Federal Regulations, the resident,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the resident had a right to be free from physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 (Resident #198) of 2 residents reviewed for restraints. Specifically, Resident #198 had a chair alarm (a pad placed on a chair) hooked to a sensor box that alarmed if a wheelchair resident attempted to stand, and had a seat belt around their lap that the resident was not able to remove when asked and that prohibited the resident from rising independently. This is evidenced by: The policy titled Restraints, dated 01/2020, documented that the facility would consider physical restraint after all other interventions were exhausted; it further documented that the nurse would document each time the restraint was applied and/or removed and the restraint would be discontinued as soon as possible. Resident #198 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure ongoing provision of programs to support each resident and their choices of activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 2 residents (Resident #104 and 119) of 2 residents reviewed. Specifically, Residents #104 and 119 did not consistently attend meaningful, accommodating activities to maintain their highest practicable quality of life. This is evidenced by: The Facility's Policy and Procedure titled Activities Department, undated, documented its policy was to provide meaningful activities to residents with various cognitive, physical, and social abilities on a regular basis to enhance their quality of life. Include resident in a variety of programming and adapt the event/activity to assist resident in participating within their ability and comfort zone. Resident #104 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Polymyalgia Rheumatica (an inflammatory disorder that causes muscle pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY