Allegria Nursing & Rehab Center Of Port Jefferson

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 155 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 144 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 143 beds and averages 125.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 5/04/2025 and completed on 5/08/2025, the facility did not ensure that it established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for 1) two (Resident #82 and Resident #73) of five residents reviewed for Medication Administration and 2) laundry room observation conducted during the Infection Control Laundry Task. Specifically, 1) Licensed Practical Nurse #1 did not follow the manufacturer's instructions and did not use the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved disinfectant to clean and disinfect the shared blood glucose meter between the two residents (Resident #82 and Resident #73). 2) Laundry Aid #1 did not use appropriate Personal Protective Equipment when handling soiled and clean laundry. The findings are: 1)The facility's policy titled Blood Glucose Testing/Glucose Control,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-08 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 5/4/2025 and completed on 5/8/2025, the facility did not maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in a safe operating condition. This was identified during the laundry observation for the Infection Control Task. Specifically, during a tour of the laundry room, a washing machine was observed overflowing and causing the water to accumulate on the floor around the drain. Additionally, the back of the washing machine and dryers had an accumulation of lint and dust. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Laundry Procedures, dated 8/16/2024, documented at the end of each shift, the walls are washed down using disinfectant, washers are wiped down with disinfectant, and then wiped down with stainless steel cleaner. The floors are swept and mopped daily using all-purpose cleaner. The Porters will clean the room weekly. Infection control policies and procedures will be followed when applicable to this department. During an observation of the laundry room on 5/7/2025 at 10:32 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 5/4/2025 and completed on 5/8/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and provided care in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life. This was identified for one unit (Unit B) of three units observed during the Dining Task. Specifically, 1) during the lunch meal observation on 5/4/2025, twelve residents were seated at a large table in the Unit B main dining room. Four (Resident #15, Resident #95, Resident #44, and Resident #56) of the twelve residents at the table did not receive their lunch meal until 30 minutes after the other eight residents were served. Resident #15 left the dining room and said they felt disrespected when they were not served their lunch meal at the same time as others. 2) Certified Nurse Aide #1 was observed standing over Resident #55 while assisting the resident with their lunch meal in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on [DATE] and completed on [DATE], the facility did not ensure that all medications and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys. This was identified for two (Unit H and Unit B ) of the four units reviewed during the Medication Storage Task. Specifically, Unit H medication carts were not clean and had items stored other than the medications. The Unit H medication refrigerator had yellowish-brown dried substances on the bottom shelf. Unit B Long Hall medication cart contained unidentifiable medication tablets and loose glucometer strips. The findings are: The facility's Routine Cleaning and Disinfecting Policy dated [DATE] documented routine surface cleaning and disinfection will be conducted with a detailed focus on visibly soiled surfaces and high touch areas to include but not limited to: treatment and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 5/4/2025 and completed on 5/8/2025, the facility did not ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was identified during the Kitchen Task. Specifically, two kitchen refrigerators contained numerous unlabeled and undated food items. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Food Storage with a revised date of 8/4/2024, documented that all food will be dated upon stocking if taken out of its original packaging. If not in the original packaging, all food items must be dated and labeled with the name of the contained food and discarded after three days. During the kitchen tour on 5/4/2025 at 10:21 AM, the refrigerator was observed with 18 egg salad sandwiches that were not labeled and dated. Another refrigerator used to store day-service food items was observed with five apple sauce cups, 30 chocolate pudding cups, six Jello cups, and seven single-serve salads that were not labeled with a use-by date. During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 5/4/2025 and completed on 5/8/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident's right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her medical record was maintained. This was identified for one (Resident #62) of nine residents observed for the Medication Administration Task. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse #4 left Resident #62's electronic medical record open in the hallway with the resident's personal and medical information visible to other staff, residents, and visitors. The finding is: Resident #62 was admitted with diagnoses that included Hypertension, Cerebral Infarction, and Hemiplegia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status score was 14, which indicated intact cognition. The resident received Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant medications. During a medication pass observation on 5/6/2025 at 9:35 AM for Resident #62,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification and abbreviated (Complaint #NY 00377877) Survey, initiated on 5/4/2025 and completed on 5/8/2025, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, and mistreatment were reported immediately to the facility administration and not later than 2 hours to the Department of Health after the allegation was made. This was identified for one (Resident #108) of one resident reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, Resident #108 alleged that Certified Nursing Aide #4 pushed them off the bed, resulting in a fall without injury. There is no documented evidence that the facility reported the allegation of abuse to the New York State Department of Health. The finding is: The facility's policy, titled Abuse, Mistreatment, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 7/14/2024, documents that the facility completes a full investigation when signs of Mistreatment, Neglect, Exploitation, or Abuse are noted by any personnel. The witness of such actions will immediately notify their Supervisor on duty. All…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification and Complaint (NY 00377877) Survey, initiated on 5/4/2025 and completed on 5/8/2025, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, mistreatment, or neglect were thoroughly investigated. This was identified for one (Resident #108) of one residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, Resident #108 alleged that Certified Nursing Assistant #4 pushed them off the bed, resulting in a fall without injury. The facility did obtain a statement from the resident and an investigation related to the allegation of being pushed out of bed was not completed. The finding is: The facility's policy, titled Abuse, Mistreatment, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 7/14/2024, documents that the facility completes a full investigation when signs of Mistreatment, Neglect, Exploitation, or Abuse are noted by any personnel. The witness of such actions will immediately notify their Supervisor on duty. All reports/allegations of potential abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and or exploitation must be reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated (NY 00377877) Survey initiated on 5/4/2025 and completed on 5/8/2025, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented for each resident to meet the resident's nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs. This was identified for one (Resident #108) of one resident reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, Resident #108 had a comprehensive care plan intervention to provide care by a male certified nursing aide and/or two aides due to verbally inappropriate behavior towards female staff. An accident/incident report dated 4/5/2025 revealed the resident received care from one female Certified Nursing Aide, Certified Nursing Assistant #4. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Care Plans, dated 6/2024, documented that care plan interventions are designed after careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their causes. Resident #108 was admitted with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 5/4/2025 and completed on 5/8/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident's Comprehensive Care Plan was revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment to reflect the resident's current status. This was identified for one (Resident #97) of one resident reviewed for Bladder and Bowel Incontinence. Specifically, Resident #97's minimum data set assessments indicated the resident was frequently incontinent of bladder; however, the comprehensive care plan inaccurately documented the resident was occasionally incontinent of bladder. The finding is: The facility's Care Plan policy and procedure, effective 6/20/2024, documented assessment of the resident is ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition changes. The care planning/interdisciplinary team is responsible for the review and updating of the care plan when: there has been a significant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY